Can we predict postoperative pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy using preoperative fecal elastase-1 level?

A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a classification system for pancreas-associated risk factors in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most relevant PD-associated complication. A simple standardized surgical reporting system based on pancreas-associated risk factors is lacking.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies investigating clinically relevant (CR) POPF (CR-POPF) and pancreas-associated risk factors after PD. A meta-analysis of CR-POPF rate for texture of the pancreas (soft vs not-soft) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Based on the results, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) proposes the following classification: A, not-soft (hard) texture and MPD >3 mm; B, not-soft (hard) texture and MPD ≤3 mm; C, soft texture and MPD >3 mm; D, soft texture and MPD ≤3 mm. The classification was evaluated in a multi-institutional, international cohort.

RESULTS

Of the 2917 articles identified, 108 studies were included in the analyses. Soft pancreatic texture was significantly associated with the development of CR-POPF [odds ratio (OR) 4.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.67-4.89, P < 0.01) following PD. Similarly, MPD diameter ≤3 mm significantly increased CR-POPF risk compared with >3 mm diameter MPDs (OR 3.66, 95% CI 2.62-5.12, P < 0.01). The proposed 4-stage system was confirmed in an independent cohort of 5533 patients with CR-POPF rates of 3.5%, 6.2%, 16.6%, and 23.2% for type A-D, respectively ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For future pancreatic surgical outcomes studies, the ISGPS recommends reporting these risk factors according to the proposed classification system for better comparability of results.

Preoperative fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) adds value in predicting post-operative pancreatic fistula: not all soft pancreas share the same risk - A prospective analysis on 105 patients

BACKGROUND

Scores predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) mainly use intraoperative predictors. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of pancreatic exocrine function expressed by fecal elastase (FE-1) as preoperative predictor of POPF.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for PD at the Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital, from April 2017 to July 2018 were prospectively enrolled. FE-1 was measured in a preoperative stool sample through an ELISA test.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 105 patients. The POPF rate was 17.1%. Patients developing POPF showed high values of FE-1 (454 vs 155 mcg/g; p < 0.01), and FE-1 was an independent predictor of POPF (OR 1.008, CI 95% 1.003-1.014; p < 0.01), even considering only patients with a "soft" texture. A cut-off value of 260 mcg/g presented 100% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity (AUC 0.83) in predicting POPF. Approximately 30% of patients with a "soft" pancreatic texture presented with FE-1 < 260 mcg/g and did not develop POPF.

CONCLUSION

FE-1 is a promising tool to preoperatively assess the risk of POPF after PD. Further studies with larger populations are needed to potentially incorporate FE-1 into risk scores for PD with better stratification.

Validation of original and alternative fistula risk scores in postoperative pancreatic fistula

Background

In 2013, the fistula risk score (FRS) was developed to assess the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR‐POPF). In 2017, the alternative FRS (a‐FRS) was proposed. The purpose of this study was to validate the original FRS (o‐FRS) and a‐FRS for CR‐POPF in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods

From January 2007 to December 2016, 1,771 patients underwent PD for periampullary cancers. POPF was defined and classified according to the 2016 International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula. All data were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Pathologic diagnosis other than ductal adenocarcinoma (P < 0.001), pancreas duct diameter (P < 0.001), and body mass index (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for CR‐POPF. Pancreatic texture (P = 0.534) and estimated blood loss (P = 0.827) were not associated with CR‐POPF. The CR‐POPF incidence increased with increasing o‐FRS score (P < 0.001), and also increased statistically significantly with increasing a‐FRS in the higher risk group (P < 0.001). However, the correlations differed. The area under the curve was 0.629 for o‐FRS and 0.622 for a‐FRS.

Conclusions

Both o‐FRS and a‐FRS might reflect CR‐POPF incidence, but some risk factors had no or low statistical significance. Further research is needed to revise the FRS.

An end-to-side suspender pancreaticojejunostomy: A new invagination pancreaticojejunostomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a severe complication of the pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Recently, we introduced a method of suspender pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) to the PD. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed various risk factors for complications after PD. We also introduced and assessed the suspender PJ to demonstrate its advantages.

