Comparative antihypertensive effects of enalapril maleate and hydrochlorothiazide, alone and in combination

Treating stage 2 hypertension

The prevalence of hypertension increases with advancing age, due primarily to increases in systolic blood pressure. Systolic hypertension is the most common form of hypertension in individuals over 50 years of age and reflects pathologic decreases in arterial compliance. Systolic blood pressure elevation is a more important risk factor for cardiovascular disease than is diastolic blood pressure elevation. Stage 2 hypertension, defined as blood pressure > or =160/100 mm Hg, is often found in older persons, who are at highest risk for cardiovascular events. In this clinical review, hypertension experts utilize a case study to provide a paradigm for treating older patients with stage 2 hypertension.

Comparison between moexipril and atenolol in obese postmenopausal women with hypertension

The present study investigated the effect of the new ACE-inhibitor moexipril versus the beta 1-adrenergic blocker atenolol on metabolic parameters, adverse events (AEs) and sitting systolic (SSBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) in obese postmenopausal women with hypertension (stage I and II). After a 4-week placebo run-in phase, 116 obese, postmenopausal women with primary hypertension were randomised into two treatment groups receiving once daily dosages of either moexipril 7.5 mg or atenolol 25 mg initially (mean age: 57 +/- 7 years in both groups; mean weight: 94 kg in the moexipril group and 89 kg in the atenolol group, corresponding to a body mass index (BMI) of 35.2 kg/m2 and 34.1 kg/m2 in both groups, respectively). After 4 and 8 weeks, the dosages were uptitrated to moexipril 15 mg, or if necessary to moexipril 15 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, or to atenolol 50 mg and atenolol 50 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, in patients whose blood pressure was not sufficiently controlled. At endpoint, metabolic parameters (total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, HDL, glucose, insulin) were not significantly altered in either treatment group. Most frequent adverse events under monotherapy (moexipril/atenolol) were asthenia (5.3/13.0%), headache (13.2/21.7%), cough (7.9/6.5%), pharyngitis (21.1/8.7%) and peripheral oedema (5.3/13.0%). Overall at least one AE was reported in 66% of the patients treated with moexipril and in 78% of those treated with atenolol. Reduction of SSBP/SDBP at endpoint was 14.7 +/- 1.9/10.0 +/- 1.1 and 8.7 +/- 1.9/8.4 +/- 1.1 mmHg after treatment with moexipril and atenolol, respectively. The results showed that moexipril and atenolol are equally effective in reducing blood pressure without adversely affecting blood lipids and carbohydrate metabolism.

Effects of hydrochlorothiazide, diltiazem and enalapril on mononuclear cell sodium and magnesium levels in systemic hypertension

Sixteen patients (mean age 68 years) with mild to moderate hypertension were treated with either diltiazem or hydrochlorothiazide for 6 weeks, followed by enalapril for a further 6 weeks. A second group of 40 patients (mean age 71 years) was treated with either hydrochlorothiazide or enalapril for 12 weeks; nonresponders received both drugs for 8 weeks. Treatment with hydrochlorothiazide or enalapril resulted in a lowering of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, but diastolic pressure was lower in patients treated with enalapril (89 +/- 2 and 82 +/- 2 mm Hg, respectively; p less than 0.05). Treatment with diltiazem resulted in a decrease in diastolic pressure only. Treatment with hydrochlorothiazide resulted in a 17% decrease in serum potassium (p less than 0.05), which returned to normal when enalapril was substituted. Hydrochlorothiazide also produced a 23% decrease in mononuclear cell sodium content at 4 weeks (p less than 0.01), with a further 15% decrease at 12 weeks (p less than 0.05). Mononuclear cell potassium and magnesium also decreased at 12 weeks by 18 and 16%, respectively (p less than 0.05). All these effects were reversed when enalapril was substituted. A similar pattern of events was seen with diltiazem, which was again reversed with enalapril. Finally, there was no relation between changes in mononuclear cell sodium or other cation content and changes in blood pressure.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a comparative review

