1
|
Zirakchian Zadeh M. The role of conventional and novel PET radiotracers in assessment of myeloma bone disease. Bone 2024; 179:116957. [PMID: 37972747 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Over 80 % of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) experience osteolytic bone lesions, primarily due to an imbalanced interaction between osteoclasts and osteoblasts. This imbalance can lead to several adverse outcomes such as pain, fractures, limited mobility, and neurological impairments. Myeloma bone disease (MBD) raises the expense of management in addition to being a major source of disability and morbidity in myeloma patients. Whole-body x-ray radiography was the gold standard imaging modality for detecting lytic lesions. Osteolytic lesions are difficult to identify at an earlier stage on X-ray since the lesions do not manifest themselves on conventional radiographs until at least 30 % to 50 % of the bone mass has been destroyed. Hence, early diagnosis of osteolytic lesions necessitates the utilization of more complex and advanced imaging modalities, such as PET. One of the PET radiotracers that has been frequently investigated in MM is 18F-FDG, which has demonstrated a high level of sensitivity and specificity in detecting myeloma lesions. However, 18F-FDG PET/CT has several restrictions, and therefore the novel PET tracers that can overcome the limitations of 18F-FDG PET/CT should be further examined in assessment of MBD. The objective of this review article is to thoroughly examine the significance of both conventional and novel PET radiotracers in the assessment of MBD. The intention is to present the information in a manner that would be easily understood by healthcare professionals from diverse backgrounds, while minimizing the use of complex nuclear medicine terminology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdi Zirakchian Zadeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy and Interventional Radiology Services, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tariq A, Kwok M, Pearce A, Rhee H, Kyle S, Marsh P, Raveenthiran S, Wong D, McBean R, Westera J, Dunglison N, Esler R, Navaratnam A, Yaxley JW, Thomas P, Pattison DA, Roberts MJ. The role of dual tracer PSMA and FDG PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) compared to conventional imaging: A multi-institutional case series with intra-individual comparison. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:66.e1-66.e9. [PMID: 34895817 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to perform an intra-individual dual tracer comparison of Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) computed tomography (CT)/Positron Emission Tomography (PET) against standard of care (SOC) imaging for the characterisation, staging and restaging of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS A multicentre retrospective cohort study was performed at 3 major tertiary referral institutions in Brisbane, Australia between 2015 and 2020. All patients who underwent both PSMA and FDG PET/CT following SOC imaging for investigation of RCC were identified. Clinical details, imaging characteristics and histopathology were collected prior to univariate statistical analysis. RESULTS Eleven patients who underwent dual tracer PET/CT were included. Mean age was 65.5 years (SD 8.8). Most patients were male (64%) with clear cell morphology (91%). The indication for dual tracer PET was staging (36%) and restaging after radical/partial nephrectomy (64%). Primary tumour assessment showed mixed avidity patterns (concordant 40%, discordant favouring PSMA 20%, and FDG 40%). Metastatic disease assessment showed concordant avidity in 6 patients (55%), concordant negative in 3 (27%), and discordant uptake favouring PSMA. PET outperformed SOC imaging for assessment of metastatic disease in 5 patients (45%) and equivalent for the remainder. A change in management was noted in three cases (27%). CONCLUSION Dual tracer FDG and PSMA PET/CT for assessment of primary and metastatic RCC were mostly concordant. PET imaging outperformed conventional imaging and led to a change in management for 1 in 4 patients. Further studies with larger samples sizes are required to validate these findings and identify characteristics to guide patient selection for selective or dual tracer use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arsalan Tariq
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Kwok
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Adam Pearce
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Wesley Urology Clinic, The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Handoo Rhee
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Samuel Kyle
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Phillip Marsh
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sheliyan Raveenthiran
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Wong
- I-MED Radiology, The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rhiannon McBean
- I-MED Radiology, The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jurjen Westera
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nigel Dunglison
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rachel Esler
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Wesley Urology Clinic, The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anojan Navaratnam
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - John W Yaxley
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Wesley Urology Clinic, The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Paul Thomas
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - David A Pattison
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Can 18F-NaF PET/CT before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Predict Survival in Multiple Myeloma? Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12051335. [PMID: 32456181 PMCID: PMC7281312 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
There is an unmet need for positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers that can image bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) in a more sensitive and specific way than the widely used 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). Sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) is a highly sensitive tracer of bone reconstruction, evolving as an important imaging agent for the assessment of malignant bone diseases. We attempted to investigate for the first time the prognostic significance of 18F-NaF PET/CT in newly diagnosed, symptomatic MM patients planned for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Forty-seven patients underwent dynamic and static PET/CT with 18F-NaF before treatment. After correlation with the respective findings on CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT that served as reference, the 18F-NaF PET findings were compared with established factors of high-risk disease, like cytogenetic abnormalities as well as bone marrow plasma cell infiltration rate. Furthermore, the impact of 18F-NaF PET/CT on progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed. Correlation analysis revealed a moderate, significant correlation of the 18F-NaF parameters SUVaverage and K1 in reference tissue with bone marrow plasma cell infiltration rate. However, no significant correlation was observed regarding all other 18F-NaF PET parameters. Survival analysis revealed that patients with a pathologic 18F-NaF PET/CT have a shorter PFS (median = 36.2 months) than those with a physiologic scan (median = 55.6 months) (p = 0.02). Nevertheless, no quantitative 18F-NaF parameter could be shown to adversely affect PFS. In contrast, the respective analysis for quantitative dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT revealed that the parameters SUVmax, fractional blood volume (VB), k3 and influx from reference tissue as well as SUVaverage from MM lesions had a significant negative impact on patient survival. The herein presented findings highlight the rather limited role of 18F-NaF PET/CT as a single PET approach in MM.
Collapse
|