Incidence, diagnosis, and outcome of immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: A nationwide survey by the Spanish registry of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Should we consider caplacizumab as routine treatment for acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura? An expert perspective on the pros and cons

INTRODUCTION

Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare and life-threatening disorder. Caplacizumab has been the latest drug incorporated into the initial treatment of acute episodes, allowing for faster platelet recovery and a decrease in refractoriness, exacerbation, thromboembolic events, and mortality. However, caplacizumab is also associated with a bleeding risk and higher treatment costs, which prevent many centers from using it universally.

AREAS COVERED

Studies that included iTTP and/or caplacizumab to date were selected for this review using PubMed and MEDLINE platforms. We describe outcomes in the pre-caplacizumab era and after it, highlighting the benefits and risks of its use early in frontline, and also pointing out special situations that require careful management.

EXPERT OPINION

It is clear that the availability of caplacizumab has significantly and favorably impacted the management of iTTP patients. Whether this improvement is cost-effective still remains uncertain, and data on long-term sequelae and different healthcare systems will help to clarify this point. In addition, evidence of the bleeding/thrombotic risk of iTTP patients under this drug needs to be better addressed in future studies.

Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in older patients: Results from the Spanish TTP Registry (REPTT)

Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is an ultra-rare disease that seldom occurs in the elderly. Few reports have studied the clinical course of iTTP in older patients. In this study, we have analysed the clinical characteristics at presentation and response to therapy in a series of 44 patients with iTTP ≥60 years at diagnosis from the Spanish TTP Registry and compared them with 209 patients with <60 years at diagnosis from the same Registry. Similar symptoms and laboratory results were described in both groups, except for a higher incidence of renal dysfunction among older patients (23% vs. 43.1%; p = 0.008). Front-line treatment in patients ≥60 years was like that administered in younger patients. Also, no evidence of a difference in clinical response and overall survival was seen in both groups. Of note, 14 and 25 patients ≥60 years received treatment with caplacizumab and rituximab, respectively, showing a favourable safety and efficacy profile, like that observed in patients <60 years.

Effectiveness and safety of caplacizumab in acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: health technology assessment and classification according to the methodology established in Colombia

OBJECTIVES

Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP) is a rare hematological disease whose clinical management includes caplacizumab along with plasma exchange and immunosuppression, according to international guidelines. Caplacizumab has been available in Colombia since 2022. This study seeks to determine the therapeutic classification of caplacizumab according to the methodology of the Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud.

METHODS

The classification was carried out through a deliberative process following the modified Delphi technique, with a panel of experts, made up of four hemato-oncologists, a pharmaceutical chemist, and a patient. The results of effectiveness and safety obtained through a systematic review, therapeutic thresholds (clinical significance), and degree of acceptability (willingness to use the technology) were used for the classification.

RESULTS

Fourteen effectiveness and safety outcomes were submitted for the classification process. Caplacizumab showed clinical significance for some effectiveness outcomes, was not considered inferior in terms of safety, and displayed acceptability of use. Through consensus, the panel determined that caplacizumab plus the standard regimen is superior to the standard regimen in terms of treatment response and composite outcome, and no different for the other effectiveness and safety outcomes. Likewise, in overall terms, the panel determined that caplacizumab together with the standard regimen is superior to the standard regimen.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with caplacizumab together with the standard regimen was considered superior to the standard regimen for the treatment of patients with aTTP, as it showed clinically significant benefits in critical outcomes for decision making, and a safety profile no different to its comparator.

Spanish registry of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (REPTT): Data evidence and new developments

Immuno Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare and potentially fatal disorder characterized by systemic microvascular thrombosis because of a severe deficiency of ADAMTS13. It is difficult to generate knowledge about TTP because of its low incidence and the lack of clinical trials. Most of the evidence on diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis has been generated from real-world data registries. In 2004, the Spanish Apheresis Group (GEA) implemented the Spanish registry of TTP (REPTT) with 438 patients suffering 684 acute episodes in 53 hospitals up to January 2022. REPTT has studied several aspects of TTP in Spain. The iTTP incidence in Spain our country is 2.67 (95 % CI 1.90-3.45) and the prevalence is 21.44 (95 % CI % 19.10-23.73) patients per million inhabitants. The refractoriness incidence is 4.8 % and exacerbation incidence was 8.4 %, with a median of follow-up of 131.5 months (IQR: 14-178 months). In a 2018 review, the mortality in the first episode due to TTP was 7.8 %. We have also found that de novo episodes require fewer PEX procedures than relapses. Since June 2023, REPTT will involve Spain and Portugal, with a recommended sampling protocol and new variables to improve the neurological, vascular and quality of life evaluation of these patients. The main strength of this project will be the involvement of a combined population of more than 57 million inhabitants, which implies an annual incidence of close to 180 acute episodes per year. This will allow us to provide better answers to questions like treatment efficacy, associated morbidity and mortality, and the possible neurocognitive and cardiac sequelae.

