1
|
Luo Q, Quan Y, Liu W, Wu Z, Qiu W, Liang W, Yang P, Huang Q, Li G, Wei J, Wang Q, Shen F, Li W, He F, Cao J. Seed and Soil: Consensus Molecular Subgroups (CMS) and Tumor Microenvironment Features Between Primary Lesions and Metastases of Different Organ Sites in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2024; 16:225-243. [PMID: 38525373 PMCID: PMC10961079 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s441675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) are mainly used for biological interpretability and clinical stratification of colorectal cancer (CRC) in primary tumors (PT) but few in metastases. The heterogeneity of CMS distribution in metastases and the concordance of CMS between PT and metastases still lack sufficient study. We used CMS to classify CRC metastases and combine it with histopathological analysis to explore differences between PT and distant metastases. Patients and Methods We obtained gene expression profiles for 942 PT samples from TCGA database (n=376) and GEO database (n=566), as well as 442 metastasis samples from GEO database. Among these, 765 PT samples and 442 metastasis samples were confidently identified with CMS using the "CMS classifier" and enrolled for analysis. Clinicopathological manifestation and CMS classification of CRC metastases were assessed with data from GEO, TCGA, and cBioPortal. Overall, 105 PT-metastasis pairs were extracted from 10 GEO datasets to assess CMS concordance. Tumor microenvironment (TME) features between PT and metastases were analyzed by immune-stromal infiltration with ESTIMATE and xCell algorithms. Finally, TME features were validated with multiplex immunohistochemistry in 27 PT-metastasis pairs we retrospectively collected. Results Up to 64% of CRC metastases exhibited concordant CMS groups with matched PT, and the TME of metastases was similar to that of PT. For most common distant metastases, liver metastases were predominantly CMS2 and lung and peritoneal metastases were mainly CMS4, highlighting "seed" of tumor cells of different CMS groups had a preference for metastasis to "soil" of specific organs. Compared with PT, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) reduced in liver metastases, CD4+T cells and M2-like macrophages increased in lung metastases, and M2-like macrophages and CAF increased in peritoneal metastases. Conclusion Our findings underscore the importance of CMS-guided specific organ monitoring and treatment post-primary tumor surgery for patients. Differences in immune-stromal infiltration among different metastases provide targeted therapeutic opportunities for metastatic CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingqing Luo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yibo Quan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zixin Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenjing Qiu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenlong Liang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ping Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qing Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Guanwei Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianchang Wei
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qiang Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fei Shen
- Department of Thyroid Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wanglin Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Feng He
- Department of Nephrology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jie Cao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stahler A, Hoppe B, Na IK, Keilholz L, Müller L, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Goekkurt E, Kasper S, Kind AJ, Kurreck A, Alig AHS, Held S, Reinacher-Schick A, Heinemann V, Horst D, Jarosch A, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Consensus Molecular Subtypes as Biomarkers of Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Maintenance Therapy With or Without Panitumumab in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PanaMa, AIO KRK 0212). J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2975-2987. [PMID: 37018649 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) were evaluated as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) with or without panitumumab (Pmab) after Pmab + mFOLFOX6 induction within the randomized phase II PanaMa trial. METHODS CMSs were determined in the safety set (ie, patients that received induction) and full analysis set (FAS; ie, randomly assigned patients who received maintenance) and correlated with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since the start of induction or maintenance treatment and objective response rates (ORRs). