1
|
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Kapral
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health system, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Arthur J Pesch
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health system, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Rachita Khot
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health system, Charlottesville, VA..
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Argiriov Y, Dani M, Tsironis C, Koizia LJ. Cholecystectomy for Complicated Gallbladder and Common Biliary Duct Stones: Current Surgical Management. Front Surg 2020; 7:42. [PMID: 32793627 PMCID: PMC7385246 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Gallstone disease accounts for the vast majority of acute surgical admissions in the UK, with a major treatment being cholecystectomy. Practice varies significantly as to whether surgery is performed during the acute symptomatic phase, or after a period of recovery. Differences in practice relate to operative factors, patient factors, surgeon factors and hospital and trust wide policies. In this review we summarize recent evidence on management of gallstone disease, particularly with respect to whether cholecystectomy should occur during index presentation or following recovery. We highlight morbidity and mortality studies, cost, and patient reported outcomes. We speculate on barriers to change in service delivery. Finally, we propose potential solutions to optimize care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanna Argiriov
- Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Research Group, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Melanie Dani
- Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Research Group, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christos Tsironis
- Department of Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louis J Koizia
- Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Research Group, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu MH, Kim YJ, Park HS, Jung SI. Benign gallbladder diseases: Imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gallbladder diseases. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:2967-2986. [PMID: 32587442 PMCID: PMC7304100 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i22.2967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Benign gallbladder diseases usually present with intraluminal lesions and localized or diffuse wall thickening. Intraluminal lesions of the gallbladder include gallstones, cholesterol polyps, adenomas, or sludge and polypoid type of gallbladder cancer must subsequently be excluded. Polyp size, stalk width, and enhancement intensity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and degree of diffusion restriction may help differentiate cholesterol polyps and adenomas from gallbladder cancer. Localized gallbladder wall thickening is largely due to segmental or focal gallbladder adenomyomatosis, although infiltrative cancer may present similarly. Identification of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses is pivotal in diagnosing adenomyomatosis. The layered pattern, degree of enhancement, and integrity of the wall are imaging clues that help discriminate innocuous thickening from gallbladder cancer. High-resolution ultrasound is especially useful for analyzing the layering of gallbladder wall. A diffusely thickened wall is frequently seen in inflammatory processes of the gallbladder. Nevertheless, it is important to check for coexistent cancer in instances of acute cholecystitis. Ultrasound used alone is limited in evaluating complicated cholecystitis and often requires complementary computed tomography. In chronic cholecystitis, preservation of a two-layered wall and weak wall enhancement are diagnostic clues for excluding malignancy. Magnetic resonance imaging in conjunction with diffusion-weighted imaging helps to differentiate xathogranulomatous cholecystitis from gallbladder cancer by identifying the presence of fat and degree of diffusion restriction. Such distinctions require a familiarity with typical imaging features of various gallbladder diseases and an understanding of the roles that assorted imaging modalities play in gallbladder evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Hye Yu
- Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, South Korea
| | - Young Jun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, South Korea
| | - Hee Sun Park
- Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, South Korea
| | - Sung Il Jung
- Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frequency-selective non-linear blending for the computed tomography diagnosis of acute gangrenous cholecystitis: Pilot retrospective evaluation. Eur J Radiol Open 2018; 5:114-120. [PMID: 30101157 PMCID: PMC6084642 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of frequency-selective non-linear blending and conventional linear blending contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of acute (AC) and gangrenous (GC) cholecystitis. Materials and methods Following local ethics committee approval for retrospective data analysis, a database search derived 39 patients (26 men, mean age 67.8 ± 14.6 years) with clinical signs of acute cholecystitis, contrast enhanced CT (CECT) evaluation, cholecystectomy, and pathological examination of the resected specimen. The interval between CECT and surgery was 4.7 ± 4.1 days. Pathological gross examination was used to categorize the cases into AC and GC. Subsequently, two radiologists categorized the CECT studies in a blinded and independent fashion into AC and GC, during two different reading sessions using linear blending and frequency-selective non-linear blending CECT. Results Histologic analysis diagnosed 31/39 (79.4%) cases of GC and 8/39 (20.6%) cases of AC. Image interpretation of linear blending CECT resulted in classification of 7/39 (17.9%) patients as GC and 32/39 (82.1%) as AC, whereas image interpretation of frequency-selective non-linear blending CECT resulted in classification of 29/39 (74.3%) patients as GC and 10/39 (25.7%) as AC. Sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV for detection of GC were 22.6%/100%/100%/25% with linear blending CECT and 80.6%/50%/86.2%/40% with frequency-selective non-linear blending CECT, respectively. Based on the histopathologic diagnosis frequency-selective non-linear blending had a significant improvement (p > 0.0001) in the diagnostic accuracy of gangrenous cholecystitis compared with linear blending. Conclusion Frequency-selective non-linear blending post-processing increases the diagnostic accuracy of gangrenous cholecystitis owing to improved visualization of absence of focal enhancement and mural ulcerations.
