"New drugs: kids come first": children should be included in trials of new biological treatments

The impact of induction therapy with three doses of infliximab on deep histological healing in paediatric patients with active Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

The clinical efficacy of infliximab (IFX) for induction of remission in both adults and children with active Crohn's disease (CD) has been well documented. Recently, so-called "deep remission" defined as mucosal healing has become the ultimate endpoint of the most recent therapeutic advances for CD. However, endoscopic evidence of mucosal healing is not necessarily associated with histological evidence of suppression of inflammation.

AIM

Since data on that issue are limited, especially in the paediatric population, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of induction therapy with IFX on deep microscopic remission in paediatric patients with CD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-six children (32 boys and 24 girls) aged 13.0 ±9.3 years with moderate to severely active CD diagnosed at the mean age of 5.5 ±0.83 years were included into the study. Colonoscopy and gastroscopy with sample collection were performed in all patients before and after three injections of IFX. Clinical activity of the disease was assessed using the Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI), and the endoscopic activity was scored using the Simple Endoscopic Score (SES-CD). Histological changes were evaluated by a previously described numerical scoring system.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine (69.6%) patients reached clinical remission (PCDAI ≤ 10). When comparing data at baseline and at week 10, a significant decrease was observed in median PCDAI, and in SES-CD score between the initial and control colonoscopies. We also reported a decrease in histological scale. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.63). Three (5.4%) patients had a score of zero in the control histological examination. The correlation was found only between histological score and SES-CD score. Clinical remission correlated better with mucosal healing expressed by a decrease in SES-CD score than with microscopic changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Biological therapy with infliximab enables mucosal healing in paediatric patients with CD, which is not necessarily associated with histological evidence of suppression of inflammation. Mucosal healing correlates better than microscopic healing with clinical remission.

Profile of infliximab in the treatment of pediatric Crohn's disease

In recent years, a novel biologic therapy with monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-alpha has revolutionized the treatment of Crohn’s disease. Infliximab, the first biologic agent, has been demonstrated to considerably improve both clinical and endoscopic outcomes. In view of the growing popularity of infliximab in the management of Crohn’s disease, we review the profile of the agent in the treatment of this disease in a pediatric setting.

Monotherapy with infliximab versus combination therapy in the maintenance of clinical remission in children with moderate to severe Crohn disease

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 protocols of maintenance therapy with infliximab (IFX) and an immunomodulatory agent in pediatric patients with Crohn disease (CD): withdrawal of immunomodulators versus continuation of immunosuppressants.

METHODS

The present multicenter randomized open-label trial included 99 patients with CD (ages 14.5 ± 2.6 years) who were administered IFX (5 mg/kg body weight) along with an immunomodulatory agent (azathioprine 1.5-3 mg/kg body weight per day, methotrexate 10-25 mg/week). After 10 weeks of the induction therapy, 84 responders were centrally randomized into 1 of the following groups: group I (n = 45) in which IFX and an immunomodulatory agent were continued up to week 54 and group II (n = 39) in which the immunomodulatory agent was discontinued after 26 weeks.

RESULTS

The induction therapy was reflected by a significant decrease in Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) and Simplified Endoscopic Activity Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) values. After the maintenance phase, the analyzed groups did not differ significantly in terms of the clinical response loss rates and final PCDAI and SES-CD scores. Furthermore, no significant intragroup differences were documented between mean PCDAI scores determined at the end of induction and maintenance phases. Intensification/modification of the treatment was required in 13 of 45 (29%) and 11 of 39 (28%) patients of groups I and II, respectively. A total of 9 serious adverse events were documented; none of the patients died during the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-six weeks likely represent the safe duration of combined IFX/immunomodulatory therapy in our sample of pediatric patients with CD.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: management and therapeutic options

THE GOALS OF TREATMENT FOR JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS (JIA) INCLUDE: suppression of inflammation, achievement of remission, relief of pain, maintenance of function and doing so with minimal toxicity. Important discoveries over the past 10-15 years have led to more targeted treatments for children with JIA. The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) classification system for childhood arthritides, better assessment tools for clinical response, improved definitions of remission, new imaging techniques and evidence in gene expression profiling have all contributed to the development of more targeted treatments. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents still have a role in mild disease and intra-articular steroid injections continue to be used most commonly in patients with oligoarticular JIA. Disease-modifying agents such as methotrexate have demonstrated efficacy and safety; however, in many patients, the disease remains active despite this treatment. These children now receive more targeted treatment including the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors, interleukin-1 blockade, interleukin-6 blockade, selective costimulation modulators and selective B-cell blockade. The biologic targeted therapies have changed the strategy in which we treat our children with JIA; however, there remains much to be learned about the long-term effects and safety of these medicines.

