1
|
Wang B, Conway L, Taylor L, Valverde K. The influence of licensure on ABGC certification examination outcomes. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:897-905. [PMID: 37787621 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
The genetic counseling field established ABGC certification and state licensure as professional standards for practice. All current state licensure laws require passing the ABGC certification examination, although states differ in their requirements regarding how soon after graduation the examination must be taken. Graduates in states without licensure can schedule the certification examination at their preference. This study explores the influence of licensure requirements on timing to take the examination and likelihood of passing the examination. Genetic counselors who graduated between 2017 and 2021 were invited to complete a 20-question survey that included demographic information, first-time pass rates, year of graduation and the month and year they took the certification examination. Usable responses were received from 246 genetic counselors who responded to the survey, a minimum response rate of 12.9%. Participants were largely female (92.7%), white (88.6%), and almost evenly divided between those whose first job was in a state with licensure (56.3%) and one without licensure (43.7%). Those who worked in states with licensure took the examination significantly sooner than those who worked in states without licensure (p = 0.028) and were 2.4 times more likely to fail the first attempt [95% CI = 1.08-5.49]). When asked about personal preference on timing of the examination, those who "would have waited if there were no licensure requirement" were almost 7 times more likely to fail the first attempt (RR = 6.81, 95% CI = 3.10-14.97). This study identified an association between state licensure requirements, genetic counselors' timing of taking the ABGC examination, and their examination performance. The data suggest that the element of choice is an important factor in pass rates. New graduates need to be aware of state-specific licensure laws' impact on their ability to choose when to take the examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baijia Wang
- Master of Science in Genetic Counseling Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- 22q and You Center, Clinical Genetics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laura Conway
- Master of Science in Genetic Counseling Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lynne Taylor
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Biostatistics Analysis Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kathleen Valverde
- Master of Science in Genetic Counseling Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Balcom JR, Ellingson MS, Bowler CA, Richardson DM, Kruisselbrink T, Thomas BC. Development of a flipped learning course to deliver and scale molecular variant evaluation education: A quality improvement initiative. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:168-178. [PMID: 38197720 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Over the past several decades, molecular genetic testing volumes have grown and testing has expanded from single-gene assays to multigene panels, exome sequencing, and genome sequencing. The number of molecular genetic variants that require manual interpretation has grown simultaneously, resulting in an increased demand for education on molecular variant evaluation (MVE). To meet this growing need, a team of genetic counselors and educational experts undertook a quality improvement (QI) initiative with the objectives of assessing, standardizing, and scaling access to MVE education, without increasing instructor time to deliver the education. Using the Six Sigma define-measure-analyze-improve-control (DMAIC) framework, a flipped learning course with a series of standardized online modules was developed to deliver MVE education in an enduring and accessible format for a diverse group of learners. Outcome measures included the number of online modules developed, the number of individual learners and unique learner groups accessing MVE education, and direct instruction time required to deliver MVE education. Countermeasures to ensure maintenance of educational quality included post-course learner satisfaction scores and performance on competency assessments. Both the total number of learners and the number of unique learner groups accessing MVE education increased, while instructor time required to deliver content per learner decreased. Learner satisfaction scores remained constant and performance on competency assessments improved. The QI initiative successfully scaled MVE education to a diverse group of learners without decreasing learner outcomes or satisfaction. The flipped learning format provides a scalable and flexible educational model for instructors and learners in a rapidly changing environment that often includes remote work and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R Balcom
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Marissa S Ellingson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Carrie A Bowler
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Darcy M Richardson
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Clinical Documentation Integrity, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Teresa Kruisselbrink
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Helix, San Carlos, California, USA
| | - Brittany C Thomas
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|