Simulation of total knee arthroplasty in 5° or 7° valgus: A study of gap imbalances and changes in limb and knee alignments from native

Does the posterior tibial slope in caliper-verified unrestricted kinematically aligned TKA using manual instruments match the slope in the contralateral healthy knee and improve function?

PURPOSE

Unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (unKA TKA) strives to restore the pre-arthritic posterior tibial slope (PTS), however consistency of achieving this alignment target is unknown. The present study determined the proportion of subjects with differences in PTS less than 2° from the target and the improvement in patient-reported function after unKA TKA.

METHODS

A review of 562 postoperative scanograms identified 99 patients (51 female) with a unKA TKA in one limb, a contralateral healthy limb, and a postoperative axial CT scan. All patients were treated with a primary unKA TKA performed with mechanical instruments where the alignment target was setting the PTS to match that of the medial compartment of the contralateral healthy knee. The PTS of the TKA and the healthy medial tibial plateau were measured and the difference determined. The patient-reported Oxford Knee Score (OKS) measured pre- and post-operative function.

RESULTS

The proportion of subjects within a tolerance interval of ±2° of the contralateral healthy knee at 95% confidence was 85%. The median OKS improved from 20 points preoperatively to 47 points (range 18-48) at 15 months postoperatively. Greater differences of the PTS from healthy were unrelated to poorer Oxford Knee Scores.

CONCLUSION

Unrestricted KA TKA using manual instruments with caliper verification of resection thickness restored a high percentage of patients within a clinically acceptable tolerance of the posterior tibial slope of the contralateral healthy knee. The median postoperative OKS indicated clinically important improvement in patient-reported function.

Non-hygroscopic ionogel-based humidity-insensitive iontronic sensor arrays for intra-articular pressure sensing

Implanted pressure sensors can provide pressure information to assess localized health conditions of specific tissues or organs, such as the intra-articular pressure within knee joints. However, the prerequisites for implanted sensors pose greater challenges than those for wearables or for robots: aside from biocompatibility and tissue-like softness, they must also exhibit humidity insensitivity and high-pressure resolution across a broad pressure spectrum. Iontronic sensors can provide superior sensing properties, but they undergo property degradation in wet environments due to the hygroscopic nature of their active component: ionogels. Herein, we introduce a humidity-insensitive iontronic sensor array based on a hydrophobic and tough ionogel polymerized in a hydrophobicity transition yielding two hydrophobic phases: a soft liquid-rich phase that enhances ionic conductivity and ductility, and a stiff polymer-rich phase that contributes to superior toughness. We demonstrate the in vivo implantation of these sensor arrays to monitor real-time intra-articular pressure distribution in a sheep model, while assessing knee flexion with an angular resolution of 0.1° and a pressure resolution of 0.1%. We anticipate that this sensor array will find applications in various orthopedic surgeries and implantable medical devices.

An Insert Goniometer Can Help Select the Optimal Insert Thickness When Performing Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Medial 1:1 Ball-in-Socket and Lateral Flat Surface Insert and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retention

Current surgical practices in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have advanced and include significant changes and improvements in alignment philosophies, femorotibial implant conformities, and ligament management to replicate in vivo knee kinematics. While corrective measures have emphasized sagittal plane alignment to restore normal flexion-extension (F-E) motion and coronal plane ligament balance, internal-external (I-E) rotation kinematics in the axial plane have been largely neglected. Recent in vivo evidence indicates that the combination of factors necessary to closely restore native tibial rotation as the knee flexes and extends is kinematic alignment (KA), which resurfaces the patient's pre-arthritic knee without releasing ligaments, an insert with medial 1:1 ball-in-socket conformity and a lateral flat surface, and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention. However, the inherent anterior-posterior (A-P) stability provided by the medial 1:1 ball-in-socket limits the surgeon's ability to select the correct insert thickness using manual laxity testing. Accordingly, this review presents the design and validation of an instrument called an insert goniometer that measures I-E tibial rotation for inserts that differ in thickness by 1 mm and uses rotation limits at extension and 90° flexion to select the optimal insert thickness. The optimal thickness is the one that provides the greatest external tibial orientation in extension and internal tibial orientation at 90° flexion without lift-off of the insert.

Tibiofemoral articulation and axial tibial rotation of the knee after a cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Numerous research has reported that total knee arthroplasty (TKA) cannot reproduce axial tibial rotations of normal knees. The objective of this study was to measure the tibiofemoral articular contact motions and axial tibial rotations of TKA knees to investigate the mechanism causing the knee kinematics change of after TKAs.