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, and dosages of the three currently available angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are reviewed. This class of agents effectively inhibits the conversion of angiotensin I to the active vasoconstrictor angiotensin II, a hormone that also promotes, via aldosterone stimulation, increased sodium and water retention. The ACE inhibitors, therefore, are capable of lowering blood pressure primarily by promoting vasodilatation and reducing intravascular fluid volume. Captopril, the first orally active, commercially available ACE inhibitor, is a sulfhydryl-containing compound. Captopril was followed by the introduction of enalapril and lisinopril, two non-sulfhydryl ACE inhibitors. The pharmacokinetic profiles of these three ACE inhibitors differ. Captopril has rapid onset with relatively short duration of action, whereas enalapril and lisinopril have slower onset and relatively long duration of action. Captopril is an active ACE inhibitor in its orally absorbable parent form. In contrast, enalapril must be deesterified in the liver to the metabolite enalaprilat in order to inhibit the converting enzyme; this accounts for its delayed onset of action. Lisinopril does not require metabolic activation to be effective; however, a slow and incomplete absorption pattern explains the delay in onset of activity. Captopril and its disulfide metabolites are primarily excreted in the urine with minor elimination in the feces. Approximately two-thirds of an administered enalapril dose is excreted in the urine as both the parent drug and the metabolite enalaprilat; the remainder of these two substances are excreted in the feces. Lisinopril does not undergo measurable metabolism and approximately one-third is excreted unchanged in the urine with the remaining parent drug being excreted in the feces. The ACE inhibitors lower systemic vascular resistance with a resultant decrease in blood pressure. Their efficacy is comparable to diuretics and beta-blockers in treating patients with mild, moderate, or severe essential and renovascular hypertension. In those patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) the ACE inhibitors produce a reduction in systemic vascular resistance, blood pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and pulmonary artery pressure. These drugs may produce improvement in cardiac output and stroke volume and, with chronic administration, may promote regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. The antihypertensive effects of the ACE inhibitors are enhanced when these agents are combined with a diuretic. Captopril and enalapril have been shown to be of particular benefits as adjunctive therapy in patients with congestive heart failure, both in terms of subjective improvement of patient symptoms, and in improving overall hemodynamic status.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

ACE inhibitors compared with thiazide diuretics as first-step antihypertensive therapy

While ACE inhibitors are considerably more expensive than thiazide diuretics, they are slightly more effective antihypertensive agents in white patients and have fewer side effects. They can be regarded as suitable first-line therapy in diabetic hypertensives. It is probable that as new drugs in this class are marketed, the price differential will lessen and they will be regarded as acceptable and useful first-line drugs in an increasingly large number of patients.

Comparative evaluation of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension

Initial treatment of elderly hypertensive patients with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor is currently discouraged due to such patients' typical low-renin profile. To validate this principle, we studied 38 elderly males (aged greater than or equal to 65 years) with mild to moderate hypertension, comparing hemodynamic responses to and subjective impressions of enalapril or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). After gradual withdrawal of existing antihypertensive therapy and a four-week, single-blind placebo period, each patient was randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either enalapril 10-20 mg/d or HCTZ 12.5-25 mg/d for two to four weeks. Combination therapy with both agents was employed if either alone failed to reduce seated diastolic BP to less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Equivalent proportions of patients receiving enalapril or HCTZ (8 of 19 and 10 of 19, respectively; p = ns) responded with significant reductions in systolic and diastolic BP in seated and standing positions. Combination therapy was most effective in patients receiving HCTZ prior to enalapril. In patients receiving enalapril before HCTZ, BP changes were minimal. No adverse effects were observed in the enalapril group but occurred in an equivalent fraction of patients in the other groups (4 of 10 HCTZ alone, 6 of 20 enalapril + HCTZ; p = ns). We conclude that enalapril may be considered a reasonable monotherapeutic antihypertensive agent in some elderly patients. Combination with HCTZ is beneficial in patients who fail to respond adequately to HCTZ alone.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

There is convincing evidence that ACE inhibitors, alone or in combination with a diuretic, effectively lower blood pressure in patients with all grades of essential or renovascular hypertension and that they are of particular benefit as adjunctive therapy in patients with congestive heart failure. The hemodynamic, hormonal and clinical effects of the presently available ACE inhibitors, captopril and enalapril, are comparable and their side effect profiles are extremely favorable. One important difference between the two oral ACE inhibitors, however, is their pharmacokinetics; enalapril's action is slower to begin and is of longer duration. Compared with other agents, ACE inhibitors offer important advantages, among them an improved feeling of well being. It is, therefore, expected that ACE inhibitors will gain greater acceptance by patients and physicians in the future.

