Diagnostic performance of different imaging modalities in the assessment of distant metastasis and local recurrence of tumor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Diagnostic performance of whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MR in cancer M staging: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To calculate the pooled diagnostic performances of whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MR in M staging of [18F]FDG-avid cancer entities.

METHODS

A diagnostic meta-analysis was conducted on the [18F]FDG PET/MR in M staging, including studies: (1) evaluated [18F]FDG PET/MR in detecting distant metastasis; (2) compared[ 18F]FDG PET/MR with histopathology, follow-up, or asynchronous multimodality imaging as the reference standard; (3) provided data for the whole-body evaluation; (4) provided adequate data to calculate the meta-analytic performances. Pooled performances were calculated with their confidence interval. In addition, forest plots, SROC curves, and likelihood ratio scatterplots were drawn. All analyses were performed using STATA 16.

RESULTS

From 52 eligible studies, 2289 patients and 2072 metastases were entered in the meta-analysis. The whole-body pooled sensitivities were 0.95 (95%CI: 0.91-0.97) and 0.97 (95%CI: 0.91-0.99) at the patient and lesion levels, respectively. The pooled specificities were 0.99 (95%CI: 0.97-1.00) and 0.97 (95%CI: 0.90-0.99), respectively. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed. The calculated pooled sensitivities for lung, gastrointestinal, breast, and gynecological cancers were 0.90, 0.93, 1.00, and 0.97, respectively. The pooled specificities were 1.00, 0.98, 0.97, and 1.00, respectively. Furthermore, the pooled sensitivities for non-small cell lung, colorectal, and cervical cancers were 0.92, 0.96, and 0.86, respectively. The pooled specificities were 1.00, 0.95, and 1.00, respectively.

CONCLUSION

[18F]FDG PET/MR was a highly accurate modality in M staging in the reported [18F]FDG-avid malignancies. The results showed high sensitivity and specificity in each reviewed malignancy type. Thus, our findings may help clinicians and patients to be confident about the performance of [18F]FDG PET/MR in the clinic.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Although [18F]FDG PET/MR is not a routine imaging technique in current guidelines, mostly due to its availability and logistic issues, our findings might add to the limited evidence regarding its performance, showing a sensitivity of 0.95 and specificity of 0.97.

KEY POINTS

• The whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MR showed high accuracy in detecting distant metastases at both patient and lesion levels. • The pooled sensitivities were 95% and 97% and pooled specificities were 99% and 97% at patient and lesion levels, respectively. • The results suggested that 18F-FDG PET/MR was a strong modality in the exclusion and confirmation of distant metastases.

State of the Art MR Imaging for Lung Cancer TNM Stage Evaluation

Since the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group (RDOG) report had been published in 1991, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging had limited clinical availability for thoracic malignancy, as well as pulmonary diseases. However, technical advancements in MR systems, such as sequence and reconstruction methods, and adjustments in the clinical protocol for gadolinium contrast media administration have provided fruitful results and validated the utility of MR imaging (MRI) for lung cancer evaluations. These techniques include: (1) contrast-enhanced MR angiography for T-factor evaluation, (2) short-time inversion recovery turbo spin-echo sequences as well as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for N-factor assessment, and (3) whole-body MRI with and without DWI and with positron emission tomography fused with MRI for M-factor or TNM stage evaluation as well as for postoperative recurrence assessment of lung cancer or other thoracic tumors using 1.5 tesla (T) or 3T systems. According to these fruitful results, the Fleischner Society has changed its position to approve of MRI for lung or thoracic diseases. The purpose of this review is to analyze recent advances in lung MRI with a particular focus on lung cancer evaluation, clinical staging, and recurrence assessment evaluation.