Collapse
|
5
|
Montini KM, Tulchinsky M. Applied hepatobiliary scintigraphy in acute cholecystitis. APPLIED RADIOLOGY 2015:21-30. [DOI: 10.37549/ar2183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark Tulchinsky
- Pennsylvania State University, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Acute cholecystitis (AC) and lower-gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding are 2 emergencies commonly encountered in nuclear medicine. Evidence of AC on hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) allows for confident diagnosis and provides support for definitive surgical treatment. Proper patient preparation is essential for HBS including fasting and the use of pharmacologic adjuncts is sometimes required. Pharmacologic adjuncts may also be administered during HBS to shorten the length of the examination and increase its specificity. In the interpretation of HBS, there are several sources of false-positive results to be aware of, most commonly chronic cholecystitis. False-negative results on HBS are usually the result of mistaking another structure, such as a dilated cystic duct, for the gallbladder. Abdominal ultrasound is the appropriate initial test in patients with suspected AC, but HBS is an excellent second tier test for the diagnosis of AC in the work-up of indeterminate cases by sonography. GI bleeding scintigraphy plays an important role in the evaluation and management of patients with acute lower-GI bleeding. Scintigraphy serves to localize sites of active GI bleeding and stratify those patients who would benefit from aggressive treatment (surgery or arteriography) vs those who can be managed medically. Pretest involvement of respective services is critical for successful bleeding site confirmation and therapy by interventional radiology or surgery or both. Single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography erythrocyte scintigraphy has demonstrated superior accuracy and precision over planar scintigraphy in the diagnosis of acute GI bleeding. Additionally, single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography scintigraphy of GI bleeding provides useful supplemental anatomical information that benefits patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas W Allen
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Hepatobiliary scintigraphy is a mature imaging technique for evaluation of patients with acute cholecystitis (AC). It is effective in calculous and acalculous forms of AC. The test is used in contemporary medical practice as the arbiter when the findings from screening abdominal ultrasound do not fit a clinical picture. It is also performed in severely ill patients who have AC suspected on other testing, but whose frail condition and high operative risk demand the highest level of certainty. This review, therefore, examines all technique variations of hepatobiliary scintigraphy, offering an approach that may best fit a variety of clinical situations and philosophies on AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Tulchinsky
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stunell H, Buckley O, Geoghegan T, O'Brien J, Ward E, Torreggiani W. Imaging of adenomyomatosis of the gall bladder. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2008; 52:109-17. [PMID: 18373800 DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2008.01926.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Adenomyomatosis is a relatively common abnormality of the gall bladder, with a reported incidence of between 2.8 and 5%. Although mainly confined to the adult study group, a number of cases have been reported in the paediatric study group. It is characterized pathologically by excessive proliferation of the surface epithelium and hypertrophy of the muscularis propria of the gall bladder wall, with invagination of the mucosa into the thickened muscularis forming the so-called 'Rokitansky-Aschoff' sinuses. The condition is usually asymptomatic and is often diagnosed as an incidental finding on abdominal imaging. The radiological diagnosis is largely dependent on the visualization of the characteristic Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses. As the condition is usually asymptomatic, the importance of making a correct diagnosis is to prevent misinterpretation of other gall bladder conditions such as gall bladder cancer, leading to incorrect treatment. In the past, oral cholecystography was the main imaging method used to make this diagnosis. In most institutions, oral cholecystography is no longer carried out, and the diagnosis is now more commonly seen on cross-sectional imaging. In this review article, we describe the manifestations of adenomyomatosis on the various imaging methods, with an emphasis on more modern techniques such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. A brief section on oral cholecystography to aid readers familiar with this technique in understanding the comparable imaging features on more modern imaging techniques is included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Stunell
- Department of Radiology, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Catalano OA, Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Cushing MS, Hahn PF, Brown JJ, Edelman RR. MR imaging of the gallbladder: a pictorial essay. Radiographics 2008; 28:135-55; quiz 324. [PMID: 18203935 DOI: 10.1148/rg.281065183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The gallbladder serves as the repository for bile produced in the liver. However, bile within the gallbladder may become supersaturated with cholesterol, leading to crystal precipitation and subsequent gallstone formation. The most common disorders of the gallbladder are related to gallstones and include symptomatic cholelithiasis, acute and chronic cholecystitis, and carcinoma of the gallbladder. Other conditions that can affect the gallbladder include biliary dyskinesia (functional), adenomyomatosis (hyperplastic), and postoperative changes or complications (iatrogenic). Ultrasonography (US) has been the traditional modality for evaluating gallbladder disease, primarily owing to its high sensitivity and specificity for both stone disease and gallbladder inflammation. US performed before and after ingestion of a fatty meal may also be useful for functional evaluation of the gallbladder. However, US is limited by patient body habitus, with degradation of image quality and anatomic detail in obese individuals. With the advent of faster and more efficient imaging techniques, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has assumed an increasing role as an adjunct modality for gallbladder imaging, primarily in patients who are incompletely assessed with US. MR imaging allows simultaneous anatomic and physiologic assessment of the gallbladder and biliary tract in both initial evaluation of disease and examination of the postoperative