Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, melphalan and prednisone therapy for elderly patients with multiple myeloma

Melphalan: old and new uses of a still master drug for multiple myeloma

The treatment of multiple myeloma has seen significant changes from the initial use of melphalan to the introduction of stem cell transplantation and, most recently, to the era of novel targeted agents. Melphalan still remains as a reference drug for combination regimens, including emerging newer therapeutic options, either used at a standard dose for initial or salvage treatments in patients who are not eligible for more intensive therapies, or in conjunction with new molecules within high-dose chemotherapy programs. In this review, the authors analyze old and novel regimens, including melphalan for the treatment of newly diagnosed or relapsed/resistant patients with multiple myeloma in the clinical settings of standard chemotherapy, as well as autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

The treatment of the elderly multiple myeloma patients

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable malignancy of the plasma cells. Most patients are diagnosed when they are older than 65 years. Therapeutic options include chemotherapy, using either established (e.g. melphalan) or newly available (e.g. thalidomide) drugs and high-dose treatment with stem-cell support (autologous as well as allogeneic). Recent research has focused on defining the target population for the different therapeutic approaches, taking into account pre-treatment characteristics of patients, particularly age, and aims to balance treatment benefit with potential adverse events. In this review we present the data available on the most recent trials dealing with the treatment of elderly MM patients.

International Society of Geriatric Oncology Chemotherapy Taskforce: evaluation of chemotherapy in older patients--an analysis of the medical literature

The elderly comprise the majority of patients with cancer and are the recipients of the greatest amount of chemotherapy. Unfortunately, there is a lack of data to make evidence-based decisions with regard to chemotherapy. This is due to the minimal participation of older patients in clinical trials and that trials have not systematically evaluated chemotherapy. This article reviews the available information with regard to chemotherapy and aging provided by a task force of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Due to the lack of prospective data, the conclusions and recommendations made are a consensus of the participants. Extrapolation of data from younger to older patients is necessary, particularly to those patients older than 80 years, for which data is almost entirely lacking. The classes of drugs reviewed include alkylators, antimetabolites, anthracyclines, taxanes, camptothecins, and epipodophyllotoxins. Clinical trials need to incorporate an analysis of chemotherapy in terms of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of aging. In addition, data already accumulated need to be reanalyzed by age to aid in the management of the older cancer patient.

Phase II study of CLAD (cyclophosphamide, liposomal doxorubicin and dexamethasone) in patients with advanced multiple myeloma and historical comparison to CAD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and dexamethasone)

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CLAD). In this prospective open-label phase II study, 60 patients with advanced multiple myeloma (MM) received three weekly cycles of CLAD, consisting of cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 i.v. d1-4, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 i.v. d1 and dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. d1-4 for a maximum of six cycles in absence of disease progression. Efficacy and toxicity was compared to our immediate historical cohort of 46 patients treated with cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone and conventional doxorubicin (CAD). A total of 239 cycles of CLAD and 209 cycles of CAD, respectively, were given. The objective response rate was 71% (CLAD) and 74% (CAD). Non-cumulative hematological toxicity was predominant in both regimens. It was found that CLAD is an active and well-tolerated treatment regimen for MM. Response rate is comparable to other anthracycline containing regimens like CAD with an advantage in hematological toxicity and lower infectious complications, and a presumed advantage of lower cardiotoxicity.