Evidence-based choice of ritonavir as index CYP3A inhibitor in drug-drug interaction studies

Evaluation of Potential Effects of CYP3A Inhibition and CYP3A Induction on the Pharmacokinetics of Fruquintinib in Healthy Subjects

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A plays a significant role in fruquintinib metabolism in vitro. This 2-part, 2-period fixed-sequence study investigated the impact of CYP3A inhibition (itraconazole) and CYP3A induction (rifampin) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of fruquintinib and M11, its main metabolite. Fourteen healthy subjects in each part received a single dose of fruquintinib 5 mg alone in Period 1 and with itraconazole (Part A) or rifampin (Part B) in Period 2 under fasted conditions. Itraconazole or rifampin was administered daily 4 or 7 days before coadministration, respectively; administration of both continued throughout the PK sampling period. PK samples were collected before dosing and over 168 hours after fruquintinib dosing. Coadministration with itraconazole resulted in an increase of fruquintinib systemic exposure, determined by area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs) by approximately 10%. Decreases in M11 AUCs and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) ranged from 44% to 55% but were not considered clinically meaningful. Rifampin reduced fruquintinib Cmax and AUCs by 12% and 65%, respectively. Rifampin had a marginal effect on M11 AUCs and increased M11 Cmax by 2.3-fold. Data support that concomitant use of fruquintinib with potent CYP3A inducers of rifampin-like potency should be avoided, but no dose adjustment is recommended when coadministered with CYP3A inhibitors.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict Drug-Drug Interactions of Soticlestat as a Victim of CYP Induction and Inhibition, and as a Perpetrator of CYP and P-Glycoprotein Inhibition

Soticlestat (TAK-935) is a cholesterol 24-hydroxylase inhibitor. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model has been developed to predict potential soticlestat drug-drug interactions (DDIs) using the Simcyp v20 Population-based Simulator and verified with data from single-/multiple-rising-dose and clinical DDI studies. Simulated area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) and maximal drug concentration (Cmax) based on the model were generally within 2-fold of observed values for all soticlestat doses. Model-simulated versus observed AUC0-inf and Cmax geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for soticlestat with/without itraconazole (potent cytochrome P450 [CYP] 3A inhibitor), and mefenamic acid (potent UDP glucuronosyltransferase [UGT] 1A9 inhibitor) were ≤1.10-fold. As soticlestat is primarily metabolized by UGT enzymes and Simulator v20 incorporates rifampin's induction of CYP3A only, the model underpredicted soticlestat's DDI with rifampin. However, with user-defined rifampin UGT induction, the predicted AUC0-inf GMR was within 1.5-fold of the observed value, meeting the 2-fold acceptance criteria. Hence, the model was appropriate for evaluating DDIs with CYP3A inhibitors and inducers not evaluated in clinical DDI studies; all predicted DDIs were low/not clinically relevant (<50% impact on exposure). Furthermore, no clinically significant DDIs were predicted following coadministration of soticlestat with sensitive CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and P-glycoprotein substrates.

Effect of Strong CYP3A4 Inhibition, CYP3A4 Induction, and OATP1B1/3 Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Oral Dose of Sotorasib

Sotorasib is a small molecule that irreversibly inhibits the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) protein with a G12C amino acid substitution mutant protein. The impact of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibition and induction on sotorasib pharmacokinetics (PKs) was evaluated in 2 separate studies in healthy volunteers (N = 14/study). The impact of CYP3A4 inhibition was interrogated utilizing repeat doses of 200 mg of itraconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, on 360 mg of sotorasib PKs. The impact of CYP3A4 induction was interrogated utilizing multiple doses of 600 mg of rifampin, a strong CYP3A4 inducer. Additionally, the impact of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1/3 inhibition on 960 mg of sotorasib PKs was interrogated after a single dose of 600 mg of rifampin. CYP3A4 inhibition did not significantly impact sotorasib Cmax but did lead to a 26% increase in sotorasib AUCinf. CYP3A4 induction decreased sotorasib Cmax by 35% and AUCinf by 51%. OATP1B1/3 inhibition decreased sotorasib Cmax and AUCinf by 16% and 23%, respectively. These results support that sotorasib can be given together with strong CYP3A4 and OATP1B1/3 inhibitors but the co-administration of sotorasib and strong CYP3A4 inducers should be avoided.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of the CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 Drug-Drug Interaction of Avacopan in 2 Open-Label Studies in Healthy Participants