Safety and efficacy of adalimumab for moderate to severe Crohn's disease in children

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The IMAgINE 1 study (NCT00409682) evaluated the safety and efficacy of adalimumab double-blind maintenance dosing regimens following open-label induction for pediatric patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

We studied 192 patients with Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) scores >30 for whom conventional treatment was unsuccessful. Patients received open-label induction therapy with subcutaneous adalimumab at weeks 0 and 2 (160 mg and 80 mg, or 80 mg and 40 mg, for body weight ≥40 kg or <40 kg). At week 4, 188 patients were assigned to groups based on achievement of clinical response (defined as decrease in PCDAI ≥15 points from baseline; 155/188 [82.4%]) and prior exposure to infliximab (82/188 [43.6%]). Groups were given double-blind maintenance therapy with adalimumab at high (40 mg or 20 mg for body weight ≥40 kg or <40 kg; n = 93) or low doses (20 mg or 10 mg for body weight ≥40 kg or <40 kg; n = 95) every other week for 48 weeks. Clinical remission (PCDAI ≤10) at week 26 (the primary end point) was compared between groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for strata, with nonresponder imputation. Adverse events were monitored to evaluate safety.

RESULTS

A total of 152 of 188 patients (80.9%) completed all 26 weeks of the study. At week 26, 63 patients (33.5%) were in clinical remission, with no significant difference between high- and low-dose groups (36/93 [38.7%] vs 27/95 [28.4%]; P = .075). No new safety signals were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab induced and maintained clinical remission of children with CD, with a safety profile comparable to that of adult patients with CD. More children who received high compared with low dose were in remission at week 26, but the difference between dose groups was not statistically significant.

Biologics in children's autoimmune disorders: efficacy and safety

Advances in understanding the pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases have led to the discovery of mechanisms of inflammation and autoimmunity and have made possible the invention of new target-specific drugs. Biologic drugs, designed to inhibit specific components of the immune system, such as cytokines, cytokine gene expression, and their complex interactions, have revolutionized the treatment options in pediatric rheumatology. Only three agents are currently available for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): etanercept, at the dose of 0.8 mg/kg once weekly, adalimumab at the dose of 24 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks, and abatacept at the dose of 10 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 4, and then every 4 weeks. They are well tolerated and relatively safe in children: Side effects are generally mild and include injection site reactions and infections. Infliximab, rilonacept, and canakinumab are also approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of pediatric autoimmune disorders and are currently investigated in JIA. This review summarizes the current state of biologic drugs, their clinical application, and their efficacy and safety in the pediatric age.

Long-term efficacy of adalimumab in paediatric Crohn's disease patients naïve to other anti-TNF therapies

INTRODUCTION

Adalimumab is a fully-humanized anti-TNF a antibody that has showed its efficacy in Crohn's disease (CD) adult patients. Its less immunogenic composition seems to be an advantage compared to previous anti-TNF α, mainly infliximab. Good response to adalimumab has been reported in patients naïve to infliximab, in those in whom infliximab has shown no efficacy and in those intolerant or who have lost previous response to it. Adalimumab has shown also its efficacy as a second-line anti-TNF α in small series of paediatric CD but data regarding its use in children naïve to infliximab are scarce.

AIM

To report our experience with adalimumab as first line anti-TNF α treatment in paediatric CD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four CD paediatric patients (2 boys) previously naïve to infliximab have received adalimumab. Mean age at diagnosis: 13 years, 4 months. Adalimumab was initiated in our patients soon after diagnosis (mean time from diagnosis: 8.5 months, range: 1 month 15 days-14 months) at decreasing loading doses (160 mg and 80 mg two weeks after) and then 40 mg subsequently every two weeks.

RESULTS

The four patients entered in remission after the first dose of adalimumab (mean previous PCDAI: 35, mean PCDAI after first dose: 3.6). No adverse effects were registered. Azathioprine was stopped after 4 months of combination therapy, without loss of efficacy or adverse reactions attributable to immunogenicity. All the 4 patients have remained in remission on adalimumab monotherapy for a mean follow-up of 17 months (range 9-20 months).

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab has shown its efficacy in our paediatric CD patients naïve to other anti-TNF α drugs. Early introduction of anti-TNF α antibodies in these patients could help to a better control of the disease. Its less immunogenicity and the possibility of a home-based administration are advantages when compared to other parenteral anti-TNF treatments. Change to monotherapy after prior successful combination therapy with azathioprine and adalimumab is a safe strategy that can help to minimize possible risks of intensive immunomodulation.