Should attendance for preclinical simulation and clinical education be mandatory?

Orthodontics rewired: A new approach to predoctoral competency training

OBJECTIVE

To describe changes in a competency-based orthodontics course in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and compare outcomes before and after these adaptations.

METHODS

Exempted by NYU IRB (#FY2021-4795, #FY2021-5748). At NYU College of Dentistry, assessments and surveys for D3 course groups were compared: 2018 (N = 89, in-person) and 2022 (N = 109, hybrid; remote synchronous with cold-calling). Assessments were identical and proctored. Pass rates, mean scores, and score distributions were compared using t-tests and Z-scores. Internal consistency of surveys was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha. Six paired Likert items were categorized into Positive, Neutral, and Negative and compared using Fisher's exact test and phi coefficients. Four items were added to the 2022 survey to assess students' responses to "cold-calling" and were evaluated using descriptive statistical methods.

RESULTS

No significant differences in pass rates or mean assessment scores were found between 2018 (79.8%, 1.45 ± 1.11) and 2022 (80.7%, 1.50 ± 0.97) groups. Surveys demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.95 and 0.81). Response rates were 79% and 80% for both groups with a median score of 4 (Agree) or higher, indicating positive confidence and motivation. Fisher's exact test and phi coefficients did not find significant differences across surveys (p ≤ 0.05). The four additional Likert items in the 2022 group survey suggested that cold-calling increased preparedness and anxiety. The median score for cold-call items = 4 (Agree).

CONCLUSIONS

The null hypothesis was upheld. Assessment and survey outcomes for 2018 and 2022 were similar. Students displayed increased confidence and motivation. "Cold-calling" was associated with increased preparedness, engagement, and anxiety.

Drawings to explore faculties‘ and students‘ perceptions from different generations cohorts about dental education: A pilot study

Introduction/Aims

We aimed at using drawings as a form of data collection to give voice to older and younger generations in regards to educational practices in undergraduate dentistry.

Materials and methods

First year dental students (younger generations) and faculty members (older generations) produced drawings depicting their perceptions of the current dental education learning environment. Qualitative analysis was conducted independently by two researchers using the drawings to produce codes, categories and themes.

Results

15 drawings were produced: 9/34 (26.4%) made by students and 6/20 (30%) made by faculty members. The generated themes indicated that students and faculties found that dental education is going through a challenging time, because of the restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic; and that they were aware about the evident division between basic/preclinical and applied/clinical courses. Faculties showed hopeful signs that the situation may get better. Students‘ drawings evoked the following topics: digital connectedness, diversity, time goes by, and future aspirations in Dentistry.

Discussion

This study reinforced the validity of visual methods as an approach in research and showed different graphical features (features that might be intentionally or unintentionally represented in the drawings) that gave voice to participants. These voices could have been invisible in more traditional qualitative approaches, such as interviews or questionnaires.

Conclusions

Although the two groups of participants came from different generation cohorts, they had aligned perceptions regarding challenges in dental education, and mentioned the separation between preclinic and clinic. Drawings were unique, innovative, and an interesting tool to express perceptions regarding today’s learning environment. These insights can consequently help educators to personalize teaching approaches to better meet the needs of the students.