Avacopan, a complement 5a receptor (C5aR) antagonist approved for treating severe active antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, was evaluated in 2 clinical drug-drug interaction studies. The studies assessed the impact of avacopan on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CYP3A4 substrates midazolam and simvastatin and CYP2C9 substrate celecoxib, and the influence of CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole and inducer rifampin on the PKs of avacopan. The results indicated that twice-daily oral administration of 30 mg of avacopan increased the area under the curve (AUC) of midazolam by 1.81-fold and celecoxib by 1.15-fold when administered without food, and twice-daily oral administration of 30 or 60 mg of avacopan increased the AUC of simvastatin by approximately 2.6-3.5-fold and the AUC of the active metabolite β-hydroxy-simvastatin acid by approximately 1.4-1.7-fold when co-administered with food. Furthermore, the AUC of avacopan increased by approximately 2.19-fold when co-administered with itraconazole and decreased by approximately 13.5-fold when co-administered with rifampin. These findings provide critical insights into the potential drug-drug interactions involving avacopan, which could have significant implications for patient care and treatment planning. (NCT06207682).

Pharmacokinetic boosting of olaparib: A randomised, cross-over study (PROACTIVE-study)

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic (PK) boosting is the intentional use of a drug-drug interaction to enhance systemic drug exposure. PK boosting of olaparib, a CYP3A-substrate, has the potential to reduce PK variability and financial burden. The aim of this study was to investigate equivalence of a boosted, reduced dose of olaparib compared to the non-boosted standard dose.

METHODS

This cross-over, multicentre trial compared olaparib 300 mg twice daily (BID) with olaparib 100 mg BID boosted with the strong CYP3A-inhibitor cobicistat 150 mg BID. Patients were randomised to the standard therapy followed by the boosted therapy, or vice versa. After seven days of each therapy, dense PK sampling was performed for noncompartmental PK analysis. Equivalence was defined as a 90% Confidence Interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the boosted versus standard therapy area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-12 h) within no-effect boundaries. These boundaries were set at 0.57-1.25, based on previous pharmacokinetic studies with olaparib capsules and tablets.

RESULTS

Of 15 included patients, 12 were eligible for PK analysis. The GMR of the AUC0-12 h was 1.45 (90% CI 1.27-1.65). No grade ≥3 adverse events were reported during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Boosting a 100 mg BID olaparib dose with cobicistat increases olaparib exposure 1.45-fold, compared to the standard dose of 300 mg BID. Equivalence of the boosted olaparib was thus not established. Boosting remains a promising strategy to reduce the olaparib dose as cobicistat increases olaparib exposure Adequate tolerability of the boosted therapy with higher exposure should be established.

The inhibitory and inducing effects of ritonavir on hepatic and intestinal CYP3A and other drug-handling proteins

