Reference range determination for imaging biomarkers: Myocardial T1

Sex- and age-specific normal values for automated quantitative pixel-wise myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance

AIMS

Recently developed in-line automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion mapping has been shown to be reproducible and comparable with positron emission tomography (PET), and can be easily integrated into clinical workflows. Bringing quantitative myocardial perfusion CMR into routine clinical care requires knowledge of sex- and age-specific normal values in order to define thresholds for disease detection. This study aimed to establish sex- and age-specific normal values for stress and rest CMR myocardial blood flow (MBF) in healthy volunteers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 151 healthy volunteers recruited from two centres underwent adenosine stress and rest myocardial perfusion CMR. In-line automatic reconstruction and post processing of perfusion data were implemented within the Gadgetron software framework, creating pixel-wise perfusion maps. Rest and stress MBF were measured, deriving myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) and were subdivided by sex and age. Mean MBF in all subjects was 0.62 ± 0.13 mL/g/min at rest and 2.24 ± 0.53 mL/g/min during stress. Mean MPR was 3.74 ± 1.00. Compared with males, females had higher rest (0.69 ± 0.13 vs. 0.58 ± 0.12 mL/g/min, P < 0.01) and stress MBF (2.41 ± 0.47 vs. 2.13 ± 0.54 mL/g/min, P = 0.001). Stress MBF and MPR showed significant negative correlations with increasing age (r = -0.43, P < 0.001 and r = -0.34, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Fully automated in-line CMR myocardial perfusion mapping produces similar normal values to the published CMR and PET literature. There is a significant increase in rest and stress MBF, but not MPR, in females and a reduction of stress MBF and MPR with advancing age, advocating the use of sex- and age-specific reference ranges for diagnostic use.

Native T1 and T2 reference values for maltese healthy cohort

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is increasingly being used for diagnosing various cardiac conditions. Parametric mapping enables quantitative myocardial characterization by directly measuring myocardial T1 and T2 values. However, reference values of parametric mapping are not standardized across different vendors and scanners, causing drawbacks for clinical implementation of this technique across different sites. We assessed the reference ranges of native T1 and T2 values in a healthy Maltese cohort to establish a local parametric mapping service. Healthy subjects [n = 51; mean age 36.0 (range 19-59) years] with normal cardiac function on CMR were recruited. Subjects underwent uniform parametric mapping pulse sequences [MOLLI 5b(3b)3b for native T1 mapping, and gradient echo single shot FLASH readout for T2 mapping] on a 3 T Siemens MAGNETOM Vida scanner. Native T1 and T2 values were measured by placing a region of interest within the interventricular septum at midventricular level. Intra- and inter-observer variability were assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Mean ± 1.96 SD was used as a reference range. Mean native T1 and T2 values were 1200.1 ± 30.7 ms and 39.5 ± 1.8 ms, respectively. There was no significant bias in repeated measurements by the same and different observers. For the first time in Malta, we established the native T1 and T2 parametric mapping reference values for healthy Caucasian Maltese individuals. This will assist cardiologists to establish diagnosis, disease progression, and response to treatment of various myocardial diseases locally.

T1 values and extracellular volume fraction in asymptomatic subjects: variations in left ventricular segments and correlation with cardiovascular risk factors

To evaluate variations in pre-contrast (preT1) and post-contrast (postT1) myocardial T1 values and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) according to left ventricular (LV) segments and to find correlations between them and cardiovascular risk factors. The 233 asymptomatic subjects (210 men, 23 women; aged 54.1 ± 6.0 years) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with preT1 and postT1 mapping on a 1.5-T scanner. T1 values and ECVs were evaluated according to LV segments, age, sex, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Based on the presence of hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM), subjects were subdivided into the control, HTN, DM, and HTN and DM (HTN-DM) groups. T1 values and ECV showed significant differences between septal and lateral segments at the mid-ventricular and basal levels (p ≤ 0.003). In subgroup analysis, the HTN-DM group showed a significantly higher ECV (0.260 ± 0.023) than the control (0.240 ± 0.021, p = 0.011) and HTN (0.241 ± 0.024, p = 0.041) groups. Overall postT1 and ECV of the LV had significant correlation with eGFR (r = 0.19, p = 0.038 for postT1; r =  − 0.23, p = 0.011 for ECV). Septal segments show higher preT1 and ECV but lower postT1 than lateral segments at the mid-ventricular and basal levels. ECV is significantly affected by HTN, DM, and eGFR, even in asymptomatic subjects.