Enalapril: a long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

The development of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is of landmark importance in the understanding and treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly hypertension and congestive heart failure. Enalapril has recently joined captopril as an approved, orally active ACE inhibitor. Like captopril, it has been effective in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure, with minimal adverse reactions noted. Differences in pharmacology exist between enalapril and captopril which may prove to be of clinical significance.

The effect of intravenous enalaprilat (MK-422) administration in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension

The antihypertensive effect of enalaprilat (MK-422), an intravenous (IV), nonsulfhydryl converting-enzyme inhibitor, was evaluated in a double-blind study of 14 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. The seven patients in the treatment group initially received IV enalaprilat 1.25 mg q6h for 24 hours. Thereafter, responding patients (diastolic blood pressure [BP] less than or equal to 95 mm Hg) continued receiving this dose q6h for an additional 24 hours, whereas nonresponding patients were increased to IV enalaprilat 5 mg q6h for another 24 hours. Baseline BP for enalaprilat was 161 +/- 5/107 +/- 2 mm Hg (+/- SEM), and for placebo it was 150 +/- 5/103 +/- 2 mm Hg. Within the first 60 minutes, a significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic BP was noted in the enalaprilat group (P less than .05), without significant changes occurring in the placebo group. Although there was a gradual decline in both systolic and diastolic BP throughout the 48-hour study period in the placebo group, systolic and diastolic BP reduction was greater in the enalaprilat group, reaching a maximal decrease of 133 +/- 3/87 +/- 3 mm Hg. Adverse side effects did not occur in any patient.

Comparison of enalapril and propranolol in essential hypertension

In 40 patients with essential hypertension, enalapril was compared with propranolol as an antihypertensive agent in a double-blind study. The patients were randomly given either enalapril 5-10-20 mg bid or propranolol 40-80-120 mg bid in a treatment consisting of step-by-step increases in dosage. When the diastolic blood pressure remained greater than 90 mm Hg on the highest dosage, hydrochlorothiazide was added. Both enalapril and propranolol reduced blood pressure, although the patients tended to achieve lower blood pressures while on enalapril. More patients on propranolol required additional diuretic therapy than patients on enalapril. Propranolol reduced heart rate; with enalapril there were no changes in heart rate. Both drugs increased serum potassium and urea. Plasma renin substrate was reduced by enalapril, but raised by propranolol. Enalapril increased plasma renin activity and angiotensin I, while propranolol reduced both. Converting enzyme activity was lowered with enalapril but was unchanged with propranolol. Both drugs reduced angiotensin II. Plasma aldosterone concentration was more suppressed with propranolol than with enalapril.

Effects of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure, renin-angiotensin system, and atrial natriuretic factor in essential hypertension: a double blind factorial cross-over study

The hypotensive and hormonal effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril (10 mg twice daily) were compared with those of hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg twice daily), with the two drugs in combination and with placebo in 21 patients with essential hypertension. For each patient there were four randomised double-blind treatment phases, each of four weeks' duration, which comprised a 2 X 2 factorial experiment. All blood pressure parameters were reduced in the three active treatment phases compared to placebo (p less than 0.001). Supine mean blood pressures were 119 mmHg (placebo), 113 mmHg (hydrochlorothiazide), 108 mmHg (enalapril), and 98 mmHg (hydrochlorothiazide plus enalapril) (SEM 3 mmHg, ANOVA). Enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide were equally effective and well tolerated and their hypotensive effects were additive. Enalapril increased plasma renin activity (PRA), reduced plasma angiotensin II (AII) and aldosterone concentrations, and reduced ACE activity, whereas hydrochlorothiazide increased PRA, plasma AII, and aldosterone concentrations without altering ACE activity. With combination treatment the effects of enalapril on PRA and plasma AII concentrations were potentiated whereas those on plasma aldosterone concentration and ACE activity were additive. Atrial natriuretic factor plasma concentration in the placebo phase was 92 pg/ml and increased to 145 pg/ml in the hydrochlorothiazide phase (p less than 0.001, SEM 13 pg/ml), but there was no significant change in either the enalapril or combination phases.