Ritonavir, originally developed as HIV protease inhibitor, is widely used as a booster in several HIV pharmacotherapy regimens and more recently in Covid-19 treatment (e.g., Paxlovid). Its boosting capacity is due to the highly potent irreversible inhibition of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3 A enzyme, thereby enhancing the plasma exposure to coadministered drugs metabolized by CYP3A. Typically used booster doses of ritonavir are 100-200 mg once or twice daily. This review aims to address several aspects of this booster drug, including the possibility to use lower ritonavir doses, 20 mg for instance, resulting in partial CYP3A inactivation in patients. If complete CYP3A inhibition is not needed, lower ritonavir doses could be used, thereby reducing unwanted side effects. In this context, there are contradictory reports on the actual recovery time of CYP3A activity after ritonavir discontinuation, but probably this will take at least one day. In addition to ritonavir's CYP3A inhibitory effect, it can also induce and/or inhibit other CYP enzymes and drug transporters, albeit to a lesser extent. Although ritonavir thus exhibits gene induction capacities, with respect to CYP3A activity the inhibition capacity clearly predominates. Another potent CYP3A inhibitor, the ritonavir analog cobicistat, has been reported to lack the ability to induce enzyme and transporter genes. This might result in a more favorable drug-drug interaction profile compared to ritonavir, although the actual benefit appears to be limited. Indeed, ritonavir is still the clinically most used pharmacokinetic enhancer, indicating that its side effects are well manageable, even in chronic administration regimens.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction of Chiglitazar with CYP3A4 Inducer or Inhibitor: An Open-Label, Sequential Crossover, Self-Control, 3-Period Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Chiglitazar, a pan agonist of non-thiazolidinedione peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, has the potential to regulate blood sugar, improve lipid metabolism, and reduce cardiovascular complications. This study aimed to examine the effect of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors/inducers on the in vivo metabolism of chiglitazar and provide a reference for the clinical combination use of chiglitazar. A single-center, open-label, sequential crossover, and self-control study was carried out in 24 healthy subjects to determine the pharmacokinetics of chiglitazar dosed with and without CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers. The findings showed that the CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole had no apparent pharmacokinetic drug interaction with chiglitazar, whereas rifampicin did. When combined with rifampicin after continuous dosing, chiglitazar exposure was not theoretically reduced but increased compared to a single dose of chiglitazar. The possible explanation may be the transporters of bile salt export pump, but this needs to be confirmed. The safety of chiglitazar in single or combination doses was well tolerated. The findings of this study provide a basis for clinical combinations of chiglitazar with CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers.

Genotoxicity of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in metabolically inactive human cervical cancer HeLa cells co-cultured with human hepatoma HepG2 cells

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) are secondary plant metabolites, which can be found as contaminant in various foods and herbal products. Several PAs can cause hepatotoxicity and liver cancer via damaging hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells (HSECs) after hepatic metabolization. HSECs themselves do not express the required metabolic enzymes for activation of PAs. Here we applied a co-culture model to mimic the in vivo hepatic environment and to study PA-induced effects on not metabolically active neighbour cells. In this co-culture model, bioactivation of PA was enabled by metabolically capable human hepatoma cells HepG2, which excrete the toxic and mutagenic pyrrole metabolites. The human cervical epithelial HeLa cells tagged with H2B-GFP were utilized as non-metabolically active neighbours because they can be identified easily based on their green fluorescence in the co-culture. The PAs europine, riddelliine and lasiocarpine induced micronuclei in HepG2 cells, and in HeLa H2B-GFP cells co-cultured with HepG2 cells, but not in HeLa H2B-GFP cells cultured alone. Metabolic inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes with ketoconazole abrogated micronucleus formation. The efflux transporter inhibitors verapamil and benzbromarone reduced micronucleus formation in the co-culture model. Furthermore, mitotic disturbances as an additional genotoxic mechanism of action were observed in HepG2 cells and in HeLa H2B-GFP cells co-cultured with HepG2 cells, but not in HeLa H2B-GFP cells cultured alone. Overall, we were able to show that PAs were activated by HepG2 cells and the metabolites induced genomic damage in co-cultured HeLa cells.