METHODS

Data from 335 patients with various periampullary lesions, who underwent the Whipple procedure (classic Whipple procedure or pylorus-preserving) PD by either traditional end-to-side invagination PJ or suspender PJ, were analyzed. The correlation between either perioperative or postoperative complications and corresponding PD approaches was evaluated by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients received the traditional end-to-side invagination PJ, and 188 patients were given the suspender PJ. Overall, 51.9% patients had various complications after PD. The mortality rate was 2.4%. The POPF incidence in patients who received the suspender PJ was 5.3%, which was significantly lower than those who received the traditional end-to-side invagination PJ (18.4%) (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that PJ approach and the pancreas texture were significantly associated with the POPF incidence rate (P < 0.01). POPF was a risk factor for both postoperative abdominal cavity infection (OR = 8.34, 95% CI: 3.99-17.42, P < 0.001) and abdominal cavity hemorrhage (OR = 4.86, 95% CI: 1.92-12.33, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the impact of the pancreas texture was a major risk factor for pancreatic leakage after a PD. The suspender PJ can be easily accomplished and widely applied and can effectively decrease the impact of the pancreas texture on pancreatic fistula after a PD and leads to a lower POPF incidence rate.

Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Upfront Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: The Actual Spectrum and Clinical Burden of Postoperative Complications

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is used for borderline-resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PDAC) and exhibits promising results in terms of pathological outcomes. However, little is known about its effect on surgical complications.

METHODS

We analyzed 445 pancreatic resections for PDAC from 2014 to 2016 at The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital. The Modified Accordion Severity Grading System and average complication burden (ACB) were used to compare patients treated with NAT with patients who underwent upfront surgery (UFS).

RESULTS

Of 305 pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD), patients treated with NAT (n = 99) had less pancreatic fistula (POPF, 9.1% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.05) without grade C cases, but grade B ACB was increased (0.28 for NAT vs. 0.24 for UFS, p = 0.05). The postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) rate was lower in the NAT group (9.1% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.02), but ACB grades B (0.37 for NAT vs. 0.26 for UFS, p = 0.03) and C (0.43 for NAT vs. 0.29 for UFS, p = 0.05) were increased. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was increased in NAT cases (15.2% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.04), with higher grade C ACB (0.43 for NAT vs. 0.29 for UFS, p = 0.03). Of 94 distal pancreatectomies (DP), NAT patients (n = 26) developed more grade C POPF (11.5% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.04) and DGE (11.5% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.01) without differences in ACB.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing PD for PDAC after NAT exhibited reduced incidence of POPF and PPH but increased incidence of DGE compared with patients treated with UFS. Among patients developing postoperative complications after PD, those receiving NAT were associated with increased clinical burden.

Preoperative fecal elastase-1 is a useful prognostic marker following curative resection of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The clinical relevance of fibrosis with regard to tumor progression is supported by the correlation between fibrosis and poor outcomes. Fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) level has been used to assess exocrine dysfunction of the pancreas and to predict pancreas fibrosis. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of FE-1 on the survival of pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

Between January 2006 and December 2014, 136 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent R0 resection at Gangnam Severance Hospital, Korea. Preoperative FE-1 levels were available in 94 patients who were enrolled in the study. Patients were classified into two groups according to preoperative FE-1: "normal" (≥200 μg/g) or "reduced" (<200 μg/g).

RESULTS

Median preoperative FE-1 level was 130.1 μg/g (IQR 32.0; 238.3). 62 patients (66.0%) had reduced pancreatic function and 32 patients (34.0%) had normal pancreatic function. The two groups had significantly different disease-free survival (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, normal FE-1, no lymph node metastasis and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy were found to be independent prognostic factors for better DFS (P = 0.001, P = 0.017, P = 0.038, respectively).

CONCLUSION

FE-1 is a simple and non-invasive predictive clinical marker for prognosis of pancreatic cancer after attempted curative resection.

Does international study group on pancreatic fistula (ISGPF) classification need modification after distal pancreatectomy?

Backgrounds/Aims

Few reports have validated the clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (PF) after distal pancreatectomy. The study intended to validate the predictability for clinical PF of drain amylase and lipase and to find out more appropriate postoperative day (POD) for diagnostic criterion of PF.

Methods

A total of 154 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. We used the clinical database registry system of the Gangnam Severance Hospital and Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System for these analyses. The receiver operating characteristic curve of the drain amylase or lipase concentration on each day was used to predict clinical PF (International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula [ISGPF] grade B or C) and areas under the curves (AUC) were compared.

Results

Amylase and lipase AUC values poorly predicted clinical PF before POD 3 and, gradually increased until POD 5 and became well correlated with clinical PF (ISGPF grade B or C). In contrast, the prediction of clinical PF using drain lipase did not differ from that using drain amylase. The drain amylase concentration on POD 6 was most precisely correlated with clinical PF.

Conclusions

Clinical PF prediction was validated by using drain amylase and lipase concentrations, in which drain amylase assessment at POD 6 appeared to be an appropriate diagnostic criterion of PF after distal pancreatectomy. We suggest some modification of ISGPF definition, especially for distal pancreatectomy.