The efficacy and safety of caplacizumab in Japanese patients with immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: an open-label phase 2/3 study

Caplacizumab is an anti-von Willebrand factor humanized single-variable-domain immunoglobulin fragment whose efficacy and safety in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura (iTTP) have been demonstrated in international studies. This prospective, open-label phase 2/3 study evaluated caplacizumab 10 mg administered daily during plasma exchange and for 30 days afterward, in combination with immunosuppressive treatment, in Japanese adults with a clinical diagnosis of iTTP (new or recurrent). The primary endpoint was prevention of iTTP recurrence; key secondary endpoints included time to platelet count response, time to organ damage normalization, and safety. Among 21 treated patients, 1 of 15 (6.7%) evaluable patients developed iTTP recurrence. Median time to normalization was 2.79 days for platelet count and 2.65 days for organ damage markers (n = 15). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mostly mild to moderate in severity; the most frequently reported caplacizumab-related TEAEs were increased alanine aminotransferase, epistaxis, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (all in 9.5% of patients). At least one bleeding event was reported in 7 of 21 patients (33%). Caplacizumab was effective in Japanese patients with iTTP, with a low rate of iTTP recurrence, rapid normalization of platelet counts and organ damage markers, and no unexpected TEAEs. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04074187.

An update on the pathogenesis and diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

INTRODUCTION

Severe ADAMTS13 deficiency defines thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). ADAMTS13 is responsible for VWF cleavage. In the absence of this enzyme, widespread thrombi formation occurs, causing microangiopathic anemia and thrombocytopenia and leading to ischemic organ injury. Understanding ADAMTS13 function is crucial to diagnose and manage TTP, both in the immune and hereditary forms.

AREAS COVERED

The role of ADAMTS13 in coagulation homeostasis and the consequences of its deficiency are detailed. Other factors that modulate the consequences of ADAMTS13 deficiency are explained, such as complement system activation, genetic predisposition, or the presence of an inflammatory status. Clinical suspicion of TTP is crucial to start prompt treatment and avoid mortality and sequelae. Available techniques to diagnose this deficiency and detect autoantibodies or gene mutations are presented, as they have become faster and more available in recent years.

EXPERT OPINION

A better knowledge of TTP pathophysiology is leading to an improvement in diagnosis and follow-up, as well as a customized treatment in patients with TTP. This scenario is necessary to define the role of new targeted therapies already available or coming soon and the need to better diagnose and monitor at the molecular level the evolution of the disease.

Real-world effectiveness of caplacizumab vs the standard of care in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a thrombotic microangiopathy caused by anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies. Caplacizumab is approved for adults with an acute episode of iTTP in conjunction with plasma exchange (PEX) and immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the safety and efficacy of caplacizumab vs the standard of care and assess the effect of the concomitant use of rituximab. A retrospective study from the Spanish TTP Registry of patients treated with caplacizumab vs those who did not receive it was conducted. A total of 155 patients with iTTP (77 caplacizumab, 78 no caplacizumab) were included. Patients initially treated with caplacizumab had fewer exacerbations (4.5% vs 20.5%; P < .05) and less refractoriness (4.5% vs 14.1%; P < .05) than those who were not treated. Time to clinical response was shorter when caplacizumab was used as initial treatment vs caplacizumab used after refractoriness or exacerbation. The multivariate analysis showed that its use in the first 3 days after PEX was associated with a lower number of PEX (odds ratio, 7.5; CI, 2.3-12.7; P < .05) and days of hospitalization (odds ratio, 11.2; CI, 5.6-16.9; P < .001) compared with standard therapy. There was no difference in time to clinical remission in patients treated with caplacizumab compared with the use of rituximab. No severe adverse event was described in the caplacizumab group. In summary, caplacizumab reduced exacerbations and refractoriness compared with standard of care regimens. When administered within the first 3 days after PEX, it also provided a faster clinical response, reducing hospitalization time and the need for PEX.

Focus on Key Issues in Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: Italian Experience of Six Centers

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is a rare and challenging hematological disease caused by the antibody anti-ADAMTS13. Though the mortality rate has decreased considerably in recent years, fatalities still remain unacceptable. This study aimed at further adding to the existing knowledge of this medical challenge. We enrolled 89 consecutive patients observed in six Italian centers (from 8 August 2013 to 28 May 2021) with a diagnosis of immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Clinical information and blood parameters were collected for all patients. We describe clinical manifestations and laboratory data, possible risk factors and the therapeutic management of first episodes or relapses. A total of 74 first episodes and 19 relapses (median 3 years (interquartile range (IQR): 2-7)) were recorded. Seventy percent of patients enrolled at the first episode showed neurological signs and/or symptoms. All the patients enrolled at the first episode were treated with plasma exchange (median = 12; IQR: 8-19.5) and methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day). Rituximab (375 mg/m² weekly for four weeks) and caplacizumab were given to 15 (20.2%) and 2 patients (2.6%), respectively. We observed an overall mortality of 5.4% in the follow-up (median 60 months; IQR: 36.0-103.5). All fatalities occurred after a diagnostic delay. Present data point to the importance of the early detection of factors mostly associated with poor outcomes. It is likely that use of caplacizumab could improve the prognosis in those patients.