1
|
Xipell M, Molina-Andújar A, Cid J, Piñeiro GJ, Montagud-Marrahi E, Cofan F, Oppenheimer F, Rovira J, Diekmann F, Lozano M. Immunogenic and immunotolerogenic effects of extracorporeal photopheresis in high immunological risk kidney recipients. A single center case series. J Clin Apher 2021; 37:197-205. [PMID: 34936110 DOI: 10.1002/jca.21958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The immunomodulatory effects of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) have been used for the treatment of T-cell mediated disorders, such as rejection in organ transplantation. Currently, it is an established therapy for heart and lung rejection, but not for kidney transplantation (KT), where experience is limited. In addition, some data suggest that ECP could generate an immune response against infections, thus being an alternative for the treatment of rejection in case of active or high-risk of infection. In the present study, we analyze four cases of use of ECP as concomitant therapy in patients with KT and high risk of opportunistic infections due to the high burden of immunosuppression throughout their renal diseases. Two patients had concomitant viral infection (cytomegalovirus and BK virus, respectively) and three patients were on treatment for graft rejection. In the two patients with active viral infection, the infection was successfully controlled during ECP treatment. In all cases, ECP has been shown to be a safe procedure, without complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Xipell
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alícia Molina-Andújar
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Cid
- Apheresis Unit, Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gastón J Piñeiro
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahi
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frederic Cofan
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frederic Oppenheimer
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain.,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain.,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miquel Lozano
- Apheresis Unit, Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gregorini M, Del Fante C, Pattonieri EF, Avanzini MA, Grignano MA, Cassaniti I, Baldanti F, Comolli G, Nocco A, Ramondetta M, Viarengo G, Sepe V, Libetta C, Klersy C, Perotti C, Rampino T. Photopheresis Abates the Anti-HLA Antibody Titer and Renal Failure Progression in Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection. BIOLOGY 2021; 10:biology10060547. [PMID: 34207225 PMCID: PMC8234140 DOI: 10.3390/biology10060547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary The most common cause of late allograft failure is chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), but no effective therapy is available. Different immunosuppressive drugs in combination with procedures that remove serum antibodies have been used and the results have not shown to improve graft and patient outcome, but only an increased risk of adverse events. Extracorporeal pho-topheresis (ECP) is leukapheresis-based immunomodulatory therapy not associated with adverse effect, in which lymphocytes treat-ed with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) are irradiated with ultraviolet-A (UVA) ex vivo and re-infused into the patient. In this study we investigated therapeutic long-term effect of ECP in patients with biopsy proved chronic ABMR. Abstract Objective: Chronic renal antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a common cause of allograft failure, but an effective therapy is not available. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been proven successful in chronic lung and heart rejection, and graft versus host disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ECP in chronic ABMR patients. Patients and Methods: We investigated ECP treatment in 14 patients with biopsy-proven chronic ABMR and stage 2–3 chronic renal failure. The primary aim was to e valuate the eGFR lowering after 1 year of ECP therapy. The ECP responders (R) showed eGFR reduction greater than 20% vs the basal levels. We also evaluated the effectiveness of ECP on proteinuria, anti-HLA antibodies (HLAab), interleukin 6 (IL-6) serum levels, and CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, NK, Treg and T helper 17 (Th17) circulating cells. Results: Three patients dropped out of the study. The R patients were eight (72.7%) out of the 11 remaining patients. Because ECP was not associated with any adverse reaction, the R patients continued such treatment for up to 3 years, showing a persisting eGFR stabilization. Twenty four hour proteinuria did not increase in the R patients over the follow-up when compared to the non-responder patients (NR). In the R patients, the HLAab levels were reduced and completely cleared in six out of eight patients when compared with the NR patients. The NR HLAab levels also increased after the discontinuation of the ECP. The ECP in the R patients showed a decrease in CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, and NK circulating cells. The ECP treatment in the R patients also induced Tregs and Th17 cell increases, and a decrease of the IL-6 serum levels. Conclusions: ECP abates the HLAab titer and renal failure progression in patients with chronic renal ABMR, modulating the immune cellular and humoral responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilena Gregorini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (E.F.P.); (M.A.G.); (V.S.); (T.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0382-502591; Fax: +39-0382-503666
| | - Claudia Del Fante
- Immunohematology and Transfusion Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (C.D.F.); (G.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Eleonora Francesca Pattonieri
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (E.F.P.); (M.A.G.); (V.S.); (T.R.)
