Mycophenolate mofetil therapy for refractory inflammatory bowel disease

Real-world use of mycophenolate mofetil in inflammatory bowel disease: Results from the ENEIDA registry

BACKGROUND

Studies to evaluate the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited after the appearance of biological treatments.

AIMS

Our primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of MMF in IBD.

METHODS

IBD patients who had received MMF were retrieved from the ENEIDA registry. Clinical activity as per the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI), partial Mayo score (pMS), physician global assessment (PGA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were reviewed at baseline, at 3 and 6 months, and at final follow-up. Adverse events and causes of treatment discontinuation were documented.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were included (66 Crohn's disease, 17 ulcerative colitis), 90% of whom had previously received other immunosuppressants. In 61% of patients systemic steroids were used at initiation of MMF, and in 27.3% biological agents were co-administered with MMF. Overall clinical effectiveness was observed in 64.7% of the population. At the end of treatment, 45.6% and 19.1% of subjects showed remission and clinical response, respectively. MMF treatment was maintained for a median of 28.9 months (IQR: 20.4-37.5).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests, in the largest cohort to date, that MMF may be an effective alternative to thiopurines and methotrexate in IBD.

Treatment approaches to patients with multiple sclerosis and coexisting autoimmune disorders

The past decades have yielded major therapeutic advances in many autoimmune conditions - such as multiple sclerosis (MS) - and thus ushered in a new era of more targeted and increasingly potent immunotherapies. Yet this growing arsenal of therapeutic immune interventions has also rendered therapy much more challenging for the attending physician, especially when treating patients with more than one autoimmune condition. Importantly, some therapeutic strategies are either approved for several autoimmune disorders or may be repurposed for other conditions, therefore opening new curative possibilities in related fields. In this article, we especially focus on frequent and therapeutically relevant concomitant autoimmune conditions faced by neurologists when treating patients with MS, namely psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases. We provide an overview of the available disease-modifying therapies, highlight possible contraindications, show pathophysiological overlaps and finally present which therapeutics can be utilized as a combinatory treatment, in order to 'kill two birds with one stone'.

Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of mycophenolate mofetil targeting Nrf-2 and NLRP3 inflammasome in acetic acid induced ulcerative colitis in rats

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that increases the risk of colorectal cancer. UC is highly associated with the disturbance of the immune system leading to oxidative stress and chronic inflammation of intestine. Therefore, the current study was conducted to investigate the potential anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of MMF against acetic acid-induced UC that might be associated with the regulation of Nrf-2 and NLRP3 inflammasome signaling. UC was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats by intracolonic instillation of acetic acid. Forty-eight hours post UC induction, MMF (50 mg/kg/day, orally) was given for 8 consecutive days. Then, colon tissues and blood samples were collected. Results showed that MMF significantly attenuated the acetic acid-induced functional, biochemical, and inflammatory injuries in colon. MMF significantly decreased oxidative stress as indicated by the decreased malondialdehyde concentration and the increased total antioxidant capacity, glutathione, catalase, and superoxide dismutase concentrations in colon tissues. MMF also significantly increased Nrf-2 and decreased NLRP3 inflammasome expressions. Moreover, MMF decreased expression of interferon-gamma and increased expression of interferon-alpha. MMF also significantly decreased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18. These results suggest that MMF has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects against acetic acid-induced UC through the upregulation of Nrf-2, and INF-α expression in addition to the suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome and subsequent release of IL1β, IL-18 and INF-γ.

Indicators of active disease and steroid dependency in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases not treated with biologics in a German real-world-setting

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

While a minority of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients receives biologics in Germany, little is known about therapeutic needs of patients receiving non-biologic therapies. This study aimed to identify indicators of active disease/steroid dependency in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with conventional therapies and to describe health care resource use (HCRU)/cost.