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI were calculated by univariate/multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Of 377 patients of the safety set, 296 (78.5%) had available CMS data: CMS1/2/3/4: 29 (9.8%)/122 (41.2%)/33 (11.2%)/112 (37.8%) and unclassifiable: 17 (5.7%). The CMSs were prognostic biomarkers in terms of PFS (P < .0001), OS (P < .0001), and ORR (P = .02) since the start of induction treatment. In FAS patients (n = 196), with CMS2/4 tumors, the addition of Pmab to FU/FA maintenance therapy was associated with longer PFS (CMS2: HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.95], P = .03; CMS4: HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.38 to 1.03], P = .07) and OS (CMS2: HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.52 to 1.52], P = .66; CMS4: HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.96], P = .04). The CMS interacted significantly with treatment in terms of PFS (CMS2 v CMS1/3: P = .02; CMS4 v CMS1/3: P = .03) and OS (CMS2 v CMS1/3: P = .03; CMS4 v CMS1/3: P < .001). CONCLUSION The CMS had a prognostic impact on PFS, OS, and ORR in RAS wild-type mCRC. In PanaMa, Pmab + FU/FA maintenance was associated with beneficial outcomes in CMS2/4, whereas no benefit was observed in CMS1/3 tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arndt Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beeke Hoppe
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Il-Kang Na
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, ECRC Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luisa Keilholz
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Munich Hospital Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg, Germany
- University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Jay Kind
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Anke Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - David Horst
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Armin Jarosch
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zaharia C, Veen T, Lea D, Kanani A, Alexeeva M, Søreide K. Histopathological Growth Pattern in Colorectal Liver Metastasis and The Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010181. [PMID: 36612177 PMCID: PMC9818232 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Almost half of all patients with colorectal cancer present with or eventually develop metastasis, most frequently in the liver. Understanding the histopathological growth patterns and tumor immune microenvironment of colorectal liver metastases may help determine treatment strategies and assess prognosis. A literature search was conducted to gather information on cancer biology, histopathological growth patterns, and the tumor immune microenvironment in colorectal liver metastases, including their mechanisms and their impact on clinical outcomes. A first consensus on histopathological growth patterns emerged in 2017, identifying five growth patterns. Later studies found benefits from a two-tier system, desmoplastic and non-desmoplastic, incorporated into the updated 2022 consensus. Furthermore, the tumor immune microenvironment shows additional characteristic features with relevance to cancer biology. This includes density of T-cells (CD8+), expression of claudin-2, presence of vessel co-option versus angiogenesis, as well as several other factors. The relation between histopathological growth patterns and the tumor immune microenvironment delineates distinct subtypes of cancer biology. The distinct subtypes are found to correlate with risk of metastasis or relapse, and hence to clinical outcome and long-term survival in each patient. In order to optimize personalized and precision therapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases, further investigation into the mechanisms of cancer biology and their translational aspects to novel treatment targets is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Zaharia
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Torhild Veen
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Dordi Lea
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Arezo Kanani
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Marina Alexeeva
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, N-7804 Bergen, Norway
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pretzsch E, Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Bender A, Chen S, Holch JW, Hofmann FO, Ren H, Bösch F, Küchenhoff H, Werner J, Angele MK. EMT-Related Genes Have No Prognostic Relevance in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer as Opposed to Stage II/III: Analysis of the Randomised, Phase III Trial FIRE-3 (AIO KRK 0306; FIRE-3). Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225596. [PMID: 36428688 PMCID: PMC9688410 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is no standard treatment after resection of colorectal liver metastases and the role of systemic therapy remains controversial. To avoid over- or undertreatment, proper risk stratification with regard to postoperative treatment strategy is highly needed. We recently demonstrated the prognostic relevance of EMT-related (epithelial-mesenchymal transition) genes in stage II/III CRC. As EMT is a major step in CRC progression, we now aimed to analyse the prognostic relevance of EMT-related genes in stage IV CRC using the study cohort of the FIRE-3 trial, an open-label multi-centre randomised controlled phase III trial of patients with metastatic CRC. METHODS Overall and progression free survival were considered as endpoints (n = 350). To investigate the prognostic relevance of EMT-related genes on either endpoint, we compared predictive performance of different models using clinical data only to models using gene data in addition to clinical data, expecting better predictive performance if EMT-related genes have