Pacemaker programming in patients with first-degree AV-block: Programming pattern and possible consequences

Clinical analysis of temporary pacemaker implantation in 13 children

BACKGROUND

At present, temporary pacemaker implantation is very common in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases in adults. However, the number of pediatric pacemakers implanted is still relatively small, and relevant research is also far less than that of adults. This study aimed to explore the application of temporary pacemakers in children with acute and critical cardiovascular diseases.

METHODS

The clinical data of children with cardiovascular diseases who were treated with temporary pacemakers in Tianjin Children's Hospital from October 2017 to February 2021 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 13 children with cardiovascular diseases were included in this study, including 4 males and 9 females, mean age of 71.2±56.3 months, and median body weight of 15.5 kg. There were 9 children with endocardial pacing and 4 children with epicardial pacing. The types of diseases included fulminant myocarditis (n=8), complete atrioventricular block (CAVB; n=1), and arrhythmias after open heart surgery (n=4). The median time from onset to admission was 1.0 days in children with endocardial pacing and there was cardiac arrest in 2 children, heart failure in 9 children, cardiogenic shock in 8 children, and Adams-Stokes attack in 7 children. The median time from admission to implantation of temporary pacemakers was 3.0 h and the operation time was 55.0±19.4 min. All 4 children with epicardial pacing had pacemakers implanted during operation because of CAVB. The pacing mode was VVI mode. The initial perceptual voltage was 1-2 mv, the output voltage was 5v, and the pacing frequency was 70-145 bpm. A total of 11 children reverted to sinus rhythm within 5.0 (1.8-34.0) h and the working time of temporary pacemakers was 134.0 (15.0-191.0) h. There was poor pacing in 2 children and catheter displacement in 1 child during pacing. A total of 12 children were followed up for 20.0±12.5 months and 1 was lost to follow-up. During the follow-up period, the cardiac functions were basically normal and no new arrhythmia appeared.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary pacemakers have the advantage of simple operation, definite effect, and safety which has a remarkable effect in the treatment of acute and critical cardiovascular diseases in children.

Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals

The purpose of the research was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the X-ray-free improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation as well as the practicability of the method in primary hospitals. Patients [including those suffering from sick sinus syndrome and third-degree and advanced atrioventricular blockage (AVB)] who needed emergency temporary pacemaker implantation from July 2017 to August 2020 in Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital were selected. They were stochastically divided into a research group (95 cases) treated with the improved simple bedside method and a control group (95 cases) with X-ray guidance. The ordinary bipolar electrodes were used in both groups. On this condition, the operation duration, the first-attempt success rate of electrodes, pacing threshold, success rate of the operation, the rate of electrode displacement, and complications in the two groups were separately calculated. The comparison results of the research group with the control group are shown as follows: operation time [(18 ± 5.91) min vs. (43 ± 2.99) min, P < 0.05], the first-attempt success rate of the electrode (97% vs. 98%, P > 0.05), pacing threshold [(0.97 ± 0.35) vs. (0.97 ± 0.32) V, P > 0.05], success rate of the operation (98.9% vs. 100%, P > 0.05), the rate of electrode displacement (8.4% vs. 7.3%, P > 0.05) and complications (3.2% vs. 2.1%, P > 0.05). The emergency temporary pacemaker implantation based on the improved simple bedside method is as safe and effective as the surgical method under X-ray guidance, and the operation is simpler and easier to learn and requires a shorter operating time, therefore, it is more suitable for use in emergency and primary hospitals.