Drug-Drug Interaction Studies to Evaluate the Effect of Inhibition of UGT1A1 and CYP3A4 and Induction of CYP3A4 on the Pharmacokinetics of Tropifexor in Healthy Subjects

Tropifexor, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, is currently under clinical development for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Tropifexor undergoes glucuronidation by uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 and oxidation by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, as reported in in vitro studies. Here, we report the results from 2 drug-drug interaction studies. Study 1 enrolled 20 healthy subjects to investigate the effect of the UGT1A1 inhibitor atazanavir (ATZ) on tropifexor pharmacokinetics (PK). Study 2 had 2 cohorts with 16 healthy subjects each to investigate the effect of the strong CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole and strong CYP3A4 inducer rifampin on the PK of tropifexor. Coadministration of ATZ reduced the maximum plasma concentration (C_max ) of tropifexor by 40%; however, it did not lead to increased exposure of tropifexor (both area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC] from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration [AUC_last ] and AUC from time 0 to infinity [AUC_inf ] reduced by only 10%), suggesting minor relevance of the UGT1A1 pathway for clearance of tropifexor and no expected drug-drug interactions based on UGT1A1 inhibition. Inhibition of CYP3A4 by itraconazole increased the C_max of tropifexor by only 9% and exposure (both AUC_last and AUC_inf ) by 47%, suggesting a weak effect of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors on tropifexor PK. Inducing CYP3A4 with rifampin decreased C_max (55%) and AUC (AUC_last by 79% and AUC_inf by 77%). Coadministration of tropifexor with either ATZ, itraconazole, or rifampin was well tolerated.

Effects of CYP3A Inhibition, CYP3A Induction, and Gastric Acid Reduction on the Pharmacokinetics of Ripretinib, a Switch Control KIT Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

Ripretinib is a switch control KIT kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of adults with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors who received prior treatment with 3 or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Ripretinib and its active metabolite (DP-5439) are cleared mainly via cytochrome P450 enzyme 3A4/5 (CYP3A4/5), and ripretinib solubility is pH-dependent, thus the drug-drug interaction potentials of ripretinib with itraconazole (strong CYP3A inhibitor), rifampin (strong CYP3A inducer), and pantoprazole (proton pump inhibitor) were each evaluated in open-label, fixed-sequence study designs. Overall, 20 participants received ripretinib 50 mg alone and with itraconazole 200 mg once daily, 24 participants received ripretinib 100 mg alone and with rifampin 600 mg once daily, and 25 participants received ripretinib 50 mg alone and with pantoprazole 40 mg once daily. Ripretinib exposure increased with concomitant itraconazole, with geometric least-squares (LS) mean ratios of ripretinib area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to ∞ (AUC_0-∞ ) and maximum observed concentration (C_max ) of 199% and 136%. Ripretinib exposure decreased with concomitant rifampin: geometric LS mean ratios for ripretinib AUC_0-∞ and C_max were 39% and 82%. Pantoprazole coadministration had no effect on ripretinib pharmacokinetics. No unexpected safety signals occurred. No dose adjustment is required for ripretinib coadministered with gastric acid reducers and strong CYP3A inhibitors; patients also receiving strong CYP3A inhibitors should be monitored more frequently for adverse reactions. Concomitant ripretinib use with strong CYP3A inducers should be avoided. Prescribers should refer to approved labeling for specific dose recommendations with concomitant use of strong and moderate CYP3A inducers.

A Phase 1, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Effect of Food and Concomitant Itraconazole Administration on the Pharmacokinetics of AMG 986 in Healthy Subjects

This phase 1, open-label study evaluated the effect of food and administration of the cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitor itraconazole (ITZ) on the pharmacokinetics of AMG 986. In cohort 1, 12 healthy subjects received a single oral dose of AMG 986 200 mg ± food on days 1 and 10. In cohort 2, 15 healthy subjects received oral ITZ 200 mg once daily on days 8 to 15 and a single oral dose of AMG 986 10 mg on days 1 and 11. The geometric least squares mean ratios of fed/fasted for AMG 986 maximum observed concentration (C_max ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_inf ) were 0.76 (90%CI, 0.61-0.95) and 1.07 (90%CI, 0.94-1.22), respectively. The geometric least squares mean ratios of AMG 986 10 mg plus ITZ 200 mg/AMG 986 10 mg alone for AMG 986 C_max and AUC_inf were 1.36 (90%CI, 1.25-1.48) and 5.13 (90%CI, 4.71-5.59), respectively. Overall, 3 subjects experienced mild treatment-related adverse events; there were no serious or fatal adverse events. In conclusion, food had no apparent effect on the exposure of AMG 986 200 mg; therefore, food restrictions are not required. Potent cytochrome P450 3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein inhibitors may warrant AMG 986 dose reduction and should be coadministered with caution in patients with heart failure treated with AMG 986.

A Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Study of Belumosudil Coadministered With CYP3A4 Inhibitors and Inducers and Proton Pump Inhibitors

Belumosudil is a selective Rho-associated protein kinase 2 inhibitor. Inhibition of Rho-associated protein kinase 2 has emerged as a promising treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease by restoring immune homeostasis and reducing fibrosis. In vitro assessments have suggested that metabolism of belumosudil is primarily dependent on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 activity and that the solubility of belumosudil is pH dependent. As such, this 2-part clinical drug-drug interaction study was conducted to assess the effect of itraconazole (a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor), rifampicin (a strong CYP3A4 inducer), rabeprazole, and omeprazole (both proton pump inhibitors) on the pharmacokinetics of belumosudil. No clinically relevant change in belumosudil exposure was observed following a 200-mg single oral dose of belumosudil with itraconazole; however, exposure of main metabolite, KD025m2, was decreased. Consistent with the proposed metabolic pathway of belumosudil, the strong CYP3A4 inducer rifampicin significantly decreased exposure of belumosudil and KD025m2 and increased KD025m1 exposure. When a 200-mg single oral dose of belumosudil was coadministered with both rabeprazole and omeprazole, parent and metabolite exposures were largely reduced, suggesting that belumosudil dosage should be increased when given with PPIs. Administration of belumosudil with and without perpetrator drugs was safe, and no notable adverse events were reported.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan with Concomitant Ritonavir or Itraconazole in Patients with HER2-Expressing Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate drug-drug interactions between the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201a) and the OATP1B/CYP3A inhibitor ritonavir or the strong CYP3A inhibitor itraconazole.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with HER2-expressing advanced solid tumors were enrolled in this phase I, open-label, single-sequence crossover study (NCT03383692) and received i.v. T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Patients received ritonavir (cohort 1) or itraconazole (cohort 2) from day 17 of cycle 2 through the end of cycle 3. Primary endpoints were maximum serum concentration (C max) and partial area under the concentration-time curve from beginning of cycle through day 17 (AUC17d) for T-DXd and deruxtecan (DXd) with (cycle 3) and without (cycle 2) ritonavir or itraconazole treatment.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled (cohort 1, n = 17; cohort 2, n = 23). T-DXd C max was similar whether combined with ritonavir [cohort 1, cycle 3/cycle 2; 90% confidence interval (CI): 1.05 (0.98-1.13)] or itraconazole [cohort 2, 1.03 (0.96-1.09)]. T-DXd AUC17d increased from cycle 2 to 3; however, the cycle 3/cycle 2 ratio upper CI bound remained at ≤1.25 for both cohorts. For DXd (cycle 3/cycle 2), C max ratio was 0.99 (90% CI, 0.85-1.14) for cohort 1 and 1.04 (0.92-1.18) for cohort 2; AUC17d ratio was 1.22 (1.08-1.37) and 1.18 (1.11-1.25), respectively. The safety profile of T-DXd plus ritonavir or itraconazole was consistent with previous studies of T-DXd monotherapy. T-DXd demonstrated promising antitumor activity across HER2-expressing solid-tumor types.

CONCLUSIONS

T-DXd was safely combined with ritonavir or itraconazole without clinically meaningful impact on T-DXd or DXd pharmacokinetics.

Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended-Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route

Buprenorphine extended‐release (BUP‐XR) formulation is a once‐monthly subcutaneous injection for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine undergoes extensive cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 metabolism, leading to potential drug‐drug interactions (DDIs) as reported for sublingual buprenorphine. Sublingual buprenorphine is subject to first‐pass extraction, as a significant proportion of the dose is swallowed. Because subcutaneous administration avoids first‐pass extraction, the DDI with CYP3A4 inhibitors is expected to be less than the 2‐fold increase reported for the sublingual route. The objective of this analysis was to predict the magnitude of DDI following coadministration of BUP‐XR with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor or inducer using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Models were developed and verified by comparing predicted and observed data for buprenorphine following intravenous and sublingual dosing. Comparison of predicted and observed pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and PK parameters demonstrated acceptable predictive performance of the models (within 1.5‐fold). Buprenorphine plasma concentrations following administration of a single dose of BUP‐XR (300 mg) were simulated using a series of intravenous infusions. Daily coadministration of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors with BUP‐XR predicted mild increases in buprenorphine exposures (AUC, 33%‐44%; C_max, 17‐28%). Daily coadministration of a strong CYP3A4 inducer was also associated with mild decreases in buprenorphine AUC (28%) and C_max (22%). In addition, the model predicted minimal increases in buprenorphine AUC (8%‐11%) under clinical conditions of 2 weeks’ treatment with CYP3A4 inhibitors administered after initiation of BUP‐XR. In conclusion, the PBPK predictions indicate that coadministration of BUP‐XR with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers would not result in clinically meaningful interactions.

Drug-Drug Interactions at Organic Cation Transporter 1

The interaction between drugs and various transporters is one of the decisive factors that affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs. The organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) is a member of the Solute Carrier 22A (SLC22A) family that plays a vital role in the membrane transport of organic cations including endogenous substances and xenobiotics. This article mainly discusses the drug-drug interactions (DDIs) mediated by OCT1 and their clinical significance.

Rational Design of CYP3A4 Inhibitors: A One-Atom Linker Elongation in Ritonavir-Like Compounds Leads to a Marked Improvement in the Binding Strength

Inhibition of the major human drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) by pharmaceuticals and other xenobiotics could lead to toxicity, drug–drug interactions and other adverse effects, as well as pharmacoenhancement. Despite serious clinical implications, the structural basis and attributes required for the potent inhibition of CYP3A4 remain to be established. We utilized a rational inhibitor design to investigate the structure–activity relationships in the analogues of ritonavir, the most potent CYP3A4 inhibitor in clinical use. This study elucidated the optimal length of the head-group spacer using eleven (series V) analogues with the R₁/R₂ side-groups as phenyls or R₁–phenyl/R₂–indole/naphthalene in various stereo configurations. Spectral, functional and structural characterization of the inhibitory complexes showed that a one-atom head-group linker elongation, from pyridyl–ethyl to pyridyl–propyl, was beneficial and markedly improved K_s, IC₅₀ and thermostability of CYP3A4. In contrast, a two-atom linker extension led to a multi-fold decrease in the binding and inhibitory strength, possibly due to spatial and/or conformational constraints. The lead compound, 3h, was among the best inhibitors designed so far and overall, the strongest binder (K_s and IC₅₀ of 0.007 and 0.090 µM, respectively). 3h was the fourth structurally simpler inhibitor superior to ritonavir, which further demonstrates the power of our approach.

The Effect of CYP3A Induction and Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of Laquinimod, a Novel Neuroimmunomodulator

Laquinimod, a neuroimmunomodulator, is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, and modulations of CYP3A4 activity may lead to alterations in the pharmacokinetics and/or clinical effects of laquinimod. To determine the drug-drug interaction potential of laquinimod with CYP3A inhibitors and inducers, interaction assessments were conducted in healthy volunteers using single-dose administration of laquinimod before and after multiple dosing of CYP3A inhibitors (ketoconazole, fluconazole, and cimetidine) or a CYP3A4 inducer (rifampin). For ketoconazole, subjects (n = 14) received laquinimod 0.6 mg following 1 day of ketoconazole (400 mg daily) pretreatment, a single concomitant dose, and 28 additional days. For fluconazole, subjects (n = 14) received laquinimod 0.6 mg after a single fluconazole dose of 400 mg followed by 200-mg daily fluconazole administration for 20 additional days. For cimetidine, subjects (n = 14) received laquinimod 0.6 mg following 1 day of cimetidine (800 mg twice daily) pretreatment, a single concomitant dose, and 21 additional days. For rifampin, subjects (n = 14) received laquinimod 0.6 mg following 9 days of rifampin (600 mg daily) pretreatment, a single concomitant dose, and 12 additional days. Coadministration of laquinimod with CYP3A inhibitors, ketoconazole, fluconazole, and cimetidine increased laquinimod area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity by approximately 3.1-, 2.5-, and 1.1-fold, respectively. Coadministration of laquinimod with rifampin decreased laquinimod area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity by 5-fold. These results indicate that coadministration of laquinimod with moderate to strong inhibitors of CYP3A or strong inducers of CYP3A may give rise to significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions.

