Effect of various forms of postmenopausal hormone therapy on the risk of ovarian cancer-A population-based case control study from Finland

Effects of menopausal hormone therapy on the risk of ovarian cancer: Health Insurance Database in South Korea-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of ovarian cancer associated with hormone therapy regimens using a Korean population-based study.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used national health checkup and insurance data from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2019, provided by Korea's National Health Insurance Service. Women older than 40 years who recorded "menopause" in the questionnaire from 2002 to 2011 were included in this study. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) preparations were classified into tibolone, combined estrogen plus progestin by the manufacturer, combined estrogen plus progestin by physician, estrogen, and topical estrogen groups. The number of participants recorded as menopausal during the national health examination between 2002 and 2011 was 2,506,271. The MHT and non-MHT groups consisted of 373,271 and 1,382,653 patients, respectively. The hazard ratios (HR) of ovarian cancer according to MHT type, age at inclusion, body mass index, region, socioeconomic status, Charlson comorbidity index, age at menarche, age at menopause, parity, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, and period from menopause to inclusion were evaluated.

RESULTS

The risk of ovarian cancer was reduced in the tibolone group (HR, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.93; P = 0.003) and in patients in rural areas (HR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.845-0.98; P = 0.013). The risk of ovarian cancer was not related to the other MHT treatments.

CONCLUSION

Tibolone was associated with a lower risk of ovarian cancer. No other MHT was associated with ovarian cancer.

Management of postmenopausal women: Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) and Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement (GEMVi) Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The aim of these recommendations is to set forth an individualized approach to the management of early postmenopausal women (i.e., within the first 10 years after natural menopause) covering all aspects of lifestyle and therapeutic management, with or without menopause hormone therapy (MHT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of French expert opinion. Recommendations were graded according to the HAS methodology and levels of evidence derived from the international literature, except when there was no good-quality evidence.

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

The beginning of menopause is an ideal time for each woman to evaluate her health status by assessing her bone, cardiovascular, and cancer-related risk factors that may be amplified by postmenopausal estrogen deficiency and by reviewing her lifestyle habits. Improving lifestyle, including nutrition and physical activity, and avoiding risk factors (notably smoking), should be recommended to all women. MHT remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms but it could be also recommended as first-line treatment for the prevention of osteoporosis in early postmenopausal women at low to moderate risk for fracture. The risks of MHT differ depending on its type, dose, duration of use, route of administration, timing of initiation, and whether a progestogen is used. There is reasonable evidence that using transdermal estradiol in association with micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone may limit both the venous thromboembolic risk associated with oral estrogens and the risk of breast cancer associated with synthetic progestins. Treatment should be individualized to each woman, by using the best available evidence to maximize benefits and minimize risks, with periodic reevaluation of its benefit-risk balance. For bothersome genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) symptoms, vaginal treatment with lubricants and moisturizers is recommended as first-line treatment together with low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy, depending on the clinical course. No recommendation of an optimal duration of MHT can be made, but it must take into consideration the initial indication for MHT as well as each woman's benefit-risk balance. Management of gynecological side-effects of MHT is also examined. These recommendations are endorsed by the Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement hormonal (GEMVI) and the Collège National des Gynécologues-Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF).

Parity, menopausal hormone therapy, and risk of ovarian granulosa cell tumor - A population-based case-control study

OBJECTIVE

Adult-type ovarian granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) are hormonally active neoplasms with limited epidemiological data available. We evaluated the effect of parity and postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) use on the risk of AGCT in a population-based case-control setting.

METHODS

We identified all women diagnosed with AGCT during 1994-2015 (n = 505) from the Finnish Cancer Registry. For each case, five controls matched for age were selected from the National Population Registry, which also provided data on parity and ages at deliveries. Information on postmenopausal HT by different regimens (estradiol-only, sequential estrogen-progestin and continuous estrogen-progestin) was obtained from nationwide Prescription Register. The association between parity, ages at deliveries, HT use, and AGCT incidence was evaluated by odds ratios (ORs) using a conditional logistic regression model and stratified by age at index date (<55 years or ≥ 55 years).