Phantom-based correction for standardization of myocardial native T1 and extracellular volume fraction in healthy subjects at 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of the phantom-based correction method for standardizing myocardial native T1 and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Seventy-one healthy asymptomatic adult (≥ 20 years) volunteers of five different age groups (34 men and 37 women, 45.5 ± 15.5 years) were prospectively enrolled in three academic hospitals. Cardiac MRI including Modified Look - Locker Inversion recovery T1 mapping sequence was performed using a 3-Tesla system with a different type of scanner for each hospital. Native T1 and ECV were measured in the short-axis T1 map and analyzed for mean values of the 16 entire segments. The myocardial T1 value of each subject was corrected based on the site-specific equation derived from the T1 Mapping and ECV Standardization phantom. The global native T1 and ECV were compared between institutions before and after phantom-based correction, and the variation in native T1 and ECV among institutions was assessed using a coefficient of variation (CoV).

RESULTS

The global native T1 value significantly differed between the institutions (1198.7 ± 32.1 ms, institution A; 1217.7 ± 39.9 ms, institution B; 1232.7 ± 31.1 ms, institution C; p = 0.002), but the mean ECV did not (26.6-27.5%, p = 0.355). After phantom-based correction, the global native T1 and ECV were 1289.7 ± 32.4 ms and 25.0 ± 2.7%, respectively, and CoV for native T1 between the three institutions decreased from 3.0 to 2.5%. The corrected native T1 value did not significantly differ between institutions (1284.5 ± 31.5 ms, institution A; 1296.5 ± 39.1 ms, institution B; 1291.3 ± 29.3 ms, institution C; p = 0.440), and neither did the ECV (24.4-25.9%, p = 0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

The phantom-based correction method can provide standardized reference T1 values in healthy subjects.

KEY POINTS

• After phantom-based correction, the global native T1 of 16 entire myocardial segments on 3-T cardiac MRI is 1289.4 ± 32.4 ms, and the extracellular volume fraction was 25.0 ± 2.7% for healthy subjects. • After phantom - based correction was applied, the differences in the global native T1 among institutions became insignificant, and the CoV also decreased from 3.0 to 2.5%.

Clinical assessment of adenosine stress and rest cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping for detecting ischemic and infarcted myocardium

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) spin-lattice relaxation time (T1) may be influenced by pathologic conditions due to changes in myocardial water content. We aimed to validate the principle and investigate T1 mapping at rest and adenosine stress to differentiate ischemic and infarcted myocardium from controls. Patients with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent CMR were prospectively recruited. Native rest and adenosine stress T1 maps were obtained using standard modified Look-Locker Inversion-Recovery technique. Among 181 patients included, T1 values were measured from three groups. In the control group, 72 patients showed myocardium with a T1 profile of 1,039 ± 75 ms at rest and a significant increase during stress (4.79 ± 3.14%, p < 0.001). While the ischemic (51 patients) and infarcted (58 patients) groups showed elevated resting T1 compared to controls (1,040 ± 90 ms for ischemic; 1,239 ± 121 ms for infarcted, p < 0.001), neither of which presented significant T1 reactivity (1.38 ± 3.02% for ischemic; 1.55 ± 5.25% for infarcted). We concluded that adenosine stress and rest T1 mapping may be useful to differentiate normal, ischemic and infarcted myocardium.

T1 mapping performance and measurement repeatability: results from the multi-national T1 mapping standardization phantom program (T1MES)

BACKGROUND

The T1 Mapping and Extracellular volume (ECV) Standardization (T1MES) program explored T1 mapping quality assurance using a purpose-developed phantom with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformité Européenne (CE) regulatory clearance. We report T1 measurement repeatability across centers describing sequence, magnet, and vendor performance.

METHODS

Phantoms batch-manufactured in August 2015 underwent 2 years of structural imaging, B0 and B1, and "reference" slow T1 testing. Temperature dependency was evaluated by the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology and by the German Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt. Center-specific T1 mapping repeatability (maximum one scan per week to minimum one per quarter year) was assessed over mean 358 (maximum 1161) days on 34 1.5 T and 22 3 T magnets using multiple T1 mapping sequences. Image and temperature data were analyzed semi-automatically. Repeatability of serial T1 was evaluated in terms of coefficient of variation (CoV), and linear mixed models were constructed to study the interplay of some of the known sources of T1 variation.