METHODS

CD/UC patients treated with immunosuppressants (IS) and/or systemic or locally acting oral corticosteroids (CS) were identified in German claims data (2013-2017) and followed for 12 months post-therapy start. Indicators of active disease/steroid dependency during follow-up period were (i) ≥ 2 prescriptions of CS (sensitivity ≥ 4) or (ii) ≥ 1 IBD-related surgery or (iii) > 7 days IBD-related hospitalization(s).

RESULTS

Of 9871 included IBD patients (5170 CD, 4701 UC), 25.7%/19.9% (CD/UC) received ≥ 2 prescriptions of CS (sensitivity, 17.4%/15.7%) (i), 3.2% experienced IBD-related surgeries (ii), and 2.5% > 7 days of hospitalizations (iii). Altogether, 44.4% had indicators of active disease/steroid dependency (sensitivity, 23.9%). Among patients with active disease/steroid dependency, 78.0% received CS monotherapy at baseline. Of these, 89.6% received a CS monotherapy in the follow-up period, too. Proportionally, fewer patients with CS monotherapy (57.4%) than IS therapy (91.0%) visited a specialist. HCRU/cost per patient year was significantly higher in patients with than without active disease/steroid dependency.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial percentage of biologic-naïve IBD patients suffers from active disease/steroid dependency. The majority receives a monotherapy with systemic CS. Referral to gastroenterologists for treatment optimization is recommended, also because active disease/steroid dependency is associated with increased HCRU/cost.

Secondary causes of inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), conventionally consist of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis. They occur in individuals with high risk genotype for the disease in the setting of appropriate environmental factors. The pathogenesis of IBD involves a dysregulated autoimmune response to gut dysbiosis, which in turn is triggered due to exposure to various inciting environmental factors. But there is no clearly defined etiology of IBD and this type of disease is termed as “idiopathic IBD”, “classic IBD”, or “primary IBD”. We reviewed the current medical literature and found that certain etiological factors may be responsible for the development of IBD or IBD-like conditions, and we consider this form of de novo IBD as “secondary IBD”. Currently known factors that are potentially responsible for giving rise to secondary IBD are medications; bowel altering surgeries and transplantation of organs, stem cells or fecal microbiome. Medications associated with the development of secondary IBD include; immunomodulators, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents, anti-interleukin agents, interferons, immune stimulating agents and checkpoint inhibitors. Colectomy can in some cases give rise to de novo CD, pouchitis of the ileal pouch, or postcolectomy enteritis syndrome. After solid organ transplantation or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the recipient may develop de novo IBD or IBD flare. Fecal microbiota transplantation has been widely used to treat patients suffering from recurrent Clostridium difficile infection but can also causes IBD flares.

Pharmacogenetics: A strategy for personalized medicine for autoimmune diseases

For many years, a considerable number of patients with autoimmune diseases (ADs) have suffered from a lack of drug response and drug-related toxicity. Despite the emergence of new therapeutic options such as biological agents, patients continue to struggle with these problems. Unfortunately, new challenges, including the paradoxical effects of biological drugs, have complicated the situation. In recent decades, efforts have been made to predict drug response as well as drug-related side effects. Thanks to the many advances in genetics, evaluation of markers to predict drug response/toxicity before the initiation of treatment may be an avenue toward personalizing treatments. Implementing pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in the clinic could improve clinical care; however, obstacles remain to effective personalized medicine for ADs. The present study attempted to clarify the concept of pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics for ADs. After an overview on the pathogenesis of the most common types of treatments, this paper focuses on pharmacogenetic studies related to the selected ADs. Bridging the gap between pharmacogenetics and personalized medicine is also discussed. Moreover, the advantages, disadvantages and recommendations related to making personalized medicine practical for ADs have been addressed.

Mycophenolate mofetil is a valid option in patients with inflammatory bowel disease resistant to TNF-α inhibitors and conventional immunosuppressants

BACKGROUND

Few studies investigated the role of mycophenolate mofetil in inflammatory bowel disease, and none of them had specifically focused on patients with previous multiple intolerances and/or nonresponses to conventional immunosuppressants and biologics.

