1
|
Bissell MM, Raimondi F, Ait Ali L, Allen BD, Barker AJ, Bolger A, Burris N, Carhäll CJ, Collins JD, Ebbers T, Francois CJ, Frydrychowicz A, Garg P, Geiger J, Ha H, Hennemuth A, Hope MD, Hsiao A, Johnson K, Kozerke S, Ma LE, Markl M, Martins D, Messina M, Oechtering TH, van Ooij P, Rigsby C, Rodriguez-Palomares J, Roest AAW, Roldán-Alzate A, Schnell S, Sotelo J, Stuber M, Syed AB, Töger J, van der Geest R, Westenberg J, Zhong L, Zhong Y, Wieben O, Dyverfeldt P. 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2023; 25:40. [PMID: 37474977 PMCID: PMC10357639 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-023-00942-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Hemodynamic assessment is an integral part of the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. Four-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow imaging (4D Flow CMR) allows comprehensive and accurate assessment of flow in a single acquisition. This consensus paper is an update from the 2015 '4D Flow CMR Consensus Statement'. We elaborate on 4D Flow CMR sequence options and imaging considerations. The document aims to assist centers starting out with 4D Flow CMR of the heart and great vessels with advice on acquisition parameters, post-processing workflows and integration into clinical practice. Furthermore, we define minimum quality assurance and validation standards for clinical centers. We also address the challenges faced in quality assurance and validation in the research setting. We also include a checklist for recommended publication standards, specifically for 4D Flow CMR. Finally, we discuss the current limitations and the future of 4D Flow CMR. This updated consensus paper will further facilitate widespread adoption of 4D Flow CMR in the clinical workflow across the globe and aid consistently high-quality publication standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malenka M Bissell
- Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), LIGHT Laboratories, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
| | | | - Lamia Ait Ali
- Institute of Clinical Physiology CNR, Massa, Italy
- Foundation CNR Tuscany Region G. Monasterio, Massa, Italy
| | - Bradley D Allen
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alex J Barker
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, USA
| | - Ann Bolger
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nicholas Burris
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Carl-Johan Carhäll
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - Tino Ebbers
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - Alex Frydrychowicz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and Universität Zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Pankaj Garg
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Julia Geiger
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
- Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hojin Ha
- Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea
| | - Anja Hennemuth
- Institute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael D Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Albert Hsiao
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kevin Johnson
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sebastian Kozerke
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Liliana E Ma
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael Markl
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Duarte Martins
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marci Messina
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thekla H Oechtering
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and Universität Zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Pim van Ooij
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Division of Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cynthia Rigsby
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Medical Imaging, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jose Rodriguez-Palomares
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron,Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-CV, CIBER CV, Madrid, Spain
| | - Arno A W Roest
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Willem-Alexander's Children Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center and Center for Congenital Heart Defects Amsterdam-Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Susanne Schnell
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, Institute of Physics, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Julio Sotelo
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
- Biomedical Imaging Center, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute for Intelligent Healthcare Engineering - iHEALTH, Santiago, Chile
| | - Matthias Stuber
- Département de Radiologie Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ali B Syed
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Johannes Töger
- Clinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Rob van der Geest
- Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jos Westenberg
- CardioVascular Imaging Group (CVIG), Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Liang Zhong
- National Heart Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yumin Zhong
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Shanghai Children's Medical Center Affiliated With Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Oliver Wieben
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Petter Dyverfeldt
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu C, Krishnamoorthy G, Yu V, Subashi E, Rimner A, Otazo R. 4D lung MRI with high-isotropic-resolution using half-spoke (UTE) and full-spoke 3D radial acquisition and temporal compressed sensing reconstruction. