1
|
Zirakchian Zadeh M. Clinical Application of 18F-FDG-PET Quantification in Hematological Malignancies: Emphasizing Multiple Myeloma, Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2023; 23:800-814. [PMID: 37558532 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Most hematological malignancies display heightened glycolytic activity, leading to their detectability through 18F-FDG-PET imaging. PET quantification enables the extraction of metabolic information from tumors. Among various PET measurements, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), which indicates the highest value of 18F-FDG uptake within the tumor, has emerged as the commonly used parameter in clinical oncology. This is because of SUVmax ease of calculation using most available commercial workstations, as well as its simplicity and independence from observer interpretation. Nonetheless, SUVmax represents the increase in activity within a specific small area, which may not fully capture the overall tumor uptake. Volumetric PET parameters have been identified as a potential solution to overcome certain limitations associated with SUVmax. However, these parameters are influenced by the low spatial resolution of PET when assessing small lesions. Another challenge is the high number of lesions observed in some patients, leading to a time-consuming process for evaluating all focal lesions. Some institutions recently have started advocating for CT-based segmentation as a method for measuring radiotracer uptake in the bone marrow and overall bone of the patients. This review article aims to provide insights into clinical application of PET quantification specifically focusing on 3 major hematologic malignancies: multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdi Zirakchian Zadeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy and Interventional Radiology Services, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Albano D, Treglia G, Dondi F, Calabrò A, Rizzo A, Annunziata S, Guerra L, Morbelli S, Tucci A, Bertagna F. 18F-FDG PET/CT Maximum Tumor Dissemination (Dmax) in Lymphoma: A New Prognostic Factor? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092494. [PMID: 37173962 PMCID: PMC10177347 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, several studies introduced the potential prognostic usefulness of maximum tumor dissemination (Dmax) measured by 2-deoxy-2-fluorine-18-fluoro-D-glucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). Dmax is a simple three-dimensional feature that represents the maximal distance between the two farthest hypermetabolic PET lesions. A comprehensive computer literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane libraries was conducted, including articles indexed up to 28 February 2023. Ultimately, 19 studies analyzing the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Dmax in patients with lymphomas were included. Despite their heterogeneity, most studies showed a significant prognostic role of Dmax in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Some articles showed that the combination of Dmax with other metabolic features, such as MTV and interim PET response, proved to better stratify the risk of relapse or death. However, some methodological open questions need to be clarified before introducing Dmax into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Albano
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Università degli Studi di Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Giorgio Treglia
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6501 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Dondi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Università degli Studi di Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Anna Calabrò
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Università degli Studi di Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessio Rizzo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Turin, Italy
| | - Salvatore Annunziata
- Unità di Medicina Nucleare, TracerGLab, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Guerra
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Ospedale San Gerardo, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Silvia Morbelli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Bertagna
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Università degli Studi di Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|