| | - Maria Antonietta Avanzini
- Immunology and Transplantation Laboratory, Cell Factory, Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Maria Antonietta Grignano
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (E.F.P.); (M.A.G.); (V.S.); (T.R.)
| | - Irene Cassaniti
- Molecular Virology Unit, Department of Microbiology and Virology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (I.C.); (F.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Fausto Baldanti
- Molecular Virology Unit, Department of Microbiology and Virology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (I.C.); (F.B.); (G.C.)
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuditta Comolli
- Molecular Virology Unit, Department of Microbiology and Virology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (I.C.); (F.B.); (G.C.)
- Experimental Research Laboratories, Biotechnology Area, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Angela Nocco
- Laboratory of Transplant Immunology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy; (A.N.); (M.R.)
| | - Miriam Ramondetta
- Laboratory of Transplant Immunology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy; (A.N.); (M.R.)
| | - Gianluca Viarengo
- Immunohematology and Transfusion Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (C.D.F.); (G.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Vincenzo Sepe
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (E.F.P.); (M.A.G.); (V.S.); (T.R.)
| | - Carmelo Libetta
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (E.F.P.); (M.A.G.); (V.S.); (T.R.)
| | - Catherine Klersy
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Cesare Perotti
- Immunohematology and Transfusion Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (C.D.F.); (G.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Teresa Rampino
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (E.F.P.); (M.A.G.); (V.S.); (T.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knobler R, Arenberger P, Arun A, Assaf C, Bagot M, Berlin G, Bohbot A, Calzavara-Pinton P, Child F, Cho A, French LE, Gennery AR, Gniadecki R, Gollnick HPM, Guenova E, Jaksch P, Jantschitsch C, Klemke C, Ludvigsson J, Papadavid E, Scarisbrick J, Schwarz T, Stadler R, Wolf P, Zic J, Zouboulis C, Zuckermann A, Greinix H. European dermatology forum: Updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020 - Part 2. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 35:27-49. [PMID: 32964529 PMCID: PMC7821314 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Following the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma published in 1983, this technology has received continued use and further recognition for additional earlier as well as refractory forms. After the publication of the first guidelines for this technology in the JEADV in 2014, this technology has maintained additional promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multidisciplinary setting. It has confirmed recognition in well‐known documented conditions such as graft‐vs.‐host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection including lung, heart and liver and to a lesser extent inflammatory bowel disease. Materials and methods In order to further provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) again proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. All authors had the opportunity to review each contribution as it was added. Results and conclusion These updated 2020 guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion. The guidelines were divided into two parts: PART I covers Cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, chronic graft‐vs.‐host disease and acute graft‐vs.‐host disease, while PART II will cover scleroderma, solid organ transplantation, Crohn’s disease, use of ECP in paediatric patients, atopic dermatitis, type 1 diabetes, pemphigus, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and erosive oral lichen planus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Knobler
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Arenberger
- Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - A Arun
- FRCPath, The Rotherham NHA Foundation Trust, Rotherham, United Kingdom
| | - C Assaf
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - M Bagot
- Hospital Saint Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - G Berlin
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - A Bohbot
- Onco-Hematology Department, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - F Child
- FRCP, St John's Institution of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Cho
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - L E French
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, München, Germany
| | - A R Gennery
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute Newcastle University Great North Children's Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - R Gniadecki
- Division of Dermatology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - H P M Gollnick
- Department Dermatology & Venereology Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - E Guenova
