A PHASE I STUDY OF UTOMILUMAB (PF-05082566), A 4-1BB/CD137 AGONIST, IN COMBINATION WITH RITUXIMAB IN PATIENTS WITH CD20+ NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA

Boosting Antitumor Response by Costimulatory Strategies Driven to 4-1BB and OX40 T-cell Receptors

Immunotherapy explores several strategies to enhance the host immune system’s ability to detect and eliminate cancer cells. The use of antibodies that block immunological checkpoints, such as anti–programed death 1/programed death 1 ligand and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4, is widely recognized to generate a long-lasting antitumor immune response in several types of cancer. Evidence indicates that the elimination of tumors by T cells is the key for tumor control. It is well known that costimulatory and coinhibitory pathways are critical regulators in the activation of T cells. Besides blocking checkpoints inhibitors, the agonistic signaling on costimulatory molecules also plays an important role in T-cell activation and antitumor response. Therefore, molecules driven to costimulatory pathways constitute promising targets in cancer therapy. The costimulation of tumor necrosis factor superfamily receptors on lymphocytes surface may transduce signals that control the survival, proliferation, differentiation, and effector functions of these immune cells. Among the members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, there are 4-1BB and OX40. Several clinical studies have been carried out targeting these molecules, with agonist monoclonal antibodies, and preclinical studies exploring their ligands and other experimental approaches. In this review, we discuss functional aspects of 4-1BB and OX40 costimulation, as well as the progress of its application in immunotherapies.

Activating the Antitumor Immune Response in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas comprise a heterogenous group of disorders which differ in biology. Although response rates are high in some groups, relapsed disease can be difficult to treat, and newer approaches are needed for this patient population. It is increasingly apparent that the immune system plays a significant role in the propagation and survival of malignant cells. Immune checkpoint blocking agents augment cytotoxic activity of the adaptive and innate immune systems and enhance tumor cell killing. Anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies have been tested as both single agents and combination therapy. Although success rates with anti-PD-1 antibodies are high in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, the results are yet to be replicated in those with non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Some lymphoma histologies, such as primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBL), central nervous system, and testicular lymphomas and gray zone lymphoma, respond favorably to PD-1 blockade, but the response rates in most lymphoma subtypes are low. Other agents including those targeting the adaptive immune system such as TIM-3, TIGIT, and BTLA and innate immune system such as CD47 and KIR are therefore in trials to test alternative ways to activate the immune system. Patient selection based on tumor biology is likely to be a determining factor in treatment response in patients, and further research exploring optimal patient populations, newer targets, and combination therapy as well as identifying biomarkers is needed.

Immunotherapy in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Innate, adaptive and targeted immunological strategies

Since the clinical introduction of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies into lymphoma treatment, immunologic approaches in lymphoma have made substantial progress. Advances in our understanding of tumor immunology have led to the development of strategies to overcome immunologic barriers responsible for an ineffective immune response. Specifically, therapeutic agents have been developed and tested against molecules that are responsible for T-cell exhaustion. The use of monoclonal antibodies against immune checkpoints in the adaptive immune system, such as programmed cell death-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, has changed the landscape of cancer therapy including the treatment of lymphoma. This achievement has recently been accompanied by the development of novel immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the innate immune system, including the CD47-SIRPα signaling pathway, and this approach has yielded promising results. To overcome impaired antigen presentation, antibody-based cytotoxic strategies, namely antibody-drug conjugates (polatuzumab vedotin and brentuximab vedotin) and bispecific T-cell or NK-cell engagers (blinatumomab, REGN1979, RG6206, and AFM13), have rapidly evolved with promising clinical activity. As additional tools become available for lymphoma treatment, formulation of safe, rational combination strategies to combine them with standard therapy will be of paramount importance. A successful approach to the treatment of lymphoma may require both an optimized anti-tumor immune response as well as effective depletion of malignant lymphoid cells.

