M-EA (methotrexate, etoposide, dactinomycin) and EMA-CO (methotrexate, etoposide, dactinomycin / cyclophosphamide, vincristine) regimens as first-line treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

Maximizing ovarian function and fertility following chemotherapy in premenopausal patients: Is there a role for ovarian suppression?

As more premenopausal patients undergo fertility preserving cancer treatments, there is an increased need for fertility counseling and ovarian sparing strategies. Many patients receive gonadotoxic chemotherapeutic agents which can put them at risk of primary ovarian insufficiency or profoundly diminished ovarian reserve. Traditionally, estradiol and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) values have been used to evaluate ovarian function but more recently, reproductive endocrinologists have been proponents of anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) as a validated measure of ovarian potential. While the gold standard for fertility preservation remains oocyte cryopreservation, data suggest there may be additional interventions that can mitigate the gonadotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents. The main objectives of this focused review were to quantify the risk of primary ovarian failure associated with the most common chemotherapies used in treatment of gynecologic cancers and to evaluate and recommend potential interventions to mitigate toxic effects on ovarian function. Chemotherapeutic agents can cause direct loss of oocytes and primordial follicles as well as stromal and vascular atrophy and the extent is dependent upon mechanism of action and age of the patient. The risk of ovarian failure is the highest with alkylating agents (42.2 %), anthracyclines (<10-34 % in patients under 40 years versus 98 % in patients aged 40-49), taxanes (57.1 %) and platinum agents (50 %). Multiple trials demonstrate that gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, when administered concurrently with chemotherapy, may have protective effects, with more patients experiencing resumption of a regular menstruation pattern and recovering ovarian function more quickly post-treatment. Premenopausal patients receiving chemotherapy for the treatment of gynecologic cancers should receive adequate counseling on the potential adverse effects on their fertility. Although oocyte cryopreservation remains the gold standard for fertility preservation, there is some evidence to suggest that GNRH agonists could help maintain and preserve ovarian function and should be considered.

Patients' experience of menopausal symptoms post-chemotherapy treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

PURPOSE

We aimed to explore patient's experience of chemotherapy-induced menopausal symptoms; to ascertain how patients tried to alleviate their symptoms and how health professionals supported them in order to identify current unmet needs.

METHODS

We designed a retrospective cross-sectional exploratory study of a sample of 11 women who received multi-agent combination chemotherapy for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia. Postal surveys using the Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) questionnaire followed up by semi-structured telephone interviews were used. Framework analysis technique was used to generate descriptions of patient's experiences.

RESULTS

Symptoms of feeling tired or lacking in energy, loss of interest in sex, muscle and joint pains and difficulty in concentrating affected participants the most. The menopausal symptoms appear to be temporary; symptoms such as hot flushes and night sweats seem to subside with resumption of menses. Others are more gradual with some evidence that mental health takes longer to recover. Regarding potential symptoms, some women do not retain the information given to them at discharge following end of treatment, which GTD services need to take into consideration when supporting patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients need to be more optimally prepared for post-chemotherapy recovery with each patient's needs and support being individually tailored. How information is discussed and disseminated needs improving to ensure patients retain the information they receive at discharge. Recommendations include the creation of menopause information booklet, alongside further developing virtual nurse-led follow up clinics post chemotherapy.

Management of trophoblastic tumors : review of evidence, current practice, and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a group of rare tumors characterized by abnormal trophoblastic proliferation following pregnancy including invasive moles, choriocarcinomas, and intermediate trophoblastic tumors (ITT). Although the treatment and follow-up of GTN has been heterogeneous, globally the emergence of expert networks has helped to harmonize its management.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an overview of the current knowledge, diagnosis, and management strategies in GTN and discuss innovative therapeutic options under investigation. While chemotherapy has been the historical backbone of GTN treatment, promising drugs such as immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors are currently being investigated remodeling the therapeutical landscape of trophoblastic tumors.

EXPERT OPINION

Chemotherapy regimens for GTN have potential long-term effects on fertility and quality of life, making innovative and less toxic therapeutic approaches necessary. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promise in reversing immune tolerance in GTN and have been evaluated in several trials. However, immunotherapy is associated with rare but life-threatening adverse events and evidence of immune-related infertility in mice, highlighting the need for further research and careful consideration of its use. Innovative biomarkers could help personalize GTN treatments and reduce chemotherapy burden in some patients.

Efficacy analysis of single-agent carboplatin AUC4 2-weekly as second-line therapy for methotrexate-resistant (MTX-R) low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN)

BACKGROUND

Approximately one-third of patients with low-risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (WHO 0-6) develop methotrexate-resistance (MTX-R). In the UK, subsequent treatment with either actinomycin-D (ActD) or multi-agent combination chemotherapy has depended on whether the hCG was above or below an hCG threshold. To reduce exposure to combination chemotherapy (CC), over the years the UK service has raised this threshold as well as using single-agent carboplatin AUC6 3-weekly at MTX-R instead of CC. Updated results for carboplatin demonstrate an 86% complete hCG response (hCG CR) but associated with haematological dose-limiting toxicity.