prognostic value. In addition to baseline models (Kaplan Meier (KM), (regularised) Cox), Random Survival Forest (RSF), and gradient boosted trees (GBT) were fit to the data. Repeated, nested five-fold cross-validation was used for hyperparameter optimisation and performance evaluation. Predictive performance was measured by the integrated Brier score (IBS). RESULTS The baseline KM model showed the best performance (OS: 0.250, PFS: 0.251). None of the other models were able to outperform the KM when using clinical data only according to the IBS scores (OS: 0.253 (Cox), 0.256 (RSF), 0.284 (GBT); PFS: 0.254 (Cox), 0.256 (RSF), 0.276 (GBT)). When adding gene data, performance of GBT improved slightly (OS: 0.262 vs. 0.284; PFS: 0.268 vs. 0.276), however, none of the models performed better than the KM baseline. CONCLUSION Overall, the results suggest that the prognostic relevance of EMT-related genes may be stage-dependent and that EMT-related genes have no prognostic relevance in stage IV CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Pretzsch
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, partner site 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, partner site 80336 Munich, Germany
- Department of Hematology/Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Bender
- Statistical Consulting Unit, StaBLab, Department of Statistics, LMU Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany
- Munich Center for Machine Learning, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Shuo Chen
- Munich Center for Machine Learning, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Walter Holch
- Department of Hematology/Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Felix Oliver Hofmann
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, partner site 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Haoyu Ren
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Bösch
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Helmut Küchenhoff
- Statistical Consulting Unit, StaBLab, Department of Statistics, LMU Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Konrad Angele
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-44000; Fax: +49-89-440075474
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Epithelial and Stromal Characteristics of Primary Tumors Predict the Bone Metastatic Subtype of Prostate Cancer and Patient Survival after Androgen-Deprivation Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215195. [PMID: 36358614 PMCID: PMC9659192 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Metastatic prostate cancer is a lethal disease and metastasis-specific treatments need to be developed. Mechanisms driving metastases and primary tumor growth could be different, but this is largely unexplored. We previously discovered that bone metastases can be separated into transcriptomic-based subtypes, showing different responses to standard androgen-deprivation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer. One subtype, named MetB, is particularly aggressive and has the worst prognosis. Here, we describe similarities and differences between primary tumors and their metastases, and specifically examine if the development of specific subtype of bone metastases can be predicted by analyzing the primary tumor. Results show that many aspects of prostate cancer bone metastases morphology are related to those in the primary tumor, while others are not. Importantly, men with primary tumors with high cell proliferation and low cellular PSA expression tend to develop metastases enriched for the MetB subtype, have poor prognosis, and need complementary treatment to standard hormone treatment. Abstract Prostate cancer (PC) bone metastases can be divided into transcriptomic subtypes, by us termed MetA-C. The MetB subtype, constituting about 20% of the cases, is characterized by high cell cycle activity, low androgen receptor (AR) activity, and a limited response to standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Complementary treatments should preferably be introduced early on if the risk of developing metastases of the MetB subtype is predicted to behigh. In this study, we therefore examined if the bone metastatic subtype and patient outcome after ADT could be predicted by immunohistochemical analysis of epithelial and stromal cell markers in primary tumor biopsies obtained at diagnosis (n = 98). In this advanced patient group, primary tumor International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade was not associated with outcome or metastasis subtype. In contrast, high tumor cell Ki67 labeling (proliferation) in combination with low tumor cell immunoreactivity for PSA, and a low fraction of AR positive stroma cells in the primary tumors were prognostic for poor survival after ADT. Accordingly, the same tissue markers were associated with developing metastases enriched for the aggressive MetB subtype. The development of the contrasting MetA subtype, showing the best response to ADT, could be predicted by the opposite staining pattern. We conclude that outcome after ADT and metastasis subtype can, at least to some extent, be predicted by analysis of primary tumor characteristics, such as tumor cell proliferation and PSA expression, and AR expression in stromal cells.