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Department of Dermatology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - P Jaksch
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Jantschitsch
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Klemke
- Hautklinik Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - J Ludvigsson
- Crown Princess Victoria Children's Hospital and Division of Pediatrics, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - E Papadavid
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - J Scarisbrick
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - T Schwarz
- Department of Dermatology, University Clinics Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - R Stadler
- University Clinic for Dermatology Johannes Wesling Medical Centre, UKRUB, University of Bochum, Minden, Germany
| | - P Wolf
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - J Zic
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Dermatology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - C Zouboulis
- Departments of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Immunology, Dessau Medical Center, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Dessau, Germany
| | - A Zuckermann
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - H Greinix
- LKH-Univ. Klinikum Graz, Division of Haematology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of graft rejection in 33 adult kidney transplant recipients. Transfus Apher Sci 2019; 58:515-524. [PMID: 31383541 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2019.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Background - Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has shown encouraging results in the prevention of allograft rejection in heart transplantation. However, the role of ECP in kidney transplant (KT) rejection needs to be determined. Methods - This multicentre retrospective study included 33 KT recipients who were treated with ECP for allograft rejection (23 acute antibody-mediated rejections (AMRs), 2 chronic AMRs and 8 acute cellular rejections (ACRs)). The ECP indications were KT rejection in patients who were resistant to standard therapies (n = 18) or in patients for whom standard therapies were contraindicated because of concomitant infections or cancers (n = 15). Results - At 12 months (M12) post-ECP, 11 patients (33%) had a stabilization of kidney function with a graft survival rate of 61%. The Banff AMR score (g + ptc + v) was a risk factor for graft loss at M12 (HR 1.44 [1.01-2.05], p < 0.05). The factorial mixed data analysis identified 2 clusters. Patients with a functional graft at M12 tended to have cellular and/or chronic rejections. Patients with graft loss at M12 tended to have acute rejections and/or AMR; higher serum creatinine levels; DSA levels and histologic scores of AMR; and a longer delay between the rejection and ECP start than those of patients with functional grafts. Conclusions - ECP may be helpful to control ACR or moderate AMR in KT recipients presenting concomitant opportunistic infections or malignancies when it is initiated early.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sirolimus Increases T-Cell Abundance in the Sun Exposed Skin of Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplant Direct 2017; 3:e171. [PMID: 28706974 PMCID: PMC5498012 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) receiving the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor sirolimus may display a reduced risk of skin cancer development compared to KTRs receiving calcineurin inhibitors. Despite studies investigating the effects of these 2 drug classes on T cells in patient blood, the effect these drugs may have in patient skin is not yet known. METHODS Fifteen patients with chronic kidney disease (not recipients of immunosuppressive drugs), and 30 KTRs (15 receiving a calcineurin inhibitor, and 15 receiving sirolimus) provided matched samples of blood, sun exposed (SE) and non-SE skin. The abundance of total CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, memory CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, and regulatory T (Treg) cells in each sample was then assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS Sirolimus treatment significantly increased absolute numbers of CD4+ T cells, memory CD8+- and CD4+ T cells, and Treg cells in SE skin versus paired samples of non-SE skin. No differences were found in the absolute number of any T cell subset in the blood. Correlation analysis revealed that the percentage of T cell subsets in the blood does not always accurately reflect the percentage of T-cell subsets in the skin of KTRs. Furthermore, sirolimus significantly disrupts the balance of memory CD4+ T cells in the skin after chronic sun exposure. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that immunosuppressive drug class and sun exposure modify the abundance of multiple T-cell subsets in the skin of KTRs. Correlation analysis revealed that the prevalence of Treg cells in KTR blood does not accurately reflect the prevalence of Treg cells in KTR skin.
