Outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory anaplastic large cell lymphoma who have failed brentuximab vedotin

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant in patients with relapsed/refractory anaplastic large cell lymphoma

The prognosis of relapsed/refractory (R/R) anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is poor. Large studies evaluating outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in systemic R/R ALCL are not available. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we evaluated outcomes of 182 adults (aged ≥18 years) with R/R ALCL undergoing allo-HCT between 2008 and 2019. Non-relapse mortality (NRM), disease relapse/progression (REL), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were modelled using Cox proportional hazards models. The median (range) follow-up of survivors was 62 (3-148) months. The 1-year NRM was 18%. The 5-year REL, PFS and OS were 32%, 41% and 56% respectively. On multivariable regression analysis African American race (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-4.8; p < 0.001) and refractory disease at allo-HCT (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.2; p < 0.001) were predictive of inferior OS. Similarly, African-American race (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4; p = 0.003), other minority race (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.3; p = 0.02) and refractory disease (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.3; p = 0.01) were predictive of inferior PFS. These data, demonstrate that allo-HCT can result in durable disease control in a sizable proportion of patients with R/R ALCL. Refractory disease and racial minority status predicted inferior allo-HCT outcomes. Whether the inferior outcomes of racial minorities with R/R ALCL after allo-HCT are driven by differences in disease biology or disparities in post allo-HCT care, or both, requires further investigation.

Resistance to Targeted Agents Used to Treat Paediatric ALK-Positive ALCL

Simple Summary

In general, the non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) diagnosed in childhood has a good survival outcome when treated with multi-agent chemotherapy. However, side effects of treatment are common, and outcomes are poorer after relapse, which occurs in up to 30% of cases. New drugs are required that are more effective and have fewer side effects. Targeted therapies are potential solutions to these problems, however, the development of resistance may limit their impact. This review summarises the potential resistance mechanisms to these targeted therapies.

Abstract

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is the third most common malignancy diagnosed in children. The vast majority of paediatric NHL are either Burkitt lymphoma (BL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL). Multi-agent chemotherapy is used to treat all of these types of NHL, and survival is over 90% but the chemotherapy regimens are intensive, and outcomes are generally poor if relapse occurs. Therefore, targeted therapies are of interest as potential solutions to these problems. However, the major problem with all targeted agents is the development of resistance. Mechanisms of resistance are not well understood, but increased knowledge will facilitate optimal management strategies through improving our understanding of when to select each targeted agent, and when a combinatorial approach may be helpful. This review summarises currently available knowledge regarding resistance to targeted therapies used in paediatric anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive ALCL. Specifically, we outline where gaps in knowledge exist, and further investigation is required in order to find a solution to the clinical problem of drug resistance in ALCL.

Targeted based therapy in nodal T-cell lymphomas

T-cell lymphomas (TCL) are a group of biologically and clinically heterogenous neoplasms derived from mature T lymphocytes. Recent findings in biology have advanced the classification of these neoplasms; however, clinical investigations based on biologic features have yet to be designed. Two biomarker-driven treatments for TCL are promising: brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with chemotherapy or as monotherapy is the standard treatment for newly diagnosed CD30-positive TCL and relapsed/refractory anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), while ALK inhibitors have induced responses in ALK+ ALCLs. Common genetic alterations in TCL, such as aberrations in PI3K/mTOR, JAK/STAT, and epigenetic regulators are also targetable by pathway inhibitors and HDAC/DNMT inhibitors; however, responses to these treatments as monotherapy are neither satisfactory nor durable, even in patients pre-stratified by several biomarkers. Additional work is needed to extend biology/biomarker-driven treatment in these neoplasms. As T-cell lymphomagenesis is multistep and multifactorial, trials are ongoing to evaluate combination treatments. The focus of this article is to summarize the status and the current role of targeted-based therapy in nodal TCL.

Alectinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in a patient with ALK-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphoma refractory to chemotherapy and brentuximab vedotin

This is the first case report of alectinib as a bridge to allo-SCT in a patient with ALK-positive ALCL refractory to both conventional chemotherapies and BV. This report offers a ray of hope for a condition with poor prognosis.

From bench to bedside: the past, present and future of therapy for systemic paediatric ALCL, ALK

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a T cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma that mainly presents in paediatric and young adult patients. The majority of cases express a chimeric fusion protein resulting in hyperactivation of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) as the consequence of a chromosomal translocation. Rarer cases lack expression of ALK fusion proteins and are categorised as ALCL, ALK-. An adapted regimen of an historic chemotherapy backbone is still used to this day, yielding overall survival (OS) of over 90% but with event-free survival (EFS) at an unacceptable 70%, improving little over the past 30 years. It is clear that continued adaption of current therapies will probably not improve these statistics and, for progress to be made, integration of biology with the design and implementation of future clinical trials is required. Indeed, advances in our understanding of the biology of ALCL are outstripping our ability to clinically translate them; laboratory-based research has highlighted a plethora of potential therapeutic targets but, with high survival rates combined with a scarcity of funding and patients to implement paediatric trials of novel agents, progress is slow. However, advances must be made to reduce the side-effects of intensive chemotherapy regimens whilst maintaining, if not improving, OS and EFS.