Collapse
|
6
|
Peters NA, Constantinides A, Ubink I, van Kuik J, Bloemendal HJ, van Dodewaard JM, Brink MA, Schwartz TP, Lolkema MP, Lacle MM, Moons LM, Geesing J, van Grevenstein WM, Roodhart JML, Koopman M, Elias SG, Borel Rinkes IH, Kranenburg O. Consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4)-targeted therapy in primary colon cancer: A proof-of-concept study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:969855. [PMID: 36147916 PMCID: PMC9486194 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.969855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundMesenchymal Consensus Molecular Subtype 4 (CMS4) colon cancer is associated with poor prognosis and therapy resistance. In this proof-of-concept study, we assessed whether a rationally chosen drug could mitigate the distinguishing molecular features of primary CMS4 colon cancer.MethodsIn the ImPACCT trial, informed consent was obtained for molecular subtyping at initial diagnosis of colon cancer using a validated RT-qPCR CMS4-test on three biopsies per tumor (Phase-1, n=69 patients), and for neoadjuvant CMS4-targeting therapy with imatinib (Phase-2, n=5). Pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies were analyzed by RNA-sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Imatinib-induced gene expression changes were associated with molecular subtypes and survival in an independent cohort of 3232 primary colon cancer.ResultsThe CMS4-test classified 52/172 biopsies as CMS4 (30%). Five patients consented to imatinib treatment prior to surgery, yielding 15 pre- and 15 post-treatment samples for molecular analysis. Imatinib treatment caused significant suppression of mesenchymal genes and upregulation of genes encoding epithelial junctions. The gene expression changes induced by imatinib were associated with improved survival and a shift from CMS4 to CMS2.ConclusionImatinib may have value as a CMS-switching drug in primary colon cancer and induces a gene expression program that is associated with improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niek A. Peters
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Alexander Constantinides
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Inge Ubink
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Joyce van Kuik
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Haiko J. Bloemendal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine/Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Menno A. Brink
- Department of Gastroenterology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - Thijs P. Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | | | - Miangela M. Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leon M. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Joost Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wilhelmina M.U. van Grevenstein
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jeanine M. L. Roodhart
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G. Elias
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Inne H.M. Borel Rinkes
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Inne H.M. Borel Rinkes, ; Onno Kranenburg,
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Inne H.M. Borel Rinkes, ; Onno Kranenburg,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Strating E, Wassenaar E, Verhagen M, Rauwerdink P, van Schelven S, de Hingh I, Rinkes IB, Boerma D, Witkamp A, Lacle M, Fodde R, Volckmann R, Koster J, Stedingk K, Giesel F, de Roos R, Poot A, Bol G, Lam M, Elias S, Kranenburg O. Fibroblast activation protein identifies Consensus Molecular Subtype 4 in colorectal cancer and allows its detection by 68Ga-FAPI-PET imaging. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:145-155. [PMID: 35296803 PMCID: PMC9276750 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01748-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In colorectal cancer (CRC), the consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4) is associated with therapy resistance and poor prognosis. Clinical diagnosis of CMS4 is hampered by locoregional and temporal variables influencing CMS classification. Diagnostic tools that comprehensively detect CMS4 are therefore urgently needed. Methods To identify targets for molecular CMS4 imaging, RNA sequencing data of 3232 primary CRC patients were explored. Heterogeneity of marker expression in relation to CMS4 status was assessed by analysing 3–5 tumour regions and 91.103 single-tumour cells (7 and 29 tumours, respectively). Candidate marker expression was validated in CMS4 peritoneal metastases (PM; n = 59). Molecular imaging was performed using the 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-46 PET tracer. Results Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) mRNA identified CMS4 with very high sensitivity and specificity (AUROC > 0.91), and was associated with significantly shorter relapse-free survival (P = 0.0038). Heterogeneous expression of FAP among and within tumour lesions correlated with CMS4 heterogeneity (AUROC = 1.00). FAP expression was homogeneously high in PM, a near-homogeneous CMS4 entity. FAPI-PET identified focal and diffuse PM that were missed using conventional imaging. Extra-peritoneal metastases displayed extensive heterogeneity of tracer uptake. Conclusion FAP expression identifies CMS4 CRC. FAPI-PET may have value in the comprehensive detection of CMS4 tumours in CRC. This is especially relevant in patients with PM, for whom effective imaging tools are currently lacking. ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Strating
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Emma Wassenaar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paulien Rauwerdink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van Schelven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Inne Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen Witkamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Riccardo Fodde
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Richard Volckmann
- Department of Oncogenomics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Koster
- Department of Oncogenomics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kris Stedingk
- Department of Oncogenomics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Giesel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Remmert de Roos
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alex Poot