AIMS

To evaluate clinical benefit and tolerability profile of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and limited treatment options.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with previous multiple intolerances and/or nonresponses to immunosuppressants and biologics who started an off-label treatment with mycophenolate mofetil from January 2014 to February 2016 were entered in a prospectively maintained database.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included. Four weeks after initiation of mycophenolate mofetil therapy, a steroid-free remission was achieved in 4 patients (16.7%), while a clinical response in 13 (54.1%). At the end of follow-up, 12 patients (50.0%) remained on mycophenolate mofetil. Six achieved and maintained steroid-free remission throughout the study period (25.0%), and a further 6 patients (25.0%) achieved a clinical response with complete discontinuation of steroids. Twelve patients (50.0%) were considered as treatment failure, and five of them underwent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first experience reporting a clinical benefit and tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and multiple previous failures to other immunosuppressants and/or biologics.

Mycophenolate mofetil therapy in the management of inflammatory bowel disease--a retrospective case series and review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The role of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an immunomodulatory drug in managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is yet to be fully defined. We reviewed our experience of MMF in treating patients with IBD.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on all patients treated with MMF for inflammatory bowel disease between 2003 and 2011. Remission was assessed by reviewing clinical, endoscopic and laboratory indices.

RESULTS

We identified 36 patients, 23 male (64%), median age 46years (range 19-75). Nineteen patients had Crohn's disease, 16 with ulcerative colitis (UC), and one with indeterminate colitis. 33 patients (92%) had previously received azathioprine; 32 of whom discontinued this due to side-effects. 26 patients (72%) were concurrently taking oral corticosteroids. Median length of MMF treatment observed was 21.5months (IQR 9.7-31.6). At 8weeks, 29 patients (81%) had either achieved or maintained remission. After 6months, 19 of 33 patients (58%) were in sustained steroid-free remission. At the end of the observation period, 29 patients (81%) remained on MMF. 13 patients (36% of original treatment group; UC/IBDU 8, Crohn's 5) maintained steroid free remission. Median time in remission was 21.4months (IQR 11.0-30.0). Drug side-effects were experienced by 7 patients (19%), managed by dose reduction in 5 patients, with discontinuation in 2 (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mycophenolate mofetil may represent a promising treatment for inducing and maintaining remission in IBD patients intolerant of thiopurines. It may be of more value and relevance in ulcerative colitis, since less alternative proven therapies are available.

Current overview of extrinsic and intrinsic factors in etiology and progression of inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic, relapsing disorders affecting gastrointestinal (GI) tract and associated with intestinal mucosa damage and inflammation. The principal therapeutic goals in IBD include control of the intestinal inflammation and treatment of the major symptoms, mainly abdominal pain and diarrhea. Current therapeutic strategies for IBD rely on the use of non-specific anti-inflammatory agents and immunosuppressive drugs (e.g. aminosalicylates, monoclonal antibodies, and antibiotics), which cause severe side effects, and - in a significant number of patients - do not induce long-term benefits. In this review, we summarize the epidemiology and the most important risk factors of IBD, including genetic, immunological and environmental. Our main focus is to discuss pharmacological targets for current and future treatments of IBD.

What is left when anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases fails?

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic incurable conditions that primarily present in young patients. Being incurable, the IBDs may be part of the patient’s life for many years and these conditions require therapies that will be effective over the long-term. Surgery in Crohn’s disease does not cure the disease with endoscopic recurrent in up to 70% of patients 1 year post resection. This means that, the patient will require many years of medications and the goal of the treating physician is to induce and maintain long-term remission without side effects. The development of the anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) agents has been a magnificent clinical advance in IBD, but they are not always effective, with loss of response overtime and, at times, discontinuation is required secondary to side effects. So what options are available if of the anti-TNFα agents can no longer be used? This review aims to provide other options for the physician, to remind them of the older established medications like azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate, the less established medications like mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus as well as newer therapeutic options like the anti-integins, which block the trafficking of leukocytes into the intestinal mucosa. The location of the intestinal inflammation must also be considered, as topical therapeutic agents may also be worthwhile to consider in the long-term management of the more challenging IBD patient. The more options that are available the more likely the patient will be able to have tailored therapy to treat their disease and a better long-term outcome.