Enalapril: a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor

Enalapril maleate is a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor marketed in the U.S. by Merck Sharp and Dohme. It has been demonstrated to actively interfere with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. This is reflected by both hemodynamic (decreased blood pressure) and humoral (increased plasma renin, angiotensin I, and decreased angiotensin II) responses to enalapril therapy. Activity in the kallikrein-bradykinin system is still controversial. Enalapril maleate is a prodrug which is quickly absorbed, hydrolyzed by the liver to the active metabolite enalaprilic acid, and excreted 33 percent in the bile and 61 percent in the urine. The therapeutic dosage range is 10-40 mg/d, maximum of 40 mg, given once or twice daily. The onset and duration of action are dose related. Vertigo and headache have been the most commonly reported side effects. Clinical comparison of enalapril to hydrochlorothiazide, beta-adrenergic blockers, and captopril find it efficacious in the treatment of essential hypertension. Efficacy in treating congestive heart failure and hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis has also been demonstrated for both angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The overall efficacy and safety of enalapril and captopril appear equivalent when used at low doses in patients with uncomplicated hypertension.

Double-blind comparison of captopril and enalapril in mild to moderate hypertension

To compare the antihypertensive and humoral effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors captopril and enalapril, 20 patients with essential hypertension, not receiving treatment for 2 weeks and consuming a prescribed sodium ion intake, were randomly assigned to two parallel, double-blind treatment groups with stratification based on race and untreated seated diastolic blood pressure. These groups received a placebo (day -1) followed by either captopril, 200 mg every 12 hours (n = 9), or enalapril maleate, 20 mg every 12 hours (n = 11), alone (days 1 to 14) and then with hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg every 12 hours (days 16 to 28). Captopril and enalapril were coadministered alone (day 15) and with hydrochlorothiazide (day 29) to assess whether further decreases in blood pressure would occur. Captopril and enalapril alone caused comparable decreases (p less than 0.05) in the mean 12 hour time-averaged seated diastolic blood pressure from values on day -1 (placebo), on day 1 (11 and 9 mm Hg, respectively) and day 14 (8 and 7 mm Hg, respectively). The addition of hydrochlorothiazide further decreased (p less than 0.05) blood pressure in each group (7 and 8 mm Hg, respectively) from values on day 14. Combined use of captopril and enalapril did not result in further reduction. Coupled with the comparable changes observed in each treatment group in serum angiotensin-converting enzyme activity, plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration, these data support the view that captopril and enalapril have similar antihypertensive effects and mechanisms.

Enalapril. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and congestive heart failure

Enalapril maleate is an orally active angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. It lowers peripheral vascular resistance without causing an increase in heart rate. Enalapril 10 to 40 mg/day administered either once or twice daily is effective in lowering blood pressure in all grades of essential and renovascular hypertension, and shows similar efficacy to usual therapeutic dosages of hydrochlorothiazide, beta-blockers (propranolol, atenolol and metoprolol) and captopril. Most patients achieve adequate blood pressure control on enalapril alone or with hydrochlorothiazide. In patients with severe congestive heart failure resistant to conventional therapy, enalapril improves cardiac performance by a reduction in both preload and afterload, and improves clinical status long term. Enalapril appears to be well tolerated, with few serious adverse effects being reported. It does not induce the bradycardia associated with beta-blockers or the adverse effects of diuretics on some laboratory values. In fact, the hypokalaemic effect of hydrochlorothiazide is attenuated by the addition of enalapril. The incidence of the main (but rare) side effects of hypotension in hypovolaemic patients and reduced renal function in certain patients with renovascular hypertension, which are also seen with captopril, might be reduced by careful dosage titration, discontinuation of diuretics, and monitoring of at-risk patients. Thus, enalapril is a particularly worthwhile addition to the antihypertensive armamentarium, as an alternative for treatment of all grades of essential and renovascular hypertension. It also shows promise in the treatment of congestive heart failure.

