Assessment of dental students' diagnostic accuracy for oral cancer screening

Evaluation of the diagnostic ability of oral lesions on clinical images among undergraduate dental students

INTRODUCTION

The dentist should be able to carry out systematic oral examinations of the mucosa of patients in order to diagnose any alterations at an early stage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational, analytical, prospective, and longitudinal study was carried out. 161 students were evaluated at the beginning of their clinical practice in their 4th year of dental school (September 2019), at the beginning and at the end of their 5th year of dental school (June 2021). Thirty oral lesions were projected, and the students were asked to provide an answer; if the lesions were benign, malignant, or potentially malignant, whether they should be biopsied and/or treated and a presumptive diagnosis.

RESULTS

Significant improvement (p < .001) was obtained between the 2019 and 2021 results, in relation to the classification, need for biopsy and treatment of lesions. For differential diagnosis, no significant difference (p = .985) was obtained between the 2019 and 2021 responses. Malignant lesions and PMD obtained mixed results, with the best results corresponding to OSCC.

DISCUSSION

In this study, a correct lesion classification by the students was over 50%. As for the OSCC, the results were superior to the rest of the images, reaching more than 95% correct.

CONCLUSION

Theoretical-practical training from universities and continuing education for graduates in relation to oral mucosal pathologies should be further promoted.

Knowledge and Attitudes About Oral Cancer Among Dental Students After Bologna Plan Implementation

Oral cancer is the most common of head and neck tumours. Dentists have an important role in the most effective prevention measures: controlling aetiological factors and early detection. Dental curriculum has suffered changes in their structures and contents during Bologna process. The aim of this study is to explore oral cancer knowledge and attitudes among dental students of Granada after the implementation of the Bologna plan. A cross-sectional study was carried out in the School of Dentistry of the University of Granada. A questionnaire was delivered to dental students in the fourth and fifth years (of study) to assess knowledge and attitudes about oral cancer area. 79.3 % related that they examined the oral mucosa from their patients regularly. Almost the whole sample (95.9 %) said that they would advise their patients about risk factors for oral cancer when they graduated. Tobacco followed by alcohol was the main oral cancer risk factor identified (94.2 and 72.7 %, respectively). 96.7 % of the sample would like to receive more information about this subject. Fourth year students had taught self-examination for early detection of oral cancer more frequently than fifth year students (42.5 versus 22.9 %, respectively). The results of this study revealed that dental students had good attitudes in the area of oral cancer. On the other hand, it highlights the need for an improvement of the teaching program regarding risk factors for oral cancer and performing routine oral examination.

Oral cancer awareness of undergraduate medical and dental students

BACKGROUND

The incidence of oral cancer is increasing in the United Kingdom. Early detection of oral cancers makes them more amenable to treatment and allows the greatest chance of cure. Delay in presentation and/or referral has a significant effect on the associated morbidity and mortality. Lack of general medical practitioner and general dental practitioner oral cancer knowledge has been shown to contribute to delays in referral and treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the oral cancer awareness of future general medical and general dental practitioners by assessing undergraduate medical and dental students' knowledge of prevention and early detection of oral cancer.

METHOD

Questionnaires were delivered to undergraduate medical and dental students at the University of Dundee, assessing oral examination habits, delivery of advice on oral cancer risk factors, knowledge of oral cancer risk factors and clinical appearance, preferred point of referral and requests for further information.

RESULTS

Undergraduate medical students were less likely to examine patients' oral mucosa routinely and less likely to advise patients about risk factors for oral cancer. Medical students identified fewer oral cancer risk factors. In particular alcohol use was identified poorly. Medical students also identified fewer oral changes associated with oral cancer. Erythroplakia and erythroleukoplakia were identified poorly. Medical students felt less well informed regarding oral cancer. 86% and 92% of undergraduate medical and dental students respectively requested further information about oral cancer.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the need for improved education of undergraduate medical and dental students regarding oral cancer.

Oral cancer: experiences and diagnostic abilities elicited by dentists in North-western Spain

BACKGROUND

Opinions, knowledge, behaviours and attitudes of general dental practitioners on oral cancer prevention and detection have been reported from many countries. However, experiences and skills of oral cancer detection have not been evaluated systematically.

OBJECTIVE

To obtain information on behaviours of screening and ability to correctly detect oral cancer and precancer among general dentists (GDP) in North-western Spain.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two randomly selected GDPs completed questionnaires and then classified 50 projected images of clinical lesions, into cancer, precancer or benign lesions.

RESULTS

87.5% reported conducting routine oral examinations, 84.4% provided routine advice to their subjects for risk modifications and 84.4% claimed to biopsy a suspected oral mucosal lesion that they detected in practice. In a quasi research setting using clinical slides, the sensitivity of visual diagnosis of a cancerous lesion was 61.4% and precancer 59.5%. The diagnostic accuracy reported here is lower than what is already reported by evaluation of published screening programmes by dentists.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data from Spain suggest a need for improving the diagnostic ability of GDPs in the visual detection of oral cancer/precancer by strengthening continuing professional education.

Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer

BACKGROUND

Screening programmes for major cancers, such as breast and cervical cancer have effectively decreased the mortality rate and helped to reduce the incidence of these cancers. Although oral cancer is a global health problem with increasing incidence and mortality rates, no national population-based screening programmes for oral cancer have been implemented. To date there is debate on whether to employ screening methods for oral cancer in the daily routine work of health providers.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of current screening methods in decreasing oral cancer mortality.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; 1966 to July 2005, The Cochrane Library - Issue 3, 2005), bibliographies, handsearching of specific journals and contact authors were used to identify published and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of screening for oral cancer or precursor oral lesions using visual examination, toluidine blue, fluorescence imaging or brush biopsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The search found 112 citations and these have been reviewed. One randomised controlled trial of screening strategies for oral cancer was identified as meeting the review's inclusion criteria. Validity assessment, data extraction and statistics evaluation were undertaken by two independent review authors.

MAIN RESULTS

One 10-year randomised controlled trial has been included (n = 13 clusters: 191,873 participants). There was no difference in the age-standardised oral cancer mortality rates for the screened group (16.4/100,000 person-years) and the control group (20.7/100,000 person-years). Interestingly, a significant 34% reduction in mortality was recorded in high-risk subjects between the intervention cohort (29.9/100,000 person-years) and the control arm (45.4/100,000). However, this study has some methodological weaknesses. Additionally, the study did not provide any information related to costs, quality of life or even harms of screening from false-positive or false-negative findings.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given the limitation of evidence (only one included randomised controlled trial) and the potential methodological weakness of the included study, it is valid to say that there is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of a visual examination as a method of screening for oral cancer using a visual examination in the general population. Furthermore, no robust evidence exists to suggest that other methods of screening, toluidine blue, fluorescence imaging or brush biopsy, are either beneficial or harmful. Future high quality studies to assess the efficacy, effectiveness and costs of screening are required for the best use of public health resources. In addition, studies to elucidate the natural history of oral cancer, prevention methods and the effectiveness of opportunistic screening in high risk groups are needed. Future studies on improved treatment modalities for oral cancer and precancer are also required.

A systematic review of test performance in screening for oral cancer and precancer

Nine databases were searched for studies on test performance in screening for oral cancer and precancer in primary care. Of 481 papers, full texts of 47 were scrutinised by two reviewers. Only prospective investigations of population screening involving examination of the oral mucosa, with gold standard verification (examination by an expert of subjects screened positive and at least a proportion of negatives), were selected. Seven papers describing eight studies were finally included (kappa=0.83). The weighted pooled value of sensitivity, from random effects meta-analysis, was 0.848 (95% CI 0.730, 0.919). The corresponding value for specificity was 0.965 (95% CI 0.930, 0.982). Main sources of clinical heterogeneity occurred between large house-to-house case finding programmes from SE Asia, utilising primary health workers, and smaller studies from England and Japan. Meta-analysis regression showed no difference (P=0.99) in the generally high level of discriminatory ability of the test between these two groups.

Oral cancer examinations among adults at high risk: findings from the 1998 National Health Interview Survey

OBJECTIVES

Cigarette smoking and alcohol use are risk factors for oral and pharyngeal cancer. Recommendations for periodic oral cancer examinations highlight the importance of examining high-risk smokers and alcohol users. This investigation assessed whether cigarette smoking and alcohol use were associated with receipt of an oral cancer examination.

METHODS

The cross-sectional 1998 National Health Interview Survey was used. Covariates included age, sex, race/ethnicity, poverty status, and geographic region. Weighted bivariate and multivariate analyses were stratified by dentition status and limited to adults aged > or = 40 years.

RESULTS

Regardless of dentition status, current smokers were no more likely to have received an examination than were never smokers. The associations between alcohol use and receipt of an examination were mixed, and were generally more favorable among those who had a dental visit in the last year. Dentate current and former alcohol users were more likely than abstainers to have received an examination. There was no statistically significant association between alcohol use and receipt of an oral cancer examination among edentulous adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Practitioners should improve the provision rates of oral cancer examinations in accordance with published guidelines, especially among current smokers and edentulous alcohol users who have not been to the dentist in the last year. Recommendations for improvement are presented.

Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer

BACKGROUND

Although the second half of the last century has generated a rich and complex body of knowledge, the burden of oral cancer is still largely present. As with other cancers, there has been a strong debate whether screening strategies for oral cancer such as visual examination, the use of toluidine blue or newer methods such as brush biopsy or fluorescence imaging are effective in reducing the mortality rate associated with oral cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of current screening methods in decreasing oral cancer mortality.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; 1966 to September 2002, The Cochrane Library - Issue 2, 2002), bibliographies, handsearching of specific journals and contact authors were used to identify published and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of screening for oral cancer or potentially premalignant oral lesions using visual examination, toluidine blue, fluorescence imaging or brush biopsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The search found 100 citations and these have been reviewed. One randomised controlled trial of screening strategies for oral cancer was identified as meeting the review's inclusion criteria. Validity assessment, data extraction and statistics evaluation have been undertaken by two independent reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

One ongoing randomised controlled trial has been included (n = 13 clusters: 153,708 eligible subjects, 130,799 included subjects). There was no difference in the age-standardised oral cancer mortality rates for the screened group (21.2/1000,000 person years) and the control group (21.3/100,000 person years). However this study has some methodological weaknesses.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Given the limitation of evidence (only one included randomised controlled trial) and the potential methodological weakness in the included study, it is valid to say that there is no evidence to support or refute the use of a visual examination as a method of screening for oral cancer using a visual examination in the general population. Furthermore, no robust evidence exists to suggest other methods of screening, toluidine blue, fluorescence imaging or brush biopsy, are either beneficial or harmful. Further cost-effective, high quality studies to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of screening are required. In addition, studies to elucidate the natural history of oral cancer, prevention methods and the effectiveness of opportunistic screening in high risk groups are needed.