Utility of measurable residual disease for predicting treatment outcomes with BCR- and BCL2-Targeted therapies in patients with CLL

Inhibitors targeting B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway proteins and B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL2) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are recommended in the first-line and relapsed/refractory disease settings. Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important prognostic tool in patients treated with the BCL2-targeted agent, venetoclax. We explored the relationship between MRD status and progression-free (PFS)/overall survival (OS) in patients with CLL, following treatment with novel BCR- and BCL2-targeted agents. Compared with chemoimmunotherapy, higher rates of undetectable (u)MRD were achieved with BCL2-targeted therapies; achieving uMRD status was associated with longer PFS and OS than MRD-positivity. Continuous treatment with BCR-targeted agents did not achieve uMRD status in many patients, and outcomes were not correlated with uMRD status. Future clinical trials of targeted treatment combinations could be designed to demonstrate uMRD as a treatment objective, and allow a response-driven, personalized strategy to optimize treatment and improve OS outcomes.

Prognostic and predictive impact of genetic markers in patients with CLL treated with obinutuzumab and venetoclax

Genetic parameters are established prognostic factors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy, but are less well studied with novel compounds. We assessed immunoglobulin heavy variable chain (IGHV) mutation status, common genomic aberrations, and gene mutations in 421 untreated patients within the CLL14 trial (NCT02242942), comparing obinutuzumab+chlorambucil (GClb) vs obinutuzumab+venetoclax (VenG). The incidences of genomic aberrations considering the hierarchical model were del(17p) 7%, del(11q) 18%, +12 18%, and del(13q) 35%, whereas IGHV was unmutated in 60% of patients. NOTCH1 mutations were most common (23%), followed by SF3B1 (16%), ATM (13%), and TP53 (10%). Although the overall response rate (ORR) for GClb was lower in patients with del(17p), del(11q), mutated TP53, ATM, and BIRC3, none of these parameters reduced complete remission (CR) rate and ORR with VenG. At a median follow-up of 28 months, del(17p) and mutated TP53 were the only abnormalities with an effect on progression-free survival (PFS) for both treatment groups: GClb (hazard ratio [HR], 4.6 [P < .01]; HR, 2.7 [P < .01], respectively) and VenG (HR, 4.4 [P < .01]; HR, 3.1 [P < .01], respectively). No other factors affected outcome with VenG, whereas for GClb del(11q), BIRC3, NOTCH1, and unmutated IGHV were associated with shorter PFS. Multivariable analysis identified del(17p), del(11q), unmutated IGHV, and mutated TP53, BIRC3, and SF3B1 as independent prognostic factors for PFS with GClb, whereas for VenG, only del(17p) was significant. VenG was superior to GClb across most genetic subgroups. Patients with adverse genetic markers had the strongest benefit from VenG, particularly subjects with unmutated IGHV, which was identified as a predictive factor in a multivariable treatment-interaction analysis.

The combination of venetoclax and rituximab for the treatment of patients with recurrent chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

In patients with recurrent chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), treatment with targeted agents such as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax is rapidly replacing chemo-immunotherapy regimens. Venetoclax has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy in patients with previously treated CLL and has been evaluated in combination with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the activity and toxicity of the time-limited combination of venetoclax plus rituximab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CLL, presenting clinical trial results and data from correlative studies, with the aim of highlighting the strengths of this treatment approach and discuss weaknesses and possible areas of improvement. Data from PubMed indexed papers as well as from abstracts presented at major international conferences are included.

EXPERT OPINION

Deep responses with venetoclax-based regimens have been shown to allow time-limited treatment and prolonged remission off-therapy in patients with CLL. The clinical benefit of venetoclax and rituximab over chemo-immunotherapy has been demonstrated in recurrent CLL. Potential advantages of time-limited treatment approaches include avoidance of long-term toxicities, high drug costs, and the selection of resistant subclones.