18F-FDG PET/MRI in Detection of Pulmonary Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background There have been conflicting results regarding fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET/MRI diagnostic performance in lung malignant neoplasms. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI for the detection of pulmonary malignant neoplasms. Materials and Methods A systematic search was conducted within the Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases until December 31, 2021. Published original articles that met the following criteria were considered eligible for meta-analysis: (a) detecting malignant lesions in the lung, (b) comparing ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI with a valid reference standard, and (c) providing data for the meta-analytic calculations. A hierarchical method was used to pool the performances. The bivariate model was used to find the summary points and 95% CIs. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model was used to draw the summary receiver operating characteristic curve and calculate the area under the curve. The Higgins I² statistic and Cochran Q test were used for heterogeneity assessment. Results A total of 43 studies involving 1278 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 96% (95% CI: 84, 99) and 100% (95% CI: 98, 100), respectively. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 99% (95% CI: 61, 100) and 99% (95% CI: 94, 100), respectively, which were comparable with those of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI. At meta-regression, studies in which contrast media (P = .03) and diffusion-weighted imaging (P = .04) were used as a part of a pulmonary ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI protocol showed significantly higher sensitivities. Conclusion Fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET/MRI was found to be accurate and comparable with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of malignant pulmonary lesions, with significantly improved sensitivity when advanced acquisition protocols were used. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI for distant metastases in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As a first-line imaging modality, whole-body fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and 18F-FDG PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had been widely applied in clinical practice. However, 18F-FDG PET/MRI may be superior to PET/CT for the diagnosis of distant metastases in patients with advanced-stage. Therefore, it is timely and important to systematically determine the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI compared with that of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of distant metastases.

METHODS

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI for the diagnosis of distant metastases in patients with malignant tumors. Relevant studies using both 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI for assessment of distant metastases in patients with malignant tumors were searched in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus from January 2010 to November 2023. Two reviewers independently selected studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A reviewer extracted relevant data and assessed the quality of the eligible studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Across 14 studies (1042 patients), 18F-FDG PET/MRI had a higher sensitivity (0.87 versus 0.81), AUC value (0.98 versus 0.95), and similar specificity (0.97 versus 0.97), than PET/CT for detecting distant metastases. In 3 studies of breast cancer (182 patients), 18F-FDG PET/MRI had a higher sensitivity (0.95 versus 0.87) and specificity (0.96 versus 0.94) than PET/CT. In 5 studies of lung cancer (429 patients), 18F-FDG PET/CT had a higher sensitivity (0.87 versus 0.84) and a lower specificity (0.95 versus 0.96) to PET/MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

18F-FDG PET/MRI and PET/CT both performed well as detectors of distant metastases in patients with malignant tumors, and the former has higher sensitivity. The subgroup analysis highlights that 18F-FDG PET/MRI and PET/CT hold different advantages for distant metastases staging in different tumors, PET/MRI has a higher accuracy in patients with breast cancer patients, while PET/CT has a higher accuracy in patients with lung cancer.

Development and Validation of the Random Forest Model via Combining CT-PET Image Features and Demographic Data for Distant Metastases among Lung Cancer Patients

The work aimed at developing and validating a random forest model of CT-PET image features combined with demographic data to diagnose distant metastases among lung cancer patients. This study involved lung cancer patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas lung adenocarcinoma (TCGA-LUAD) dataset, the lung PET-CT dataset, the lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) dataset, and the National Cancer Institute's Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium lung adenocarcinoma (CPTAC-LUAD) dataset and collected the information on 178 CT, 178 PET, and the patients' age, history of smoking, and gender. We conducted image processing and feature extraction. Finally, 4 computed tomography (CT) image features and 2 positron emission tomography (PET) image features were extracted. Four prediction models based on CT image features, PET image features, and demographic data were developed, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of prediction models. A total of 178 eligible samples were randomly divided into a training set (n = 134) and a testing set (n = 44) at a ratio of 3 : 1, with 2021 as a random number. ROC analyses illustrated that the predictive performance for distant metastases of combining CT-PET image features and demographic data for training and testing were 0.923 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.873-0.973) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.757-0.990). In addition, the predictive performance of the combined model in the testing set was significantly better than that of the CT-demographic data model (0.716, 95% CI: 0.531-0.902), PET-demographic data model (0.802, 95% CI: 0.633-0.970), and CT-PET model (0.797, 95% CI: 0.666-0.928). The random forest model via combining CT-PET image features and demographic data could have great performance in predicting distant metastases among lung cancer patients.