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Guus Bol
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix Lam
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Sjoerd Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ahluwalia P, Mondal AK, Ahluwalia M, Sahajpal NS, Jones K, Jilani Y, Gahlay GK, Barrett A, Kota V, Rojiani AM, Kolhe R. Clinical and molecular assessment of an onco-immune signature with prognostic significance in patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Med 2022; 11:1573-1586. [PMID: 35137551 PMCID: PMC8921909 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding the complex tumor microenvironment is key to the development of personalized therapies for the treatment of cancer including colorectal cancer (CRC). In the past decade, significant advances in the field of immunotherapy have changed the paradigm of cancer treatment. Despite significant improvements, tumor heterogeneity and lack of appropriate classification tools for CRC have prevented accurate risk stratification and identification of a wider patient population that may potentially benefit from targeted therapies. To identify novel signatures for accurate prognostication of CRC, we quantified gene expression of 12 immune‐related genes using a medium‐throughput NanoString quantification platform in 93 CRC patients. Multivariate prognostic analysis identified a combined four‐gene prognostic signature (TGFB1, PTK2, RORC, and SOCS1) (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.05–2.95, *p < 0.02). The survival trend was captured in an independent gene expression data set: GSE17536 (177 patients; HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.99–5.55, *p < 0.01) and GSE14333 (226 patients; HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.35–4.53, *p < 0.01). Further, gene set enrichment analysis of the TCGA data set associated higher prognostic scores with epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and inflammatory pathways. Comparatively, a lower prognostic score was correlated with oxidative phosphorylation and MYC and E2F targets. Analysis of immune parameters identified infiltration of T‐reg cells, CD8+ T cells, M2 macrophages, and B cells in high‐risk patient groups along with upregulation of immune exhaustion genes. This molecular study has identified a novel prognostic gene signature with clinical utility in CRC. Therefore, along with prognostic features, characterization of immune cell infiltrates and immunosuppression provides actionable information that should be considered while employing personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pankaj Ahluwalia
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ashis K Mondal
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Nikhil S Sahajpal
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kimya Jones
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yasmeen Jilani
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Gagandeep K Gahlay
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India
| | - Amanda Barrett
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Vamsi Kota
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amyn M Rojiani
- Department of Pathology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA
| | - Ravindra Kolhe
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Garcia-Vicién G, Mezheyeuski A, Micke P, Ruiz N, Ruffinelli JC, Mils K, Bañuls M, Molina N, Losa F, Lladó L, Molleví DG. Spatial Immunology in Liver Metastases from Colorectal Carcinoma according to the Histologic Growth Pattern. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030689. [PMID: 35158957 PMCID: PMC8833601 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In the era of immunotherapy, the tumor microenvironment (TME) has attracted special interest. However, colorectal liver metastases (CRC-LM) present histological peculiarities that could affect the interaction of immune and tumor cells such as fibrotic encapsulation and dense intratumoral stroma. We explored the spatial distribution of lymphocytic infiltrates in CRC-LM in the context of the histologic growth patterns using multispectral digital pathology providing data on three different scenarios, tumor periphery, invasive margin, and central tumoral areas. Our results illustrate a similar poor cell density of CD8+ cells between different metastases subtypes in intratumoral regions. However, in encapsulated metastases, cytotoxic cells reach the tumor cells while remaining retained in stromal areas in non-encapsulating metastases. Some aspects are still unresolved, such as understanding the reason why most lymphocytes are largely retained in the capsule. Abstract Colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRC-LM) present differential histologic growth patterns (HGP) that determine the interaction between immune and tumor cells. We explored the spatial distribution of lymphocytic infiltrates in CRC-LM in the context of the HGP using multispectral digital pathology. We did not find statistically significant differences of immune cell densities in the central regions of desmoplastic (dHGP) and non-desmoplastic (ndHGP) metastases. The spatial evaluation reported that dHGP-metastases displayed higher infiltration by CD8+ and CD20+ cells in peripheral regions as well as CD4+ and CD45RO+ cells in ndHGP-metastases. However, the reactive stroma regions at the invasive margin (IM) of ndHGP-metastases displayed higher density of CD4+, CD20+, and CD45RO+ cells. The antitumor status of the TIL infiltrates measured as CD8/CD4 reported higher values in the IM of encapsulated metastases up to 400 μm towards the tumor center (p < 0.05). Remarkably, the IM of dHGP-metastases was characterized by higher infiltration of CD8+ cells in the epithelial compartment parameter assessed with the ratio CD8epithelial/CD8stromal, suggesting anti-tumoral activity in the encapsulating lesions. Taking together, the amount of CD8+ cells is comparable in the IM of both HGP metastases types. However, in dHGP-metastases some cytotoxic cells reach the tumor nests while remaining retained in the stromal areas in ndHGP-metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Garcia-Vicién
- Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Gran Via 197-203, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; (G.G.-V.); (N.R.); (J.C.R.); (K.M.); (M.B.); (N.M.); (F.L.); (L.L.)
