Amygdala responses to quetiapine XR and citalopram treatment in major depression: the role of 5-HTTLPR-S/Lg polymorphisms

Amygdala biomarkers of treatment response in major depressive disorder: An fMRI systematic review of SSRI antidepressants

Functional neuroimaging studies have demonstrated abnormal activity and functional connectivity (FC) of the amygdala among individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD), which may be rectified with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment. This systematic review aimed to identify changes in the amygdala on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans among individuals with MDD who received SSRIs. A search for fMRI studies examining amygdala correlates of SSRI response via fMRI was conducted through OVID (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase). The end date was April 4th, 2023. In total, 623 records were screened, and 16 studies were included in this review. While the search pertained to SSRIs broadly, the included studies were escitalopram-, citalopram-, fluoxetine-, sertraline-, and paroxetine-specific. Decreases in event-related amygdala activity were found following 6-to-12-week SSRI treatment, particularly in response to negative stimuli. Eight-week courses of SSRI pharmacotherapy were associated with increased event-related amygdala FC (i.e., with the prefrontal [PFC] and anterior cingulate cortices, insula, thalamus, caudate nucleus, and putamen) and decreased resting-state effective connectivity (i.e., amygdala-PFC). Preliminary evidence suggests that SSRIs may alter amygdala activity and FC in MDD. Additional studies are needed to corroborate findings. Future research should employ long-term follow-ups to determine whether effects persist after treatment termination.

Treatment with the second-generation antipsychotic quetiapine is associated with increased subgenual ACC activation during reward processing in major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

The second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) quetiapine is an essential option for antidepressant augmentation therapy in major depressive disorder (MDD), yet neurobiological mechanisms behind its antidepressant properties remain unclear. As SGAs interfere with activity in reward-related brain areas, including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) - a key brain region in antidepressant interventions, this study examined whether quetiapine treatment affects ACC activity during reward processing in MDD patients.

METHODS

Using the ACC as region of interest, an independent t-test comparing reward-related BOLD response of 51 quetiapine-taking and 51 antipsychotic-free MDD patients was conducted. Monetary reward outcome feedback was measured in a card-guessing paradigm using pseudorandom blocks. Participants were matched for age, sex, and depression severity and analyses were controlled for confounding variables, including total antidepressant medication load, illness chronicity and acute depression severity. Potential dosage effects were examined in a 3 × 1 ANOVA. Differences in ACC-related functional connectivity were assessed in psycho-physiological interaction (PPI) analyses.

RESULTS

Left subgenual ACC activity was significantly higher in the quetiapine group compared to antipsychotic-free participants and dependent on high-dose quetiapine intake. Results remained significant after controlling for confounding variables. The PPI analysis did not yield significant group differences in ACC-related functional connectivity.

LIMITATIONS

Causal interpretation is limited due to cross-sectional findings.

CONCLUSION

Elevated subgenual ACC activity to rewarding stimuli may represent a neurobiological marker and potential key interface of quetiapine's antidepressant effects in MDD. These results underline ACC activity during reward processing as an investigative avenue for future research and therapeutic interventions to improve MDD treatment outcomes.

Early post-treatment blood oxygenation level-dependent responses to emotion processing associated with clinical response to pharmacological treatment in major depressive disorder

INTRODUCTION

Pre-treatment blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been used for the early identification of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who later respond or fail to respond to medication. However, BOLD responses early after treatment initiation may offer insight into early neural changes associated with later clinical response. The present study evaluated both pre-treatment and early post-treatment fMRI responses to an emotion processing task, to further our understanding of neural changes associated with a successful response to pharmacological intervention.

METHODS

MDD patients who responded (n = 22) and failed to respond (n = 12) after 8 weeks of treatment with either citalopram or quetiapine extended release, and healthy controls (n = 18) underwent two fMRI scans, baseline (pre-treatment), and early post-treatment (one week after treatment commencement). Participants completed an emotional face matching task at both scans.

