Comparison of the effect of gel used in two different serum separator tubes for thyroid function tests

Serum or Plasma (and Which Plasma), That Is the Question

Blood derivatives are the biofluids of choice for metabolomic clinical studies since blood can be collected with low invasiveness and is rich in biological information. However, the choice of the blood collection tubes has an undeniable impact on the plasma and serum metabolic content. Here, we compared the metabolomic and lipoprotein profiles of blood samples collected at the same time and place from six healthy volunteers but using different collection tubes (each enrolled volunteer provided multiple blood samples at a distance of a few weeks/months): citrate plasma, EDTA plasma, and serum tubes. All samples were analyzed via nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Several metabolites showed statistically significant alterations among the three blood matrices, and also metabolites’ correlations were shown to be affected. The effects of blood collection tubes on the lipoproteins’ profiles are relevant too, but less marked. Overcoming the issue associated with different blood collection tubes is pivotal to scale metabolomics and lipoprotein analysis at the level of epidemiological studies based on samples from multicenter cohorts. We propose a statistical solution, based on regression, that is shown to be efficient in reducing the alterations induced by the different collection tubes for both the metabolomic and lipoprotein profiles.

Comparison of the effect of gel used in two different serum separator tubes for thyroid function tests

BACKGROUND

Selection and verification of blood collection tubes is an important preanalytical issue in clinical laboratories. Today, gel tubes are commonly used with many advantages, although they are known to cause interference in immunoassay methods. In this study, we aimed to compare SSTs of two different suppliers (Ayset clot activator & Gel and Becton Dickinson (BD) Vacutainer SST II advance) with reference tubes and evaluate the effect of storage time in terms of commonly used endocrine tests such as thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4), and free triiodothyronine (fT3).

METHODS

Fifty-five volunteers were included in the study. Samples were taken into three different tubes and analyzed for serum TSH, fT4, and fT3 on Architect ci8200 Immunoassay System. Clinical decision levels were estimated using total allowable error (TEa).

RESULTS

No difference was found between tubes in terms of TSH, fT3, and fT4 levels. From a statistical standpoint, TSH and fT4 levels were no longer stable during 24, 48, and 72 hours storage time periods. However, their variations were not clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

Ayset clot activator & Gel tubes and BD Vacutainer SST II advance tubes have comparable results with glass tube in terms of TSH, fT3, and fT4 levels on Architect ci8200 Immunoassay Systems. From a clinical standpoint, serum TSH, fT4, and fT3 concentrations may be considered as stable when storing these tubes over 72 hours.