Cimetidine--acetaminophen interaction in humans

Metabolic and mitochondrial treatments for severe paracetamol poisoning: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) remains a leading cause of poisoning in Europe, North America, and Australia. For over four decades, acetylcysteine has been the antidote of choice. However, despite the use of acetylcysteine, some patients who ingest very large doses of paracetamol or who reach hospital late in the course of their poisoning, develop acute liver failure. Some will develop metabolic acidosis indicating mitochondrial toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

We review the experimental and clinical data reported with the use of cimetidine, fomepizole, and calmangafodipir in the treatment of paracetamol toxicity to determine if these treatments alone or in combination with acetylcysteine might be of benefit.

METHODS

We searched Ovid Medline 1946-2020, Embase 1947-2020, Scopus 2004-2020, Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and clinicaltrials.gov 1997-2020 for records including the concepts of paracetamol poisoning and cimetidine, fomepizole, calmangafodipir, and acetylcysteine. We included basic science studies in animals and all available study types in humans. We reviewed the reference lists of included articles to search for references missed in the original search. We registered the protocol in PROSPERO.

RESULTS

We completed all search strategies on 20 August 2019, 27 January 2020, and 15 June 2020. These produced 6,826 citations. We identified and deleted 2,843 duplicate resulting in a total of 3,856 unique citations. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 89 studies remained. The largest numbers of studies described the past use of cimetidine, and the more recent use of fomepizole.Cimetidine: There is good animal evidence that cimetidine blocks CYP 2E1 with the potential to inhibit the toxic metabolism of paracetamol. Early case reports were inconclusive regarding the benefit to humans in paracetamol poisoning. Two comparative trials found no benefit of cimetidine in paracetamol poisoning, but few patients had severe poisoning.Fomepizole: There is good animal evidence that fomepizole blocks CYP 2E1 with the potential to inhibit the toxic metabolism of paracetamol. There are no comparative trials of fomepizole for acute paracetamol poisoning. Case reports are inconclusive due to multiple other interventions including the use of acetylcysteine in all cases. The benefit of fomepizole as adjunct treatment has not been demonstrated.Calmangafodipir: Calmangafodipir, a drug mimicking superoxide dismutase, has emerged as a potential treatment for severe paracetamol toxicity because the formation of superoxide free radicals appears to explain part of the mitochondrial toxicity of extremely large paracetamol overdoses. Calmangafodipir has reached Phase I/II trial of safety in humans with acute paracetamol overdose. Planning for a Phase III study of efficacy is currently underway.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of patients with acute paracetamol overdose enjoy excellent outcomes with acetylcysteine alone. Although cimetidine and fomepizole inhibit CYP 2E1 in animals, there is insufficient evidence to recommend their use either as a primary treatment or adjunct therapy in paracetamol poisoning. Calmangafodipir remains investigational.

Comparing the Therapeutic Effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine with the Combination of N-acetyl Cysteine and Cimetidine in Acute Acetaminophen Toxicity: A Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been used as a classic treatment for hepatotoxicity induced by N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI) as a metabolite of acetaminophen. However, cimetidine theoretically can reduce the production of toxic metabolites through the inhibition of cytochrome p450, and it recently was proposed as a complementary treatment for acetaminophen toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of treating acute acetaminophen toxicity with NAC alone and with a combination of NAC and cimetidine.

METHODS

From October 2013 to March 2014, 105 patients suspected of acetaminophen toxicity who had paraclinical confirmation of toxicity requiring medical treatment (based on the risk assessment nomogram of acetaminophen serum level) were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial at Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad, Iran. The patients were divided into two groups, i.e., 1) patients who were treated with NAC alone (group A) and 2) patients who were treated with a combination of NAC and cimetidine (group B). The primary outcomes were 1) the serum level of acetaminophen and 2) the serum level of aminotransferases at the time of admission and 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours after admission. Exclusion criteria included multiple toxicities, concurrent diseases that could affect liver enzymes, the use of other drugs, and dissatisfaction with the project. For measuring quantitative data, SPSS version 16 was used for t-test analysis and for analyzing the qualitative data with chi-squared analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (32 females and 28 males) with a mean age of 25.2 ± 7.3 years were classified in two groups of 30.. There was no difference between the groups in terms of their admission information. The average levels of acetaminophen in both groups at admission, 12, 24, and 48 hours after hospitalization were not significantly different from each other. Twelve hours after hospitalization, the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level in the group treated with NAC was significantly higher than in the group treated with the combination of NAC and cimetidine (IU/L30.1 ± 110.0 versus IU/L26.38 ± 94.93, p = 0.044). At the other times that the level of liver enzymes was assessed, the serum levels of urea and creatinine were not significantly different in the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The intravenous administration of 300 mg of cimetidine every six hours with NAC did not improve the level of hepatoprotective action significantly compared with the NAC treatment protocol alone.

