Survey of clinical pharmacist perceptions and practices in promoting sleep in intensive care unit patients

Clinical pharmacists' participation in ward rounds in hospitals: responses from a national survey

OBJECTIVES

The inclusion of clinical pharmacists in ward rounds (WRs) can reduce adverse drug events, improve communication and enable collaborative decision-making. The aim of this study is to investigate the level of and factors that influence WR participation by clinical pharmacists in Australia.

METHODS

An online administered, anonymous survey of clinical pharmacists in Australia was conducted. The survey was open to pharmacists aged ≥18 years, who had worked in an Australian hospital in a clinical role in the previous two weeks. It was distributed via The Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia and on pharmacist-specific social media threads. Survey questions related to the extent of WR participation and factors that influence WR participation. Cross-tabulation analysis was conducted to determine whether there was an association between WR participation and factors that influence WR participation.

KEY FINDINGS

Ninety-nine responses were included. The level of WR participation by clinical pharmacists in Australian hospitals was low, with only 26/67 (39%) pharmacists who had a WR in their clinical unit actually attending the WR in the previous 2 weeks. Factors that influenced WR participation included having recognition of the role of the clinical pharmacist within the WR team, support from pharmacy management and the broader interprofessional team, and having adequate time and expectation from pharmacy management and colleagues to participate in WRs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the need for ongoing interventions such as restructuring workflows and increasing the awareness of the role of a clinical pharmacist in WR to increase participation of pharmacists in this interprofessional activity.

Evaluation of the Impact of Prior-to-Admission Sleep Aid Prescribing Practices on Sleep and Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Sleep disruptions in the intensive care unit (ICU) may lead to complications such as delirium. There is limited evidence addressing how sleep aid use before and during ICU admission affects outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of prior-to-admission sleep aid prescribing practices in the ICU on delirium and sleep outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of adult patients admitted to any ICU from January to June 2018 receiving a sleep aid prior to admission. Patients were categorized based on sleep aid continuation, discontinuation, or alteration during the ICU admission. The primary end point was the incidence of delirium. Secondary end points included the incidence of sleep-wake cycle disturbances, delirium scores, and ICU length of stay.

RESULTS

A total of 291 patients were included with 109 in the continued group, 121 in the discontinued group, and 61 in the altered group. There was a similar incidence of delirium at 24 hours (P = 0.71), 48 hours (P = 0.60), 72 hours (P = 0.25), and 5 days (P = 0.48) after ICU admission. There was also no statistical difference in sleep-wake cycle disturbances or delirium scores at any time point. ICU length of stay was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The incidence of delirium and sleep-wake cycle disturbances was not affected by differences in prior-to-admission sleep aid prescribing patterns during ICU admission.

The pharmacist's role in implementation of the ABCDEF bundle into clinical practice

PURPOSE

To summarize published data regarding implementation of the ABCDEF bundle, a multicomponent process for avoidance of oversedation and prolonged ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients; discuss pertinent literature to support each bundle element; and discuss the role of the pharmacist in coordinating bundle elements and implementation of the ABCDEF bundle into clinical practice.

SUMMARY

Neuromuscular weakness and ICU-acquired weakness are common among critically ill patients and associated with significant cost and societal burdens. Recent literature supporting early liberation from mechanical ventilation and early mobilization has demonstrated improved short- and long-term outcomes. With expanded use of pharmacy services in the ICU setting, pharmacists are well positioned to advocate for best care practices in ICUs. A dedicated, interprofessional team is necessary for the implementation of the ABCDEF bundle in inpatient clinical practice settings. As evidenced by a number of studies, successful implementation of the ABCDEF bundle derives from involvement by motivated and highly trained individuals, timely completion of individual patient care tasks, and effective leadership to ensure proper implementation and ongoing support. Factors commonly identified by clinicians as barriers to bundle implementation in clinical practice include patient instability and safety concerns, lack of knowledge, staff concerns, unclear protocol criteria, and lack of interprofessional team care coordination. This narrative review discusses research on bundle elements and recommendations for application by pharmacists in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the benefits associated with implementation of the ABCDEF bundle, evidence suggests that the recommended interventions may not be routinely used within the ICU. The pharmacist provides the expertise and knowledge for adoption of the bundle into everyday clinical practice.