Review article: strategies for the management of chronic unremitting ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic active ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with significant morbidity, loss of productivity, increased colorectal cancer risk and cost. Up to 18% of patients suffer chronic active disease, with 30% requiring colectomy at 10 years. The management remains challenging given the relatively few clinical trials in this area.

AIM

To summarise the evidence regarding optimal management strategies for patients with chronic active UC of differing disease extents and degrees of treatment refractoriness.

METHOD

A literature search using the PubMed and Medline databases was performed. No time limit was set on article publication for inclusion.

RESULTS

The principles of management should focus on confirming disease activity, exclusion of alternative diagnoses, adherence and treatment escalation. Infliximab and topical tacrolimus are options in refractory proctitis, although the evidence for these therapies is limited. Both infliximab and adalimumab are effective in corticosteroid-refractory disease, although the proportions of patients achieving corticosteroid-free remission remain modest (24% at 30 weeks and 16.9% at 8 weeks respectively). Alternatives include ciclosporin and tacrolimus, and possibly methotrexate. Colectomy often leads to an improved quality of life; medical strategies unlikely to provide durable corticosteroid-free remission should not be pursued.

CONCLUSIONS

No current pharmacological treatment delivers mucosal healing in the majority of patients. Newer treatments such as vedolizumab and tofacitinib may represent valuable future therapies. Available medical options should be discussed with patients at every step of their management, with an honest appraisal of the evidence. Surgery should always be considered in patients with chronic refractory disease of any extent.

Drug-induced inflammatory bowel disease and IBD-like conditions

The pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is multifactorial and results from an interaction between genetic, immunologic, microbial, and environmental factors. Certain drugs could act as a trigger for the disease and have been implicated in the development of new onset IBD in a number a studies. These relationships are based on case reports and cohort studies, as proving this in the context of randomized controlled trials would be difficult. Drugs that have been linked to causing or worsening IBD include isotretinoin, antibiotics, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, oral contraceptives, mycophenolate mofetil, etanercept, ipilimumab, and rituximab. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy has also been associated with aphthoid lesions that may be confused with IBD. However, given the source of these reports we have to be cautious in the interpretation of the data before concluding that these drugs trigger IBD and what is being observed is not related to other confounding factors. Different pathogenic mechanisms have been suggested for the different drugs listed above. In order to clarify the confusion a comprehensive literature review was performed with the goal of advancing the knowledge on this subject.

Medical management of Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

The medical approach to Crohn's disease has been modified in recent years thanks to the introduction of new therapies, like biologics. Also, well-designed studies and systematic reviews have allowed better evaluation of the role of old drugs like steroids and immunosuppressors. This review aims to evaluate the recent evidence on the medical approach to Crohn's disease in the different settings of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses were included in the review. The research on all the studies discussed was based on the Cochrane Library, Medline and Embase, using the following medical subject headings: Crohn's disease, clinical trial, therapy, 5-aminosalicylic acid, steroid, budesonide, immunosuppressant, anti-meta-analysis TNF and biologics.

EXPERT OPINION

In a mild active inflammatory ileocecal disease, budesonide is considered the best approach. The efficacy of aminosalicylates is limited, but a trial that has recently compared aminosalicylates and budesonide has shown that the two drugs are comparable. In a mild colonic disease, sulfasalazine, antibiotics and steroids are effective but the evidence for antibiotics is less clear. The maintenance of remission in this setting is debatable, but sulfasalazine seems the better choice. In a moderate severe ileal and colonic disease, steroids are the best therapy to induce remission. Once remission is reached, immunosuppressors remain today the better choice to maintain the remission. Anti-TNF therapy is indicated in patients intolerant or not responding to steroids and immunosuppressors and in fistulizing Crohn's disease. Early therapy with biologics may be considered in patients with severe disease.