RESULTS

Parity and age at first or last delivery had no significant effect on AGCT risk. Systemic postmenopausal HT had been used by 20.4% of women who were later diagnosed with AGCT. The risk for subsequent AGCT was significantly decreased among users of estradiol-only therapy for at least five years (OR 0.28; 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.94) and continuous estradiol-progestin therapy for 6 months to 5 years (0.23; 0.08-0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike in epithelial ovarian cancer, AGCT development is not clearly associated with parity, and users of postmenopausal HT do not seem to carry an excess risk for AGCT formation.

Impact of parity on the incidence of ovarian cancer subtypes: a population-based case-control study

BACKGROUND

Parity is known to have a protective effect as regards ovarian cancer, but its effect on the different histological subtypes of ovarian cancer is not well known. The impact of parity on the incidence of ovarian cancer subtypes was studied.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All Finnish women diagnosed 1994-2013 with ovarian cancer for the first time were included. Altogether, 5412 cases of ovarian cancer were identified in the Finnish Cancer Registry and stratified according to morphology into serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell and others. Five age-matched controls were randomly selected for each case from the Finnish National Population Registry. Data on postmenopausal hormonal therapy were derived from the Registry of Prescribed drugs and used as cofactors. Multivariate conditional logistic regression for matched case-control data was used to examine the associations between parity parameters and ovarian cancer risk.

RESULTS

Parous women had lower risk than nulliparous women in getting ovarian cancer of any type under age of 55 years. The odds ratio (OR) for serous cancer was 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.77), for mucinous cancer 0.66 (0.52-0.83), for endometrioid cancer 0.52 (0.40-0.68), for clear-cell cancer 0.30 (0.19-0.46) and for other types 0.59 (0.43-0.80). In women aged 55 or older, the respective ORs were 0.86 (0.75-0.99), 0.78 (0.57-1.07), 0.61 (0.47-0.79), 0.44 (0.29-0.66) and 0.74 (0.57-0.95), adjusted for hormone therapy. Number of childbirths was associated with a trend toward reduction of risk, especially in serous and clear-cell cancers. Higher age at first birth was associated with higher risk of clear-cell cancer but otherwise age at first or last birth did not have an impact on the incidence of cancer subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Childbirths decrease the risk of all histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer in women in premenopausal and postmenopausal age.

Cigarette Smoking and Estrogen-Related Cancer

Cigarette smoking is a known cause of many cancers, yet epidemiologic studies have found protective associations with the risk of four "estrogen-related" malignancies: endometrial cancer, endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancers, and thyroid cancer. This review considers epidemiologic and biological aspects of these associations, focusing particularly on estrogen signaling, and contrasts them with those for breast cancer, another estrogen-related malignancy. The observational findings regarding the inverse associations are consistent and remain after adjustment for possible confounding factors. In general, women who smoke do not have lower circulating estrogen levels than nonsmokers, eliminating one possible explanation for reduced risks of these malignancies. For endometrial and endometrioid ovarian cancer, the negative associations could plausibly be explained by interference with signaling through the estrogen receptor α. However, this is unlikely to explain the lower risks of thyroid and clear cell ovarian cancers. For thyroid cancer, an anti-inflammatory effect of nicotine and reduced TSH levels from smoking have been proposed explanations for the inverse association, but both lack convincing evidence. While the overall impact of cigarette smoking is overwhelmingly negative, protective associations such as those discussed here can provide potential clues to disease etiology, treatment, and prevention.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in reducing risk of ovarian cancer

Background

Ovarian carcinoma (OC) is one of the most widespread tumors in the world and is characterized by low survival rates.

Objective

To determine whether the levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system (LNG‐IUS) can prevent OC.

Search strategy

The literature until December 2020 were systematically reviewed according to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42019137957).

Selection criteria

Studies assessing the impact of LNG‐IUS on the risk of OC were included.

Data collection and analysis

Data were extracted independently by two authors to ensure accuracy and consistency.

Main results

A total of 34 323 records were obtained, of which three satisfied the inclusion criteria. In total, 1687 events of OC in a population of 20 461 311 person‐years were considered. Data pooling revealed that the use of LNG‐IUS did not confer a lower risk of OC relative to the never‐use of LNG‐IUS, with an estimated odds ratio of 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.41–1.08; I² = 84%; P = 0.002).

Conclusion

The meta‐analysis did not demonstrate a preventive role of LNG‐IUS on OC. However, it was carried out on a few papers, and a definitive conclusion on the topic still cannot be drawn. Further studies are indicated in the future to define the impact of LNG‐IUS on OC.