Adverse reactions with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors

Teprotide, a nonapeptide isolated from the venom of a Brazilian pit viper, Bothrops jararaca, was the first angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor to be discovered and tested. It was found to be an effective, non-toxic antihypertensive agent as well as an afterload-reducing agent for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). The primary activity of teprotide resulted from blockade of the angiotensin I converting enzyme--the pivotal step in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), and consequent reductions in angiotensin II levels. There was limited clinical testing for teprotide because of: its scarcity; the need for parenteral administration; and the subsequent discovery and synthesis of captopril, the first orally active angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. Captopril is the prototype oral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and has been extensively studied since the initiation of formal studies in 1976. Perhaps one of the most closely researched drugs in modern times, the experience with captopril now includes more than 12,000 patients studied in formalized trials and over 4,000,000 patients treated world-wide by physicians for hypertension and congestive heart failure. Enalapril (MK421) is the first of what appears to be a growing number of analogues which are structurally and pharmacodynamically different from captopril; yet, they possess the same capacity for inhibiting the activity of angiotensin converting enzyme. The side effect profile of enalapril (and presumably future) angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors appears to be similar to captopril, though clearly more experience is needed with newer agents. The initial use of captopril was troubled by a relatively high incidence of side effects which will form the focus of this discussion. Partially the result of incomplete pharmacokinetic information, captopril was administered in early studies at dosages now recognised to be far in excess of those necessary for drug action. In addition, dosages were given without regard for deficiencies of renal function, now known to be the main excretory route of captopril. The population of those patients studied frequently had chronic, treatment-resistant hypertension, often associated with concomitant end-organ disease (especially renal disease); and many additional factors further complicating the clinical setting, e.g. a relatively high incidence of collagen vascular disease and immunosuppressive treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Enalaprilat in hypertensive emergencies

Enalaprilat (MK-422), an intravenously administered angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, which is the parent compound of the oral angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril (MK-421), was studied in 11 patients with asymptomatic accelerated hypertension. Each patient received an initial intravenous dose of 1 mg, followed at one-hour intervals by enalaprilat 10 mg, furosemide 40 mg, and enalaprilat 40 mg. Six of 11 patients responded with a drop in mean arterial pressure greater than 15 mm Hg to diastolic levels below 110 mm Hg; there were four partial responders and one nonresponder. Pretreatment renins were not predictive of blood pressure response. No patient had any adverse reaction to the drug; there were no significant changes in posttreatment laboratory values. We conclude that enalaprilat is an effective, well-tolerated agent for the treatment of uncomplicated accelerated hypertension and its use does not imperil nonresponding uncomplicated patients.

Effects of enalapril alone, and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone, renal function, salt and water excretion, and body fluid composition

Enalapril is a new, oral, long-acting nonsulfhydral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. Thirty-nine patients with primary hypertension were entered into a randomized, double-blind protocol to assess the efficacy of enalapril (10 to 20 mg bid), hydrochlorothiazide (25 to 50 mg bid), or combined drug therapy. Enalapril, either alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, effectively controlled blood pressure. Enalapril monotherapy was associated with an increase in plasma renin activity and a decrease in angiotensin II concentration; in patients with an initial inulin clearance less than or equal to 80 mL/min/1.73 m2, inulin and para-aminohippurate clearances were markedly improved, without producing adverse effects on salt and water excretion or body fluid composition. Combination therapy was associated with a marked increase in plasma renin activity; however, only those patients with an initial inulin clearance less than or equal to 80 mL/min/1.73 m2 demonstrated suppression of angiotensin II concentration and marked improvement in inulin and para-aminohippurate clearances. These observations suggest that enalapril, either alone or in combination with a diuretic, has the potential to reverse renal function abnormalities encountered in the hypertensive state.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. Unique and effective therapy for hypertension and congestive heart failure

Major developments in the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure have occurred since the discovery of captopril in June 1975. Early in the past decade, this oral ACE inhibitor was restricted to refractory and severe cases of hypertension. By July 1985, the Food and Drug Administration approved its use not only for all degrees of hypertension but also for the initial treatment of hypertensive patients with uncomplicated disease. New information has confirmed the effectiveness of twice-daily administration (which favorably influences compliance) and the lack of a need to monitor blood or urine levels to assure safety. The renin-mediated and non-renin-mediated mechanisms of action of captopril-induced ACE inhibition have been fully delineated, as has its side effect profile, which does not include various CNS, sympathetic reflex, and metabolic side effects seen with other antihypertensive agents. As the first vasodilator to prove its efficacy in the acute and chronic treatment of congestive heart failure to the FDA, captopril is now widely used throughout the United States. ACE inhibition reduces symptoms, enhances exercise capacity, and favorably affects sodium, water, and potassium homeostasis in patients with heart failure. Also, recent but as yet unconfirmed evidence suggests that ACE inhibition may prolong survival in these patients. The success of captopril, the first oral agent of this class, promises to hold true for other ACE inhibitors (such as enalapril), which have similar activities but differing pharmacokinetic properties and will soon be available for clinical use. Further information on these newer agents is anxiously awaited. In the near future, the clinician will undoubtedly be able to choose from a large selection of ACE inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. Therefore, it is important to learn about any meaningful differences among ACE inhibitors and to contrast this class of agents with older, standard therapies. This learning process is crucial as we assess whether newer agents offer clinical advantages over the old.