patient. This assessment is accomplished chiefly through the use of MR imaging contrast agents excreted preferentially via the biliary system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onofrio A Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Division of Gastrointestinal Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Altun E, Semelka RC, Elias J, Braga L, Voultsinos V, Patel J, Balci NC, Woosley JT. Acute cholecystitis: MR findings and differentiation from chronic cholecystitis. Radiology 2007; 244:174-83. [PMID: 17581902 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2441060920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively determine the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for differentiation between acute and chronic cholecystitis, with histopathologic analysis as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval with waived informed consent was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Four reviewers blinded to the cholecystitis type but aware that cholecystitis was present retrospectively evaluated MR images for predetermined findings in 32 patients (15 male, 17 female; mean age +/- standard deviation, 55 years +/- 20) with histopathologically proved acute or chronic cholecystitis. The final MR diagnoses and MR findings in both groups were compared with each other and with the histopathologic diagnoses to determine the sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging. Chi(2) tests were used to detect differences in MR findings between the acute and chronic cholecystitis groups. RESULTS MR imaging sensitivity and specificity for detection of acute cholecystitis were 95% (18 of 19 patients) and 69% (nine of 13 patients), respectively. The sensitivities of increased gallbladder wall enhancement and increased transient pericholecystic hepatic enhancement were 74% (14 of 19 patients) and 62% (10 of 16 patients), respectively. Both findings had 92% (12 of 13 patients) specificity. Sensitivities of increased wall thickness, pericholecystic fluid, and adjacent fat signal intensity changes were 100% (19 of 19 patients), 95% (18 of 19 patients), and 95% (18 of 19 patients), respectively; specificities were 54% (seven of 13 patients), 38% (five of 13 patients), and 54% (seven of 13 patients), respectively. Pericholecystic abscess, intraluminal membranes, and wall irregularity or defect each had 100% (13 of 13 patients) specificity; sensitivities were 11% (two of 19 patients), 26% (five of 19 patients), and 21% (four of 19 patients), respectively. Increased gallbladder wall enhancement (P<.001) and increased transient pericholecystic hepatic enhancement (P=.003) were the most significantly different between acute and chronic cholecystitis. CONCLUSION Increased gallbladder wall enhancement and increased transient pericholecystic hepatic enhancement had the highest combination of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis and differentiation of acute and chronic cholecystitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ersan Altun
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7510, 2000 Old Clinic Bldg, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Watanabe Y, Nagayama M, Okumura A, Amoh Y, Katsube T, Suga T, Koyama S, Nakatani K, Dodo Y. MR imaging of acute biliary disorders. Radiographics 2007; 27:477-95. [PMID: 17374864 DOI: 10.1148/rg.272055148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
In patients with acute right-sided epigastric pain, jaundice, and a high fever, it is essential to accurately diagnose the cause of the symptoms, differentiate acute biliary disorders from nonbiliary disorders, and evaluate the severity of the disease. Gray-scale ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) are useful primary imaging modalities, but their results are not always conclusive. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, including MR cholangiopancreatography, can be a valuable complement to US and CT when additional information is needed. MR images have excellent tissue contrast and can provide more specific information, allowing diagnosis of complications that arise from acute cholecystitis, such as empyema, gangrenous cholecystitis, gallbladder perforation, enterocholecystic fistula, emphysematous cholecystitis, and hemorrhagic cholecystitis. In addition, causes of obstructive jaundice, acute suppurative cholangitis, and hemobilia can be clearly demonstrated with multisequence MR imaging. Single-section MR cholangiopancreatography and heavily T2-weighted imaging, in combination with fat-suppressed T1- and T2-weighted imaging, provide comprehensive and detailed information about the biliary system around the obstruction site, biliary calculi, inflammatory processes, purulent material, abscesses, gas, and hemorrhage. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging is useful for evaluation of the gallbladder wall; lack of enhancement and disruption of the wall may be findings specific for gangrenous cholecystitis and gallbladder perforation, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Watanabe
- Department of Radiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki 710-8602, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Helmberger H, Kammer B. [Inflammatory diseases of the gall bladder and biliary system. I. Imaging--cholelithasis--inflammation of the gall bladder]. Radiologe 2005; 45:479-90; quiz 491. [PMID: 15875153 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-005-1224-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Cholelithiasis is the most common affliction of the gallbladder and biliary tract. Including its complications, gallstone disease represents the basis for cholecystitis and cholangitis in the majority of cases. Inflammatory diseases of the biliary system are divided into acute and chronic forms originating from the gallbladder as well as from the biliary tract. Although acute calculous cholecystitis is the most common form, gangrenous, and emphysematous inflammation of the gallbladder as well as gallbladder empyema are included in this group of diseases. In the chronic forms, calculous and acalculous inflammation is also differentiated. Recent developments in cross-sectional imaging in sonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging offer numerous tools for depicting the biliary system with high diagnostic accuracy. Invasive imaging modalities of the biliary system are mainly used for therapeutic aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Helmberger
- Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie/Nuklearmedizin, Krankenhaus Dritter Orden München-Nymphenburg, München.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Current awareness in NMR in biomedicine. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2003; 16:510-517. [PMID: 14719526 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
|