Benchmarking predictions of allostery in liver pyruvate kinase in CAGI4

What is allosteric regulation? Exploring the exceptions that prove the rule!

"Allosteric" was first introduced to mean the other site (i.e., a site distinct from the active or orthosteric site), an adjective for "regulation" to imply a regulatory outcome resulting from ligand binding at another site. That original idea outlines a system with two ligand-binding events at two distinct locations on a macromolecule (originally a protein system), which defines a four-state energy cycle. An allosteric energy cycle provides a quantifiable allosteric coupling constant and focuses our attention on the unique properties of the four equilibrated protein complexes that constitute the energy cycle. Because many observed phenomena have been referenced as "allosteric regulation" in the literature, the goal of this work is to use literature examples to explore which systems are and are not consistent with the two-ligand thermodynamic energy cycle-based definition of allosteric regulation. We emphasize the need for consistent language so comparisons can be made among the ever-increasing number of allosteric systems. Building on the mutually exclusive natures of an energy cycle definition of allosteric regulation versus classic two-state models, we conclude our discussion by outlining how the often-proposed Rube-Goldberg-like mechanisms are likely inconsistent with an energy cycle definition of allosteric regulation.

CAGI, the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation, establishes progress and prospects for computational genetic variant interpretation methods

BACKGROUND

The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) aims to advance the state-of-the-art for computational prediction of genetic variant impact, particularly where relevant to disease. The five complete editions of the CAGI community experiment comprised 50 challenges, in which participants made blind predictions of phenotypes from genetic data, and these were evaluated by independent assessors.

RESULTS

Performance was particularly strong for clinical pathogenic variants, including some difficult-to-diagnose cases, and extends to interpretation of cancer-related variants. Missense variant interpretation methods were able to estimate biochemical effects with increasing accuracy. Assessment of methods for regulatory variants and complex trait disease risk was less definitive and indicates performance potentially suitable for auxiliary use in the clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

Results show that while current methods are imperfect, they have major utility for research and clinical applications. Emerging methods and increasingly large, robust datasets for training and assessment promise further progress ahead.

The 2.4 Å structure of Zymomonas mobilis pyruvate kinase: Implications for stability and regulation

Human liver pyruvate kinase (hlPYK) catalyzes the final step in glycolysis, the formation of pyruvate (PYR) and ATP from phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and ADP. Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (FBP), a pathway intermediate of glycolysis, serves as an allosteric activator of hlPYK. Zymomonas mobilis pyruvate kinase (ZmPYK) performs the final step of the Entner-Doudoroff pathway, which is similar to glycolysis in that energy is harvested from glucose and pyruvate is generated. The Entner-Doudoroff pathway does not have FBP as a pathway intermediate, and ZmPYK is not allosterically activated. In this work, we solved the 2.4 Å X-ray crystallographic structure of ZmPYK. The protein is dimeric in solution as determined by gel filtration chromatography, but crystallizes as a tetramer. The buried surface area of the ZmPYK tetramerization interface is significantly smaller than that of hlPYK, and yet tetramerization using the standard interfaces from higher organisms provides an accessible low energy crystallization pathway. Interestingly, the ZmPYK structure showed a phosphate ion in the analogous location to the 6-phosphate binding site of FBP in hlPYK. Circular Dichroism (CD) was used to measure melting temperatures of hlPYK and ZmPYK in the absence and presence of substrates and effectors. The only significant difference was an additional phase of small amplitude for the ZmPYK melting curves. We conclude that the phosphate ion plays neither a structural or allosteric role in ZmPYK under the conditions tested. We hypothesize that ZmPYK does not have sufficient protein stability for activity to be tuned by allosteric effectors as described for rheostat positions in the allosteric homologues.

Pey A. Effect of naturally-occurring mutations on the stability and function of cancer-associated NQO1: Comparison of experiments and computation

Recent advances in DNA sequencing technologies are revealing a large individual variability of the human genome. Our capacity to establish genotype-phenotype correlations in such large-scale is, however, limited. This task is particularly challenging due to the multifunctional nature of many proteins. Here we describe an extensive analysis of the stability and function of naturally-occurring variants (found in the COSMIC and gnomAD databases) of the cancer-associated human NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1). First, we performed in silico saturation mutagenesis studies (>5,000 substitutions) aimed to identify regions in NQO1 important for stability and function. We then experimentally characterized twenty-two naturally-occurring variants in terms of protein levels during bacterial expression, solubility, thermal stability, and coenzyme binding. These studies showed a good overall correlation between experimental analysis and computational predictions; also the magnitude of the effects of the substitutions are similarly distributed in variants from the COSMIC and gnomAD databases. Outliers in these experimental-computational genotype-phenotype correlations remain, and we discuss these on the grounds and limitations of our approaches. Our work represents a further step to characterize the mutational landscape of NQO1 in the human genome and may help to improve high-throughput in silico tools for genotype-phenotype correlations in this multifunctional protein associated with disease.