Collapse
|
6
|
Morelli AE, Larregina AT. Concise Review: Mechanisms Behind Apoptotic Cell-Based Therapies Against Transplant Rejection and Graft versus Host Disease. Stem Cells 2016; 34:1142-50. [PMID: 26865545 DOI: 10.1002/stem.2326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2015] [Revised: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 01/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The main limitations to the success of transplantation are the antigraft response developed by the recipient immune system, and the adverse side effects of chronic immunosuppression. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) triggered by donor-derived T lymphocytes against the recipient tissues is another serious obstacle in the field of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Several laboratories have tested the possibility of promoting antigen (Ag)-specific tolerance for therapy of graft rejection, GVHD, and autoimmune disorders, by developing methodologies that mimic the mechanisms by which the immune system maintains peripheral tolerance in the steady state. It has been long recognized that the silent clearance of cells undergoing apoptosis exerts potent immune-regulatory effects and provides apoptotic cell-derived Ags to those Ag-presenting cells (APCs) that internalize them, in particular macrophages and dendritic cells. Therefore, in situ-targeting of recipient APCs by systemic administration of leukocytes in early apoptosis and bearing donor Ags represents a relatively simple approach to control the antidonor response against allografts. Here, we review the mechanisms by which apoptotic cells are silently cleared by phagocytes, and how such phenomenon leads to down-regulation of the innate and adaptive immunity. We discuss the evolution of apoptotic cell-based therapies from murine models of organ/tissue transplantation and GVHD, to clinical trials. We make emphasis on potential limitations and areas of concern of apoptotic cell-based therapies, and on how other immune-suppressive therapies used in the clinics or tested experimentally likely also function through the silent clearance of apoptotic cells by the immune system. Stem Cells 2016;34:1142-1150.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian E Morelli
- T.E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, Department of Surgery.,Departments of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, USA
| | - Adriana T Larregina
- Departments of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, USA.,Departments of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, USA.,McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Knobler R, Berlin G, Calzavara-Pinton P, Greinix H, Jaksch P, Laroche L, Ludvigsson J, Quaglino P, Reinisch W, Scarisbrick J, Schwarz T, Wolf P, Arenberger P, Assaf C, Bagot M, Barr M, Bohbot A, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Dreno B, Enk A, French L, Gniadecki R, Gollnick H, Hertl M, Jantschitsch C, Jung A, Just U, Klemke CD, Lippert U, Luger T, Papadavid E, Pehamberger H, Ranki A, Stadler R, Sterry W, Wolf IH, Worm M, Zic J, Zouboulis CC, Hillen U. Guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 28 Suppl 1:1-37. [PMID: 24354653 PMCID: PMC4291097 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2013] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma was published in 1983 with its subsequent recognition by the FDA for its refractory forms, the technology has shown significant promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi-disciplinary setting. Among the major studied conditions are graft versus host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection and inflammatory bowel disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS In order to provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION These guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Knobler
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Worel N, Leitner G. Clinical Results of Extracorporeal Photopheresis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 39:254-262. [PMID: 22969695 DOI: 10.1159/000341811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2012] [Accepted: 07/12/2012] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a combination of leukapheresis and photodynamic therapy in which blood is treated with photoactivable drugs which are then activated with ultraviolet light and re-infused to the patient. It has been used successfully for more than 30 years in the treatment of erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and over 20 years for chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). ECP has also shown promising results in the treatment of acute GVHD and other T-cell-mediated diseases, including systemic sclerosis, treatment and prevention of solid organ rejection, and more recently Crohn's disease. The use of ECP may allow a significant reduction or even discontinuation of corticosteroids and/or other immunosuppressants, thus leading to reduced long-term morbidity and mortality and improved overall survival. ECP is a well-tolerated therapy. No significant side effects have been reported during the last 30 years. It has been shown that ECP is not associated with an increased incidence of infections, malignancies, or recurrence of underlying malignant disease, neither during short-term nor during long-term therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Worel
- Department for Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
One of the ultimate goals in transplantation is to develop novel therapeutic methods for induction of donor-specific tolerance to reduce the side effects caused by the generalized immunosuppression associated to the currently used pharmacologic regimens. Interaction or phagocytosis of cells in early apoptosis exerts potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects on antigen (Ag)-presenting cells (APC) like dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages. This observation led to the idea that apoptotic cell-based therapies could be employed to deliver donor-Ag in combination with regulatory signals to recipient’s APC as therapeutic approach to restrain the anti-donor response. This review describes the multiple mechanisms by which apoptotic cells down-modulate the immuno-stimulatory and pro-inflammatory functions of DC and macrophages, and the role of the interaction between apoptotic cells and APC in self-tolerance and in apoptotic cell-based therapies to prevent/treat allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease in murine experimental systems and in humans. It also explores the role that in vivo-generated apoptotic cells could have in the beneficial effects of extracorporeal photopheresis, donor-specific transfusion, and tolerogenic DC-based therapies in transplantation.
Collapse
|