Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment of Patients with Hepatitis C Resolves Serologic and Histopathologic Features of Autoimmune Hepatitis

Histological improvement in chronic hepatitis C-autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome by glecaprevir and pibrentasvir

A 60-year-old man with type-2 diabetes and chronic hepatitis C (HCV) was diagnosed with single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of 67 mm in the hepatic posterior right lobe. Lenvatinib 8 mg was initiated but discontinued because of grade 3 liver injury. The patient continued to have prolonged liver injury and persistently high immunoglobulin G levels. Antinuclear antibody titer increased from 1:40 to 1:320. Histopathological examination of a liver biopsy specimen revealed interface hepatitis with lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltration, rosette formation, and emperipolesis, suggesting the possibility of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). First, treatment with prednisolone was initiated; however, the response was poor. After starting glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) as direct-acting antivirals (DAA), HCV RNA rapidly disappeared, and serological liver function improved. After confirmation of sustained virological response 24, HCC recurrence was observed, and partial hepatectomy was performed. Background liver findings showed that liver parenchymal inflammation improved compared with that before DAA treatment. This is the first case of HCV-AIH overlap syndrome treated with DAA using GLE/PIB. Liver function improved within a short treatment period of 8 weeks, as confirmed using serology and histology.

A retrospective study of prevalence and pattern of international consensus on ANA patterns among patients with hepatitis C virus infection

Background

A previous study reported a 30% prevalence of various autoantibodies among patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The International Consensus on Anti-Nuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns was recently introduced to classify ANA patterns based on immunoassay on HEp-2 cells. There is no previous report with this newly developed classification to evaluate patients with HCV infection. The study aims to study the prevalence and pattern of ANA patterns among HCV-infected patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with HCV infection from September 2020 to June 2021 at our institution. A positive ANA is defined as a titer of more than 1:320. We compared patient features among the positive and negative groups.

Results

Overall, 258 patients were enrolled-184 patients with negative ANA and 74 patients (28.7%) with positive ANA. The mean age was 67.3 in ANA positive group and 61.2 ANA negative group. Female was prominent with ANA positive and accounted for 63.5%. The most detected ANA pattern was AC-1(homogeneous) (25.9%), followed by AC-4(fine speckled) (25.2%) and AC-21(anti-mitochondrial antibody) (9.6%). In ANA positive group, we found a trend of lower HCV viral load (5.72 log₁₀ IU/ML vs. 6.02 log₁₀ IU/ML), lower alanine aminotransferase level (39.5 U/L vs. 44 U/L), and higher advanced fibrosis (F3 and F4) (38.5% vs. 26.1%). In addition, higher positive ANA (more than 1:640) is significantly associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (77.76 vs. 87.94 mL/min/1.73 m², P = 0.044).

Conclusions

A high prevalence (28.7%) of ANA was found in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The presence of positive ANA is not related to the severity of their hepatic manifestation. However, higher positive ANA was significantly associated with lower eGFR.

Transcriptomic profiling of blood from autoimmune hepatitis patients reveals potential mechanisms with implications for management

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a poorly understood, chronic disease, for which corticosteroids are still the mainstay of therapy and most patients undergo liver biopsy to obtain a diagnosis. We aimed to determine if there was a transcriptomic signature of AIH in the peripheral blood and investigate underlying biologic pathways revealed by gene expression analysis. Whole blood RNA from 75 AIH patients and 25 healthy volunteers was extracted and sequenced. Differential gene expression analysis revealed 249 genes that were significantly differentially expressed in AIH patients compared to controls. Using a random forest algorithm, we determined that less than 10 genes were sufficient to differentiate the two groups in our cohort. Interferon signaling was more active in AIH samples compared to controls, regardless of treatment status. Pegivirus sequences were detected in five AIH samples and 1 healthy sample. The gene expression data and clinical metadata were used to determine 12 genes that were significantly associated with advanced fibrosis in AIH. AIH patients with a partial response to therapy demonstrated decreased evidence of a CD8+ T cell gene expression signal. These findings represent progress in understanding a disease in need of better tests, therapies, and biomarkers.