RESULTS

Over 2 years, phantom gel integrity remained intact (no rips/tears), B0 and B1 homogenous, and "reference" T1 stable compared to baseline (% change at 1.5 T, 1.95 ± 1.39%; 3 T, 2.22 ± 1.44%). Per degrees Celsius, 1.5 T, T1 (MOLLI 5s(3s)3s) increased by 11.4 ms in long native blood tubes and decreased by 1.2 ms in short post-contrast myocardium tubes. Agreement of estimated T1 times with "reference" T1 was similar across Siemens and Philips CMR systems at both field strengths (adjusted R2 ranges for both field strengths, 0.99-1.00). Over 1 year, many 1.5 T and 3 T sequences/magnets were repeatable with mean CoVs < 1 and 2% respectively. Repeatability was narrower for 1.5 T over 3 T. Within T1MES repeatability for native T1 was narrow for several sequences, for example, at 1.5 T, Siemens MOLLI 5s(3s)3s prototype number 448B (mean CoV = 0.27%) and Philips modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) 3s(3s)5s (CoV 0.54%), and at 3 T, Philips MOLLI 3b(3s)5b (CoV 0.33%) and Siemens shortened MOLLI (ShMOLLI) prototype 780C (CoV 0.69%). After adjusting for temperature and field strength, it was found that the T1 mapping sequence and scanner software version (both P < 0.001 at 1.5 T and 3 T), and to a lesser extent the scanner model (P = 0.011, 1.5 T only), had the greatest influence on T1 across multiple centers.

CONCLUSION

The T1MES CE/FDA approved phantom is a robust quality assurance device. In a multi-center setting, T1 mapping had performance differences between field strengths, sequences, scanner software versions, and manufacturers. However, several specific combinations of field strength, sequence, and scanner are highly repeatable, and thus, have potential to provide standardized assessment of T1 times for clinical use, although temperature correction is required for native T1 tubes at least.

Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal T1 and T2 mapping MRI

To develop technical recommendations on the acquisition and post-processing of renal longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) relaxation time mapping. A multidisciplinary panel consisting of 18 experts in the field of renal T1 and T2 mapping participated in a consensus project, which was initiated by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology Action PARENCHIMA CA16103. Consensus recommendations were formulated using a two-step modified Delphi method. The first survey consisted of 56 items on T1 mapping, of which 4 reached the pre-defined consensus threshold of 75% or higher. The second survey was expanded to include both T1 and T2 mapping, and consisted of 54 items of which 32 reached consensus. Recommendations based were formulated on hardware, patient preparation, acquisition, analysis and reporting. Consensus-based technical recommendations for renal T1 and T2 mapping were formulated. However, there was considerable lack of consensus for renal T1 and particularly renal T2 mapping, to some extent surprising considering the long history of relaxometry in MRI, highlighting key knowledge gaps that require further work. This paper should be regarded as a first step in a long-term evidence-based iterative process towards ever increasing harmonization of scan protocols across sites, to ultimately facilitate clinical implementation.

Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal T1 and T2 mapping MRI

To develop technical recommendations on the acquisition and post-processing of renal longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) relaxation time mapping. A multidisciplinary panel consisting of 18 experts in the field of renal T1 and T2 mapping participated in a consensus project, which was initiated by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology Action PARENCHIMA CA16103. Consensus recommendations were formulated using a two-step modified Delphi method. The first survey consisted of 56 items on T1 mapping, of which 4 reached the pre-defined consensus threshold of 75% or higher. The second survey was expanded to include both T1 and T2 mapping, and consisted of 54 items of which 32 reached consensus. Recommendations based were formulated on hardware, patient preparation, acquisition, analysis and reporting. Consensus-based technical recommendations for renal T1 and T2 mapping were formulated. However, there was considerable lack of consensus for renal T1 and particularly renal T2 mapping, to some extent surprising considering the long history of relaxometry in MRI, highlighting key knowledge gaps that require further work. This paper should be regarded as a first step in a long-term evidence-based iterative process towards ever increasing harmonization of scan protocols across sites, to ultimately facilitate clinical implementation.