Computed Diffusion-Weighted Images of Rectal Cancer: Image Quality, Restaging, and Treatment Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy

Differentiating rectal cancer grades using virtual magnetic resonance elastography and fractional order calculus diffusion model

BACKGROUND

To investigate the value of virtual magnetic resonance elastography (vMRE), fractional order calculus (FROC) model, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating rectal cancer grades.

METHODS

This prospective study included 74 patients with rectal cancer who underwent a pelvic MRI. The Mann-Whitney U test or independent samples t-test was employed to compare the parameters of vMRE (µMRE), the FROC model (D, β, and µ), and DWI (ADC). Logistic regression analysis and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were utilized separately for multiparameter co-diagnosis and to assess diagnostic performance. Pearson's correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship of different parameters.

RESULTS

Compared to the low-grade group, the high-grade group had higher µMRE and µ values and lower D, β, and ADC values (all P < 0.05). In terms of the different parameters, the D value demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficacy with an AUC of 0.852(95% CI: 0.750-0.924). In terms of the various methods, the FROC model (D + β + µ) had the highest diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.943(95% CI: 0.864-0.984), which was significantly higher than those of DWI and vMRE (Z = 3.586, 2.430, and 2.081, all P < 0.05). µMRE showed moderately negative correlations with ADC, D, and β (r = - 0.553, - 0.683, and - 0.530, respectively, all P < 0.05) and a moderately positive correlation with µ (r = 0.443, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

FROC, vMRE, and DWI can be utilized for assessing rectal cancer grades, with FROC offering comparatively better diagnostic performance.

Synthetic diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis: a comparison study with different B-value combinations

AIM

To evaluate the impact of different b-value combinations on synthetic diffusion-weighted imaging (sDWI) and determine the sDWI with an optimal b-value combination for prostatic cancer (PCa) diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 68 patients with abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was conducted. The sDWI images with b value of 1500 s/mm2 were separately reconstructed by the following five b-value combinations: b=0, 200s/mm2 (sDWI0-200); b=600, 800s/mm2 (sDWI600-800); b=0, 600s/mm2 (sDWI0-600); b=200, 800s/mm2 sDWI200-800); b=0, 800s/mm2 (sDWI0-800). Quantitative analysis was performed on the acquired DWI (aDWI) images with b=1500s/mm2 (aDWI1500) and all sDWI images. These six image groups were scored in five aspects for image quality and further reviewed by two radiologists via six protocols: Protocol Ⅰ, T2WI+sDWI0-200; Protocol Ⅱ, T2WI+sDWI600-800; Protocol Ⅲ, T2WI+sDWI0-600; Protocol Ⅳ, T2WI+sDWI200-800; Protocol Ⅴ, T2WI+sDWI0-800; Protocol Ⅵ, T2WI+aDWI1500. The corresponding diagnostic efficacies for PCa were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Contrast ratio values of all sDWI images were higher than those of aDWI1500 images. Contrast-to-noise ratio values of sDWI0-200 and sDWI600-800 images were lower than those of the rest sDWI images. All subjective quality scores of sDWI0-600, sDWI200-800, and sDWI0-800 were significantly higher than other groups except for background signal suppression. The area under the curve (AUC) of Protocol Ⅲ, Ⅳ, Ⅴ, and Ⅵ was significantly larger than those of other protocols.

CONCLUSION

Different b-value combinations impact the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of sDWI for PCa detection. The combination of b≤200s/mm2 and b≥600s/mm2 revealed to be optimal.

Comparison of computed versus acquired readout-segmented diffusion-weighted imaging in visualizing scrotal or testicular lesions

PURPOSE

Combining computed diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with readout-segmented echo-planar-imaging may shorten acquisition time and improve imaging quality. This study aimed to compare computed vs. acquired DWI qualitatively and quantitatively in visualizing scrotal or testicular lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 57 consecutive men who underwent scrotal MRI. Four computed DWI sets (cDWI800, cDWI1000, cDWI1200, and cDWI1400) were generated from acquired DWI with two lower b-values (150 and 600 s/mm2). Acquired DWI (DWI800 and DWI1000) and computed DWI were compared through qualitative (susceptibility artifact, signal loss artifact, anatomic clarity, and lesion conspicuity) and quantitative assessment (signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and lesion-to-testicular parenchyma contrast ratio (CR)).

RESULTS

Computed DWI was prone to signal loss artifact and slightly lower assessment scores in terms of anatomic clarity and lesion conspicuity, comparing with acquired DWI. The SNR of computed and acquired DWI decreased with increasing b value. Under the same b-values (800 and 1,000 s/mm2), there was no difference in the median SNR and CR between computed and acquired DWI. The median CR of cDWI1400 was significantly higher than that of the other DWI sets excepting cDWI1200 (P=1.000). The median CNR tended to be lower for computed vs. acquired DWI, while no significant difference (P=0.233).

CONCLUSIONS

Computed and acquired DWI were nearly equivalent in both qualitative and quantitative evaluations at the b values of 800 and 1,000 s/mm2. Computed DWI could enhance the contrast of scrotal or testicular lesions.

The predicting value of post neoadjuvant treatment magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant therapy has become standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer patients. It is correlated with improved clinical and pathological outcomes, including significant tumor downstaging and organ preservation in certain patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which has become the standard for pre-operative staging, is also used for clinical and pre-operative restaging following pre-operative treatment. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the concordance between restaging MRI (following the completion of neoadjuvant therapy) and postoperative pathology result.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed and Google Scholar for studies reporting restaging MRI results compared to pathological outcomes. Outcomes included tumor and nodal staging, circumferential resection margin (CRM) and pathological complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

Out of 25,000 studies found on the initial search; 33 studies were included. The studies were published between 2005 and 2023 and included 4100 patients (57.14% males). The median age was 62.45 years. The median interval between the conclusion of neoadjuvant treatment and the subsequent restaging MRI was 6 weeks (range 4.14-8.8 weeks). The pooled concordance rates between the restaging MRI and the pathological outcomes for ypT stage and ypN stage were 63.9% (54.5%-73.3%, I2 = 96.02%) and 60.9% (42.9%-78.9%, I2 = 98.96%), respectively. The pooled concordance for predicting pathological complete response was 70.4% (53.6%-87.1%, I2 = 98.21%). As for the circumferential resection margin (CRM), the pooled concordance was 78.2.% (71.6%-84.8%, I2 = 83.76%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the concordance rates between restaging MRI and pathological outcomes in rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant therapy are limited. Caregivers should take these results into consideration when making clinical decisions about these patients. More data should be gathered about the predictive value of MRI after total neoadjuvant therapy as well as immunotherapy in rectal cancer patients.

Editorial for "Computed Diffusion-Weighted Images of Rectal Cancer: Image Quality, Restaging, and Treatment Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy"

Level of Evidence

5

Technical Efficacy Stage

2