Evaluation of velocity-sensitized and acceleration-sensitized NCE-MRA for below-knee peripheral arterial disease

Turbo spin-echo-based enhanced acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling without electrocardiography or peripheral pulse unit triggering and contrast enhancement for lower extremity MRA

PURPOSE

Lower extremity magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) without electrocardiography (ECG) or peripheral pulse unit (PPU) triggering and contrast enhancement is beneficial for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD) while avoiding synchronization failure and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of turbo spin-echo-based enhanced acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) (TSE-Acc) of the lower extremities with that of turbo field-echo-based eAccASL (TFE-Acc) and triggered angiography non-contrast enhanced (TRANCE).

METHODS

Nine healthy volunteers and a patient with PAD were examined on a 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. The artery-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (SIR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. The arterial visibility (1: poor, 4: excellent) and artifact contamination (1: severe, 4: no) were independently assessed by two radiologists. Phase-contrast MRI and digital subtraction angiography were referenced in a patient with PAD. Friedman's test and a post-hoc test according to the Bonferroni-adjusted Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for the SIR, CNR, and visual assessment. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

No significant differences in nearly all the SIRs were observed among the three MRA methods. Higher CNRs were observed with TSE-Acc than those with TFE-Acc (anterior tibial artery, p = 0.014; peroneal artery, p = 0.029; and posterior tibial artery, p = 0.014) in distal arterial segments; however, no significant differences were observed upon comparison with TRANCE (all p > 0.05). The arterial visibility scores exhibited similar trends as the CNRs. The artifact contamination scores with TSE-Acc were significantly lower (but within an acceptable level) compared to those with TFE-Acc. In the patient with PAD, the sluggish peripheral arteries were better visualized using TSE-Acc than those using TFE-Acc, and the collateral and stenosis arteries were better visualized using TSE-Acc than those using TRANCE.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral arterial visualization was better with TSE-Acc than that with TFE-Acc in lower extremity MRA without ECG or PPU triggering and contrast enhancement, which was comparable with TRANCE as the reference standard. Furthermore, TSE-Acc may propose satisfactory diagnostic performance for diagnosing PAD in patients with arrhythmia and chronic kidney disease.

Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography in the Era of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis and Gadolinium Deposition

ABSTRACT

Gadolinium-based contrast agents for clinical magnetic resonance imaging are overall safe. However, the discovery of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with severe renal impairment and gadolinium deposition in patients receiving contrast have generated developments in contrast-free imaging of the vasculature, that is, noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography. This article presents an update on noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography techniques, with comparison to other imaging alternatives. Potential benefits and challenges to implementation, and evidence to date for various clinical applications are discussed.

Optimized enhanced acceleration selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) for non-gated and non-enhanced MR angiography of the hands

PURPOSE

Enhanced acceleration selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) was introduced as non-enhanced and non-gated magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). This technique has not been applied to hand MRA. The objective of this study was to optimize the eAccASL for MRA of the hands and to investigate the factors for MRA visibility of the hands.

METHODS

Twenty healthy volunteers were examined on a 1.5 T MR system. To evaluate arterial visualization, we compared four different acceleration-encoding (AENC) values (i.e., 0.12, 0.29, 0.58, and 0.87 m/s²). Image quality score regarding the MRA depiction of the proximal artery (range, 0-10), the distal artery (0-5), and venous contamination (0-5) was evaluated by three radiologists. We measured the peak to peak arterial blood flow velocity (Vpp) measured by phase contrast cine MRI and hand temperature as the factors for arterial visualization. Qualitative scores were compared with Friedman's tests. Spearman's correlation of qualitative scores with Vpp and hand temperature was performed to analyze influencing factors.

RESULTS

For the distal arterial depiction, scores at AENC 0.12 (median, 9.0) and AENC 0.29 (8.0) were significantly better (both P < 0.0001) than those at AENC 0.87 (5.5). For the proximal arterial depiction, scores at AENC 0.12 (2.25) and AENC 0.29 (2.0) were significantly better (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively) than those at AENC 0.87 (1.5). Conversely, venous contamination scores at AENC 0.12 (3.0) and AENC 0.29 (3.0) were significantly worse (both P < 0.0001) than those at AENC 0.87 (4.0). There were significantly negative correlations between venous contamination and Vpp at AENC 0.12 (ρ = -0.56, P = 0.01), and 0.29 (ρ = -0.68, P = 0.001), whereas hand temperatures were not significantly correlated with scores (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

eAccASL MRA of the hands was optimized by using low AENC values (0.12-0.29 m/s²). Venous contamination may increase with elevation of arterial blood flow.

"Push-button" noncontrast MR angiography using balanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state (bT1RESS)

PURPOSE

We introduce a MR imaging technique, balanced T₁ relaxation-enhanced steady-state (bT1RESS), that provides the unique capability to efficiently impart a flexible amount of T₁ weighting to a balanced steady-state free precession acquisition using periodically applied contrast-modifying RF pulses. Leveraging this capability to suppress the signal intensity of background tissues, we implemented a 3D noncontrast MR angiography technique that continuously acquires thin overlapping 3D volumes and tested it for evaluation of the peripheral arteries.

METHODS

bT1RESS used a fast interrupted steady-state readout with a 45° cslab-selective ontrast-modifying RF pulse applied at 262 msec intervals. A series of 16.4-mm thick overlapping 3D volumes was acquired using a radial stack-of-stars k-space trajectory. The combination of slice oversampling, slab overlap, and averaging of edge slices was helpful to reduce venetian blind artifact. Spatial resolution was near isotropic with reconstructed slice thickness = 0.7 mm and in-plane resolution = 0.5 mm.

RESULTS

Pilot studies in the peripheral arteries demonstrated improved vessel sharpness compared with cardiac-gated quiescent interval slice-selective noncontrast MR angiography. bT1RESS noncontrast MR angiography reliably identified stenotic and occlusive arterial disease in a small cohort of patients with peripheral artery disease.

CONCLUSIONS

bT1RESS provides the basis for a simplified, completely "push button" approach for noncontrast MR angiography that obviates the need for contrast agents, electrocardiographic gating, scout imaging, breath holding, or tailoring of imaging parameters for the individual patient. Further work is needed for technical optimization and clinical validation.

Non-enhanced and Non-gated MR Angiography for Robust Visualization of Peripheral Arteries Using Enhanced Acceleration-selective Arterial Spin Labeling (eAccASL)

This study aimed to assess the feasibility for applying enhanced acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) to non-electrocardiogram-gated and non-enhanced peripheral MRA. We compared eAccASL and background suppressed single shot turbo field echo (TFE)-triggered angiography non-contrast-enhanced sequence (BASS TRANCE) required electrocardiographic-gating in eight volunteers and three patients. In the volunteer study, eAccASL demonstrated a comparable arterial visualization compared with BASS TRANCE. In patient observation, the advantages with eAccASL were found in arterial visualization on the collateral vessels and without artifacts affected by arrhythmia events.

Noncontrast MR angiography: An update

Both computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) have proven to be useful and accurate cross-sectional imaging modalities over a wide range of vascular territories and vascular disorders. A key advantage of MRA is that, unlike CTA, it can be performed without the administration of a contrast agent. In this review article we consider the motivations for using noncontrast MRA, potential contrast mechanisms, imaging techniques, advantages, and drawbacks with respect to CTA and CEMRA, and the level of evidence for using the various MRA techniques. In addition, we explore new developments that promise to expand the reliability and range of clinical applications for noncontrast MRA, along with functional MRA capabilities not available with CTA or CEMRA. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:355-373.