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36535035 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acace6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective. To develop a respiratory motion-resolved four-dimensional (4D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique with high-isotropic-resolution (1.1 mm) using 3D radial sampling, camera-based respiratory motion sensing, and temporal compressed sensing reconstruction for lung cancer imaging.Approach. Free-breathing half- and full-spoke 3D golden-angle radial acquisitions were performed on eight healthy volunteers and eight patients with lung tumors of varying size. A back-and-forth k-space ordering between consecutive interleaves of the 3D radial acquisition was performed to minimize eddy current-related artifacts. Data were sorted into respiratory motion states using camera-based motion navigation and 4D images were reconstructed using temporal compressed sensing to reduce scan time. Normalized sharpness indices of the diaphragm, apparent signal-to-noise ratio (aSNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the lung tumor (patients only), liver, and aortic arch were compared between half- and full-spoke 4D MRI images to evaluate the impact of respiratory motion and image contrast on 4D MRI image quality. Respiration-induced changes in lung volumes and center of mass shifts were compared between half- and full-spoke 4D MRI measurements. In addition, the motion measurements from 4D MRI and the same-day 4D CT were presented in one of the lung tumor patients.Main results. Half-spoke 4D MRI provides better visualization of the lung parenchyma, while full-spoke 4D MRI presents sharper diaphragm images and higher aSNR and CNR in the lung tumor, liver, and aortic arch. Lung volume changes and center of mass shifts measured by half- and full-spoke 4D MRI were not statistically different. For the patient with 4D MRI and same-day 4D CT, lung volume changes and center of mass shifts were generally comparable.Significance. This work demonstrates the feasibility of a motion-resolved 4D MRI technique with high-isotropic-resolution using 3D radial acquisition, camera-based respiratory motion sensing, and temporal compressed sensing reconstruction for treatment planning and motion monitoring in radiotherapy of lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Can Wu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | | | - Victoria Yu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Ergys Subashi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Ricardo Otazo
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America.,Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Darnell D, Truong TK, Song AW. Recent Advances in Radio-Frequency Coil Technologies: Flexible, Wireless, and Integrated Coil Arrays. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 55:1026-1042. [PMID: 34324753 PMCID: PMC10494287 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radio-frequency (RF) coils are to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners what eyes are to the human body. Because of their critical importance, there have been constant innovations driving the rapid development of RF coil technologies. Over the past four decades, the breadth and depth of the RF coil technology evolution have far exceeded the space allowed for this review article. However, these past developments have laid the very foundation on which some of the recent technical breakthroughs are built upon. Here, we narrow our focus on some of the most recent RF coil advances, specifically, on flexible, wireless, and integrated coil arrays. To provide a detailed review, we discuss the theoretical underpinnings, experimental implementations, promising results, as well as future outlooks covering these exciting topics. These recent innovations have greatly improved patient comfort and ease of scan, while also increasing the signal-to-noise ratio, image resolution, temporal throughput, and diagnostic and treatment accuracy. Together with advances in other MRI subfields, they will undoubtedly continue to drive the field forward and lead us to an ever more exciting future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean Darnell
- Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Trong-Kha Truong
- Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allen W. Song
- Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blanken CPS, Gottwald LM, Westenberg JJM, Peper ES, Coolen BF, Strijkers GJ, Nederveen AJ, Planken RN, van Ooij P. Whole-Heart 4D Flow MRI for Evaluation of Normal and Regurgitant Valvular Flow: A Quantitative Comparison Between Pseudo-Spiral Sampling and EPI Readout. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 55:1120-1130. [PMID: 34510612 PMCID: PMC9290924 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pseudo‐spiral Cartesian sampling with compressed sensing reconstruction has facilitated highly accelerated 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in various cardiovascular structures. However, unlike echo planar imaging (EPI)‐accelerated 4D flow MRI, it has not been validated in whole‐heart applications. Hypothesis Pseudo‐spiral 4D flow MRI (PROUD [PROspective Undersampling in multiple Dimensions]) is comparable to EPI in robustness of valvular flow measurements and remains comparable as the undersampling factor is increased and scan time reduced. Study Type Prospective. Population Twelve healthy subjects and eight patients with valvular regurgitation. Field Strength/Sequence 3.0 T; PROUD and EPI 4D flow sequences, 2D flow and balanced steady‐state free precession sequences. Assessment Valvular blood flow was quantified using valve tracking. PROUD‐ and EPI‐based measurements of aortic (AV) and pulmonary (PV) flow volumes and left and right ventricular stroke volumes were tested for agreement with 2D MRI‐based measurements. PROUD reconstructions with undersampling factors (R) of 9, 14, 28, and 56 were tested for intervalve consistency (per valve, compared to the other valves) and preservation of peak velocities and E/A ratios. Statistical Tests We used repeated measures ANOVA, Bland‐Altman, Wilcoxon signed rank, and intraclass correlation coefficients. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results PROUD and EPI intervalve consistencies were not significantly different both in healthy subjects (valve‐averaged mean difference [limits of agreement width]: 3.2 ± 0.8 [8.7 ± 1.1] mL/beat for PROUD, 5.5 ± 2.9 [13.7 ± 2.3] mL/beat for EPI, P = 0.07) and in patients with valvular regurgitation (2.3 ± 1.2 [15.3 ± 5.9] mL/beat for PROUD, 0.6 ± 0.6 [19.3 ± 2.9] mL/beat for EPI, P = 0.47). Agreement between EPI and PROUD was higher than between 4D flow (EPI or PROUD) and 2D MRI for forward flow, stroke volumes, and regurgitant volumes. Up to R = 28 in healthy subjects and R = 14 in patients with valvular regurgitation, PROUD intervalve consistency remained comparable to that of EPI. Peak velocities and E/A ratios were preserved up to R = 9. Conclusion PROUD is comparable to EPI in terms of intervalve consistency and may be used with higher undersampling factors to shorten scan times further. Level of Evidence 1 Technical Efficacy Stage 2
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen P S Blanken
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas M Gottwald
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eva S Peper
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bram F Coolen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gustav J Strijkers
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aart J Nederveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Nils Planken
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim van Ooij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|