Small Cell Lung Cancer Staging: Prospective Comparison of Conventional Staging Tests, FDG PET/CT, Whole-Body MRI, and Coregistered FDG PET/MRI

Background: Whole-body MRI and FDG PET/MRI have shown encouraging results for staging of thoracic malignancy, but are poorly studied for staging of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Objective: To compare the performance of conventional staging tests, FDG PET/CT, whole-body MRI, and FDG PET/MRI for staging of SCLC. Methods: This prospective study included 98 patients (64 men, 34 women; median age, 74 years) with SCLC who underwent conventional staging tests (brain MRI; neck, chest, and abdominopelvic CT; bone scintigraphy), FDG PET/CT, and FDG PET/MRI, within 2 weeks before treatment; coregistered FDG PET/MRI was generated. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed conventional tests and FDG PET/CT examinations in separate sessions; two chest radiologists independently reviewed whole-body MRI and FDG PET/MRI examinations in separate sessions. Readers assessed T, N, and M categories; TNM stage; and Veterans Administration Lung Cancer Study Group (VALSG) stage. Reader pairs subsequently reached consensus. Stages determined clinically during tumor board sessions served as reference. Results: Accuracy for T category was higher (p<.05) for whole-body MRI (94.9%) and FDG PET/MRI (94.9%) than for FDG PET/CT (85.7%). Accuracy for N category was higher (p<.05) for whole-body MRI (84.7%), FDG PET/MRI (83.7%), and FDG PET/CT (81.6%) than for conventional staging tests (75.5%). Accuracy for M category was higher (p<.05) for whole-body MRI (94.9%), FDG PET/MRI (94.9%), and FDG PET/CT (94.9%) than for conventional staging tests (84.7%). Accuracy for TNM stage was higher (p<.05) for whole-body MRI (88.8%) and FDG PET/MRI (86.7%) than for FDG PET/CT (77.6%) and conventional staging tests (72.4%). Accuracy for VALSG stage was higher (p<.05) for whole-body MRI (95.9%), FDG PET/MRI (95.9%), and FDG PET/CT (98.0%) than for conventional staging tests (82.7%). Interobserver agreement, expressed as kappa, ranged from 0.81 to 0.94 across imaging tests and staging endpoints. Conclusion: FDG PET/CT, whole-body MRI, and coregistered FDG PET/MRI outperformed conventional tests for various staging endpoints in patients with SCLC. Whole-body MRI and FDG PET/MRI outperformed FDG PET/CT for T category and thus TNM stage, indicating utility of MRI for assessing extent of local invasion in SCLC. Clinical Impact: Incorporation of either MRI approach may improve initial staging evaluation in SCLC.

An international expert opinion statement on the utility of PET/MR for imaging of skeletal metastases

BACKGROUND

MR is an important imaging modality for evaluating musculoskeletal malignancies owing to its high soft tissue contrast and its ability to acquire multiparametric information. PET provides quantitative molecular and physiologic information and is a critical tool in the diagnosis and staging of several malignancies. PET/MR, which can take advantage of its constituent modalities, is uniquely suited for evaluating skeletal metastases. We reviewed the current evidence of PET/MR in assessing for skeletal metastases and provided recommendations for its use.

METHODS

We searched for the peer reviewed literature related to the usage of PET/MR in the settings of osseous metastases. In addition, expert opinions, practices, and protocols of major research institutions performing research on PET/MR of skeletal metastases were considered.

RESULTS

Peer-reviewed published literature was included. Nuclear medicine and radiology experts, including those from 13 major PET/MR centers, shared the gained expertise on PET/MR use for evaluating skeletal metastases and contributed to a consensus expert opinion statement. [18F]-FDG and non [18F]-FDG PET/MR may provide key advantages over PET/CT in the evaluation for osseous metastases in several primary malignancies.

CONCLUSION

PET/MR should be considered for staging of malignancies where there is a high likelihood of osseous metastatic disease based on the characteristics of the primary malignancy, hight clinical suspicious and in case, where the presence of osseous metastases will have an impact on patient management. Appropriate choice of tumor-specific radiopharmaceuticals, as well as stringent adherence to PET and MR protocols, should be employed.

