Detrimental graft survival of size-mismatched graft for high model for end-stage liver disease recipients in liver transplantation

Improved graft survival by using three-dimensional printing of intra-abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation

Backgrounds/Aims

While large-for-size syndrome is uncommon in liver transplantation (LT), it can result in fatal outcome. To prevent such fatality, we manufactured 3D-printed intra-abdominal cavity replicas to provide intuitive understanding of the sizes of the graft and the patient's abdomen in patients with small body size between July 2020 and February 2022.

Methods

Clinical outcomes were compared between patients using our 3D model during LT, and patients who underwent LT without 3D model by using 1 : 5 ratio propensity score-matched analysis.

Results

After matching, a total of 20 patients using 3D-printed abdominal cavity model and 100 patients of the control group were included in this study. There were no significant differences in 30-day postoperative complication (50.0% vs. 64.0%, p = 0.356) and the incidence of large-for-size syndrome (0% vs. 7%, p = 0.599). Overall survival of the 3D-printed group was similar to that of the control group (p = 0.665), but graft survival was significantly superior in the 3D-printed group, compared to the control group (p = 0.034).

Conclusions

Since it showed better graft survival, as well as low cost and short production time, our 3D-printing protocol can be a feasible option for patients with small abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome after LT.

Association Between Liver Graft to Recipient Weight Ratio and Acute Kidney Injury Following Liver Transplantation: A Historical Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication following liver transplantation (LT) that has a multifactorial etiology. While some perioperative risk factors have been associated with postoperative AKI, the impact of liver graft weight to recipient body weight ratio (GW/RBW) has been poorly explored. We hypothesized that a high GW/RBW ratio would be associated with AKI after LT.

METHODS

This single-center historical cohort study included all consecutive adults who had LT at Paul Brousse Hospital between 2018 and 2022. Patients requiring preoperative renal replacement therapy, combined solid organ transplantation, retransplantation, split or domino graft were excluded, as well as those with missing graft weight and creatinine values during the first postoperative week. The primary exposure was GW/RBW ratio expressed as a proportion. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative AKI within 7 days after surgery, defined using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. The secondary outcome was the AKI severity (KDIGO grades). We estimated logistic and ordinal regression models adjusted for potential confounding factors and explored nonlinear associations.

RESULTS

Of 467 patients analyzed, 211 (45%) developed AKI. A high GW/RBW ratio was associated with both the risk of postoperative AKI and the severity of AKI (KDIGO grades), especially above a threshold of 2.5% (non-linear effect).

CONCLUSION

A high GW/RBW ratio was associated with an exponential increase in the risk of AKI after LT. A high GW/RBW ratio was also associated with an increased AKI severity. Our findings may help improve graft allocation in patients undergoing LT.

Re-thinking of T-tube use in whole liver transplantation: an analysis on the risk of delayed graft function

The liver-gut axis has been identified as crucial mediator of liver regeneration. Thus, the use of a T-tube in liver transplantation (LT), which interrupts the enterohepatic bile circulation, may potentially have a detrimental effect on the early allograft functional recovery. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 261 patients transplanted with a whole liver graft, with a duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis, who did not develop any surgical complication within postoperative day 14. Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was defined according to the criteria of Olthoff et al. (EAD-O), and graded according to the Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF) score. EAD-O developed in 24.7% of recipients and the median MEAF score was 4.0 [interquartile range 2.9-5.5]. Both MEAF and EAD predicted 90-day post-LT mortality. A T-tube was used in 49.4% of cases (n = 129). After a propensity score matching for donor age, cold and warm ischemia time, donor risk index, balance of risk score, Child-Pugh class C, and MELD score, the T-tube group showed a significantly higher prevalence of EAD-O and value of MEAF than the no-T-tube group (EAD-O: 29 [34.1%] vs 16 [19.0%], p = 0.027; MEAF 4.5 [3.5-5.7] vs 3.7 [2.9-5.0], p = 0.014). In conclusion, T-tube use in LT may be a risk factor for EAD and higher MEAF, irrespective of graft quality and severity of pre-LT liver disease.

Analysis of factors associated with discrepancies between predicted and observed liver weight in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Even using predictive formulas based on anthropometrics in about 30% of subjects, liver weight (LW) cannot be predicted with a ≤20% margin of error. We aimed to identify factors associated with discrepancies between predicted and observed LW.

METHODS

In 500 consecutive liver grafts, we tested LW predictive performance using 17 formulas based on anthropometric characteristics. Hashimoto's formula (961.3 × BSA_D-404.8) was associated with the lowest mean absolute error and used to predict LW for the entire cohort. Clinical factors associated with a ≥20% margin of error were identified in a multivariable analysis after propensity score matching (PSM) of donors with similar anthropometric characteristics.

