SOAP-V: Introducing a method to empower medical students to be change agents in bending the cost curve

The Use of Virtual Standardized Patients for Practice in High Value Care

INTRODUCTION

This study examined the influence of high value care (HVC)-focused virtual standardized patients (VSPs) on learner attitudes toward cost-conscious care (CCC), performance on subsequent standardized patient (SP) encounters, and the correlation of VSP performance with educational outcomes.

METHOD

After didactic sessions on HVC, third-year medical students participated in a randomized crossover design of simulation modalities consisting of 4 VSPs and 3 SPs. Surveys of attitudes toward CCC were administered before didactics and after the first simulation method. Performance markers included automated VSP grading and, for SP cases, faculty-graded observational checklists and patient notes. Performance was compared between modalities using t tests and analysis of variance and then correlated with US Medical Licensing Examination performance.

RESULTS

Sixty-six students participated (VSP first: n = 37; SP-first: n = 29). Attitudes toward CCC significantly improved after training (Cohen d = 0.35, P = 0.043), regardless of modality. Simulation order did not impact learner performance for SP encounters. Learners randomized to VSP first performed significantly better within VSP cases for interview (Cohen d = 0.55, P = 0.001) and treatment (Cohen d = 0.50, P = 0.043). The HVC component of learner performance on the SP simulations significantly correlated with US Medical Licensing Examination step 1 ( r = 0.26, P = 0.038) and step 2 clinical knowledge ( r = 0.33, P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

High value care didactics combined with either VSPs or SPs positively influenced attitudes toward CCC. The ability to detect an impact of VSPs on learner SP performance was limited by content specificity and sample size.

Expectations of and for Clerkship Directors 2.0: A Collaborative Statement from the Alliance for Clinical Education

This article presents an update of the collaborative statement on clerkship directors (CDs), first published in 2003, from the national undergraduate medical education organizations that comprise the Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE). The clerkship director remains an essential leader in the education of medical students on core clinical rotations, and the role of the CD has and continues to evolve. The selection of a CD should be an explicit contract between the CD, their department, and the medical school, with each party fulfilling their obligations to ensure the success of the students, the clerkship and of the CD. Educational innovations and accreditation requirements have evolved in the last two decades and therefore this article updates the 2003 standards for what is expected of a CD and provides guidelines for the resources and support to be provided.In their roles as CDs, medical student educators engage in several critical activities: administration, education/teaching, coaching, advising, and mentoring, faculty development, compliance with accreditation standards, and scholarly activity. This article describes (a) the work products that are the primary responsibility of the CD; (b) the qualifications for the CD; (c) the support structure, resources, and personnel that are necessary for the CD to accomplish their responsibilities; (d) incentives and career development for the CD; and (e) the dedicated time that should be provided for the clerkship and the CD to succeed. Given all that should rightfully be expected of a CD, a minimum of 50% of a full-time equivalent is recognized as appropriate. The complexity and needs of the clerkship now require that at least one full-time clerkship administrator (CA) be a part of the CD's team.To better reflect the current circumstances, ACE has updated its recommendations for institutions and departments to have clear standards for what is expected of the director of a clinical clerkship and have correspondingly clear guidelines as to what should be expected for CDs in the support they are provided. This work has been endorsed by each of the eight ACE member organizations.

Effect of a high value care curriculum on standardized patient exam in the Core Clerkship in Internal Medicine

BACKGROUND

With almost 20% unnecessary spending on healthcare, there has been increasing interest in high value care defined as the best care for the patient, with the optimal result for the circumstances, delivered at the right price. The American Association of Medical Colleges recommend that medical students are proficient in concepts of cost-effective clinical practice by graduation, thus leading to curricula on high value care. However little is published on the effectiveness of these curricula on medical students' ability to practice high value care.

METHODS

In addition to the standard curriculum, the intervention group received two classroom sessions and three virtual patients focused on the concepts of high value care. The primary outcome was number of tests and charges for tests on standardized patients.

RESULTS

136 students enrolled in the Core Clerkship in Internal Medicine and 70 completed the high value care curriculum. There were no significant differences in ordering of appropriate tests (3.1 vs. 3.2 tests/students, p = 0.55) and inappropriate tests (1.8 vs. 2.2, p = 0.13) between the intervention and control. Students in the intervention group had significantly lower median Medicare charges ($287.59 vs. $500.86, p = 0.04) and felt their education in high value care was appropriate (81% vs. 56%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to describe the impact of a high value care curriculum on medical students' ordering practices. While number of inappropriate tests was not significantly different, students in the intervention group refrained from ordering expensive tests.

General Internists as Change Agents: Opportunities and Barriers to Leadership in Health Systems and Medical Education Transformation

Health systems are increasingly engaging in mission development around the quadruple aim of patient experience of care, population health, cost of care, and work-life balance of clinicians. This integrated approach is closely aligned with the education principles and competencies of health systems science (HSS), which includes population health, high-value care, leadership, teamwork, collaboration, and systems thinking. Influenced by health outcomes research, the systems-based practice competency, and the Clinical Learning Environment Review, many medical schools and residency programs are taking on the challenge of comprehensively incorporating these HSS competencies into the education agenda. General internal medicine physicians, inclusive of hospitalists, geriatricians, and palliative and primary care physicians, are at the frontlines of this transformation and uniquely positioned to contribute to and lead health system transformation, role model HSS competencies for trainees, and facilitate the education of a new workforce equipped with HSS skills to accelerate change in healthcare. Although GIM faculty are positioned to be early adopters and leaders in evolving systems of care and education, professional development and changes with academic health systems are required. This Perspective article explores the conceptualization and opportunities to effectively link GIM with healthcare and medical education transformation.