State-of-the-art MR Imaging for Thoracic Diseases

Since thoracic MR imaging was first used in a clinical setting, it has been suggested that MR imaging has limited clinical utility for thoracic diseases, especially lung diseases, in comparison with x-ray CT and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. However, in many countries and states and for specific indications, MR imaging has recently become practicable. In addition, recently developed pulmonary MR imaging with ultra-short TE (UTE) and zero TE (ZTE) has enhanced the utility of MR imaging for thoracic diseases in routine clinical practice. Furthermore, MR imaging has been introduced as being capable of assessing pulmonary function. It should be borne in mind, however, that these applications have so far been academically and clinically used only for healthy volunteers, but not for patients with various pulmonary diseases in Japan or other countries. In 2020, the Fleischner Society published a new report, which provides consensus expert opinions regarding appropriate clinical indications of pulmonary MR imaging for not only oncologic but also pulmonary diseases. This review article presents a brief history of MR imaging for thoracic diseases regarding its technical aspects and major clinical indications in Japan 1) in terms of what is currently available, 2) promising but requiring further validation or evaluation, and 3) developments warranting research investigations in preclinical or patient studies. State-of-the-art MR imaging can non-invasively visualize lung structural and functional abnormalities without ionizing radiation and thus provide an alternative to CT. MR imaging is considered as a tool for providing unique information. Moreover, prospective, randomized, and multi-center trials should be conducted to directly compare MR imaging with conventional methods to determine whether the former has equal or superior clinical relevance. The results of these trials together with continued improvements are expected to update or modify recommendations for the use of MRI in near future.

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy for TNM Stage Among Whole-Body MRI and Coregistered PET/MRI Using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI Systems and Integrated PET/CT for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of TNM stage for whole-body MRI and coregistered PET/MRI using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI systems and PET/CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A total of 104 patients with pathologically diagnosed NSCLC underwent whole-body MRI at 1.5 T and 3T and integrated PET/CT, as well as a combination of surgical, pathologic, or follow-up examinations. Whole-body MR images obtained by the five sequences were combined with the PET part of the PET/CT using proprietary software for the PET/MRI studies. The TNM stage obtained with all methods was visually assessed. Kappa statistics were used to determine agreement between TNM stage assessment and final diagnoses, and the McNemar test was used to compare diagnostic accuracy of all methods. RESULTS. Findings of TNM stage on whole-body MRI using 3-T (κ, 0.87; p < 0.0001) and 1.5-T (κ, 0.83; p < 0.0001) systems and for coregistered PET/MRI using a 3-T system (PET/MRI_3T; κ, 0.85; p < 0.0001) were rated as significant and almost perfect, and findings for coregistered PET/MRI using a 1.5-T system (PET/MRI_1.5T; κ, 0.80; p < 0.0001) and PET/CT (κ, 0.73; p < 0.0001) were rated significant and substantial. Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI using the 3-T system was 88.5% (92/104; p = 0.0002, and using the 1.5-T system it was 84.6% (88/104; p = 0.004); results for PET/MRI_3T and PET/MRI_1.5T were 86.5% (90/104; p = 0.001) and 81.7% (85/104; p = 0.03), respectively, which were both significantly better than accuracy of results for PET/CT at 76.0% (79/104). Moreover, diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI using a 3-T system was significantly higher than that of PET/MRI using a 1.5-T system (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION. Whole-body MRI and coregistered PET/MRI using 3-T and 1.5-T systems are as accurate or more accurate than PET/CT, whereas differences between 3-T and 1.5-T MRI systems are not considered significant.

Is there a connection between immunohistochemical markers and grading of lung cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardised uptake values (SUV) of hybrid 18F-FDG-PET/MRI?

INTRODUCTION

To correlate tumour grading and prognostic immunohistochemical markers of lung cancer with simultaneously acquired standardised uptake values (SUV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from hybrid PET/MRI.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 55 consecutive patients (mean age 62.5 ± 9.2 years) with therapy-naïve, histologically proven lung cancer were included. All patients underwent whole-body PET/MRI using 18F-flourdeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) as a radiotracer. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the chest (DWI, b-values: 0, 500, 1000 s/mm² ) was performed simultaneously with PET acquisition. Histopathological tumour grading was available in 43/55 patients. In 15/55 patients, immunohistochemical markers, that is, phospho-AKT Ser473 (pAKTS473), phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (erbB2) were available.

