The performance of the chemiluminescent immunoassay for measuring serum myeloperoxidase and proteinase 3 antibodies

Verification, implementation and harmonization of automated chemiluminescent immunoassays for MPO- and PR3-ANCA detection

OBJECTIVES

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) testing assists clinicians diagnose ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). We aimed to verify and harmonize chemiluminescent immunoassays for the detection of myeloperoxidase (MPO)- and proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA.

METHODS

An in-house ELISA, a capture ELISA, and a chemiluminescent assay QUANTA Flash on a BIO-FLASH analyzer were used to detect MPO- and PR3-ANCA in sera from 39 patients with AAV, 55 patients with various non-AAV, and 66 patients with connective tissue diseases. The results of the assays were evaluated, and their clinical performance was assessed. The precision and linearity of the QUANTA Flash assays were determined, and likelihood ratios (LRs) for AAV at diagnosis were calculated.

RESULTS

The precision and linearity of the QUANTA Flash assays were confirmed. Overall agreement between 97.5 and 98.8 % and Cohen's kappa coefficients between 0.861 and 0.947 were observed for the results of the QUANTA Flash assays and ELISAs. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and ROC analysis of the assays for AAV were statistically similar (in-house ELISA 89.7 %, 95.0 %, and 0.937; capture ELISA 92.3 %, 98.3 %, and 0.939; and QUANTA Flash 89.7 %, 95.9 %, and 0.972). For the QUANTA Flash assay results, the interval-specific LRs for AAV at diagnosis were: 0-8 CU had LR 0.08, 8-29 CU had LR 1.03, 29-121 CU had LR 7.76, 121-191 CU had LR 12.4, and >191 CU had LR ∞.

CONCLUSIONS

The QUANTA Flash MPO and PR3 assays provide precise and consistent results and have comparable clinical utility for AAV. The calculated LRs were consistent with published LRs, confirming the utility of LRs for harmonization of ANCA results.

The performance of the chemiluminescent immunoassay for measuring serum myeloperoxidase and proteinase 3 antibodies

Background

Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has traditionally been used to detect myeloperoxidase (MPO) and proteinase 3 (PR3) antibodies, although it is time‐consuming and physically demanding. As a novel and highly effective immunoassay, we compared chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) with ELISA to verify the application value of CIA in MPO and PR3 antibodies detection.

Methods

By ELISA and CIA, serum levels of anti‐MPO and anti‐PR3 antibodies were measured in 63 anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)‐associated vasculitis (AAV) patients (AAV group), including 47 microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) patients and 16 granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) patients, in addition, 68 patients in interference control group (IC group), 19 healthy subjects in healthy control group (HC group). We compared MPO and PR3 antibodies levels and positive rates measured by these two methods among groups. Relationship and coincidence rate between ELISA and CIA were investigated. Diagnostic values for clinical outcomes for MPO and PR3 antibodies were assessed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

In AAV patients, when detecting anti‐MPO (r = .90) and anti‐PR3 (r = .81), CIA was highly correlated with ELISA, companying with highly total (88.89%, 92.06%, respectively) and positive coincidence rates (84.78%, 77.27%, respectively). In HC group, anti‐PR3 positive rate detected by both immunoassay were 0, anti‐MPO almost were 0, which without statistically significant difference (P = .32). In IC group, the total (76.47%, 58.82, respectively) and positive coincidence rates (48.38%, 30.00%, respectively) of anti‐MPO and anti‐PR3 were the lowest, but the negative coincidence rates reached 100%. By CIA, similar to ELISA, the levels of anti‐MPO were significantly higher both in AAV patients (56.00; [4.40‐235.30]) and MPA patients (98.00; [27.90‐324.70]) compared with either IC group (3.20; [3.20‐18.55) (P < .0001) or HC group (3.20; [3.20‐3.20]) (P < .0001), yielded an area under curve (AUC) of 0.76 for AAV and 0.89 for MPA, the concentration of anti‐PR3 in GPA group (66.65; [24.43‐150.00]) was significantly higher than that in IC group (2.3; [2.3‐10.95]) (P < .0001) and HC group (2.3; [2.3‐2.3]) (P < .0001), with an AUC of 0.92.

Conclusion

Similar to ELISA, CIA was competent to detect MPO and PR3 antibodies in AAV patients and healthy population, thus distinguish AAV patients from IC group and HC group and effectively diagnose MPA and GPA.