The meta‐analysis carried out on three papers did not demonstrate a preventive role of the levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine device on ovarian cancer.

[Menopause hormone treatment in practice. Postmenopausal women management: CNGOF and GEMVi clinical practice guidelines]

Menopause Hormonal Treatment (MHT) was initially developed to correct the climacteric symptoms induced by postmenopausal estrogen deficiency. In non-hysterectomized women, MHT combines estrogens and a progestogen, the latter opposing the negative impact of estrogen on endometrial proliferation. In France, and contrary to the USA and Northern European countries, MHT mainly combines 17β-estradiol, which is the physiological estrogen produced by the ovary, and progesterone or its derivative, dihydrogesterone. France has been a pioneer in the development of cutaneous administration routes (gel or transdermal patch) for estradiol, allowing better metabolic tolerance and a reduction of the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to the oral route. The choice of the doses as well as the treatment regimen is underpinned by tolerance as well as acceptance and compliance. The risk of breast cancer, which is one of the main risks of MHT, is higher with estro-progestogen combinations than with estrogens alone ; the preferential use of progesterone or dihydrogesterone being likely to limit the excess risk of breast cancer associated with MHT at least for duration of treatment of less than 5 to 7 years. The question of the optimal duration of MHT remains an issue and must take into account the initial indication of treatment as well as the benefit-risk balance, which is specific to each woman. Continuation of MHT is conditioned by the benefit-risk balance, which must be evaluated regularly, but also by the evolution of symptoms when MHT is stopped as well as menopause-related health risks or induced by MHT. After stopping MHT, it is necessary to maintain a medical follow-up to be adapted to the clinical situation of each woman and in particular, her cardiovascular and gynecological risk factors.

Prior uterine myoma and risk of ovarian cancer: a population-based case-control study

Objective

Uterine myoma which results in the magnitude of ovarian cancer remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the association between women with previous uterine myoma and the risk of ovarian cancer.

Methods

This population-based case-control study was conducted using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between 2006 and 2010. We identified 4,088 adult women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer with 16,348 women without ovarian cancer matched for age, urbanization level, income and initial diagnosis date. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the variables associated with ovarian cancer. In addition, the effect of surgical interventions on the risk of ovarian cancer was also evaluated.

Results

Women with previous uterine myoma were more likely than those who did not to have ovarian cancer (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.06−2.49). Patients with uterine myoma who either received (aOR=1.79; 95% CI=1.51−2.13) or did not receive hormone replacement therapy (aOR=2.51; 95% CI=2.24−2.82) experienced a significantly higher risk of ovarian cancer than those without uterine myoma, respectively. However, patients with uterine myoma who underwent either myomectomy (aOR=0.55; 95% CI=0.39−0.77) or hysterectomy (aOR=0.33; 95% CI=0.26−0.42) had a significantly lower risk of ovarian cancer.

Conclusion

The results revealed that a significantly higher risk of ovarian cancer in women with previous uterine myoma, through an indirect mechanism. Furthermore, a lower risk of ovarian cancer was observed in women who underwent surgical removal of the uterine myoma.

Screening and Prevention for High-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary Based on Carcinogenesis-Fallopian Tube- and Ovarian-Derived Tumors and Incessant Retrograde Bleeding

High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common and lethal subtype of ovarian carcinoma. Many HGSCs are now believed to originate in the fallopian tube epithelium; ovarian surface epithelium is another possible origin. Thus, current screening methods, i.e., ultrasonography and serum CA-125 measurements, have a limitation in their early detection. Recently, circulating biomarkers, such as tumor DNA, autoantibody, and microRNA, have been investigated to detect HGSCs. As cancer cells in the fallopian tube flow into the endometrial cavity, the detection of exfoliated cells, tumor DNA, and proteome from samples obtained from the endometrial cavity or the cervix may be useful. The risk of ovarian serous carcinoma is affected by the use of oral contraceptive and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). MHT regimens causing endometrial bleeding increase serous carcinoma risk, hence, incessant retrograde bleeding from the endometrial cavity into the Douglas pouch appears to play an important role in high-grade serous carcinogenesis. In this review, we provide an overview of current and novel screening methods and prevention approaches for ovarian and fallopian tube HGSC.