RESULTS

Using threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) and non-parametric permutation testing, fMRI activation maps showed that after one week of treatment, responders demonstrated increased activation in the left parietal lobule, precentral gyrus, and bilateral insula (all P < 0.05 threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) family-wise error-corrected) to negative facial expressions. Non-responders showed some small increases in the precentral gyrus, while controls showed no differences between scans. Compared to non-responders, responders showed some increased activation in the superior parietal lobule and middle temporal gyrus at the post-treatment scan. There were no group differences between responders, non-responders, and controls at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

One week after treatment commencement, BOLD signal changes in the parietal lobules, insula, and middle temporal gyrus were related to clinical response to pharmacological treatment.

5HTTLPR Genetic Variant and Major Depressive Disorder: A Review

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a disease that involves biological, psychological, and social interactions. Studies have shown the importance of genetics contribution to MDD development. The SCL6A4 protein (5HTTLPR) functions transporting serotonin, a neurotransmitter linked to mood and emotion, to the synaptic cleft. Hence, this study seeks, through a literature review, a better comprehension of the 5HTTLPR genetic variant association with MDD. For this purpose, a search was performed on the Virtual Health Library Portal for articles that related 5HTTLPR to MDD. Most of the articles found were conducted in the American continent, with one (1) study implemented in Brazil. 5HTTLPR associations were found regarding changes in the nervous system, pharmacology, and risk factors seen in MDD patients. When verifying the allelic distribution, the S allele had a higher frequency in most of the studies analyzed. Despite not finding a commonality in the different studies, the tremendous genetic variation found demonstrates the MDD complexity. For this reason, further studies in diverse populations should be conducted to assist in the understanding and treatment of the disease.

Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Predicting Treatment Response and Recurrence of Major Depressive Disorder

The acute treatment duration for major depressive disorder (MDD) is 8 weeks or more. Treatment of patients with MDD without predictors of treatment response and future recurrence presents challenges and clinical problems to patients and physicians. Recently, many neuroimaging studies have been published on biomarkers for treatment response and recurrence of MDD using various methods such as brain volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional MRI (resting-state and affective tasks), diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, near-infrared spectroscopy, and molecular imaging (i.e., positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography). The results have been inconsistent, and we hypothesize that this could be due to small sample size; different study design, including eligibility criteria; and differences in the imaging and analysis techniques. In the future, we suggest a more sophisticated research design, larger sample size, and a more comprehensive integration including genetics to establish biomarkers for the prediction of treatment response and recurrence of MDD.

Activation of EphB2 in the basolateral amygdala promotes stress vulnerability of mice by increasing NMDA-dependent synaptic function

The occurrence of major depressive disorder (MDD) has been linked to an increased vulnerability to stress. The basolateral amygdala (BLA) is one of the critical brain areas that involved in the regulation of pathological reactivity to stress. Increasing evidence indicates that the EphB2 receptor (EphB2) plays a critical role in neuropsychiatric disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, pain and anxiety. However, whether the EphB2 in the BLA is involved in stress vulnerability is unclear. Here, we identified EphB2 in the BLA as a key regulator contributed to the modulation of stress vulnerability in adult mice. We found that the expression of EphB2 in the BLA was significantly increased in the animal model induced by chronic social stress. Knockdown of EphB2 in the BLA produced antidepressant-like behavioral effects, whereas activation of EphB2 in the BLA increased the susceptibility to subthreshold social defeat stress. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the role of EphB2 in the stress vulnerability was mediated by modulating NMDA receptors, since the knockdown of EphB2 in the BLA prevented not only the increase in the amplitudes of both the miniature and the evoked NMDAR-mediated EPSC, but also the enhancement of surface expression of NMDARs in the defeated mice. Taken together, these results suggest that EphB2 in the BLA is a critical factor contributes to the vulnerability to stress, which may be a potential target for the treatment of depression.