METHODS

In 2017, single-agent carboplatin became the national standard second-line treatment following MTX-R at hCG of >3000 IU/L. Carboplatin was changed to two-weekly AUC4 scheduling and continued until normal hCG plus 3 consolidation cycles. For patients failing to respond, CC (Etoposide-Actinomycin-D or EMA-CO) was introduced.

RESULTS

22 evaluable patients with a median hCG at MTX-R of 10,147 IU/L (IQR 5527-19,639) received carboplatin AUC4 2-weekly (median no. of cycles = 6, IQR 2-8). Of these, 36% achieved a hCG CR. All 14 non-CR patients were cured with subsequent CC; 11 and 2 patients with 3rd line and 4th line CC respectively and 1 patient following 5th line CC and hysterectomy. Overall survival remains 100%.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin is not sufficiently active in the second-line treatment of low-risk MTX-resistant GTN. New strategies are required to increase hCG CR and spare more toxic CC regimens.

Treatments and outcomes in high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

High-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is rare and treated with diverse approaches. Limited published institutional data has yet to be systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To compile global high-risk GTN (prognostic score ≥7) cohorts to summarise treatments and outcomes by disease characteristics and primary chemotherapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane were searched through March 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Full-text manuscripts reporting mortality among ≥10 high-risk GTN patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Binomial proportions were summed, and random-effects meta-analyses performed.

MAIN RESULTS

From 1137 records, we included 35 studies, representing 20 countries. Among 2276 unique high-risk GTN patients, 99.7% received chemotherapy, 35.8% surgery and 4.9% radiation. Mortality was 10.9% (243/2236; meta-analysis: 10%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7-12%) and likelihood of complete response to primary chemotherapy was 79.7% (1506/1890; meta-analysis: 78%, 95% CI: 74-83%). Across 24 reporting studies, modern preferred chemotherapy (EMA/CO or EMA/EP) was associated with lower mortality (overall: 8.8 versus 9.5%; comparative meta-analysis: 8.1 versus 12.4%, OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.90%, 14 studies) and higher likelihood of complete response (overall: 76.6 versus 72.8%; comparative meta-analysis: 75.9 versus 60.7%, OR 2.98, 95% CI: 1.06-8.35%, 14 studies), though studies focused on non-preferred regimens reported comparable outcomes. Mortality was increased for ultra-high-risk disease (30 versus 7.5% high-risk; meta-analysis OR 7.44, 95% CI: 4.29-12.9%) and disease following term delivery (20.8 versus 7.3% following molar pregnancy; meta-analysis OR 2.64, 95% CI: 1.10-6.31%). Relapse rate estimates ranged from 3 to 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk GTN is responsive to several chemotherapy regimens, with EMA/CO or EMA/EP associated with improved outcomes. Mortality is increased in patients with ultra-high-risk, relapsed and post-term pregnancy disease.

Leptomeningeal disease as a presenting feature of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A review and recommendations for management

OBJECTIVES

Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN) is a rare group of malignant placental-related tumours requiring systemic anti-cancer treatment. Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) related to GTN is not well reported with no consensus in optimal treatment. We offer recommendations for management of these patients.

METHODS

We discuss five patients with GTN who presented with features of LMD and were diagnosed with gadolinium-enhanced MRI brain, all of whom received low dose induction etoposide-cisplatin (EP) followed by either EP-etoposide, methotrexate (CNS) and actinomycin-D (EMA) or EMA(CNS)-cyclophosphamide and vincristine (CO).

RESULTS

Four out of the five patients additionally received intrathecal methotrexate. Four patients had complete hCG response to first line multi-agent chemotherapy, one patient required second line paclitaxel, cisplatin alternating with paclitaxel, etoposide (TP/TE), where paclitaxel was substituted with nab-paclitaxel due to anaphylaxis, followed by hysterectomy. One of the four initial complete hCG responders relapsed in the lung requiring further systemic treatment with subsequent lobectomy. Patient reported outcomes indicate persistent neurological symptoms are mild and do not affect functionality and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

With a follow-up range of 2-6 years, all five patients remain cured demonstrating excellent survival outcomes with the avoidance of whole-brain radiotherapy in all cases.

PREDICT-GTN 1: Can we improve the FIGO scoring system in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia?

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) patients are treated according to the eight-variable International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) scoring system, that aims to predict first-line single-agent chemotherapy resistance. FIGO is imperfect with one-third of low-risk patients developing disease resistance to first-line single-agent chemotherapy. We aimed to generate simplified models that improve upon FIGO. Logistic regression (LR) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) modelling (n = 4191) generated six models (M1-6). M1, all eight FIGO variables (scored data); M2, all eight FIGO variables (scored and raw data); M3, nonimaging variables (scored data); M4, nonimaging variables (scored and raw data); M5, imaging variables (scored data); and M6, pretreatment hCG (raw data) + imaging variables (scored data). Performance was compared to FIGO using true and false positive rates, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic odds ratio, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Bland-Altman calibration plots, decision curve analysis and contingency tables. M1-6 were calibrated and outperformed FIGO on true positive rate and positive predictive value. Using LR and MLP, M1, M2 and M4 generated small improvements to the ROC curve and decision curve analysis. M3, M5 and M6 matched FIGO or performed less well. Compared to FIGO, most (excluding LR M4 and MLP M5) had significant discordance in patient classification (McNemar's test P < .05); 55-112 undertreated, 46-206 overtreated. Statistical modelling yielded only small gains over FIGO performance, arising through recategorisation of treatment-resistant patients, with a significant proportion of under/overtreatment as the available data have been used a priori to allocate primary chemotherapy. Streamlining FIGO should now be the focus.