Indolent lymphomas: pushing the pace with novel agents

Chemoimmunotherapy has been a hallmark of treatment of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas for the past 2 decades, with high response rates seen but relapses nearly inevitable and patients spending, on average, 20 years on and off treatment. Treatment advances, then, should be aimed at maintaining efficacy while minimizing toxicity or at achieving cure. Improved understanding of the genetic and molecular features of these diseases, as well as of the interaction between the tumor cell and its immune microenvironment, has resulted in an accelerated expansion of tolerable treatment options for patients, with new combinations of therapy holding promise that definitive therapy in these diseases is possible. These drugs include immunomodulating agents such as lenalidomide, small-molecule inhibitors of the B-cell receptor signaling pathway such as ibrutinib and idelalisib, B-cell lymphoma 2 homology 3 mimetics such as venetoclax, and enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitors such as tazemetostat. Therapies that improve the host immune response against the malignant B cell are also of great interest, given the durable remission seen after allogeneic stem cell transplant in these diseases, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, agonist antibodies against immunostimulatory T-cell receptors, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and finally chimeric antigen receptor T cells are all being investigated, with promising early efficacy signals. These treatments may not necessarily replace chemotherapy but rather augment it in an attempt to improve quality of life and survival for these patients.

Role of immunotherapy in bladder cancer: past, present and future

As research focus in oncology has recently shifted from oral targeted therapy to immunomodulation, the era of successful drug development in bladder cancer has just begun. This has led to unprecedented approval of five immunotherapeutic agents by regulatory agencies for metastatic bladder cancer within a span of 12 months. With an initial triumph of anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (anti-PDL-1) drugs, ongoing efforts are aimed at identification and validation of new druggable immune targets to consolidate the initial gains. In this paper, we review the role of immunotherapy in the treatment of bladder cancer as well as the various emerging immunotherapeutic agents and their possible use in bladder cancer.

Checkpoint blockade in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is characterized by nearly universal genetic alterations in 9p24.1, resulting in constitutive expression of PD-1 ligands. This likely underlies the unique sensitivity of cHL to PD-1 blockade, with response rates of ∼70% in relapsed/refractory disease. There are now numerous clinical trials testing PD-1 inhibitors in earlier stages of treatment and in combination with many other therapies. In general, non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) do not display a high frequency of 9p24.1 alterations and do not share cHL's vulnerability to PD-1 blockade. However, a few entities have genetic or immunologic features that may predict sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade. These include primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma, primary central nervous system lymphoma, and primary testicular lymphoma, which harbor frequent alterations in 9p24.1, as well as Epstein Barr virus (EBV)-infected lymphomas, where EBV infection leads to increased PD-L1 expression. Although these subtypes may be specifically vulnerable to PD-1 blockade, the majority of NHLs appear to be minimally sensitive to PD-1 blockade monotherapy. Current investigations in NHL are therefore focusing on targeting other checkpoints or studying PD-1-based combination therapy. Looking forward, additional insight into the most common mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors will be important to guide rational clinical trial design. In this review, we describe the biological basis for checkpoint blockade in cHL and NHL and summarize the clinical data generated to date. Guided by our rapidly evolving understanding of the pathobiology of various lymphoma subtypes, we are hopeful that the role of checkpoint inhibitors in lymphoma treatment will continue to grow.

Immunotherapy targeting 4-1BB: mechanistic rationale, clinical results, and future strategies

4-1BB (CD137, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily 9) is an inducible costimulatory receptor expressed on activated T and natural killer (NK) cells. 4-1BB ligation on T cells triggers a signaling cascade that results in upregulation of antiapoptotic molecules, cytokine secretion, and enhanced effector function. In dysfunctional T cells that have a decreased cytotoxic capacity, 4-1BB ligation demonstrates a potent ability to restore effector functions. On NK cells, 4-1BB signaling can increase antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Agonistic monoclonal antibodies targeting 4-1BB have been developed to harness 4-1BB signaling for cancer immunotherapy. Preclinical results in a variety of induced and spontaneous tumor models suggest that targeting 4-1BB with agonist antibodies can lead to tumor clearance and durable antitumor immunity. Clinical trials of 2 agonist antibodies, urelumab and utomilumab, are ongoing. Despite initial signs of efficacy, clinical development of urelumab has been hampered by inflammatory liver toxicity at doses >1 mg/kg. Utomilumab has a superior safety profile, but is a less potent 4-1BB agonist relative to urelumab. Both antibodies have demonstrated promising results in patients with lymphoma and are being tested in combination therapy trials with other immunomodulatory agents. In an effort to optimally leverage 4-1BB-mediated immune activation, the next generation of 4-1BB targeting strategies attempts to decouple the observed antitumor efficacy from the on-target liver toxicity. Multiple therapeutics that attempt to restrict 4-1BB agonism to the tumor microenvironment and minimize systemic exposure have emerged. 4-1BB is a compelling target for cancer immunotherapy and future agents show great promise for achieving potent immune activation while avoiding limiting immune-related adverse events.