Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Modeling of Daratumumab Subcutaneous Administration in Patients With Light-Chain Amyloidosis

Time-dependent clearance can confound exposure-response analysis of therapeutic antibodies: A comprehensive review of the current literature

Exposure-response (ER) analysis is used to optimize dose and dose regimens during clinical development. Characterization of relationships between drug exposure and efficacy or safety outcomes can be utilized to make dose adjustments that improve patient response. Therapeutic antibodies typically show predictable pharmacokinetics (PK) but can exhibit clearance that decreases over time due to treatment. Moreover, time-dependent changes in clearance are frequently associated with drug response, with larger decreases in clearance and increased exposure seen in patients who respond to treatment. This often confounds traditional ER analysis, as drug response influences exposure rather than the reverse. In this review, we survey published population PK analyses for reported time-dependent drug clearance effects across 158 therapeutic antibodies approved or in regulatory review. We describe the mechanisms by which time-dependent clearance can arise, and evaluate trends in frequency, magnitude, and time scale of changes in clearance with respect to indication, mechanistic interpretation of time-dependence, and PK modeling techniques employed. We discuss the modeling and simulation strategies commonly used to characterize time-dependent clearance, and examples where time-dependent clearance has impeded ER analysis. A case study using population model simulation was explored to interrogate the impact of time-dependent clearance on ER analysis and how it can lead to spurious conclusions. Overall, time-dependent clearance arises frequently among therapeutic antibodies and has spurred erroneous conclusions in ER analysis. Appropriate PK modeling techniques aid in identifying and characterizing temporal shifts in exposure that may impede accurate ER assessment and successful dose optimization.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Daratumumab

Daratumumab is a fully human, monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 and a first-in-class CD38-targeting drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma or newly diagnosed light-chain amyloidosis. CD38 is heavily expressed on malignant myeloma cells, and daratumumab exerts anti-myeloma activity via immune-mediated mechanisms, direct induction of apoptosis, and immunomodulation. Daratumumab is used as monotherapy or in combination with standard-of-care myeloma therapies, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, DNA-alkylating agents, and corticosteroids. Following an intravenous infusion, daratumumab exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PK), as clearance decreases with higher doses and over time because of target-mediated effects. Dosing schedules vary depending on indications and co-administered drugs, but generally daratumumab is administered weekly for 6-9 weeks followed by a less frequent dosing regimen, once every 2-4 weeks. Daratumumab exposure is strongly correlated with efficacy, and the exposure-efficacy relationship follows a maximal effect model, whereas exposure is not correlated with safety endpoints. The approved dose of 16 mg/kg of daratumumab results in the saturation of 99% of the target at the end of weekly dosing in most patients, and high target saturation is maintained over time during the less frequent dosing schedule. Infusion-related reactions are frequently observed in patients given daratumumab, particularly with the first infusion, thus prompting long durations of infusion (~ 7 h) and splitting of the first dose across 2 days. This led to the development of a subcutaneous delivery formulation for daratumumab (Dara-SC). Dara-SC provides a similar efficacy and safety profile to intravenous daratumumab (Dara-IV) but has a much lower rate of infusion-related reactions and a shorter infusion time. Exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety endpoints were similar between Dara-SC and Dara-IV, and co-administered drugs with either Dara-IV or Dara-SC do not significantly affect daratumumab PK. Except for baseline myeloma type and albumin level, none of the other investigated disease and patient characteristics (renal/hepatic function, age, sex, race, weight, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status) was identified to have clinically relevant effects on exposure to daratumumab monotherapy or combination therapy regimens. Dara-IV exposure was significantly lower in patients with immunoglobulin G myeloma compared with patients with non-immunoglobulin G myeloma (p < 0.0001) and in patients with a lower albumin level, whereas the overall response rate was similar regardless of the myeloma type and albumin level. Daratumumab dose adjustment is not currently recommended based on disease and patient characteristics.

Guidelines for non-transplant chemotherapy for treatment of systemic AL amyloidosis: EHA-ISA working group

BACKGROUND

This guideline has been developed jointly by the European Society of Haematology and International Society of Amyloidosis recommending non-transplant chemotherapy treatment for patients with AL amyloidosis.