METHODS

Eleven patients with unilateral cruciate retaining (CR) TKA were tested for measurements of knee motion during a weight-bearing flexion from 0° to 105° using an imaging technique. The tibiofemoral contact kinematics were determined using the contact points on medial and lateral surfaces of the tibia and femoral condyles. Axial tibial rotations were calculated using the differences between the medial and lateral articulation distances on the femoral condyles and tibial surfaces at each flexion interval of 15°.

RESULTS

On femoral condyles, articular contact distances are consistently longer on the medial than on the lateral sides (p < 0.05) up to 60° of flexion, corresponding to internal tibial rotations (e.g., 1.3° ± 1.0° at 15-30° interval). On tibial surfaces, the articular contact point on the medial side moved more posteriorly than on the lateral side at low flexion angles, corresponding to external tibial rotations (e.g., -1.4° ± 1.8° at 15-30° interval); and more anteriorly than on the lateral sides at mid-range flexion, corresponding to internal tibial rotations (e.g., 0.8° ± 1.7° at 45-60° interval). At higher flexion, articular motions on both femoral condyles and tibial surfaces caused minimal changes in tibial rotations.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the axial tibial rotations of these TKA knees were mainly attributed to asymmetric articulations on the medial and lateral femoral condyles and tibial surfaces. The data can help understand the mechanisms causing axial tibial rotations of TKA knees and help improve implant designs for restoration of normal knee kinematics.

Why Kinematic Alignment Makes Little Sense in Valgus Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Narrative Review

There is a debate about the best alignment strategies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mechanical alignment (MA) targets in combination with necessary soft tissue releases are the gold standard for TKA in end-stage valgus osteoarthritis. Some authors propagate kinematic alignment (KA) with the aim of restoring the patient's native alignment and minimizing the need for soft tissue releases. Our previous studies showed that MA with standardized soft tissue release produces reproducible results, and that the preoperative phenotype does not influence the results of patients with valgus osteoarthritis. These data suggest that there is no functional advantage to preserving valgus alignment in patients with valgus osteoarthritis. Many patients with valgus osteoarthritis present with a compromised medial collateral ligament and leaving the knee in valgus could increase the risk of secondary instability. The current literature supports MA TKA with soft tissue release as the gold standard. While using more sophisticated enabling technologies like robotic surgery might allow for aiming for very slight (1-2°) valgus alignment on the femoral side, any valgus alignment outside this range should be avoided. This review paper summarizes our current knowledge on the surgical techniques of TKA in patients with valgus osteoarthritis.

Differences in Trochlear Morphology of a New Femoral Component Designed for Kinematic Alignment from a Mechanical Alignment Design

Because kinematic alignment (KA) aligns femoral components in greater valgus and with less external rotation than mechanical alignment (MA), the trochlear groove of an MA design used in KA is medialized, which can lead to complications. Hence, a KA design has emerged. In this study, our primary objective was to quantify differences in trochlear morphology between the KA design and the MA design from which the KA design evolved. The KA and MA designs were aligned in KA on ten 3D femur-cartilage models. Dependent variables describing the morphology of the trochlea along the anterior flange, which extends proximal to the native trochlea, and along the arc length of the native trochlea, were determined, as was flange coverage. Along the anterior flange, the KA groove was significantly lateral proximally by 10 mm and was significantly wider proximally by 5 mm compared to the MA design (p < 0.0001). Along the arc length of the native trochlea, the KA groove was significantly lateral to the MA design by 4.3 mm proximally (p ≤ 0.0001) and was significantly wider proximally by 19 mm than the MA design. The KA design reduced lateral under-coverage of the flange from 4 mm to 2 mm (p < 0.0001). The KA design potentially mitigates risk of patellofemoral complications by lateralizing and widening the groove to avoid medializing the patella for wide variations in the lateral distal femoral angle, and by widening the flange laterally to reduce under-coverage. This information enables clinicians to make informed decisions regarding use of the KA design.

Setting the distal and posterior condyle of the femoral component to restore the medial pre-arthritic femoral articular surface results in better outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The present study of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) describes an intra-operative method that determines the direction and quantifies the magnitude of deviation of the distal and the posterior medial and lateral (DM, PM, DL, and PL) condyle of the femoral component relative to the pre-arthritic femoral articular surface. For each femoral condyle, the deviations were categorized, and an analysis determined which had better or worse Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and WOMAC scores at 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

Four academic arthroplasty surgeons supervised a cemented primary CR TKA (Triathlon, Stryker) on 120 consecutive patients. 103 that completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed. The surgeon determined the direction and the magnitude of deviation of the condyle of the femoral component by intraoperatively measuring the thickness of the femoral resection, adding compensations of 1 mm for the saw kerf and 2 mm for worn cartilage, and then subtracting the thickness of the femoral component's condyle. For each femoral condyle, a Kruskal-Wallis test determined the categories of deviation with clinically important and significantly different 1-year PROMs.