| | - Artur Mezheyeuski
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, S-75105 Uppsala, Sweden;
- Correspondence: (A.M.); (D.G.M.); Tel.: +34-93-260-7370 (D.G.M.); Fax: +34-93-260-7466 (D.G.M.)
| | - Patrick Micke
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, S-75105 Uppsala, Sweden;
| | - Núria Ruiz
- Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Gran Via 197-203, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; (G.G.-V.); (N.R.); (J.C.R.); (K.M.); (M.B.); (N.M.); (F.L.); (L.L.)
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - José Carlos Ruffinelli
- Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Gran Via 197-203, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; (G.G.-V.); (N.R.); (J.C.R.); (K.M.); (M.B.); (N.M.); (F.L.); (L.L.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Català d’Oncologia, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Kristel Mils
- Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Gran Via 197-203, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; (G.G.-V.); (N.R.); (J.C.R.); (K.M.); (M.B.); (N.M.); (F.L.); (L.L.)
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - María Bañuls
- Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Gran Via 197-203, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; (G.G.-V.); (N.R.); (J.C.R.); (K.M.); (M.B.); (N.M.); (F.L.); (L.L.)
| | - Natàlia Molina
- Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Gran Via 197-203, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; (G.G.-V.); (N.R.); (J.C.R.); (K.M.); (M.B.); (N.M.); (F.L.); (L.L.)
| | - Ferran Losa
- Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Gran Via 197-203, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; (G.G.-V.); (N.R.); (J.C.R.); (K.M.); (M.B.); (N.M.); (F.L.); (L.L.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Català d’Oncologia, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Laura Lladó
- Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Gran Via 197-203, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; (G.G.-V.); (N.R.); (J.C.R.); (K.M.); (M.B.); (N.M.); (F.L.); (L.L.)
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - David G. Molleví
- Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Gran Via 197-203, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; (G.G.-V.); (N.R.); (J.C.R.); (K.M.); (M.B.); (N.M.); (F.L.); (L.L.)
- Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Institut Català d’Oncologia, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Correspondence: (A.M.); (D.G.M.); Tel.: +34-93-260-7370 (D.G.M.); Fax: +34-93-260-7466 (D.G.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ten Hoorn S, Sommeijer DW, Elliott F, Fisher D, de Back TR, Trinh A, Koens L, Maughan T, Seligmann J, Seymour MT, Quirke P, Adams R, Richman SD, Punt CJA, Vermeulen L. Molecular subtype-specific efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer is dependent on the chemotherapy backbone. Br J Cancer 2021; 125:1080-1088. [PMID: 34253874 PMCID: PMC8505637 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01477-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient selection for addition of anti-EGFR therapy to chemotherapy for patients with RAS and BRAF wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer can still be optimised. Here we investigate the effect of anti-EGFR therapy on survival in different consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) and stratified by primary tumour location. METHODS Retrospective analyses, using the immunohistochemistry-based CMS classifier, were performed in the COIN (first-line oxaliplatin backbone with or without cetuximab) and PICCOLO trial (second-line irinotecan with or without panitumumab). Tumour tissue was available for 323 patients (20%) and 349 (41%), respectively. RESULTS When using an irinotecan backbone, anti-EGFR therapy is effective in both CMS2/3 and CMS4 in left-sided primary tumours (progression-free survival (PFS): HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.75, P = 0.003 and HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.36, P < 0.001, respectively) and in CMS4 right-sided tumours (PFS HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.71, P = 0.02). Efficacy using an oxaliplatin backbone was restricted to left-sided CMS2/3 tumours (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.96, P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS The subtype-specific efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy is dependent on the chemotherapy backbone. This may provide the possibility of subtype-specific treatment strategies for a more optimal use of anti-EGFR therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne Ten Hoorn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, LEXOR, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirkje W Sommeijer
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, LEXOR, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Flevohospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Faye Elliott
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - David Fisher
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tim R de Back
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, LEXOR, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Trinh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lianne Koens
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Maughan
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jenny Seligmann
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew T Seymour
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Phil Quirke
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard Adams