Genome interpretation using in silico predictors of variant impact

Estimating the effects of variants found in disease driver genes opens the door to personalized therapeutic opportunities. Clinical associations and laboratory experiments can only characterize a tiny fraction of all the available variants, leaving the majority as variants of unknown significance (VUS). In silico methods bridge this gap by providing instant estimates on a large scale, most often based on the numerous genetic differences between species. Despite concerns that these methods may lack reliability in individual subjects, their numerous practical applications over cohorts suggest they are already helpful and have a role to play in genome interpretation when used at the proper scale and context. In this review, we aim to gain insights into the training and validation of these variant effect predicting methods and illustrate representative types of experimental and clinical applications. Objective performance assessments using various datasets that are not yet published indicate the strengths and limitations of each method. These show that cautious use of in silico variant impact predictors is essential for addressing genome interpretation challenges.

Functional effects of protein variants

Genetic and other variations frequently affect protein functions. Scientific articles can contain confusing descriptions about which function or property is affected, and in many cases the statements are pure speculation without any experimental evidence. To clarify functional effects of protein variations of genetic or non-genetic origin, a systematic conceptualisation and framework are introduced. This framework describes protein functional effects on abundance, activity, specificity and affinity, along with countermeasures, which allow cells, tissues and organisms to tolerate, avoid, repair, attenuate or resist (TARAR) the effects. Effects on abundance discussed include gene dosage, restricted expression, mis-localisation and degradation. Enzymopathies, effects on kinetics, allostery and regulation of protein activity are subtopics for the effects of variants on activity. Variation outcomes on specificity and affinity comprise promiscuity, specificity, affinity and moonlighting. TARAR mechanisms redress variations with active and passive processes including chaperones, redundancy, robustness, canalisation and metabolic and signalling rewiring. A framework for pragmatic protein function analysis and presentation is introduced. All of the mechanisms and effects are described along with representative examples, most often in relation to diseases. In addition, protein function is discussed from evolutionary point of view. Application of the presented framework facilitates unambiguous, detailed and specific description of functional effects and their systematic study.

Using deep mutational scanning to benchmark variant effect predictors and identify disease mutations

To deal with the huge number of novel protein-coding variants identified by genome and exome sequencing studies, many computational variant effect predictors (VEPs) have been developed. Such predictors are often trained and evaluated using different variant data sets, making a direct comparison between VEPs difficult. In this study, we use 31 previously published deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments, which provide quantitative, independent phenotypic measurements for large numbers of single amino acid substitutions, in order to benchmark and compare 46 different VEPs. We also evaluate the ability of DMS measurements and VEPs to discriminate between pathogenic and benign missense variants. We find that DMS experiments tend to be superior to the top-ranking predictors, demonstrating the tremendous potential of DMS for identifying novel human disease mutations. Among the VEPs, DeepSequence clearly stood out, showing both the strongest correlations with DMS data and having the best ability to predict pathogenic mutations, which is especially remarkable given that it is an unsupervised method. We further recommend SNAP2, DEOGEN2, SNPs&GO, SuSPect and REVEL based upon their performance in these analyses.

CAGI5: Objective performance assessments of predictions based on the Evolutionary Action equation

Many computational approaches estimate the effect of coding variants, but their predictions often disagree with each other. These contradictions confound users and raise questions regarding reliability. Performance assessments can indicate the expected accuracy for each method and highlight advantages and limitations. The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) community aims to organize objective and systematic assessments: They challenge predictors on unpublished experimental and clinical data and assign independent assessors to evaluate the submissions. We participated in CAGI experiments as predictors, using the Evolutionary Action (EA) method to estimate the fitness effect of coding mutations. EA is untrained, uses homology information, and relies on a formal equation: The fitness effect equals the functional sensitivity to residue changes multiplied by the magnitude of the substitution. In previous CAGI experiments (between 2011 and 2016), our submissions aimed to predict the protein activity of single mutants. In 2018 (CAGI5), we also submitted predictions regarding clinical associations, folding stability, and matching genomic data with phenotype. For all these diverse challenges, we used EA to predict the fitness effect of variants, adjusted to specifically address each question. Our submissions had consistently good performance, suggesting that EA predicts reliably the effects of genetic variants.

