Resting-State Brain Temperature: Dynamic Fluctuations in Brain Temperature and the Brain-Body Temperature Gradient

Response strategies and biological applications of organic fluorescent thermometry: cell- and mitochondrion-level detection

Temperature homeostasis is critical for cells to perform their physiological functions. Among the diverse methods for temperature detection, fluorescent temperature probes stand out as a proven and effective tool, especially for monitoring temperature in cells and suborganelles, with a specific emphasis on mitochondria. The utilization of these probes provides a new opportunity to enhance our understanding of the mechanisms and interconnections underlying various physiological activities related to temperature homeostasis. However, the complexity and variability of cells and suborganelles necessitate fluorescent temperature probes with high resolution and sensitivity. To meet the demanding requirements for intracellular/subcellular temperature detection, several strategies have been developed, offering a range of options to address this challenge. This review examines four fundamental temperature-response strategies employed by small molecule and polymer probes, including intramolecular rotation, polarity sensitivity, Förster resonance energy transfer, and structural changes. The primary emphasis was placed on elucidating molecular design and biological applications specific to each type of probe. Furthermore, this review provides an insightful discussion on factors that may affect fluorescent thermometry, providing valuable perspectives for future development in the field. Finally, the review concludes by presenting cutting-edge response strategies and research insights for mitigating biases in temperature sensing.

Brain temperature remains stable during the day: a study of diffusion-weighted imaging thermometry in healthy individuals

PURPOSE

To investigate the daily fluctuations in brain temperature in healthy individuals using magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) thermometry and to clarify the associations between the brain and body temperatures and sex.

METHODS

Thirty-two age-matched healthy male and female volunteers (male = 16, 20-38 years) were recruited between July 2021 and January 2022. Brain MR examinations were performed in the morning and evening phases on the same day to calculate the brain temperatures using DWI thermometry. Body temperature was also measured in each MR examination. Group comparisons of body and brain temperatures between the two phases were performed using paired t-tests. A multiple linear regression model was used to predict the morning brain temperature using sex, evening brain temperature, and the interaction between sex and evening brain temperature as covariates.

RESULTS

Body temperatures were significantly higher in the evening than in the morning in all participants, male group, and female group (p < 0.001, = 0001, and < 0.001, respectively). Meanwhile, no significant difference was observed between the morning and evening brain temperatures in each analysis (p = 0.23, 0.70, and 0.16, respectively). Multiple linear regression analysis showed significant associations of morning brain temperature with sex (p = 0.038), evening brain temperature (p < 0.001), and the interaction between sex and evening brain temperature (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Unlike body temperature, brain temperature showed no significant daily fluctuations; however, daily fluctuations in brain temperature may vary depending on sex.

Effects of orientation-dependent susceptibility on MR chemical shift brain thermometry

PURPOSE

The presence of orientation-dependent susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance chemical shift thermometry (CST) can confound accurate temperature calculations. Here, we quantify the effect of white matter (WM) tract orientation on CST due to tissue-specific susceptibility.

METHODS

Twenty-nine healthy volunteers (27 ± 4 years old) were scanned on a 3 T MR scanner with a 32-channel head coil. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), T1-weighted imaging, and single voxel spectroscopy (SVS) for CST were acquired. Participants were then asked to rotate their head ∼3-5° (yaw or roll) to alter the orientation of WM tracts relative to the external magnetic field. After head rotation, a second SVS scan and T1-weighted imaging were acquired. The WM-fraction-normalized DTI principal eigenvector (V1) images were used to calculate the length of the x-y component of V1, which was used as a surrogate for WM tracts perpendicular to B₀. A linear regression model was used to determine the relationship between the perpendicular WM tracts and brain temperature.

RESULTS

Significant temperature differences between post- and pre-head rotation scans were observed for brain (-0.72 °C ± 1.36 °C, p = 0.01) but not body (0.012 °C ± 0.07 °C, p = 0.37) temperatures. The difference in brain temperature was positively associated with the corresponding change in perpendicular WM tracts after head rotation (R² = 0.26, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate WM tract orientation affects temperature calculations, suggesting artifacts from orientation-dependent susceptibility may be present in CST.