- Centre for Trials Research Cardiff University and Velindre Hospital, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Susan D Richman
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Louis Vermeulen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, LEXOR, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eide PW, Moosavi SH, Eilertsen IA, Brunsell TH, Langerud J, Berg KCG, Røsok BI, Bjørnbeth BA, Nesbakken A, Lothe RA, Sveen A. Metastatic heterogeneity of the consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. NPJ Genom Med 2021; 6:59. [PMID: 34262039 PMCID: PMC8280229 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-021-00223-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Gene expression-based subtypes of colorectal cancer have clinical relevance, but the representativeness of primary tumors and the consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) for metastatic cancers is not well known. We investigated the metastatic heterogeneity of CMS. The best approach to subtype translation was delineated by comparisons of transcriptomic profiles from 317 primary tumors and 295 liver metastases, including multi-metastatic samples from 45 patients and 14 primary-metastasis sets. Associations were validated in an external data set (n = 618). Projection of metastases onto principal components of primary tumors showed that metastases were depleted of CMS1-immune/CMS3-metabolic signals, enriched for CMS4-mesenchymal/stromal signals, and heavily influenced by the microenvironment. The tailored CMS classifier (available in an updated version of the R package CMScaller) therefore implemented an approach to regress out the liver tissue background. The majority of classified metastases were either CMS2 or CMS4. Nonetheless, subtype switching and inter-metastatic CMS heterogeneity were frequent and increased with sampling intensity. Poor-prognostic value of CMS1/3 metastases was consistent in the context of intra-patient tumor heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter W Eide
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Seyed H Moosavi
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ina A Eilertsen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tuva H Brunsell
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jonas Langerud
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kaja C G Berg
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bård I Røsok
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn A Bjørnbeth
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Sveen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ten Hoorn S, de Back TR, Sommeijer DW, Vermeulen L. Clinical Value of Consensus Molecular Subtypes in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 114:503-516. [PMID: 34077519 PMCID: PMC9002278 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) capture tumor heterogeneity at the gene-expression level. Currently, a restricted number of molecular features are used to guide treatment for CRC. We summarize the evidence on the clinical value of the CMSs. Methods We systematically identified studies in Medline and Embase that evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of CMSs in CRC patients. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed on prognostic data. Predictive data were summarized. Results In local disease, CMS4 tumors were associated with worse overall survival (OS) compared with CMS1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.27 to 8.47) and CMS2 cancers (HR = 2.60, 95% confidence interval = 1.93 to 3.50). In metastatic disease, CMS1 consistently had worse survival than CMS2-4 (OS HR range = 0.33-0.55; progression-free survival HR range = 0.53-0.89). Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III CRC was most beneficial for OS in CMS2 and CMS3 (HR range = 0.16-0.45) and not effective in CMS4 tumors. In metastatic CMS4 cancers, an irinotecan-based regimen improved outcome compared with oxaliplatin (HR range = 0.31-0.72). The addition of bevacizumab seemed beneficial in CMS1, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy improved outcome for KRAS wild-type CMS2 patients. Conclusions The CMS classification holds clear potential for clinical use in predicting both prognosis and response to systemic therapy, which seems to be independent of the classifier used. Prospective studies are warranted to support implementation of the CMS taxonomy in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne Ten Hoorn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, LEXOR, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim R de Back
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, LEXOR, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirkje W Sommeijer
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, LEXOR, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Flevohospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospitaalweg 1, 1315 RA, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Louis Vermeulen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, LEXOR, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Okamoto T, duVerle D, Yaginuma K, Natsume Y, Yamanaka H, Kusama D, Fukuda M, Yamamoto M, Perraudeau F, Srivastava U, Kashima Y, Suzuki A, Kuze Y, Takahashi Y, Ueno M, Sakai Y, Noda T, Tsuda K, Suzuki Y, Nagayama S, Yao R. Comparative Analysis of Patient-Matched PDOs Revealed a Reduction in OLFM4-Associated Clusters in Metastatic Lesions in Colorectal Cancer. Stem Cell Reports 2021; 16:954-967. [PMID: 33711267 PMCID: PMC8072036 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastasis is the major cause of cancer-related death, but whether metastatic lesions exhibit the same cellular composition as primary tumors has yet to be elucidated. To investigate the cellular heterogeneity of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), we established 72 patient-derived organoids (PDOs) from 21 patients. Combined bulk transcriptomic and single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis revealed decreased gene expression of markers for differentiated cells in PDOs derived from metastatic lesions. Paradoxically, expression of potential intestinal stem cell markers was also decreased. We identified OLFM4 as the gene most strongly correlating with a stem-like cell cluster, and found OLFM4+ cells to be capable of initiating organoid culture growth and differentiation capacity in primary PDOs. These cells were required for the efficient growth of primary PDOs but dispensable for metastatic PDOs. These observations demonstrate that metastatic lesions have a cellular composition distinct from that of primary tumors; patient-matched PDOs are a useful resource for analyzing metastatic CRC. Seventy-two PDOs were established from 21 stage IV CRC patients Forty-one DEGs were identified between primary and corresponding metastatic PODs scRNA-seq analysis identified OLFM4 as a potential cancer stem cell marker Different roles of OLFM4+ cells in primary and metastatic PDOs were demonstrated
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Okamoto
- Department of Cell Biology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - David duVerle
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Yaginuma
- Department of Cell Biology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuko Natsume
- Department of Cell Biology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hitomi Yamanaka
- Department of Cell Biology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kusama
- Department of Cell Biology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayuko Fukuda
- Department of Cell Biology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayuko Yamamoto
- Department of Cell Biology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fanny Perraudeau
- Graduate Group in Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Upasna Srivastava
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yukie Kashima
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ayako Suzuki
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuuta Kuze
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masashi Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiharu Sakai
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Noda
- Director's Room, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Tsuda
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yutaka Suzuki
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nagayama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryoji Yao
- Department of Cell Biology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zou Y, Hu X, Zheng S, Yang A, Li X, Tang H, Kong Y, Xie X. Discordance of immunotherapy response predictive biomarkers between primary lesions and paired metastases in tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EBioMedicine 2020; 63:103137. [PMID: 33310681 PMCID: PMC7736926 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several biomarkers predict the efficacy of immunotherapy, which is essential for selecting patients who would potentially benefit. Discordant status of these biomarkers between primary tumours and paired metastases has been increasingly revealed. We aimed to comprehensively summarize the incidence of this phenomenon. Methods Databases were searched to identify studies reporting primary-to-metastatic conversion of biomarkers, including programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), PD-L2, tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL), tumour mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI). Findings 56 studies with 2739 patients were included. The pooled discordance rate of PD-L1 was 22%. The percentage of PD-L1 changed from positive to negative was 41%, whereas that from negative to positive was 16%. The discordance rate for PD-1 and PD-L2 was 26% and 22%, respectively. TIL level was found with a discordance rate of 39%, and changes from high to low (50%) occurred more than that from low to high (16%). No significant difference in TMB was observed between two sites in most studies. MSI status discordance was found in 6% patients, with a percentage of 9% from MSI-high to microsatellite instable (MSS) and 0% from MSS to MSI-high. Interpretation Our study demonstrates that PD-L1, PD-1, PD-L2, and TIL level had high frequency of discordance, while TMB and MSI status were less likely to change between primary tumours and paired metastases. Therefore, evaluating those frequently altered biomarkers of both primary and metastatic tumours is strongly recommended for precise clinical decision of immune checkpoint treatment. Fund The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872152).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutian Zou
- Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoqian Hu
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
| | - Shaoquan Zheng
- Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Anli Yang
- Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Xing Li
- Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Hailin Tang
- Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanan Kong
- Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xiaoming Xie
- Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|