Physician perspectives on unresolved issues in the use of conventional therapy in Crohn's disease: results from an international survey and discussion programme

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Data on the optimal use of conventional therapies in Crohn's disease are lacking in guidelines. An educational programme was established to explore questions raised in clinical practice and to provide practical answers.

METHODS

Telephone interviews with 96 gastroenterologists and a web survey of 1370 gastroenterologists identified 26 key questions. Ten questions were taken forward to the next stage based on the opinion of an International Steering Committee. Draft answers to the questions were prepared from available evidence following a literature search. The draft answers were debated in national meetings of participating countries (n=36) and voted on using a standard scoring system. Revised answers went forward to an international meeting and were debated and voted on using the same methodology. Final answers were developed, based on evidence and clinical experience of the participants.

RESULTS

Evidence on corticosteroid and immunomodulator use such as dosage, timing and duration, choice of drug or regimen, and safety is scarce. Key points of the answers included the importance of: identifying patients with poor prognosis; early intervention with optimal doses of immunomodulators; avoiding prolonged or repetitive corticosteroid therapy; achieving corticosteroid-free remission; achieving a balance between clinical benefit and safety when intensifying or prolonging therapy or combining different agents; re-evaluating therapy at appropriate time points; and considering the role of biomarkers and mucosal healing.

CONCLUSIONS

The answers to 10 key questions were based on available evidence and clinical experience of programme participants. It is hoped they will be of practical use in everyday gastroenterology practice.

Efficacy and tolerability of methotrexate therapy for refractory Crohn's disease: a large single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials demonstrate that methotrexate is effective in inducing remission and preventing relapse of Crohn's disease (CD) as a first-line immunosuppressant, but efficacy data after failure with, or intolerance to, thiopurines are limited.

AIMS

To report efficacy of methotrexate in a cohort of refractory CD patients, most of whom had not responded to, or were intolerant of, thiopurines.

METHODS

Data were collected for patients receiving methotrexate for active CD. Response to methotrexate induction therapy at 4 months, and sustained clinical benefit at last point of follow-up with maintenance therapy, were assessed via physician's global assessment. Demographic and disease factors predicting response, or sustained clinical benefit, were examined by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-six [38 (54%) female patients, mean age at diagnosis 29.4 years] patients received methotrexate between 2001 and 2010, 61 (92%) of whom received the drug parenterally. Sixty patients had failed, or were intolerant of, thiopurines. Response to therapy at 4 months occurred in 54 (82%) patients. However, sustained clinical benefit occurred in only 19 (29%) patients at last point of follow-up, including six patients who discontinued the drug for family planning reasons. No predictors of response or sustained clinical benefit were identified. Adverse events occurred in 20 (30%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that methotrexate is effective in terms of initial response in Crohn's disease patients who have failed, or are intolerant of, thiopurines. However, efficacy is not sustained in the long term.

Fulminant ulcerative colitis despite maximal immunosuppression following liver transplantation: a case report and literature review

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is thought to be the result of an overly aggressive immune response to ubiquitous antigens. Immuno -modulation and -suppression is therefore currently the treatment of choice. It was long anticipated that the course of pre-existing IBD should improve after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) due to increased immunosuppression. We report the case of a patient who developed acute fulminant colitis despite triple immunosuppression and mesalazine and review the relevant literature.

Review article: the role of non-biological drugs in refractory inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Up to one-third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not respond to, or are intolerant of conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Although biological agents are alternative treatments, they may not be suitable or available to some patients.