Menopausal hormone therapy treatment options and ovarian cancer risk: A Swedish prospective population-based matched-cohort study

Although menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) seemingly increases the risk of ovarian cancer, evidence is insufficient whether the risk varies between various MHT formulations, regimens and administration modes. With the aim of filling these knowledge gaps, we investigated the effect of different MHT treatment options on the risk of ovarian cancer. This prospective Swedish population-based matched-cohort study included all women ≥40 years having used systemic MHT between 2005 and 2012 (288,950 ever-users), group-level matched (1:3) to 866,546 nonusers. MHT use was ascertained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Registry and data was linked to several national health data registries. Multivariable conditional logistic regression provided odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for parity, and comorbidities. Current EP-MHT use was associated with a modestly increased risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.18-1.62), while no consistent risk was found among past users (OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.84-1.18). Current continuous testosterone derived (OR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.15-1.96) regimens increased the risk whereas progesterone derived (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.00-2.21) regimens increased the risk marginally. Nonsignificant positive associations were observed for sequential regimens (OR = 1.87, 95% CI 0.70-5.08; OR = 1.54, 95% CI 0.96-2.47, respectively). An inverse relationship was observed for all E-MHT use (OR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.22-0.29), but this association might partly be explained by underreporting of oophorectomies or tubal ligations. Current cutaneous EP-MHT (OR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.81-2.02) suggested a possibly lower risk than oral MHT (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.25-1.75). In conclusion EP-MHT, notably continuous regimens, were associated with a modestly increased risk of ovarian cancer. The role of E-MHT requires further clarification.

Age at last birth and risk of developing epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

Background: Many epidemiologic studies have explored the association between age at last birth (ALB) and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer, but the results remain controversial. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Med Online for relevant articles published up to April 2019. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effect model. Dose-response relationship was assessed by restricted cubic spline model. Results: Thirteen articles with 19,959 cases and 2,451,071 participants were included in our meta-analysis, and we found that ALB was negatively associated with epithelial ovarian cancer. The pooled RR (95% CI) of epithelial ovarian cancer for the highest versus the lowest stratification of ALB was 0.77 (0.65-0.91). Furthermore, significantly negative associations were shown in case-control studies (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60-0.88), studies conducted in North America (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.60-0.84), studies with adjustment for parity (RR: 0.76; 95%CI: 0.63-0.93), studies with adjustment for tubal ligation (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.58-0.94), in the subgroup analysis. In dose-response analysis, the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer decreased nonlinearly with the increase of ALB, and the negative results become significant when ALB was 22.5 years old. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggested that ALB was negatively associated with the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. The risk of epithelial ovarian cancer decreased gradually with the ALB for women.

Menopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Findings by epidemiologic studies on menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and the risk of ovarian cancer are inconsistent. This study aimed to assess the association of menopausal HRT with the risk of ovarian cancer by histological subtype. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and EmBase for relevant articles published from inception to August 2018. Pooled relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined with a random-effects model. Results: Thirty-six studies involving 4, 229, 061 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled RR of ovarian cancer was 1.29 (95%CI 1.19-1.40, I ² = 57.4%) for menopausal HRT. In subgroup analysis by study design, pooled RRs of ovarian cancer in cohort and case-control studies were 1.35 (95%CI 1.19-1.53) and 1.24 (95%CI 1.11-1.38), respectively. In subgroup analysis by continent, association of menopausal HRT with ovarian cancer was significant for North America (1.41 [1.23-1.61]), Europe (1.22 [1.12-1.34]), and Asia (1.76 [1.09-2.85]), but not Australia (0.96 [0.57-1.61]). Association differed across histological subtypes. Increased risk was only found for two common types, including serous (1.50 [1.35-1.68]) and endometrioid (1.48 [1.13-1.94]) tumors. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that menopausal HRT may increase the risk of ovarian cancer, especially for serous and endometrioid tumors.

The role of menopausal hormone therapy in women with or at risk of ovarian and breast cancers: Misconceptions and current directions

For women who are candidates for menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), estrogen can provide relief from symptomatic menopause, decrease rates of chronic illnesses, and improve health-related quality of life. However, confusion surrounds the evidence regarding the impact of exogenous estrogen and progesterone on the breast and ovary. Available data regarding the risks of MHT (estrogen and/or progestin) related to the development of breast and ovarian cancer are often inconsistent or incomplete. Modern molecular and genetic techniques have improved our understanding of the heterogeneity of breast and ovarian cancer. This enhanced understanding of the disease has impacted our understanding of carcinogenesis. Treatment options have evolved to be more targeted toward hormonal therapy for certain subtypes of disease, whereas cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the standard for other histological and molecular subtypes. The role of MHT in the breast and ovarian cancer survivor, as well as women who are at high risk for the development of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, remains controversial despite evidence that this treatment can improve quality of life and survival outcomes. Through this article, we examine the evidence for and against the use of MHT with a focus on women who have or are at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer.