RESULTS

The total LW was underestimated with a ≥20% margin of error in 53/500 (10.6%) donors and overestimated in 62/500 (12%) donors. After PSM analysis, ages ≥ 65, (OR = 3.21; CI95% = 1.63-6.31; P = .0007), age ≤ 30 years, (OR = 2.92; CI95% = 1.15-7.40; P = .02), and elevated gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels (OR = 0.98; CI95% = 0.97-0.99; P = .006), influenced the risk of LW overestimation. Age ≥ 65 years, (OR = 5.98; CI95% = 2.28-15.6; P = .0002), intensive care unit (ICU) stay with ventilation > 7 days, (OR = 0.32; CI95% = 0.12-0.85; P = .02) and waist circumference increase (OR = 1.02; CI95% = 1.00-1.04; P = .04) were factors associated with LW underestimation.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased waist circumference, age, prolonged ICU stay with ventilation, elevated GGT were associated with an increase in the margin of error in LW prediction. These factors and anthropometric characteristics could help transplant surgeons during the donor-recipient matching process.

Predicting the available space for liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients: a computed tomography-based volumetric study

BACKGROUND

Anthropometric parameters (weight, height) are usually used for quick matching between two individuals (donor and recipient) in liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed to evaluate clinical factors influencing the overall available space for implanting a liver graft in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

In a cohort of 275 cirrhotic patients undergoing LT, we calculated the liver volume (LV), cavity volume (CV), which is considered the additional space between the liver and the right hypocondrium, and the overall volume (OV = LV + CV) using a computed tomography (CT)-based volumetric system. We then chose the formula based on anthropometric parameters that showed the best predictive value for LV. This formula was used to predict the OV in the same population. Factors influencing OV variations were identified by multivariable logistic analysis.

RESULTS

The Hashimoto formula (961.3 × BSA_D-404.8) yielded the lowest median absolute percentage error (21.7%) in predicting the LV. The median LV was 1531 ml. One-hundred eighty-five patients (67.2%) had a median CV of 1156 ml (range: 70-7006), and the median OV was 2240 ml (range: 592-8537). Forty-nine patients (17%) had an OV lower than that predicted by the Hashimoto formula. Independent factors influencing the OV included the number of portosystemic shunts, right anteroposterior abdominal diameter, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score > 25, high albumin value, and BMI > 30.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional anthropometric characteristics (right anteroposterior diameter, body mass index) clinical (number of portosystemic shunts), and biological (MELD, albumin) factors might influence the overall volume available for liver graft implantation. Knowledge of these factors might be helpful during the donor-recipient matching.

Large-for-Size Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: a Systematic Review of Definitions, Outcomes, and Solutions

BACKGROUND

We systematically reviewed the literature on definitions and outcomes of large-for-size (LFS) syndrome in orthotopic liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase were searched (January 1990-January 2019) for studies reporting LFS in LT. Primary outcomes were definitions and mortality of LFS LT.

RESULTS

Eleven studies reporting patients with LFS LT were identified. Four different formulas (graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), body surface area index (BSAi), donor standardized total liver volume (sTLV)-to-recipient sTLV ratio, and graft weight/right anteroposterior distance (RAP) ratio) with their critical thresholds were found. There were 81 patients (54% women) with a median weight and height of 62.5 kg (range, 40-105 kg) and 165 cm (range, 145-180 cm). The median graft weight was 1772 g (range, 1290-2400 g), and the median GWRW was 2.77% (range, 2.1-4.00%). Graft venous outflow obstruction was described in seven patients (8.6%). At the time of LT, fascial closure was not achieved in 24 patients (29.6%) and the graft size was reduced by a liver resection in three patients (3.7%). Thirteen deaths (16%) were reported in the first 90 postoperative days with two patients undergoing re-transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

LFS LT remains heterogeneously defined but characterized by high mortality rates despite the use of tailored surgical solutions (graft reduction and open abdomen). A composite definition is proposed in order to better describe LFS clinical syndrome.

Size mismatch in liver transplantation

Size mismatch is an unique and inevitable but critical issue in live donor liver transplantation. Unmatched metabolic demand of recipient as well as physiologic mismatch aggravates the damage to liver graft, inevitably leading to graft failure on recipient. Also, an excessive resection of liver graft for better recipient outcome in live donor liver transplant may jeopardize the healthy donor well-being and even put donor life in danger. There is a fine balance between resected graft volume required to meet the recipient's metabolic demand and residual graft volume required for donor safety. The obvious clinical necessity of finding that balance has prompted a clinical need and promoted the improvement of knowledge and development of management strategies for size-mismatched transplants. The development of the size-matching methodology has significantly improved graft outcome and recipient survival in live donor liver transplants. On the other hand, the effect of size mismatch in cadaveric transplants has never been observed as being so pronounced. The importance of matching of the donor recipient size has been unrecognized in cadaveric liver transplant. In this review, we attempt to summarize the current most updated knowledge on the subject, particularly addressing the definition and complications of size-mismatched cadaveric liver transplant, as well as management strategies.