RESULTS

The average SUVmax, SUVmean, ADCmin and ADCmean in lung cancer primaries were 12.6 ± 5.9, 7.7 ± 4.6, 569.9 ± 96.1 s/mm² and 825.8 ± 93.2 s/mm² , respectively. We found a significant inverse correlation between the ADCmin and SUVmax (r = -0.58, P < 0.001) as well as between the ADCmin and SUVmean (r = -0.44, P < 0.001). Tumour grading showed a significant positive correlation with SUVmax and SUVmean (R = 0.34 and R = 0.31, both P < 0.05) and a significant inverse correlation with ADCmin and ADCmean (r = -0.30 and r = -0.40, both P < 0.05). In addition, erbB2 showed a significant inverse correlation with SUVmax and SUVmean (r = -0.50 and r = -0.49, both P < 0.05). The other immunohistochemical markers did not show any significant correlation.

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG-PET/MRI showed weak to moderate correlations between SUV, ADC, tumour grading and erbB2-expression of lung cancer. Hence, 18F-FDG-PET/MRI may, to some extent, offer complementary information to the histopathology of lung cancer, for the evaluation of tumour aggressiveness and treatment response.

Information feedback of 18F-FDG PET/CT computer imaging combined with tumor markers on recurrence and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer

To investigate the diagnostic value or information feedback of tumor markers combined with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT computer imaging on recurrence and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: From January 2013 to December 2017, 95 NSCLC patients undergoing systemic ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT computer imaging examination at the PET/CT computer imaging center of Mudanjiang Medical University had been enrolled. Typically, the interval between the completion of treatment and PET/CT computer imaging examination should be at least three months. Besides, all patients had undergone serum CEA monitoring before and after ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT computer imaging, and 70 of them had received CYFRA21-1 test at the same time. Tumor markers were examined with PET/CT at intervals of less than one week, and all the feedback results were compared with clinical follow-up results or final pathology. Additionally, all the enrolled patients were followed up for 6-12 months. RESULTS: The sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ¹⁸F-FDGPET/CT information feedback in evaluating recurrence or metastasis after NSCLC treatment were superior to those of common tumor markers, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Those of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT computer imaging combined with tumor marker examination for the recurrence and/or metastasis after NSCLC treatment were remarkably higher than those of either individual examination, and the accuracy difference of information feedback had significant statistical significance (P<0.05). Clearly, the diagnosis using tumor markers was correlated with that by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging, and the correlation coefficient was r=0.63. Moreover, serum CEA was grouped at different levels, and the positive rate and accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT computer imaging diagnosis were increased with the increase in CEA level. 8 patients had received ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT dual-phase examination, among them, 4 were diagnosed with recurrence or metastasis after MSCLC treatment, and all of them had been detected.

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in oncology: recommendations and key uses

The past decade has witnessed a growing role and increasing use of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI). Driving these successes are developments in both hardware and software that have reduced overall examination times and significantly improved MR imaging quality. In addition, radiologists and clinicians have continued to find promising new applications of this innovative imaging technique that brings together morphologic and functional characterization of tissues. In oncology, the role of WB-MRI has expanded to the point of being recommended in international guidelines for the assessment of several cancer histotypes (multiple myeloma, melanoma, prostate cancer) and cancer-prone syndromes (Li-Fraumeni and hereditary paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndromes). The literature shows growing use of WB-MRI for the staging and follow-up of other cancer histotypes and cancer-related syndromes (including breast cancer, lymphoma, neurofibromatosis, and von Hippel-Lindau syndromes). The main aim of this review is to examine the current scientific evidence for the use of WB-MRI in oncology.

