Diagnostic analysis of lupus anticoagulant using clot waveform analysis in activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged cases: A retrospective analysis

Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) requires the presence of a clinical criterion (thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity), combined with persistently circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is one of the three laboratory parameters (the others being antibodies to either cardiolipin or β2-glycoprotein I) that defines this rare but potentially devastating condition. For the search for aCL and aβ2-GP-I, traditionally measured with immunological solid-phase assays (ELISA), several different assays and detection techniques are currently available, thus making these tests relatively reliable and widespread. On the other hand, LA detection is based on functional coagulation procedures that are characterized by poor standardization, difficulties in interpreting the results, and interference by several drugs commonly used in the clinical settings in which LA search is appropriate. This article aims to review the current state of the art and the challenges that clinicians and laboratories incur in the detection of LA.

Performance and Interpretation of Clot Waveform Analysis

The prothrombin time (PT) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) are two basic tests for routine purposes, which are widely used in the clinical screening of coagulopathies. PT and aPTT are useful tests for detecting both symptomatic (hemorrhagic) and asymptomatic defects, but they are unsuitable for studying hypercoagulable states. However, these tests are available for studying the dynamic process of clot formation by means of the detection of the clot waveform analysis (CWA), which has been introduced several years ago. CWA can provide useful information on both hypocoagulable and hypercoagulable states. Nowadays it is possible to detect the whole clot formation both in the PT and aPTT tubes starting from the initial step of fibrin polymerization by means of specific and dedicated algorithm implemented in a coagulometer. In particular, CWA provides information on the velocity (first derivative), acceleration (second derivative), and density (delta) of clot formation. CWA has been applied to several pathologic conditions such as coagulation factor deficiency (including congenital hemophilia from factor VIII, IX, or XI deficiency), acquired hemophilia, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), sepsis, replacement therapy management, chronic spontaneous urticarial, and liver cirrhosis, in patients with high venous thromboembolic risk before LMWH prophylaxis, and in patients with different hemorrhagic patterns along with an electron microscopy evaluation of the clot density. We report here materials and methods used for detecting the additional clotting parameters available in both PT and aPTT.

A multi-laboratory assessment of lupus anticoagulant assays performed on the ACL TOP 50 family for harmonized testing in a large laboratory network

Introduction

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing is commonly performed within hemostasis laboratories, and the ACL TOP 50 family of instruments represent a new “single platform” of hemostasis instrumentation. Our aim was to evaluate these instruments and manufacturer reagents or alternatives for utility in LA testing.

Methods

Comparative evaluations of LA testing using newly installed ACL TOPs 550 and 750 as well as comparative assessments with existing “reference,” predominantly Stago, instrumentation, and reagents. Evaluations comprised both dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)‐based assays. Establishment of normal reference ranges (NRR).

Results

The HemosIL dRVVT‐based assays showed good comparability with the existing Stago reference method (R > 0.9) and could be considered as verified as fit for purpose. A variety of APTT assays was additionally evaluated for LA utility, and we identified from the assessment good utility of a non‐Werfen solution in Hyphen BioMed Cephen reagents. NRR were established based on ≥120 normal individual plasma samples.

Conclusion

This evaluation of LA reagents on ACL TOP 50 Family instruments identified overall acceptable performance of both dRVVT (Werfen solution) and APTT (non‐Werfen solution) to enable harmonization of LA testing in our large network.