Sustained Impairment of Lurasidone Clearance After Discontinuation of Posaconazole: Impact of Obesity, and Implications for Patient Safety

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

The antipsychotic agent lurasidone (Latuda®) is metabolized by Cytochrome P450-3A (CYP3A) enzymes. Coadministration with strong CYP3A inhibitors (such as ketoconazole, posaconazole, and ritonavir) is contraindicated due to the risk of sedation and movement disorders from high levels of lurasidone. This study evaluated the time-course of recovery from the posaconazole drug interaction, and the effect of obesity on the recovery process.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

Healthy normal-weight volunteers (n = 11, mean body mass index, BMI, = 23.1 kg/m) and otherwise healthy obese subjects (n = 13, mean BMI = 49.3 kg/m) received single doses of lurasidone in the baseline control condition, again during coadministration of posaconazole, and at 4 additional time points during the 2 weeks after posaconazole discontinuation.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

With posaconazole coadministration, lurasidone area under the concentration curve (AUC) increased by an arithmetic mean factor of 6.2 in normals, and by 4.9 in obese subjects. Post-treatment washout of posaconazole was slow in normals (mean half-life 31 hours), and further prolonged in obese subjects (53 hours). Recovery of lurasidone AUC toward baseline was correspondingly slow, and was incomplete. AUC remained significantly elevated above baseline both in normals (factor of 2.1) and obese subjects (factor of 3.4) even at 2 weeks after stopping posaconazole.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Product labeling does not address the necessary delay after discontinuation of a strong CYP3A inhibitor before lurasidone can be safely administered. We recommend requiring normal-weight and obese patients to limit the dosage of lurasidone, or undergo a washout period, for two and three weeks, respectively, after discontinuation of posaconazole.

Inhibition of human cytochromes P450 in vitro by ritonavir and cobicistat

OBJECTIVES

Ritonavir and cobicistat are strong inhibitors of human cytochrome P450-3A (CYP3A) isoforms, and are used clinically as pharmacokinetic boosting agents for other antiretroviral drugs. Data reported by the manufacturer suggest that cobicistat is a more selective inhibitor of CYP3A than ritonavir. However, this claim has not been validated in clinical studies. This study evaluated the in-vitro inhibitory potency of ritonavir and cobicistat vs a series of human CYP isoforms.

METHOD

The model system utilized human liver microsomes and isoform-selective index substrates.

KEY FINDINGS

Ritonavir and cobicistat both were strong inhibitors of CYP3A4, with IC₅₀ values of 0.014 and 0.032 μm, respectively. A component of inhibition was time-dependent (mechanism-based). Neither drug meaningfully inhibited CYP1A2 (IC₅₀  > 150 μm). CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 were inhibited by both drugs, but with IC₅₀ values exceeding 6 μm.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with previous reports, both ritonavir and cobicistat were highly potent inhibitors of CYP3A. Both drugs were weaker inhibitors of other human CYPs, with IC₅₀ values at least two orders of magnitude higher. There was no evidence of a meaningful difference in selectivity between the two drugs.