High-Value, Cost-Conscious Communication Skills in Undergraduate Medical Education: Validity Evidence for Scores Derived from Two Standardized Patient Scenarios

INTRODUCTION

Training in high-value, cost-conscious care (HVCCC) is increasingly being incorporated into medical school curricula, but students may have limited opportunities to engage patients in HVCCC conversations. The aim of this study was to develop two standardized patient scenarios with associated checklists, hypothesizing that resulting scores would allow for valid formative assessments of HVCCC communication skills.

METHODS

Scenarios were designed to generate a less-is-more conversation (in response to a patient requesting an unnecessary test) and a shared decision-making conversation (in response to a patient choosing between multiple effective treatment options). Checklists were developed by experts and informed by the existing literature. Validity evidence was collected from content, response process, internal structure, relations to other variables, and consequences of testing.

RESULTS

Ninety-three third-year medical students participated during 2014-2015. Mean checklist scores were 79% (SD = 18, Cronbach α = 0.72) and 72% (SD = 13, Cronbach α = 0.62) for the less-is-more and shared decision-making scenarios, respectively. Checklist scores correlated with global ratings of performance (r = 0.65 and 0.54, respectively, both P < 0.001), and overall interrater reliability was good (r = 0.66). Checklist scores discriminated between higher and lower performers (discrimination indices of 0.84 and 0.65, respectively, both P < 0.001). Most students (83/90, 92%) agreed that the session improved their HVCCC communication skills.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides validity evidence supporting the use of scores derived from two standardized patient scenarios for formative assessment of HVCCC communication skills among third-year medical students. These scenarios can help equip students with practical, patient-centered strategies for promoting value in clinical encounters.

Science of Health Care Delivery: An Innovation in Undergraduate Medical Education to Meet Society's Needs

The purpose of this special article is to describe a new, 4-year Science of Health Care Delivery curriculum at Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, including curricular content and structure, methods for instruction, partnership with Arizona State University, and implementation challenges. This curriculum is intended to ensure that graduating medical students enter residency prepared to train and eventually practice within person-centered, community- and population-oriented, science-driven, collaborative care teams delivering high-value care. A Science of Health Care Delivery curriculum in undergraduate medical education is necessary to successfully prepare physicians so as to ensure the best clinical outcomes and patient experience of care, at the lowest cost.

Pediatric Training Faculty and Resident Perceptions on Teaching High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care: A Multi-Institutional Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-value, cost-conscious care (HVCCC) is care that promotes optimal patient outcomes while reducing unnecessary costs. Teaching to promote HVCCC is essential, yet little research has assessed the dual perspectives of residents and faculty on this topic. Our aim was to investigate pediatric resident and faculty perspectives of HVCCC training and role modeling to more effectively promote curriculum and faculty development on this subject.

METHODS

Pediatric residents and teaching faculty in 2 academic medical centers were surveyed during the 2015-2016 academic year. Questions addressed comfort with HVCCC, current teaching practices, barriers to teaching HVCC, and desired curriculum. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data, and Fisher's exact or χ² tests were used to assess for associations between responses. Institutional review board approval was obtained at both participating institutions.

RESULTS

We received responses from 51% of faculty (128 of 249) and 60% of residents (73 of 123). Most faculty and residents agreed that HVCCC training is important, but only 26% of residents (18 of 69) felt comfortable practicing HVCCC. Faculty and residents identified lack of training or knowledge (50%, 61 of 121 and 53%, 37 of 70, respectively) and lack of hospital support (73%, 88 of 121 and 69%, 47 of 68, respectively) as the largest barriers. Of residents, >85% (60 of 69) reported a lack of attending physician role modeling. Most faculty (83%, 102 of 123) desired faculty development.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents and faculty agree that HVCCC is important and that training institutions have a responsibility to address it. However, most residents were not comfortable with HVCCC. Faculty development in HVCCC as well as hospital support for access to pricing data will be key for programs to develop effective resident training in this area.

Countering cognitive biases in minimising low value care

Cognitive biases in decision making may make it difficult for clinicians to reconcile evidence of overuse with highly ingrained prior beliefs and intuition. Such biases can predispose clinicians towards low value care and may limit the impact of recently launched campaigns aimed at reducing such care. Commonly encountered biases comprise commission bias, illusion of control, impact bias, availability bias, ambiguity bias, extrapolation bias, endowment effects, sunken cost bias and groupthink. Various strategies may be used to counter such biases, including cognitive huddles, narratives of patient harm, value considerations in clinical assessments, defining acceptable levels of risk of adverse outcomes, substitution, reflective practice and role modelling, normalisation of deviance, nudge techniques and shared decision making. These debiasing strategies have considerable face validity and, for some, effectiveness in reducing low value care has been shown in randomised trials.

Consensus of the Millennium Conference on Teaching High Value Care

ISSUE

Healthcare costs have spiraled out of control, yet students and residents may lack the knowledge and skills to provide high value care, which emphasizes the best possible care while reducing unnecessary costs.

EVIDENCE

Mainly national campaigns are aimed at physicians to reconsider their test ordering behaviors, identify overused diagnostics, and disseminate innovative practices. These efforts will fall short if principles of high value care are not incorporated across the spectrum of training for the next generation of physicians.

IMPLICATIONS

Consensus findings of an invitational conference of 7 medical school teams consisting of academic leaders included strategies for institutions to meaningfully incorporate high value care into their medical school, residency, and faculty development curricula.