AIM

To review the evidence for use of nonbiological drugs in the treatment of patients with IBD refractory to corticosteroids or thiopurines.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed for English language publications with predetermined search criteria to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Published evidence from uncontrolled series and controlled clinical trials has been used to produce a practical approach relevant to clinical practice which incorporates the indication, optimal dose, and side effects of various therapies including tacrolimus, methotrexate, thalidomide, tioguanine, mycophenolate mofotil, leucocyte apheresis, nutritional therapy, antibiotics, probiotics, allopurinol, rectal acetarsol and ciclosporin in the treatment of patients with refractory ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Approaches to optimise thiopurine efficacy are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD refractory to corticosteroids or thiopurines may respond to alternative anti-inflammatory chemical molecules, but the evidence base for many of these alternatives is limited and further trials are needed.

New and emerging therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases

The inflammatory bowel diseases have undergone an explosion of discovery in the last 10 years. The overwhelming focus of this has been in genetics and immune mechanisms of disease. While the former has provided critical information on predisposing factors, the latter has resulted in a panoply of novel immune-based therapies and technologies. These range from an improved approach to the use of conventional immunomodulators, such as azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine, to commonplace availability of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents such as infliximab and adalimumab, through to small molecule inhibition of immune mediators. Unusual treatments, such as helminth infestation, stem cell transplantation, and leucocytapheresis, all derive from the burgeoning understanding of pathogenesis. Most important to our successful use of these therapies will be a fundamental understanding of the patient phenotypes and genotypes that will dictate particular treatment approaches in the future.

Use of mycophenolate mofetil in inflammatory bowel disease

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prospectively in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients intolerant or refractory to conventional medical therapy.

METHODS: Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis/IBD unclassified (UC/IBDU) patients intolerant or refractory to conventional medical therapy received MMF (500-2000 mg bid). Clinical response was assessed by the Harvey Bradshaw index (HBI) or colitis activity index (CAI) after 2, 6 and 12 mo of therapy, as were steroid usage and adverse effects.

RESULTS: Fourteen patients (9 CD/5 UC/IBDU; 8M/6F; mean age 50.4 years, range 28-67 years) were treated and prospectively assessed for their response to oral MMF. Of the 11 patients who were not in remission on commencing MMF, 7/11 (63.6%) achieved remission by 8 wk. All 3 patients in remission on commencing MMF maintained their remission. Ten patients were still on MMF at 6 mo with 9/14 (64.3%) in remission, while of 12 patients followed for 12 mo, 8 were in remission without dose escalation (66.7%). Three patients were withdrawn from the MMF due to drug intolerance. There were no serious adverse events attributed due to the medication.

CONCLUSION: MMF demonstrated efficacy in the management of difficult IBD. MMF appeared safe, well tolerated and efficacious for both short and long-term therapy, without the need for dose escalation. Further evaluation of MMF comparing it to conventional immunosuppressants is required.

Therapy of ulcerative colitis: state of the art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in conventional therapy, novel targets and therapeutic goals are the highlights of treatment for ulcerative colitis in the last year. There have also been disappointments. This review summarizes the highs and lows, with an emphasis on strategy as opposed to seeking the newest treatment option.

RECENT FINDINGS

In conventional therapy, once daily therapy for 5-aminosalicylic acid is generally sufficient. Furthermore, a new 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalamine MMX) has been released that effectively induces and maintains remission. There have been reappraisals of immunomodulators and further evaluation of (yes, now conventional!) infliximab for ulcerative colitis. Opportunistic infections, long-term outcomes and the burden of disease are being characterized. New therapeutic targets included an antibody against T cells (anti-CD3), but trials on visilizumab for acute severe colitis have been suspended. T-cell costimulation, phosphatidylcholine to promote barrier function, new anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, B-cell (anti-CD20) depletion and complementary therapies represent new therapeutic horizons. International agreement is needed on activity indices, definitions of remission, therapeutic goals (including mucosal healing) and outcomes that matter to patients, so that trials can be compared.

SUMMARY

Advances will take time to alter mainstream practice, but 2007-2008 is the year of organized strategies, with European, American and British guidelines on ulcerative colitis published or in press. These should be the platform for better outcomes for patients.