METHODS

A review of literature and grading of evidence as well as expert recommendations by the ESH and ISA guideline committees.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The recommendations of this committee suggest that treatment follows the clinical presentation which determines treatment tolerance tempered by potential side effects to select and modify use of drugs in AL amyloidosis. All patients with AL amyloidosis should be considered for clinical trials where available. Daratumumab-VCD is recommended from most untreated patients (VCD or VMDex if daratumumab is unavailable). At relapse, the two guiding principles are the depth and duration of initial response, use of a class of agents not previously exposed as well as the limitation imposed by patients' fitness/frailty and end organ damage. Targeted agents like venetoclax need urgent prospective evaluation. Future prospective trials should include advanced stage patients to allow for evidence-based treatment decisions. Therapies targeting amyloid fibrils or those reducing the proteotoxicity of amyloidogenic light chains/oligomers are urgently needed.

Risk Factors, Hyaluronidase Expression, and Clinical Immunogenicity of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase PH20, an Enzyme Enabling Subcutaneous Drug Administration

Multiple FDA-approved and clinical-development stage therapeutics include recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) to facilitate subcutaneous administration. As rHuPH20-reactive antibodies potentially interact with endogenous PH20, we investigated rHuPH20 immunogenicity risk through hyaluronidase tissue expression, predicted B cell epitopes, CD4+ T cell stimulation indices and related these to observed clinical immunogenicity profiles from 18 clinical studies. Endogenous hyaluronidase PH20 expression in humans/mice was assessed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), quantitative RT-PCR, and deep RNA-Seq. rHuPH20 potential T cell epitopes were evaluated in silico and confirmed in vitro. Potential B cell epitopes were predicted for rHuPH20 sequence in silico, and binding of polyclonal antibodies from various species tested on a rHuPH20 peptide microarray. Clinical immunogenicity data were collected from 2643 subjects. From 57 human adult and fetal tissues previously screened by RT-PCR, 22 tissue types were analyzed by deep RNA-Seq. Hyaluronidase PH20 messenger RNA expression was detected in adult human testes. In silico analyses of the rHuPH20 sequence revealed nine T cell epitope clusters with immunogenic potential, one cluster was homologous to human leukocyte antigen. rHuPH20 induced T cell activation in 6-10% of peripheral blood mononuclear cell donors. Fifteen epitopes in the rHuPH20 sequence had the potential to cross-react with B cells. The cumulative treatment-induced incidence of anti-rHuPH20 antibodies across clinical studies was 8.8%. Hyaluronidase PH20 expression occurs primarily in adult testes. Low CD4+ T cell activation and B cell cross-reactivity by rHuPH20 suggest weak rHuPH20 immunogenicity potential. Restricted expression patterns of endogenous PH20 indicate low immunogenicity risk of subcutaneous rHuPH20.

CDC7 as a novel biomarker and druggable target in cancer

Due to the bottlenecks encountered in traditional treatment for tumor, more effective drug targets need to be developed. Cell division cycle 7 kinase plays an important role in DNA replication, DNA repair and recombination signaling pathways. In this review, we first describe recent studies on the role of CDC7 in DNA replication in normal human tissues, and then we integrate new evidence focusing on the important role of CDC7 in replication stress tolerance of tumor cells and its impact on the prognosis of clinical oncology patients. Finally, we comb through the CDC7 inhibitors identified in recent studies as a reference for further research in clinical practice.

Daratumumab: A Review in Newly Diagnosed Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis

Subcutaneous daratumumab (DARZALEX^®) co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase (DARZALEX FASPRO^®) is approved in several countries, including the USA and those of the EU, for use in combination with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Daratumumab is a CD38-targeting, human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody. In the pivotal phase III ANDROMEDA trial in adults with newly diagnosed systemic AL amyloidosis, the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving a haematological complete response relative to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone alone (primary endpoint). Daratumumab combination therapy produced rapid and deep haematological responses which were associated with improved major organ deterioration progression-free survival (PFS). The addition of daratumumab also led to higher cardiac and renal response rates at 6 and 12 months. Daratumumab had an acceptable tolerability profile when used as combination therapy. Therefore, daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone represents an important emerging first-line treatment option for patients with systemic AL amyloidosis.