An Open-Label Dose-Finding Study of Allopurinol to Target Defined Reduction in Urate Levels in Hemodialysis Patients

Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia in chronic kidney disease: mechanisms and clinical implications

Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia (HU) is considered a pathogenic factor in multiple disease contexts, but a causative role is only proven for the crystalline form of uric acid in gouty arthritis and urate nephropathy. Epidemiological studies document a robust association of HU with hypertension, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CKD progression, but CKD-related impaired uric acid (UA) clearance and the use of diuretics that further impair UA clearance likely accounts for these associations. Interpreting the available trial evidence is further complicated by referring to xanthine oxidase inhibitors as urate-lowering treatment, although these drugs inhibit other substrates, so attributing their effects only to HU is problematic. In this review we provide new mechanistic insights into the biological effects of soluble and crystalline UA and discuss clinical evidence on the role of asymptomatic HU in CKD, CVD and sterile inflammation. We identify research areas with gaps in experimental and clinical evidence, specifically on infectious complications that represent the second common cause of death in CKD patients, referred to as secondary immunodeficiency related to kidney disease. In addition, we address potential therapeutic approaches on how and when to treat asymptomatic HU in patients with kidney disease and where further interventional studies are required.

Serum Urate Levels of Hemodialyzed Renal Patients Revisited

OBJECTIVES

The need of maintaining serum urate (SU)-lowering agents in hemodialysis (HD) patients is an understudied area that requires a review, as it is a common practice. The aims were to assess the SU reduction achieved under HD and to analyze the kinetics of SU in a week of intermittent HD.

METHODS

The serum urate levels were determined before and after HD sessions in 96 consecutive patients with end-stage renal disease, and the average SU reduction was assessed. Variables related to HD were analyzed whether they were associated with SU reductions of 80% greater. In addition, a kinetics study was performed on 10 selected patients with hyperuricemia (SU before HD >6.8 mg/dL) throughout intermittent HD sessions in a 1-week period.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD age of the patients was 66.5 ± 13.8 years, and 62 of them were male (64.6%). The mean ± SD time on HD replacement was 7.1 ± 7.2 years, and 16 (16.4%) continued with urate-lowering agents. The mean SU reduction immediately after HD was 80.2% (95% confidence interval, 78.4-82.0); 51 patients (56.7%) showed SU reduction of 80% or greater. In the SU kinetics study, SU levels significantly reduced all over the period and persisted below hyperuricemia threshold (p = 0.015). Noteworthy, 6 patients (60%) were hyperuricemic before session 1, but only 1 (10%) before session 2 and none before session 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Under HD replacement therapy, the SU levels effectively reduced and persisted below saturation point, suggesting that the SU-lowering therapy would be unnecessary for patients on HD, but necessary in selected cases. The definition of hyperuricemia under HD needs to be revised.

Management of gout in chronic kidney disease: a G-CAN Consensus Statement on the research priorities

Gout and chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently coexist, but quality evidence to guide gout management in people with CKD is lacking. Use of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in the context of advanced CKD varies greatly, and professional bodies have issued conflicting recommendations regarding the treatment of gout in people with concomitant CKD. As a result, confusion exists among medical professionals about the appropriate management of people with gout and CKD. This Consensus Statement from the Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) discusses the evidence and/or lack thereof for the management of gout in people with CKD and identifies key areas for research to address the challenges faced in the management of gout and CKD. These discussions, which address areas for research both in general as well as related to specific medications used to treat gout flares or as ULT, are supported by separately published G-CAN systematic literature reviews. This Consensus Statement is not intended as a guideline for the management of gout in CKD; rather, it analyses the available literature on the safety and efficacy of drugs used in gout management to identify important gaps in knowledge and associated areas for research.

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effect of Allopurinol on Left Ventricular Mass Index in Hemodialysis Patients

Introduction

Increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI) is associated with mortality in end-stage renal disease. LVMI regression may improve outcomes. Allopurinol has reduced LVMI in randomized controlled trials in chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and ischemic heart disease. This study investigated whether allopurinol would regress LVMI in hemodialysis patients.

Methods

This was a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind multicenter trial funded by the British Heart Foundation (PG/12/72/29743). A total of 80 patients undergoing regular maintenance hemodialysis were recruited from NHS Tayside, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Ayrshire and Arran in Scotland, UK. Participants were randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to 12 months of therapy with allopurinol 300 mg or placebo after each dialysis session. The primary outcome was change in LVMI, as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) at baseline and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were change in BP, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), augmentation indices (AIx), and pulse wave velocity (PWV).

Results

A total of 53 patients, with a mean age of 58 years, completed the study and had CMRI follow-up data for analysis. Allopurinol did not regress LVMI (change in LVMI: placebo +3.6 ± 10.4 g/m²; allopurinol: +1.6 ± 11 g/m²; P = 0.49). Allopurinol had no demonstrable effect on BP, FMD, AIx, or PWV.

Conclusion

Compared with placebo, treatment with allopurinol did not regress LVMI in this trial.