Whole-Body MR Imaging: The Novel, "Intrinsically Hybrid," Approach to Metastases, Myeloma, Lymphoma, in Bones and Beyond

Whole-body MR imaging (WB-MR imaging) has become a modality of choice for detecting bone metastases in multiple cancers, and bone marrow involvement by multiple myeloma or lymphoma. Combination of anatomic and functional sequences imparts an inherently hybrid dimension to this nonirradiating tool and extends the screening of malignancies outside the skeleton. WB-MR imaging outperforms bone scintigraphy and CT and offers an alternative to PET in many tumors by time of lesion detection and assessment of treatment response. Much work has been done to standardize procedures, optimize sequences, validate indications, confirm preliminary research into new applications, rendering clinical application more user-friendly.

Performance Comparison Between 18F-FDG PET/CT Plus Brain MRI and Conventional Staging Plus Brain MRI in Staging of Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the capabilities of integrated FDG PET/CT and conventional staging for identification of TNM factors, evaluation of the TNM and Veterans Administration Lung Study Group (VALSG) stages, and selection of patients with stage I small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine patients (mean age, 69.6 ± 7.8 [SD] years; range, 40-84 years) with pathologically diagnosed SCLC underwent integrated ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and conventional staging with enhanced brain MRI. TNM and VALSG stages were evaluated by two different reader groups. Kappa statistics and chi-square test result were determined for evaluations of interobserver agreement of all factors and for each clinical stage for both methods. Diagnostic accuracy of identification of each factor and clinical stage was statistically compared by McNemar test.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreements for all factors and each clinical stage were assessed as almost perfect for PET/CT (0.83 ≤ κ ≤ 0.93; p < 0.001) and substantial and almost perfect (0.63 ≤ κ ≤ 0.96; p < 0.001) for conventional staging plus enhanced brain MRI. The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT for N factor and TNM stage (N, 89.8% [53/59]; TNM stage, 88.1% [52/59]) was significantly higher than that of conventional staging plus enhanced brain MRI (N, 67.8% [40/59], p = 0.0002; TNM stage, 72.9% [43/59], p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Integrated FDG PET/CT with contrast-enhanced brain MRI is potentially equal to or more effective than conventional staging plus enhanced brain MRI for T, N, and M assessment and TNM and VALSG staging of SCLC.

Whole Body MRI and oncology: recent major advances

MRI is a very attractive approach for tumour detection and oncological staging with its absence of ionizing radiation, high soft tissue contrast and spatial resolution. Less than 10 years ago the use of Whole Body MRI (WB-MRI) protocols was uncommon due to many limitations, such as the forbidding acquisition times and limited availability. This decade has marked substantial progress in WB-MRI protocols. This very promising technique is rapidly arising from the research world and is becoming a commonly used examination for tumour detection due to recent technological developments and validation of WB-MRI by multiple studies and consensus papers. As a result, WB-MRI is progressively proposed by radiologists as an efficient examination for an expanding range of indications. As the spectrum of its uses becomes wider, radiologists will soon be confronted with the challenges of this technique and be urged to be trained in order to accurately read and report these examinations. The aim of this review is to summarize the validated indications of WB-MRI and present an overview of its most recent advances. This paper will briefly discuss how this examination is performed and which are the recommended sequences along with the future perspectives in the field.

Whole Body MRI and oncology: recent major advances

MRI is a very attractive approach for tumour detection and oncological staging with its absence of ionizing radiation, high soft tissue contrast and spatial resolution. Less than 10 years ago the use of Whole Body MRI (WB-MRI) protocols was uncommon due to many limitations, such as the forbidding acquisition times and limited availability. This decade has marked substantial progress in WB-MRI protocols. This very promising technique is rapidly arising from the research world and is becoming a commonly used examination for tumour detection due to recent technological developments and validation of WB-MRI by multiple studies and consensus papers. As a result, WB-MRI is progressively proposed by radiologists as an efficient examination for an expanding range of indications. As the spectrum of its uses becomes wider, radiologists will soon be confronted with the challenges of this technique and be urged to be trained in order to accurately read and report these examinations. The aim of this review is to summarize the validated indications of WB-MRI and present an overview of its most recent advances. This paper will briefly discuss how this examination is performed and which are the recommended sequences along with the future perspectives in the field.