In vitro inhibition of human UGT isoforms by ritonavir and cobicistat

1. Ritonavir and cobicistat are pharmacokinetic boosting agents used to increase systemic exposure to other antiretroviral therapies. The manufacturer's data suggests that cobicistat is a more selective CYP3A4 inhibitor than ritonavir. However, the inhibitory effect of ritonavir and cobicistat on human UDP glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes in Phase II metabolism is not established. This study evaluated the inhibition of human UGT isoforms by ritonavir versus cobicistat. 2. Acetaminophen and ibuprofen were used as substrates to evaluate the metabolic activity of the principal human UGTs. Metabolite formation rates were determined by HPLC analysis of incubates following in vitro incubation of index substrates with human liver microsomes (HLMs) at different concentrations of ritonavir or cobicistat. Probenecid and estradiol served as positive control inhibitors. 3. The 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀) of cobicistat and ritonavir were at least 50 µM, which substantially exceeds usual clinical plasma concentrations. Probenecid inhibited the glucuronidation of acetaminophen (IC₅₀ 0.7 mM), but not glucuronidation of ibuprofen. At relatively high concentrations, estradiol inhibited ibuprofen glucuronidation (IC₅₀ 17 µM). 4. Ritonavir and cobicistat are unlikely to produce clinically important drug interactions involving drugs metabolized to glucuronide conjugates by UGT1A1, 1A3, 1A6, 1A9, 2B4 and 2B7.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Isavuconazole and a Fixed-Dose Combination of Lopinavir 400 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg in Healthy Subjects

This phase 1, open‐label study evaluated the pharmacokinetic effects of coadministration of the antifungal agent, isavuconazole (administered as its water‐soluble prodrug isavuconazonium sulfate), with the antiretroviral agent lopinavir/ritonavir in healthy adults. In part 1, 13 subjects were randomized to 2 arms to receive multiple doses of oral isavuconazole 100 mg either alone or with lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg. In part 2, a different group of 55 subjects were randomized to 3 arms to receive multiple doses of oral isavuconazole 200 mg, either alone or with lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg, or to receive oral lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg alone. Mean area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) following the last dose (AUC_τ) and C_max of isavuconazole increased by 113% and 96% in part 1 and by 96% and 74% in part 2 in the presence vs absence of lopinavir/ritonavir, respectively. Mean AUC_τ and C_max of lopinavir were 27% and 23% lower, and mean AUC_τ and C_max of ritonavir were 31% and 33% lower in the presence vs absence of isavuconazole, respectively. Mild to moderate gastrointestinal disorders were the most common adverse events experienced. These findings indicate that coadministration of lopinavir/ritonavir with isavuconazole can decrease the exposure of lopinavir/ritonavir and increase the exposure of isavuconazole. Patients should be monitored for reduced antiviral efficacy if these agents are coadministered.

No Increased Risk of Ketoconazole Toxicity in Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

In July 2013 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a safety announcement regarding the use of ketoconazole and its adverse drug reactions. The FDA report advised against the use ketoconazole tablets as a first-line treatment for any fungal infections because of the risk of potentially serious drug-drug interactions and liver and adrenal gland complications. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) also proposed to limit the use of oral ketoconazole in fungal infections because of the same risk of harmful effects and interactions. In addition, the FDA also advised against the use of oral ketoconazole in drug interaction studies, in which it has been extensively used as an index inhibitor of drug metabolism. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the risks of ketoconazole-induced hepatotoxicity described by the FDA and EMA in published drug interaction studies with ketoconazole and compare these data with the toxicity reported for ketoconazole when used as antifungal treatment. In the drug interaction studies (2355 participants; healthy volunteers and patients; median treatment duration, 6 days), only 40 participants were reported to have increased liver transaminase activity (1.7%), and no deaths were reported or associated with ketoconazole. In studies investigating ketoconazole treatment, patients were treated for 276 days (median), and 5.6% of patients had elevated liver enzyme activity. Because of the short treatment period in drug interaction studies the risk of drug-induced hepatic injury is considered very low. As such, we recommend that ketoconazole remain a safe CYP3A index inhibitor for use in drug interaction studies with healthy volunteers.