Comparison of liver biopsies before and after direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C and correlation with clinical outcome

Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) have replaced interferon (IFN)-based therapies for hepatitis C virus. In this retrospective clinical study, we examined differences in histopathologic features in paired liver biopsies collected from the same patient before and after DAA and correlated these findings with clinical outcome. Biopsies (n = 19) were evaluated by quantitative imaging analysis to measure steatosis and fibrosis. Most patients had decreased steatosis in their post-treatment, follow-up biopsies. However, one patient had a striking increase in steatosis (from 0.86 to 6.32%) and later developed decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This patient had a marked increase in fibrosis between biopsies, with a CPA of 6.74 to 32.02. Another patient, who already had bridging fibrosis at the time of her pre-treatment biopsy, developed cholangiocarcinoma after DAA. Even though the overall inflammatory activity in the post-treatment biopsies significantly decreased after treatment, 60% of patients had persistent portal lymphocytic inflammation. In summary, DAAs decreased steatosis and hepatic inflammation in most patients, although some may have persistence of lymphocytic portal inflammation. Patients known to have advanced fibrosis at treatment initiation and who have other risk factors for ongoing liver injury, such as steatosis, should be followed closely for the development of adverse outcomes, such as portal hypertension and primary liver cancers.

Autoimmune hepatitis-is histology conclusive?

Liver biopsy is an essential and necessary element in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis, and is of very special importance in the scoring system for diagnosis. Histopathology shows moderate to severe inflammatory infiltrates with abundant plasma cells in the enlarged portal tracts with interface hepatitis and moderate to severe necroinflammatory lesions in the lobules with lymphoplasmacytic reaction. Regeneration develops with rosette formation and regenerative nodules. One important issue is the differentiation between acute onset of autoimmune hepatitis and a flare up of chronic disease; this cannot be diagnosed in some cases clinically and therefore requires a biopsy to evaluate the stage of the disease. There are some variants of the disease with cholestatic features such as autoantibody negative autoimmune hepatitis and giant cell hepatitis as well as overlap syndromes with primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clinically, three types of autoimmune hepatitis are differentiated according to autoantibody formation and the clinical picture, however, histopathologically there is no difference between these three types. Differential diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis includes drug-induced liver injury with minocycline, alpha methyldopa, nitrofurantoin and checkpoint inhibitors such as infliximab. Wilson´s disease is also an important differential diagnosis especially in young adults. A liver biopsy is mandatory to confirm the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis but histopathology alone is not conclusive.

Eradication of hepatitis C virus infection disclosing a previously hidden, underlying autoimmune hepatitis: Autoimmune hepatitis and HCV

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and autoimmune disorders show a complex interplay, with HCV often being identified as the trigger of autoimmune phenomena or diseases. While there is evidence of successful HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) in patients with concomitant HCV and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), there are also sparse reports of AIH developing during, or following, DAA treatment. Here we report a case of a patient with suspected concomitant HCV and AIH who underwent liver biopsy but showed no histological hallmarks of autoimmunity. The patient later developed a hepatitic flare following DAA-induced viral clearance, and a second liver biopsy showed features compatible with AIH. Response to corticosteroid and azathioprine treatment was seen. This reports demonstrates that patients with features of auto-reactivity and HCV after DAA-induced viral clearance require careful follow-up.

Recent updates on the management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immunoinflammatory chronic liver disease with dynamic and rather heterogeneous disease manifestations. A trend of increasing prevalence of AIH has been observed worldwide, along with a relative increase in the percentage of male patients. AIH is characterized and diagnosed based on serum biochemistry and liver histology: elevated aminotransferases and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG), the presence of serum anti-nuclear antibody or anti-smooth muscle antibody, and interface lympho-plasmacytic hepatitis. Clinical manifestations differ among disease subtypes with distinct time-frames, i.e., AIH with a chronic insidious onset, and acute-onset AIH (the diagnosis of which is often challenging due to the lack of typical serum findings). The absence of disease-specific biomarkers or histological findings may expand the disease phenotype into drug-induced AIH-like liver injury. Corticosteroids and azathioprine are recommended first-line treatments for AIH. The complete normalization of aminotransferases and serum IgG is an essential treatment response to ensure long-term overall survival. An incomplete response or intolerance to these drugs is considered an indication for second-line treatment, especially with mycophenolate mofetil. Life-long maintenance treatment is required for the majority of patients, but the few who achieve prolonged and stringent biochemical remission with lower alanine aminotransferase and IgG within the normal range may be able to discontinue the medications. In the future, the quality of life of AIH patients should be managed by personalized medicine, including the appropriate selection and dosing of first-line therapy and perhaps alternating with potential therapeutics, and the prediction of the success of treatment withdrawal.