Premenopausal Hysterectomy and Risk of Ovarian Cancer in African-American Women

Although the inverse association between hysterectomy and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) was considered well established, investigators in recent studies including women diagnosed after 2000 have observed modest increases in risk. Most studies have been conducted in white women with little representation of African-American women. We examined the relationship between premenopausal hysterectomy and EOC in African-American women and explored whether hormone therapy (HT) modified this association in 614 cases and 743 controls enrolled in the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (2010-2015). Premenopausal hysterectomy was inversely associated with the odds of EOC (odds ratio (OR) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56, 1.01). Qualitative interaction by estrogen-only HT was present; among never users of estrogen-only HT, premenopausal hysterectomy was associated with a significantly decreased odds of EOC (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.92), whereas among users of estrogen-only HT, a positive association was observed (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.76, 3.84). In a population of African-American women diagnosed after 2000, our overall results are consistent with the inverse association observed in the era before 2000, yet the effect modification by HT suggests that HT use among women who have had hysterectomies may negate the protective effects of hysterectomy on EOC, creating the appearance of a null or slightly increased risk.

Impact of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use on the cancer risk of the ovary and fallopian tube

BACKGROUND

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is used for contraception and heavy menstrual bleeding. A long-term hormone therapy can modify the risk of gynecologic cancers. Little is known about the impact of LNG-IUS use on the risk for invasive and borderline ovarian tumor subtypes or for primary fallopian tube carcinoma. We examined the associations of LNG-IUS use with these tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified from the national Medical Reimbursement Registry of Finland the women aged 30-49 years who had used LNG-IUS for menorrhagia in 1994-2007, and from the Finnish Cancer Registry ovarian cancers and primary fallopian tube carcinomas diagnosed before the age of 55 and by the end of 2013.

RESULTS

A total of 77 invasive ovarian cancers and seven primary fallopian tube carcinoma cases were diagnosed in a cohort of 93 843 LNG-IUS users during the follow-up of 1 083 126 women-years. The LNG-IUS users had decreased risk for both invasive ovarian cancer [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.73] and for borderline ovarian tumors (SIR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-0.99) as compared to the background population. The risk of primary fallopian tube carcinoma was not increased (SIR 1.22, 95% CI 0.49-2.50). Decreased risks for mucinous (SIR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-0.87), endometrioid (SIR 0.55, 95% CI 0.28-0.98), and serous ovarian carcinomas (SIR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55-0.99) were seen in LNG-IUS users.

CONCLUSIONS

LNG-IUS use associated with decreased risk for both invasive and borderline ovarian tumors. The incidence of primary fallopian tube carcinoma did not significantly differ between LNG-IUS users and the background population.

Identifying post-menopausal women at elevated risk for epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

We developed and validated a hybrid risk classifier combining serum markers and epidemiologic risk factors to identify post-menopausal women at elevated risk for invasive fallopian tube, primary peritoneal, and ovarian epithelial carcinoma.

METHODS

To select epidemiologic risk factors for use in the classifier, Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted using 74,786 Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Observational Study (OS) participants. To construct a combination classifier, 210 WHI OS cases and 536 matched controls with serum marker measurements were analyzed; validation employed 143 cases and 725 matched controls from the WHI Clinical Trial (CT) with similar data.

RESULTS

Analyses identified a combination risk classifier composed of two elevated-risk groups: 1) women with CA125 or HE4 exceeding a 98% specificity threshold; and 2) women with intact fallopian tubes, prior use of menopausal hormone therapy for at least two years, and either a first degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer or a personal history of breast cancer. In the WHI OS population, it classified 13% of women as elevated risk, identifying 30% of ovarian cancers diagnosed up to 7.8years post-enrollment (Hazard Ratio [HR]=2.6, p<0.001). In the WHI CT validation population, it classified 8% of women as elevated risk, identifying 31% of cancers diagnosed within 7years of enrollment (HR=4.6, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