Blood pressure response to enalaprilic acid in essential hypertension: dose-response and effect of pre-treatment with furosemide

Enalaprilic acid (MK 422), the active metabolite of enalapril, has recently become available for intravenous administration. In order to establish the proper dose for rapid blood pressure reduction, 9 patients with moderate to severe essential hypertension on a constant sodium intake of 100 mmol/24h were studied. They received four single doses of MK 422 according to an up-and-down titration schedule. Doses between 5 and 80 mg resulted in effective blood pressure reduction with an onset of action of about 10 minutes. Within this dose range the response was flat. No symptomatic hypotension was observed. The fall in blood pressure was less pronounced in patients with low initial plasma renin activity (PRA). Accordingly, a study was done to show whether the blood pressure response could be augmented by preceding stimulation of PRA by injection of 40 mg furosemide 15 minutes before the administration of MK 422. PRA increased after furosemide, but the blood pressure response to MK 422 was not augmented.

Antihypertensive efficacy of once daily MK-521, a new nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

The effects of the new nonsulfhydryl-containing oral converting-enzyme inhibitor MK-521 on blood pressure, heart rate, angiotensin-converting enzyme activity, plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration were assessed in 10 hypertensive patients. After a 2-week no-treatment period, patients received placebo and then 14 days each: MK-521 20 mg once daily, hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg once daily and the latter 2 in combination. During the last day of each treatment, the mean (+/- standard deviation) time-averaged (1- to 12-hour) standing diastolic blood pressure decreased from 106 +/- 8 (placebo) to 95 +/- 10 mm Hg with MK-521, 95 +/- 13 mm Hg with hydrochlorothiazide (p less than 0.05 vs placebo) and 88 +/- 11 mm Hg with the combination (p less than 0.05 vs all other treatments). The antihypertensive effect of MK-521 was maintained 24 hours after dosing. Heart rate did not change significantly after MK-521 treatment. MK-521 caused a marked suppression of converting enzyme activity for over 24 hours; plasma renin activity increased significantly after each active treatment and MK-521 significantly decreased the hydrochlorothiazide-induced elevation of plasma aldosterone concentration. In this short-term trial, MK-521 was well tolerated.

An overview of the clinical pharmacology of enalapril

Enalapril maleate is a prodrug which when administered orally is hydrolysed to release the active converting enzyme inhibitor enalaprilat. Enalapril maleate is 60% absorbed and 40% bioavailable as enalaprilat. Both compounds undergo renal excretion without further metabolism. The functional half-life for accumulation of enalaprilat is 11 h, and this is increased in the presence of a reduction in renal function. Inhibition of converting enzyme inhibition is associated with reductions in plasma angiotensin II and plasma aldosterone, and with increases in plasma renin activity and plasma angiotensin I. Acute and chronic effects have been reviewed. When given with hydrochlorothiazide, enalapril attenuates the secondary aldosteronism and ameliorates the hypokalaemia from diuretics. Both acutely and chronically in patients with essential hypertension, enalapril reduced blood pressure with a rather flat dose-response curve. No evidence of a triphasic response such as seen with captopril has been demonstrated with enalapril, and blood pressure returns smoothly to pretreatment levels when the drug is abruptly discontinued. Once- or twice-daily dosing gives similar results. The antihypertensive effects of enalapril are potentiated by hydrochlorothiazide. Haemodynamically, blood pressure reduction is associated with a reduced peripheral vascular resistance and an increase in cardiac output and stroke volume with little change in heart rate. Renal vascular resistance decreases, and renal blood flow may increase without an increase in glomerular filtration in patients with normal renal function. In patients with essential hypertension and glomerular filtration rates below 80 ml/min/m2, both renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rates may increase.