Incidence, electrophysiological characteristics, and long-term follow-up of perimitral atrial flutter in patients with previously confirmed mitral isthmus block

Comparison of anterior mitral line and mitral isthmus line for ablation of mitral annular flutter

BACKGROUND

Mitral annular flutter (MAF) is the most common left atrial macro-reentrant arrhythmia following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The best ablation approach for this arrhythmia remains unclear.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study sought to compare the acute and long-term outcomes of patients with MAF treated with an anterior mitral line (AML) versus a mitral isthmus line (MIL). Acute ablation success, complication rates, and long-term arrhythmia recurrence were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2021, a total of 81 patients underwent ablation of MAF (58 with an AML and 23 with a MIL). Acute procedural success defined as bidirectional block was achieved in 88% of the AML and 91% of the MIL patients respectively (p = 1.0). One year freedom from atrial arrhythmias was 49.5% versus 77.5% and at 4 years was 24% versus 59.6% for AML versus MIL, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38, confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.82, p = .009). Fewer patients in the MIL group had recurrent atrial flutter when compared to the AML group (HR: 0.32, CI: 0.12-0.83, p = .009). The incidence of recurrent AF, on the other side, was not different between both groups (21.7% vs. 18.9%; p = .76). There were no serious adverse events in either group.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study of patients with MAF, a MIL compared to AML was associated with a long-term reduction in recurrent atrial arrhythmias driven by a reduction in macroreentrant atrial flutters.

Box Lesion Isolation of the Left Atrial Posterior Wall with Radiofrequency Ablation Restricted in Predetermined Lines for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The Prognostic Role of Acute Interventional Outcome and Trigger Identification

The left atrial posterior wall (PW) is known to be a critical substrate for the initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and has been explored as a target for catheter ablation, particularly in persistent AF (PerAF). In this retrospective study, we investigate the clinical outcome of patients with PerAF who underwent PW isolation (PWI) restricted in predetermined lines in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). One hundred consecutive patients (64 ± 9.1 years, 66% male, 20% with previous PVI ablation) underwent PWI in a box lesion setting for PerAF lasting >3 months (34% long-standing PerAF). PW triggers were defined as either foci from the PW that repeatedly induced AF or as isolated AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) within the PW. After a mean follow-up period of 25.6 ± 6.7 months, 61% of the patients remained in sinus rhythm after the last procedure. In 79 patients, the PW was successfully isolated, while, in 21 patients, complete isolation was not possible due to failure in completion of the roof line (n = 16), the floor line (n = 7), or both (n = 2). Patients with incomplete isolation had similar AF/AT recurrence rates compared to those with complete PWI. In 12 patients, PW triggers were identified, and PWI in these patients was shown to have a significantly better prognosis in terms of sinus rhythm maintenance (P = .031). Failure of complete PWI does not predispose a patient to an inferior outcome nor is it responsible for iatrogenic ATs. The presence of AF triggers within the PW leads to a particularly favorable result after box lesion isolation.

Peri-mitral flutter with epicardial bypass after surgical maze procedure

Peri-mitral flutter with long epicardial bypass after surgical maze procedure.

Comparison of the Anterior Septal Line and Mitral Isthmus Line for Perimitral Atrial Flutter Ablation Using Robotic Magnetic Navigation

Background

Perimitral atrial flutter (PMAFL) is one of the most common macro-reentrant left atrial tachycardias. Mitral isthmus (MI) linear ablation is a common strategy for the treatment of PMAFLs, and anterior septum (AS) linear ablation has emerged as a novel ablation approach. We aimed at assessing the effectiveness of AS linear ablation using robotic magnetic navigation for PMAFL ablation.

Methods

In this retrospective study, a total of 36 consecutive patients presented with AFL as the unique arrhythmia or accompanied with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent catheter ablation were enrolled. Patients were classified into two groups according to the different ablation strategies, the MI line group (10 patients) and the AS line group (26 patients).

Results

The clinical baseline characteristics of patients in the two groups were nearly identical. There were no significant differences in procedure time (148.7 ± 46.1 vs. 123.2 ± 30.1 min, P=0.058) or radiofrequency ablation time (25.9 ± 11.4 vs. 23.5 ± 12.6 min) between the two groups. Fluoroscopy time was longer in the MI line group (8.0 ± 4.4 vs. 5.1 ± 2.7 min, P=0.024), and the acute success rate was higher in the AS line group versus the MI line group (96.2% vs. 70%, P=0.025). The long-term freedom from arrhythmia survival rate was higher in the AS line group (73%) than in the MI line group (40%) after a mean follow-up time of 37.4 months with a 3-month blanking period (P=0.049).

Conclusions

AS linear ablation is an effective and safe strategy for PMAFL ablation using robotic magnetic navigation.