Single-dose pharmacokinetics of isepamicin in young and geriatric volunteers

A Mechanistic Approach for the Scaling of Clearance in Children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Clearance is an important pharmacokinetic concept for scaling dosage, understanding the risks of drug-drug interactions and environmental risk assessment in children. Accurate clearance scaling to children requires prior knowledge of adult clearance mechanisms and the age-dependence of physiological and enzymatic development. The objective of this research was to develop and evaluate ontogeny models that would provide an assessment of the age-dependence of clearance.

METHODS

Using in vitro data and/or in vivo clearance values for children for eight compounds that are eliminated primarily by one process, models for the ontogeny of renal clearance, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, CYP2E1, CYP1A2, uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7, UGT1A6, sulfonation and biliary clearance were developed. Resulting ontogeny models were evaluated using six compounds that demonstrated elimination via multiple pathways. The proportion of total clearance attributed to each clearance pathway in adults was delineated. Each pathway was individually scaled to the desired age, inclusive of protein-binding prediction, and summed to generate a total plasma clearance for the child under investigation. The paediatric age range included in the study was premature neonates to sub-adults.

RESULTS

There was excellent correlation between observed and predicted clearances for the model development (R2 = 0.979) and test sets (Q2 = 0.927). Clearance in premature neonates could also be well predicted (development R2 = 0.951; test Q2 = 0.899).

CONCLUSION

Paediatric clinical trial development could greatly benefit from clearance scaling, particularly in guiding dosing regimens. Furthermore, since the proportion of clearance via different elimination pathways is age-dependent, information could be gained on the developmental extent of drug-drug interactions.

Comparison of two methods to obtain a desired first isepamicin peak in intensive care patients

A randomized multicenter study in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, evaluated the capacity of a Bayesian method to obtain an optimal first isepamicin (ISP) peak of 80 mg/L in comparison to a fixed loading dose (LD). Patients (n=236) over 18 years of age were enrolled from 6 September 1997 to 17 July 1999 and randomly assigned to received ISP in a calculated dose (CD) or a loading dose (LD) of 25 mg/kg body weight. The CD was estimated using a specific population model with Bayesian methodology implemented in the PKS program (Abbott PKS, Abbott Diagnostics, Rungis, France). The data required included age, body weight, height, gender and serum creatinine. ISP disposition is described by a one-compartment model. Blood samples were drawn 1 and 24 h after the start of infusion for fluorescence polarization immunoassay measurement of serum ISP concentrations. The predictive performance was assessed by computing bias and precision. Peak concentrations were significantly higher in CD group than the LD group (84.2 +/- 28.6 vs. 74.7 +/- 24.1 mg/L, respectively; P=0.008), but trough levels were comparable. The optimal ISP peak was attained by a significantly higher percentage of CD patients (P=0.018), and by significantly more CD patients on mechanical ventilation (P=0.025), and with simplified acute physiological scores (SAPS) > 35 (P=0.002). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for the two groups with large interindividual variations. Mean (+/- SD) volume of distribution of ventilated patients (72%) was significantly higher than of nonventilated patients (23.31 +/- 7.35 vs. 20.60 +/- 6.30 L, respectively; P=0.001). No relationship was found between the volume of distribution and SAPS. Total clearance was significantly correlated with estimated CLCR (creatinine clearance) (P=0.0001). Precision (RMSE) is better for CD than for LD strategy, respectively 27.96 and 28.66 mg/L. The Bayesian method was significantly more accurate and performed particularly well in ventilated patients and patients with high SAPS, compare to an LD of 25 mg/kg to obtain a first ISP peak of 80 mg/L in ICU patients. Therefore, a fixed dose of 28.5 mg/kg would be also adequate to reach a peak of 80 mg/L.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of isepamicin

Isepamicin is an aminoglycoside antibacterial with properties similar to those of amikacin, but with better activity against strains producing type I 6'-acetyltransferase. The antibacterial spectrum includes Enterobacteriaceae and staphylococci. Anaerobes, Neisseriaceae and streptococci are resistant. The lower and upper break-points are 8 and 16 mg/L. Like other aminoglycosides, isepamicin exhibits a strong concentration-dependent bactericidal effect, a long post-antibiotic effect (several hours) and induces adaptive resistance. Isepamicin is administered intravenously or intramuscularly at a dosage of 15 mg/kg once daily or 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. Isepamicin is not bound to plasma proteins, and it distributes in extracellular fluids and into some cells (outer hair cells, kidney cortex) by active transport. Isepamicin is not metabolised and is eliminated solely via the renal route with an elimination half-life (t 1/2 beta) of 2 to 3 hours in adults with normal renal function. The clearance of isepamicin is reduced in neonates, and 7.5 mg/kg once daily is recommended in children <16 days old. Clearance is also reduced in the elderly, but no dosage adjustment is required. In patients with chronic renal impairment, isepamicin clearance is proportional to creatinine clearance (CLCR); the recommended regimen is 8 mg/kg with an administration interval of 24 hours in moderate impairment, 48 hours in severe impairment, 72 hours for CL(CR) 0.6 to 1.14 L/h (10 to 19 ml/min) and 96 hours for CL(CR) 0.36 to 0.54 L/h (6 to 9 ml/min). In end-stage renal failure, isepamicin is eliminated by haemodialysis, but the administration interval should be determined by monitoring the plasma concentration. Compared with healthy volunteers, patients in the intensive care unit or with neutropenic cancer have an increased volume of distribution and a lower clearance, but the 15 mg/kg once daily regimen remains adequate. Isepamicin kinetics are linear in the range 7.5 to 25 mg/kg, so that dosage adjustments, if necessary, are straightforward. Isepamicin can induce nephro-, vestibulo- and oto-toxicity. However, animal and clinical studies show that isepamicin is one of the less toxic aminoglycosides. The usefulness of maintaining serum aminoglycoside concentrations within a therapeutic range remains controversial. With isepamicin, it is proposed to achieve a 1-hour concentration (30 minutes after a 30-minute infusion) >40 mg/L to maximise bactericidal efficacy, and a 'trough' concentration (at the end of the administration interval) <5 mg/L to minimise toxicity. These thresholds should be modified on an individual basis, considering covariates such as concomitant treatment, underlying disease, nature of bacterial strain and site of infection.