Review: Precision medicine and driver mutations: Computational methods, functional assays and conformational principles for interpreting cancer drivers

At the root of the so-called precision medicine or precision oncology, which is our focus here, is the hypothesis that cancer treatment would be considerably better if therapies were guided by a tumor’s genomic alterations. This hypothesis has sparked major initiatives focusing on whole-genome and/or exome sequencing, creation of large databases, and developing tools for their statistical analyses—all aspiring to identify actionable alterations, and thus molecular targets, in a patient. At the center of the massive amount of collected sequence data is their interpretations that largely rest on statistical analysis and phenotypic observations. Statistics is vital, because it guides identification of cancer-driving alterations. However, statistics of mutations do not identify a change in protein conformation; therefore, it may not define sufficiently accurate actionable mutations, neglecting those that are rare. Among the many thematic overviews of precision oncology, this review innovates by further comprehensively including precision pharmacology, and within this framework, articulating its protein structural landscape and consequences to cellular signaling pathways. It provides the underlying physicochemical basis, thereby also opening the door to a broader community.

Precision medicine review: rare driver mutations and their biophysical classification

How can biophysical principles help precision medicine identify rare driver mutations? A major tenet of pragmatic approaches to precision oncology and pharmacology is that driver mutations are very frequent. However, frequency is a statistical attribute, not a mechanistic one. Rare mutations can also act through the same mechanism, and as we discuss below, “latent driver” mutations may also follow the same route, with “helper” mutations. Here, we review how biophysics provides mechanistic guidelines that extend precision medicine. We outline principles and strategies, especially focusing on mutations that drive cancer. Biophysics has contributed profoundly to deciphering biological processes. However, driven by data science, precision medicine has skirted some of its major tenets. Data science embodies genomics, tissue- and cell-specific expression levels, making it capable of defining genome- and systems-wide molecular disease signatures. It classifies cancer driver genes/mutations and affected pathways, and its associated protein structural data guide drug discovery. Biophysics complements data science. It considers structures and their heterogeneous ensembles, explains how mutational variants can signal through distinct pathways, and how allo-network drugs can be harnessed. Biophysics clarifies how one mutation—frequent or rare—can affect multiple phenotypic traits by populating conformations that favor interactions with other network modules. It also suggests how to identify such mutations and their signaling consequences. Biophysics offers principles and strategies that can help precision medicine push the boundaries to transform our insight into biological processes and the practice of personalized medicine. By contrast, “phenotypic drug discovery,” which capitalizes on physiological cellular conditions and first-in-class drug discovery, may not capture the proper molecular variant. This is because variants of the same protein can express more than one phenotype, and a phenotype can be encoded by several variants.

Advances in the Computational Identification of Allosteric Sites and Pathways in Proteins

With the increasing difficulty to develop new drugs and the emergence of resistance to traditional orthosteric-site inhibitors, the search for alternatives is finally approaching the focus on allosteric sites. Allosteric sites offer opportunities to regulate many pharmacologically targeted pathways by inhibition or activation. In addition, allosteric sites tend to be less conserved than the functional site, which may facilitate the design of specific effectors in the protein families for which specific orthosteric inhibitors have proved difficult to design. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that all proteins might be susceptible of allosteric regulation, increasing the space of druggable targets. Computational identification of allosteric sites has therefore become an active field of research. The problem can be approached from two sides: (1) the identification of allosteric-communication pathways between the functional site and potential allosteric sites and (2) the functional-site-independent identification of allosteric sites. While the first approach tends to be more laborious and thus restricted to a single protein, the second tends to be more amenable to larger-scale analysis, thus providing tools for the two drug discovery scenarios: the analysis of known targets and the screening for new potential targets. Here, I show some basic concepts and methods useful to the identification of allosteric sites and pathways, in line with these two approaches. I describe them in some detail to build a clear framework, at the risk of losing the interest of experts. Examples of recent studies involving these methods are also illustrated, focusing on the techniques rather than on their findings on allosterism.