The impact of strike action on healthcare delivery: A scoping review

From plaster casts to picket lines: Public support for industrial action in the National Health Service in England

This paper explores public sentiment towards strike action among healthcare workers, as a result of their perceived inadequate pay. By analysing survey data collected in England between 2022 and 2023, the study focuses on NHS nurses and junior doctors, due to their critical role in delivering essential public services. Results indicate higher public support for strikes by nurses and junior doctors compared to other professions such as postal workers, teachers, rail workers, airport workers, civil servants and university lecturers. However, variation in support for strikes by healthcare workers is observed across societal segments. Significant disparities in support are linked to individual political affiliations, left-right ideological positions and trust in the NHS. In short, nonconservative voters, individuals leaning towards left-wing politics and those with greater trust in the NHS demonstrate higher likelihoods of supporting strikes by health workers. These findings carry implications for future strike decisions and highlight specific target groups for enhanced communication efforts to garner increased public support.

Impact of junior doctor strikes on patient flow in the emergency department: a cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Healthcare worker strikes are a global phenomenon. Mortality and morbidity seem to be unaffected by doctor strikes, but there is little evidence on the impact on emergency department (ED) flow and patient characteristics. In March and April 2023, two consecutive UK junior doctor strikes occurred.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the impact of junior doctor strikes on ED patient flow. Additionally, variation in patient presentations was compared between non-strike and strike days.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at King's College Hospital ED, a university hospital in London. All ED attendances during the 72- and 96-hour strike actions were compared with the corresponding non-strike days of the previous week.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS

National key performance indicators (KPIs) were analysed and compared between non-strike and strike days. Patients' demographics, acuity and diagnoses were compared. Outcome measures included number of 4-hour breaches, number of patients admitted or discharged and ED mortality. Staff seniority was categorised into levels for analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

There was increased ED patient flow during strike days with a significantly shorter total time in department in March [240 min (IQR 155-469) vs. 286 min (IQR 198.5-523.5), P  < 0.001] and in April [222.5 min (IQR 147-351) vs. 251.5 min (IQR 174-443), P  < 0.001]. Time to first clinician, treatment, and decision to admit were all shorter during both strike actions. Number of attendances, acuity, diagnoses, admission, discharge, and mortality rates were similar during strike and non-strike days. Staffing numbers were lower or equivalent on strike days but level of seniority was higher ( P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The improved KPIs and increased patient flow during strike days, while multifactorial, seem largely attributed to the higher number of senior staff. Patient presentations and outcomes were unaffected by junior doctor strike action.

Revisiting the comparison between healthcare strikes and just war

In the UK, healthcare workers are again considering whether to strike, and the moral status of strike action is being publicly debated. Mpho Selemogo argued that we can think productively about the ethical status of healthcare strikes by using the ethical framework often applied to armed conflict (2014). On this view, strikes need to be just, proportionate, likely to succeed, a last resort, pursued by a legitimate organisation and publicly communicated. In this article, I argue for a different approach to the just war comparison. Selemogo adopts a traditional, collectivist conception of just war reasoning but this is not the only view. So-called 'individualist' approaches to the morality of war can also be applied to strike action. Taking an individualist perspective complicates the traditional picture of a dispute arising between three well-defined groups of healthcare workers, employers and the innocent subjects of collateral damage: patients and the public. We arrive instead at a more complicated moral picture: some people might be more morally liable to be harmed than others during a strike, or can justly bear increased risks, and some are more obliged to strike than others. I describe this shift of framework before critically examining some of the traditional jus ad bellum conditions as applied to strikes.

Impact of the junior doctors' industrial action on the emergency eye department in a large tertiary ophthalmic hospital: the Manchester experience

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of the junior doctors' industrial action on one of the largest emergency eye departments (EED) in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

We compared staff allocation, patient presentation, time in streaming, time in the department, the Manchester Triage System (MTS) score, number of eye emergencies and follow-up care of patients who attended the EED in the Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (MREH) during the 3-day industrial action (13-15 March 2023) compared with control periods 2 weeks before and 2 weeks after the industrial action.

RESULTS

During the industrial action, there were almost 1.5 times more staff allocated to EED with a near doubling of the senior workforce. There was no difference in patient presentation, MTS score, number of eye emergencies or patient follow-up during the industrial action. However, patients had significantly less time in streaming (p < 0.001) and in the department (p < 0.001) during the industrial action compared to control periods.

CONCLUSION

Emergency ophthalmic patient care was not compromised during the industrial action due to the reallocation of the workforce to EED. The results of this study may help in the planning of ophthalmic eye-care services in the event of future industrial actions.