Pharmacokinetic properties of mezlocillin in ambulatory elderly subjects

Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of ß-lactam Antibiotics in Older People: A Systematic Review of Current Literature

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

(Patho)physiological changes in older people may influence the pharmacokinetics (PK), and consequently the target attainment, of ß-lactam antibiotics using standard dosing regimens. This systematic review compiles the current knowledge on the PK and target attainment of ß-lactam antibiotics in older people, with the aim to identify priorities for dose optimization in this patient population.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted. Relevant articles published prior to 1 December 2021 were identified as eligible when they included data on the PK of ß-lactam antibiotics in adults ≥ 65 years of age. Extracted information included reported PK parameters (volume of distribution, clearance [CL], elimination rate constant, intercompartmental CL, elimination half-life, area under the concentration-time curve, maximum and trough concentration), covariates on PK parameters, target attainment rate, and dosing recommendations.

RESULTS

Ninety-one relevant articles were included in this review. Four main ß-lactam subclasses were represented: 59.3% on cephalosporins + cephamycins, 25.3% on penicillins, 15.4% on carbapenems, and 3.3% on monobactams; 65.9% of articles involved intravenous administration, 16.5% mixed administration routes, 12.1% oral administration, and 5.5% intramuscular administration. The majority of studies had a small sample size, often did not include detailed information on the study population and methods, and were fairly old. CL was, on average, decreased, while elimination half-life was prolonged in aged subjects compared with young subjects. Volume of distribution was generally similar between age groups. Most studies identified renal function as the most important contributor to altered drug CL. In only 30.8% of the articles, target attainment was studied, and in 35.7% of these articles, target attainment was found to be suboptimal. Dosing recommendations were incorporated in 87.9% of articles.

CONCLUSION

Studies frequently fail to provide an evidence-based dosing recommendation for this diverse patient population. Model-based PK studies that address both physiological and disease-related changes are urgently needed. This review identified gaps of knowledge to set priorities for further research.

Analysis of the variability of the pharmacokinetics of multiple drugs in young adult and elderly subjects and its implications for acceptable daily exposures and cleaning validation limits

The elderly constitute a significant, potentially sensitive, subpopulation within the general population, which must be taken into account when performing risk assessments including determining an acceptable daily exposure (ADE) for the purpose of a cleaning validation. Known differences in the pharmacokinetics of drugs between young adults (who are typically the subjects recruited into clinical trials) and the elderly are potential contributors affecting the interindividual uncertainty factor (UF_H) component of the ADE calculation. The UF_H values were calculated for 206 drugs for young adult and elderly groups separately and combined (with the elderly assumed to be a sensitive subpopulation) from published studies where the pharmacokinetics of the young adult and elderly groups were directly compared. Based on the analysis presented here, it is recommended to use a default UF_H value of 10 for worker populations (which are assumed to be approximately equivalent to the young adult groups) where no supporting pharmacokinetic data exist, while it is recommended to use a default UF_H value of 15 for the general population, to take the elderly into consideration when calculating ADE values. The underlying reasons for the large differences between the exposures in the young adult and elderly subjects for the 10 compounds which show the greatest separation are different in almost every case, involving the OCT2 transporter, glucuronidation, hydrolysis, CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 or CYP3A5. Therefore, there is no consistent underlying mechanism which appears responsible for the largest differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between young adult and elderly subjects.

Pharmacokinetic dosage guidelines for elderly subjects

Ageing is associated with a decline in drug elimination; hence, using the same doses as in younger adults may result in higher plasma drug concentrations and toxicity. Two approaches are available for dose correction to account for decreased drug elimination. One procedure is based on the extrarenal elimination fraction (Q(0)) and the age-dependent changes in creatinine clearance; the other uses the decline in total drug clearance (CL). Mean values of Q(0) and CL in young and old people are reported for many drugs in the literature and are summarised in this article. Although the pharmacokinetic techniques for dose adjustment in the elderly are useful, they provide only an average dose correction and neglect age-dependent changes in drug bio-availability, plasma protein binding, the fate of active metabolites, and altered sensitivity to drugs. To account for pharmacodynamic changes in old age, clinical and/or biochemical targets should be defined as therapeutic goals. Drugs whose effects cannot be monitored in these terms should be avoided in elderly individuals.

Pharmacokinetics of aztreonam in healthy elderly and young adult volunteers

Aztreonam is a monobactam exhibiting an antibacterial spectrum similar to that of the aminoglycosides, with activity against aerobic gram-negative bacilli, and is the only related drug that may be given to patients hypersensitive to beta-lactams. The pharmacokinetics of aztreonam were compared in two groups of healthy volunteers. The young group comprised 10 adults between the ages of 18 and 30 years, and the elderly group included 10 adults older than 65 years of age. The two groups each received two doses (1 and 2 g) aztreonam, separated by 1 week. Although the mean peak serum concentrations of aztreonam for the two groups were similar, there were differences in other pharmacokinetic parameters. For example, for the 2-g dose the mean half-life (1.8 +/- .51 versus 3.1 +/- .9 hour), and area under the curve (AUC) (294.42 +/- 64.08 versus 469.01 +/- 144.02 micrograms x hour/mL per 1.73 m2) were less for the younger group compared with the elderly group. The mean total body clearance of aztreonam was greater for the younger than the elderly group. The results were similar to the pharmacokinetic parameters derived from the 1-g dose. These results mirror the lower creatinine clearances and higher serum creatinine levels found in the elderly group. The data suggest that lower doses of aztreonam given at less frequent intervals may be appropriate in the elderly population.