Current Evidence on Immunotherapy for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN)

Simple Summary

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a rare tumor group that arises from the malignant transformation of placental tissue. Based on the evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) anatomic staging and FIGO prognostic score, GTN is divided into low-, high-, and ultra-high-risk groups if the score obtained is less than or equal to 6, greater than 6 or greater than 12, respectively. The standard treatment is chemotherapy, using a single agent in low-risk disease and multiagent chemotherapy in high- and ultra-high-risk GTN. In chemoresistant forms of GTN, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1/2, could represent a new therapeutic strategy. In this study, we evaluate the available evidence on immune checkpoint inhibitors for GTN treatment.

Abstract

Background: Gestational trophoblastic disease includes a rare group of benign and malignant tumors derived from abnormal trophoblastic proliferation. Malignant forms are called gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) and include invasive mole, choriocarcinoma, placental site trophoblastic tumor and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor. Standard treatment of GTN is chemotherapy. The regimen of choice mainly depends on the FIGO prognostic score. Low-risk and high-risk GTN is treated with single-agent or multiagent chemotherapy, respectively. In the case of chemoresistance, immunotherapy may represent a new therapeutic strategy. Methods: Literature obtained from searches on PubMed concerning GTN and immunotherapy was reviewed. Results: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligands (PD-L1/2) are expressed in GTN. Published data on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone in GTN were available for 51 patients. Pembrolizumab is an anti-PD-1 inhibitor used in chemoresistant forms of GTN. In the TROPHIMMUN trial, Avelumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting PD-L1, showed promising results only in patients with GTN resistant to monochemotherapy. Conversely, in patients with resistance to multiagent chemotherapy, treatment with Avelumab was discontinued due to severe toxicity and disease progression. The association of Camrelizumab and Apatinib could represent a different treatment for forms of GTN refractory to polychemotherapy or for relapses. Conclusions: Anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 might represent an important new treatment strategy for the management of chemoresistant/refractory GTN.

Efficacies of FAEV and EMA/CO regimens as primary treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D (EMA)/cyclophosphamide, vincristine (CO) as first-line treatment for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). However, the floxuridine, actinomycin D, etoposide and vincristine (FAEV) regimen is commonly used to treat these patients in China. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacies and toxicities of FAEV and EMA/CO.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients with GTN were enrolled between May 2015 and April 2019 and randomly assigned to the FAEV or EMA/CO regimen. The rates of complete remission and relapse and the toxicities were compared in August 2021.

RESULTS

Five patients were excluded from the analysis. There were 46 patients in the FAEV group and 43 patients in the EMA/CO group. The complete remission rates following primary treatment were 89.1% and 79.1% (P = 0.193), respectively. The relapse rates were 8.7% and 9.3% (P = 0.604). The apparent incidences of grade 4 myelosuppression were 60.9% and 32.6% (P = 0.008), respectively; however, they became both 32.6% (P = 0.996) after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Other adverse reactions were similar in the two groups. No patient died of disease.

CONCLUSION

FAEV has comparable efficacy and toxicity to EMA/CO as the primary treatment for high-risk GTN, and may thus be another first-line choice of chemotherapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR1800017423.

Vincristine in Combination Therapy of Cancer: Emerging Trends in Clinics

Treatment of blood malignancies and other cancer diseases has been mostly unfeasible, so far. Therefore, novel treatment regimens should be developed and the currently used ones should be further elaborated. A stable component in various cancer treatment regimens consists of vincristine, an antimitotic compound of natural origin. Despite its strong anticancer activity, mostly, it cannot be administered as monotherapy due to its unspecific action and severe side effects. However, vincristine is suitable for combination therapy. Multidrug treatment regimens including vincristine are standardly applied in the therapy of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other malignancies, in which it is combined with drugs of different mechanisms of action, mainly with DNA-interacting compounds (for example cyclophosphamide), or drugs interfering with DNA synthesis (for example methotrexate). Besides, co-administration of vincristine with monoclonal antibodies has also emerged, the typical example of which is the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Although in some combination anticancer therapies, vincristine has been replaced with other drugs exhibiting lesser side effects, though, in most cases, it is still irreplaceable. This is strongly evidenced by the number of active clinical trials evaluating vincristine in combination cancer therapy. Therefore, in this article, we have reviewed the most common cancer treatment regimens employing vincristine and bring an overview of current trends in the clinical development of this compound.