Interventions for paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose

BACKGROUND

Poisoning with paracetamol (acetaminophen) is a common cause of hepatotoxicity in the Western World. Inhibition of absorption, removal from the vascular system, antidotes, and liver transplantation are interventions for paracetamol poisoning.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of interventions for paracetamol overdose.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until December 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials and observational studies were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality plus liver transplantation. Secondary outcome measures were clinical symptoms, (eg, hepatic encephalopathy, fulminant hepatic failure), hepatotoxicity, adverse events, and plasma paracetamol concentration. We used Peto odds ratios and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for analysis of outcomes. Random- and fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten small and low-methodological quality randomised trials, one quasi-randomised study, and 48 observational studies were identified. It was not possible to perform relevant meta-analyses of randomised trials that have addressed our outcome measures. Activated charcoal, gastric lavage, and ipecacuanha are able to reduce the absorption of paracetamol, but the clinical benefit is unclear. Of these, activated charcoal seems to have the best risk-benefit ratio. N-acetylcysteine seems preferable to placebo/supportive treatment, dimercaprol, and cysteamine, but N-acetylcysteine's superiority to methionine is unproven. It is not clear which N-acetylcysteine treatment protocol offers the best efficacy. No strong evidence supports other interventions for paracetamol overdose. N-acetylcysteine may reduce mortality in patients with fulminant hepatic failure (Peto OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.94, one trial). Liver transplantation has the potential to be life saving in fulminant hepatic failure, but refinement of selection criteria for transplantation and long-term outcome reporting are required.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight a paucity of randomised trials on interventions for paracetamol overdose. Activated charcoal seems the best choice to reduce absorption. N-acetylcysteine should be given to patients with overdose but the selection criteria are not clear. No N-acetylcysteine regime has been shown to be more effective than any other. It is a delicate balance when to proceed to liver transplantation, which may be life-saving for patients with poor prognosis.

Interventions for paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdoses

BACKGROUND

Self-poisoning with paracetamol (acetaminophen) is a common cause of hepatotoxicity in the Western World. Interventions for paracetamol poisoning encompass inhibition of absorption, removal from the vascular system, antidotes, and liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of interventions or combination of interventions for paracetamol overdose.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and text searches were combined (until July 2001).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies as well as human volunteer randomised trials were included. The studies could be unpublished or published as an article, an abstract, or a letter and no language limitations were applied.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All the analyses were performed according to the intention to treat. The methodological quality of the included trials was evaluated by components of methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine RCTs (all small and of low methodological quality), one quasi-randomised trials, 37 observational studies, and nine randomised trials including human volunteers were identified. It was impossible to perform meta-analyses including more than two RCTs. Activated charcoal, gastric lavage, and ipecacuanha are able to reduce the absorption of paracetamol but the clinical benefit is unclear. Of these, activated charcoal seems to have the best risk-benefit ratio. N-acetylcysteine seems preferable to placebo/supportive treatment (relative risk of mortality in patients with fulminant hepatic failure = 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.99), dimercaprol, and cysteamine, but N-acetylcysteine's superiority to methionine is unproven. It is not clear which N-acetylcysteine treatment protocol offers the best efficacy. No evidence supports haemoperfusion or cimetidine for paracetamol overdose. Liver transplantation has the potential to be life saving in fulminant hepatic failure, but further refinement of selection criteria for liver transplantation and evaluation of the long-term outcome are required.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This systematic Review has highlighted a paucity of RCTs on interventions for paracetamol overdose. Activated charcoal seems the best choice to reduce paracetamol absorption. N-acetylcysteine should be given to patients with paracetamol overdose. No N-acetylcysteine regime has been shown to be more effective than any other. It is a delicate balance when to proceed to liver transplantation, which may be life saving in patients with a poor prognosis. Interventions for paracetamol overdose need assessment in high-quality, multi-centre RCTs.

