1
|
Feng J, Le X, Li L, Tang L, Xia Y, Shi F, Guo Y, Zhou Y, Li C. Automatic Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Patients With White Matter Hyperintensity Using Deep Learning and Radiomics. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2025; 40:15333175251325091. [PMID: 40087144 PMCID: PMC11909688 DOI: 10.1177/15333175251325091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 02/15/2025] [Indexed: 03/16/2025]
Abstract
White matter hyperintensity (WMH) is associated with cognitive impairment. In this study, 79 patients with WMH from hospital 1 were randomly divided into a training set (62 patients) and an internal validation set (17 patients). In addition, 29 WMH patients from hospital 2 were used as an external validation set. Cognitive status was determined based on neuropsychological assessment results. A deep learning convolutional neural network of VB-Nets was used to automatically identify and segment whole-brain subregions and WMH. The PyRadiomics package in Python was used to automatically extract radiomic features from the WMH and bilateral hippocampi. Delong tests revealed that the random forest model based on combined features had the best performance for the detection of cognitive impairment in WMH patients, with an AUC of 0.900 in the external validation set. Our results provide clinical doctors with a reliable tool for the early diagnosis of cognitive impairment in WMH patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junbang Feng
- Medical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xingyan Le
- Medical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Li
- Pathology Department, Chongqing UniversityCentral Hospital, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing, China
| | - Lin Tang
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuwei Xia
- Department of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence, Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Shi
- Department of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence, Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Guo
- Medical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yueqin Zhou
- Medical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chuanming Li
- Pathology Department, Chongqing UniversityCentral Hospital, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ayde R, Vornehm M, Zhao Y, Knoll F, Wu EX, Sarracanie M. MRI at low field: A review of software solutions for improving SNR. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2025; 38:e5268. [PMID: 39375036 PMCID: PMC11605168 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024]
Abstract
Low magnetic field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (B 0 $$ {B}_0 $$ < 1 T) is regaining interest in the magnetic resonance (MR) community as a complementary, more flexible, and cost-effective approach to MRI diagnosis. Yet, the impaired signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) per square root of time, or SNR efficiency, leading in turn to prolonged acquisition times, still challenges its relevance at the clinical level. To address this, researchers investigate various hardware and software solutions to improve SNR efficiency at low field, including the leveraging of latest advances in computing hardware. However, there may not be a single recipe for improving SNR at low field, and it is key to embrace the challenges and limitations of each proposed solution. In other words, suitable solutions depend on the final objective or application envisioned for a low-field scanner and, more importantly, on the characteristics of a specific lowB 0 $$ {B}_0 $$ field. In this review, we aim to provide an overview on software solutions to improve SNR efficiency at low field. First, we cover techniques for efficient k-space sampling and reconstruction. Then, we present post-acquisition techniques that enhance MR images such as denoising and super-resolution. In addition, we summarize recently introduced electromagnetic interference cancellation approaches showing great promises when operating in shielding-free environments. Finally, we discuss the advantages and limitations of these approaches that could provide directions for future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reina Ayde
- Center for Adaptable MRI Technology, Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine & NutritionUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
| | - Marc Vornehm
- Department of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical EngineeringFriedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐NürnbergErlangenGermany
| | - Yujiao Zhao
- Department of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of Hong KongHong KongChina
| | - Florian Knoll
- Department of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical EngineeringFriedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐NürnbergErlangenGermany
| | - Ed X. Wu
- Department of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of Hong KongHong KongChina
| | - Mathieu Sarracanie
- Center for Adaptable MRI Technology, Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine & NutritionUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shetty AS, Ludwig DR, Ippolito JE, Andrews TJ, Narra VR, Fraum TJ. Low-Field-Strength Body MRI: Challenges and Opportunities at 0.55 T. Radiographics 2023; 43:e230073. [PMID: 37917537 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Advances in MRI technology have led to the development of low-field-strength (hereafter, "low-field") (0.55 T) MRI systems with lower weight, fewer shielding requirements, and lower cost than those of traditional (1.5-3 T) systems. The trade-offs of lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 0.55 T are partially offset by patient safety and potential comfort advantages (eg, lower specific absorption rate and a more cost-effective larger bore diameter) and physical advantages (eg, decreased T2* decay, shorter T1 relaxation times). Image reconstruction advances leveraging developing technologies (such as deep learning-based denoising) can be paired with traditional techniques (such as increasing the number of signal averages) to improve SNR. The overall image quality produced by low-field MRI systems, although perhaps somewhat inferior to 1.5-3 T MRI systems in terms of SNR, is nevertheless diagnostic for a broad variety of body imaging applications. Effective low-field body MRI requires (a) an understanding of the trade-offs resulting from lower field strengths, (b) an approach to modifying routine sequences to overcome SNR challenges, and (c) a workflow for carefully selecting appropriate patients. The authors describe the rationale, opportunities, and challenges of low-field body MRI; discuss important considerations for low-field imaging with common body MRI sequences; and delineate a variety of use cases for low-field body MRI. The authors also include lessons learned from their preliminary experience with a new low-field MRI system at a tertiary care center. Finally, they explore the future of low-field MRI, summarizing current limitations and potential future developments that may enhance the clinical adoption of this technology. ©RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Venkatesh in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anup S Shetty
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Daniel R Ludwig
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Joseph E Ippolito
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Trevor J Andrews
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Vamsi R Narra
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Tyler J Fraum
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Campbell-Washburn AE, Keenan KE, Hu P, Mugler JP, Nayak KS, Webb AG, Obungoloch J, Sheth KN, Hennig J, Rosen MS, Salameh N, Sodickson DK, Stein JM, Marques JP, Simonetti OP. Low-field MRI: A report on the 2022 ISMRM workshop. Magn Reson Med 2023; 90:1682-1694. [PMID: 37345725 PMCID: PMC10683532 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