Functional MRI findings, pharmacological treatment in major depression and clinical response

Major depressive disorders are common conditions with relatively limited response to treatment. In order to improve response to treatment, a better understanding of functional neuroanatomy is necessary to improve treatment targets at brain level. This work summarises the literature of longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging studies in major depression to identify brain regions where aberrant neural activity normalises after clinical response following treatment with pharmacological compounds with known antidepressant properties. Hyperactivity in regions such as the amygdala and the ventral components of the anterior cingulate cortex were some of the most replicated findings of functional MRI studies in major depression and normalisation of aberrant activity one of the best predictive biomarkers of treatment response.

Genetic variants in major depressive disorder: From pathophysiology to therapy

In spite of promising preclinical results there is a decreasing number of new registered medications in major depression. The main reason behind this fact is the lack of confirmation in clinical studies for the assumed, and in animals confirmed, therapeutic results. This suggests low predictive value of animal studies for central nervous system disorders. One solution for identifying new possible targets is the application of genetics and genomics, which may pinpoint new targets based on the effect of genetic variants in humans. The present review summarizes such research focusing on depression and its therapy. The inconsistency between most genetic studies in depression suggests, first of all, a significant role of environmental stress. Furthermore, effect of individual genes and polymorphisms is weak, therefore gene x gene interactions or complete biochemical pathways should be analyzed. Even genes encoding target proteins of currently used antidepressants remain non-significant in genome-wide case control investigations suggesting no main effect in depression, but rather an interaction with stress. The few significant genes in GWASs are related to neurogenesis, neuronal synapse, cell contact and DNA transcription and as being nonspecific for depression are difficult to harvest pharmacologically. Most candidate genes in replicable gene x environment interactions, on the other hand, are connected to the regulation of stress and the HPA axis and thus could serve as drug targets for depression subgroups characterized by stress-sensitivity and anxiety while other risk polymorphisms such as those related to prominent cognitive symptoms in depression may help to identify additional subgroups and their distinct treatment. Until these new targets find their way into therapy, the optimization of current medications can be approached by pharmacogenomics, where metabolizing enzyme polymorphisms remain prominent determinants of therapeutic success.

The Role of Neural Plasticity in Depression: From Hippocampus to Prefrontal Cortex

Neural plasticity, a fundamental mechanism of neuronal adaptation, is disrupted in depression. The changes in neural plasticity induced by stress and other negative stimuli play a significant role in the onset and development of depression. Antidepressant treatments have also been found to exert their antidepressant effects through regulatory effects on neural plasticity. However, the detailed mechanisms of neural plasticity in depression still remain unclear. Therefore, in this review, we summarize the recent literature to elaborate the possible mechanistic role of neural plasticity in depression. Taken together, these findings may pave the way for future progress in neural plasticity studies.

Pharmacogenetics and Imaging-Pharmacogenetics of Antidepressant Response: Towards Translational Strategies

Genetic variation underlies both the response to antidepressant treatment and the occurrence of side effects. Over the past two decades, a number of pharmacogenetic variants, among these the SCL6A4, BDNF, FKBP5, GNB3, GRIK4, and ABCB1 genes, have come to the forefront in this regard. However, small effects sizes, mixed results in independent samples, and conflicting meta-analyses results led to inherent difficulties in the field of pharmacogenetics translating these findings into clinical practice. Nearly all antidepressant pharmacogenetic variants have potentially pleiotropic effects in which they are associated with major depressive disorder, intermediate phenotypes involved in emotional processes, and brain areas affected by antidepressant treatment. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the advances made in the field of pharmacogenetics of antidepressant efficacy and side effects, imaging findings of antidepressant response, and the latest results in the expanding field of imaging-pharmacogenetics studies. We suggest there is mounting evidence that genetic factors exert their impact on treatment response by influencing brain structural and functional changes during antidepressant treatment, and combining neuroimaging and genetic methods may be a more powerful way to detect biological mechanisms of response than either method alone. The most promising imaging-pharmacogenetics findings exist for the SCL6A4 gene, with converging associations with antidepressant response, frontolimbic predictors of affective symptoms, and normalization of frontolimbic activity following antidepressant treatment. More research is required before imaging-pharmacogenetics informed personalized medicine can be applied to antidepressant treatment; nevertheless, inroads have been made towards assessing genetic and neuroanatomical liability and potential clinical application.