Cimetidine as adjunctive treatment for acetaminophen overdose

The aim of this study was to determine if cimetidine in addition to N-acetylcysteine and standard supportive care provide additional hepatoprotection following acute acetaminophen poisoning. It was designed as a prospective study with alternate month treatment protocol, and the work was carried out at a regional certified poison information centre. For a 2-year period, consultations received by the Rocky Mountain Poison Center involving acute acetaminophen overdose patients with a serum level above the nomogram line, but who would not receive N-acetylcystine therapy until at least 8 h postingestion, were prospectively evaluated for adjunctive treatment with cimetidine. All patients received standard supportive therapy and N-acetylcysteine treatment. During odd numbered months, cimetidine 300 mg was administered intravenously every 6 h for the duration of N-acetylcysteine therapy. Forty-one cimetidine treated patients were compared to 66 patients in the control group. The peak measured AST levels (+/- s.e.) were 1259+/-330 and 1301+/-451 for the control and cimetidine treatment groups, respectively (P = 0.94). Fourteen of 64 patients (21%) in the control group and 8/41 patients (20%) in the cimetidine group developed an AST > 1000 IUL-1. There were no statistical differences between the cimetidine-treated and control groups when classified by AST < 100 IUL-1, 100-1000 IUL-1, or > 1000 IUL-1. The addition of cimetidine therapy to standard N-acetylcysteine treatment did not provide additional hepatoprotection in acutely acetaminophen poisoned patients when treatment was started later than 8 h post overdose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Drug glucuronidation in humans

Glucuronidation is a major metabolic pathway for a large number of drugs in humans. Conjugation of drugs and other chemicals with glucuronic acid is catalyzed by the multigene UDP-glucuronosyltransferase family. It is believed that a number (unspecified at present) of glucuronosyltransferase isozymes, which probably differ in terms of substrate specificity and regulation, contribute to drug glucuronidation. Factors known to influence the pharmacokinetics of glucuronidated drugs in man, presumably via an effect on specific glucuronosyltransferases, include age (especially the neonatal period), cigarette smoking, diet, certain disease states, coadministered drugs, ethnicity, genetics and hormonal effects.

Potential use of cimetidine for treatment of acetaminophen overdose

Acetaminophen, a drug frequently taken in intentional and accidental overdose, causes liver toxicity when concentration of the cytochrome P-450-derived metabolite exceeds the metabolic capacity of available glutathione. Present treatment of acetaminophen overdose involves oral N-acetylcysteine (NAC), which enhances liver glutathione synthesis. An alternative or additive approach to therapy would be to inhibit the formation of the toxic metabolite by inhibiting the cytochrome P-450 system. The H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine inhibits the cytochrome P-450 system, does not interfere with the administration or function of NAC, and therefore affords additive protection. Also, it has little effect on the nontoxic routes of elimination of acetaminophen and is itself quite nontoxic. That cimetidine protects against acetaminophen toxicity in animal models has been demonstrated on the basis of improved survival, as well as decreases in several critical elements used to monitor acetaminophen toxicity: classic histologic changes, aminotransferase activity, metabolite covalent binding, and liver glutathione depletion. Administration of cimetidine well after the overdose is also protective. In contrast, animal models of acetaminophen toxicity demonstrate that ranitidine does not afford protection from acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Clinical data in well-done trials in humans will be needed to support the experimental animal data.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of cimetidine 1987

The number of studies on drug interactions with cimetidine has increased at a rapid rate over the past 5 years, with many of the interactions being solely pharmacokinetic in origin. Very few studies have investigated the clinical relevance of such pharmacokinetic interactions by measuring pharmacodynamic responses or clinical endpoints. Apart from pharmacokinetic studies, invariably conducted in young, healthy subjects, there have been a large number of in vitro and in vivo animal studies, case reports, clinical observations and general reviews on the subject, which is tending to develop an industry of its own accord. Nevertheless, where specific mechanisms have been considered, these have undoubtedly increased our knowledge on the way in which humans eliminate xenobiotics. There is now sufficient information to predict the likelihood of a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction with cimetidine and to make specific clinical recommendations. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with cimetidine occur at the sites of gastrointestinal absorption and elimination including metabolism and excretion. Cimetidine has been found to reduce the plasma concentrations of ketoconazole, indomethacin and chlorpromazine by reducing their absorption. In the case of ketoconazole the interaction was clinically important. Cimetidine does not inhibit conjugation mechanisms including glucuronidation, sulphation and acetylation, or deacetylation or ethanol dehydrogenation. It binds to the haem portion of cytochrome P-450 and is thus an inhibitor of phase I drug metabolism (i.e. hydroxylation, dealkylation). Although generally recognised as a nonspecific inhibitor of this type of metabolism, cimetidine does demonstrate some degree of specificity. To date, theophylline 8-oxidation, tolbutamide hydroxylation, ibuprofen hydroxylation, misonidazole demethylation, carbamazepine epoxidation, mexiletine oxidation and steroid hydroxylation have not been shown to be inhibited by cimetidine in humans but the metabolism of at least 30 other drugs is affected. Recent evidence indicates negligible effects of cimetidine on liver blood flow. Cimetidine reduces the renal clearance of drugs which are organic cations, by competing for active tubular secretion in the proximal tubule of the kidney, reducing the renal clearances of procainamide, ranitidine, triamterene, metformin, flecainide and the active metabolite N-acetylprocainamide. This previously unrecognised form of drug interaction with cimetidine may be clinically important for both parent drug, and metabolites which may be active.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)