In March 2022, the first ISMRM Workshop on Low-Field MRI was held virtually. The goals of this workshop were to discuss recent low field MRI technology including hardware and software developments, novel methodology, new contrast mechanisms, as well as the clinical translation and dissemination of these systems. The virtual Workshop was attended by 368 registrants from 24 countries, and included 34 invited talks, 100 abstract presentations, 2 panel discussions, and 2 live scanner demonstrations. Here, we report on the scientific content of the Workshop and identify the key themes that emerged. The subject matter of the Workshop reflected the ongoing developments of low-field MRI as an accessible imaging modality that may expand the usage of MRI through cost reduction, portability, and ease of installation. Many talks in this Workshop addressed the use of computational power, efficient acquisitions, and contemporary hardware to overcome the SNR limitations associated with low field strength. Participants discussed the selection of appropriate clinical applications that leverage the unique capabilities of low-field MRI within traditional radiology practices, other point-of-care settings, and the broader community. The notion of "image quality" versus "information content" was also discussed, as images from low-field portable systems that are purpose-built for clinical decision-making may not replicate the current standard of clinical imaging. Speakers also described technical challenges and infrastructure challenges related to portability and widespread dissemination, and speculated about future directions for the field to improve the technology and establish clinical value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn
- Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathryn E Keenan
- Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Peng Hu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
| | - John P Mugler
- Department of Radiology & Medical Imaging, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Krishna S Nayak
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Andrew G Webb
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Kevin N Sheth
- Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, and the Yale Center for Brain and Mind Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jürgen Hennig
- Dept.of Radiology, Medical Physics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Basics in NeuroModulation (NeuroModulBasics), Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthew S Rosen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Najat Salameh
- Center for Adaptable MRI Technology (AMT Center), Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland
| | - Daniel K Sodickson
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joel M Stein
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - José P Marques
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Orlando P Simonetti
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heiss R, Nagel AM, Laun FB, Uder M, Bickelhaupt S. Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A New Generation of Breakthrough Technology in Clinical Imaging. Invest Radiol 2021; 56:726-733. [PMID: 34132228 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a pivotal role in diagnostic imaging. In today's clinical environment, scanners with field strengths of 1.5 to 3 T are most commonly used. However, recent technological advancements might help to augment the clinical usage and availability of MRI via the introduction of high-performance low-field MRI systems (ranging from ~0.1-0.55 T in current systems). The combination of low field strength and high-performance hardware is characterized by increased flexibility, excellent quality of results, and reduced cost. This review discusses the multifaceted potential advantages of a new generation of high-performance low-field MRI systems and presents the potential impact of such systems in terms of socioeconomic benefits as well as positive effects on patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Heiss
- From the Institute of Radiology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen
| | | | - Frederik B Laun
- From the Institute of Radiology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen
| | - Michael Uder
- From the Institute of Radiology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology now enable the feasible three-dimensional (3D) acquisition of images. With respect to the imaging of musculoskeletal (MSK) tumors, literature is beginning to accumulate on the use of 3D MRI acquisition for tumor detection and characterization. The benefits of 3D MRI, including general advantages, such as decreased acquisition time, isotropic resolution, and increased image quality, are not only inherently useful for tumor imaging, but they also contribute to the feasibility of more specialized tumor-imaging techniques, such as whole-body MRI, and are reviewed here. Disadvantages of 3D acquisition, such as motion artifact and equipment requirements, do exist and are also discussed. Although further study is needed, 3D MRI acquisition will likely prove increasingly useful in the evaluation of patients with tumors of the MSK system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake C Jones
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Shivani Ahlawat
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Laura M Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zijlstra F, Seevinck PR. Multiple-echo steady-state (MESS): Extending DESS for joint T 2 mapping and chemical-shift corrected water-fat separation. Magn Reson Med 2021; 86:3156-3165. [PMID: 34270127 PMCID: PMC8596862 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To extend the double echo steady‐state (DESS) sequence to enable chemical‐shift corrected water‐fat separation. Methods This study proposes multiple‐echo steady‐state (MESS), a sequence that modifies the readouts of the DESS sequence to acquire two echoes each with bipolar readout gradients with higher readout bandwidth. This enables water‐fat separation and eliminates the need for water‐selective excitation that is often used in combination with DESS, without increasing scan time. An iterative fitting approach was used to perform joint chemical‐shift corrected water‐fat separation and T2 estimation on all four MESS echoes simultaneously. MESS and water‐selective DESS images were acquired for five volunteers, and were compared qualitatively as well as quantitatively on cartilage T2 and thickness measurements. Signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and T2 quantification were evaluated numerically using pseudo‐replications of the acquisition. Results The water‐fat separation provided by MESS was robust and with quality comparable to water‐selective DESS. MESS T2 estimation was similar to DESS, albeit with slightly higher variability. Noise analysis showed that SNR in MESS was comparable to DESS on average, but did exhibit local variations caused by uncertainty in the water‐fat separation. Conclusion In the same acquisition time as DESS, MESS provides water‐fat separation with comparable SNR in the reconstructed water and fat images. By providing additional image contrasts in addition to the water‐selective DESS images, MESS provides a promising alternative to DESS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Zijlstra
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Peter R Seevinck
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,MRIGuidance BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Link TM, Patel R. The need for short MRI examinations: A musculoskeletal perspective. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 49:e49-e50. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M. Link
- Department of Radiology of Biomedical ImagingUniversity of California San Francisco California USA
| | - Rina Patel
- Department of Radiology of Biomedical ImagingUniversity of California San Francisco California USA
| |
Collapse
|