CA125 and HE4 contributed significantly to a risk prediction classifier combining serum markers with epidemiologic risk factors. The hybrid risk classifier may be useful to identify post-menopausal women who would benefit from timely surgical intervention to prevent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy-also use of estradiol plus levonorgestrel-intrauterine system is associated with an increased risk of primary fallopian tube carcinoma

Data on the possible impact of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on the incidence of rare primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) are scarce. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide case-control study analyzing the association between the use of different HTs and PFTC. All women aged 50 years or older with an incident PFTC (n = 360) during 1995-2007 were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. For each case of PFTC, ten age- and place of residence-matched controls were selected from the Finnish National Population Register, which also provided information on parity. Data on HT purchases were received from the Prescription Register, and data on hysterectomies and sterilizations from the National Care Register. Controls with a salpingectomy before the PFTC diagnosis of the respective case were excluded. The PFTC risk in relation to different HTs was estimated with a conditional logistic regression model, adjusted for parity, age at last delivery, hysterectomy and sterilization. The use for five years or more of estradiol combined with levonorgestrel-releasing-intrauterine system (odds ratio 2.84, 95% confidence interval 1.10-7.38) and sequential estradiol-progestin therapy (EPT; 3.37; 2.23-5.08) were both linked with increases in the risk of PFTC, while the risk with use of estradiol-only therapy or continuous EPT was not statistically significantly increased. The OR for the use of tibolone for one year or more was 1.56 (0.55-4.41). The use of HT is related to an increased risk of PFTC, particularly when a progestin component is intrauterine or systemic progestin is given in sequential manner.

Cancer risk in women with 10 or more deliveries

OBJECTIVE

To determine cancer incidence among Finnish women with 10 or more deliveries.

METHODS

Finnish women with at least 10 childbirths before December 31, 2010 (n=4,967) were identified from the Finnish Population Register and followed for cancer incidence through the Finnish Cancer Registry to the end of 2010. Cancer risks in this cohort were expressed as ratios between observed and expected numbers of cases (standardized incidence ratios), both drawn from the Finnish Cancer Registry, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Total cancer incidence was markedly lower than in the reference population (656 cases, standardized incidence ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.73-0.79). There was clearly less breast (0.44, 0.35-0.53), ovarian (0.49, 0.28-0.80), endometrial (0.31, 0.17-0.44), and basal cell skin cancer (0.72, 0.60-0.85) than in the reference population. The incidence of thyroid cancer (2.33, 1.59-3.29), lip cancer (2.87, 1.05-6.24), and uterine sarcoma (3.41, 1.47-6.72) was markedly increased.

CONCLUSION

Women with 10 or more deliveries show a decreased overall cancer incidence as a result of decreased risks of cancers of the ovary, endometrium, and breast and basal cell carcinoma of the skin. The increased risks were observed in thyroid cancer and some rare cancer types.

Use of CA125 and HE4 serum markers to predict ovarian cancer in elevated-risk women

BACKGROUND

Serum markers are used before pelvic imaging to improve specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of ovarian cancer multimodal screening strategies.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled pilot trial to estimate surgical PPV of a "2 of 3 tests positive" screening rule, and to compare use of HE4 as a first-line (Arm 1) versus a second-line (Arm 2) screen, in women at high and elevated risk for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) at five study sites. Semiannual screening was offered to 208 women ages 25 to 80 years with deleterious BRCA germline mutations and to 834 women ages 35 to 80 years with pedigrees suggesting inherited susceptibility. Annual screening was offered to 130 women ages 45 to 80 years (Risk Group 3) with epidemiologic and serum marker risk factors. Rising marker levels were identified using the parametric empirical Bayes algorithm.

RESULTS

Both strategies yielded surgical PPV above 25%. Protocol-indicated surgery was performed in 6 women, identifying two ovarian malignancies and yielding a surgical PPV in both arms combined of 33% (95% confidence interval: 4%-78%), 25% in Arm 1 and 50% in Arm 2. Surgical consultation was recommended for 37 women (26 in Arm 1 and 11 in Arm 2). On the basis of 12 women with at least 2 of 3 tests positive (CA125, HE4, or imaging), an intent-to-treat analysis yielded PPV of 14% in Arm 1 and 20% in Arm 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive screens were more frequent when HE4 was included in the primary screen.

IMPACT

HE4 may be useful as a confirmatory screen when rising CA125 is used alone as a primary screen.