RESULTS

A 1 to 2.5 mm and 3 mm or more proximal deviation of the DM condyle of the femoral component worsened the median FJS by 35 and 40 points, OKS by 9 and 14 points, and WOMAC score by 9 and 17 points, respectively, relative to those with a -0.5 to 0.5 mm deviation (p < 0.01). A 1 to 2.5 mm and 3 mm or more anterior deviation of the PM condyle of the femoral component worsened the FJS by 34 and 48 points, OKS by 7 and 13 points, and WOMAC scores by 8 and 16 points, respectively (p < 0.01). Deviations of the DL and PL condyle of the femoral component did not affect PROMs (p ≥ 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Although many factors can affect PROM, such as patient expectations, the surgeon should understand that setting the DM and the PM condyles of the femoral component within 1 mm of the patient's pre-arthritic femoral articular surface can potentially result in better FJS, OKS, and WOMAC scores at 1 year.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Prospective cohort study.

Analysis of Short-Term Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty with Kinematic Alignment Technique

BACKGROUND

Surgery remains the best option for more advanced stages of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Kinematic alignment (KA) is an innovative surgical technique that aims to co-align the rotational axes of the femoral, tibial, and patella components with the three kinematic axes of the knee. This study aims to evaluate and analyze short-term clinical, psychological, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing total knee replacement with the KA technique.

METHODS

Twelve patients who underwent total knee replacement surgery with kinematic alignment from May 2022 until July 2022 were prospectively followed and interviewed. Before surgery, the day after surgery, and postoperative day 14, the following tests were evaluated: VAS, SF-12 PS, SF-12 MS, KSS, KSS-F, PHQ-9, and KOOS-PS.

RESULTS

The mean BMI value of 30.4 (±3.4) Kg/m², mean age of 71.8 (±7.2) years. All the scores on the various tests administered consistently showed statistically significant improvement, not only immediately after surgery but also comparing the first to the fourteenth postoperative day.

CONCLUSION

Kinematic alignment technique as a surgical treatment for KO allows the patient a fast postoperative recovery and good clinical, psychological, and functional results in a short time. Further studies are needed with a larger sample size, and prospective randomized studies are essential to compare these results with mechanical alignment.

Influence of Mechanical Alignment on Functional Knee Phenotypes and Clinical Outcomes in Primary TKA: A 1-Year Prospective Analysis

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), functional knee phenotypes are of interest regarding surgical alignment strategies. Functional knee phenotypes were introduced in 2019 and consist of limb, femoral, and tibial phenotypes. The hypothesis of this study was that mechanically aligned (MA) TKA changes preoperative functional phenotypes, which decreases the 1-year Forgotten Joint (FJS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and increases the 1-year WOMAC. All patients included in this study had end-stage osteoarthritis and were treated with a primary MA TKA, which was supervised by four academic knee arthroplasty specialists. To determine the limb, femoral, and tibial phenotype, a long-leg radiograph (LLR) was imaged preoperatively and two to three days after TKA. FJS, OKS, and WOMAC were obtained 1 year after TKA. Patients were categorized using the change in functional limb, femoral, and tibial phenotype measured on LLR, and the scores were compared between the different categories. A complete dataset of preoperative and postoperative scores and radiographic images could be obtained for 59 patients. 42% of these patients had a change of limb phenotype, 41% a change of femoral phenotype, and 24% a change of tibial phenotype of more than ±1 relative to the preoperative phenotype. Patients with more than ±1 change of limb phenotype had significantly lower median FJS (27 points) and OKS (31 points) and higher WOMAC scores (30 points) relative to the 59-, 41-, and 4-point scores of those with a 0 ± 1 change (p < 0.0001 to 0.0048). Patients with a more than ±1 change of femoral phenotype had significantly lower median FJS (28 points) and OKS (32 points) and higher WOMAC scores (24 points) relative to the 69-, 40-, and 8-point scores of those with a 0 ± 1 change (p < 0.0001). A change in tibial phenotype had no effect on the FJS, OKS, and WOMAC scores. Surgeons performing MA TKA could consider limiting coronal alignment corrections of the limb and femoral joint line to within one phenotype to reduce the risk of low patient-reported satisfaction and function at 1-year.

Shear wave tensiometry tracks reductions in collateral ligament tension due to incremental releases

Surgeons routinely perform incremental releases on overly tight ligaments during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce ligament tension and achieve their desired implant alignment. However, current methods to assess whether the surgeon achieved their desired reduction in the tension of a released ligament are subjective and/or do not provide a quantitative metric of tension in an individual ligament. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to determine whether shear wave tensiometry, a novel method to assess tension in individual ligaments based on the speed of shear wave propagation, can detect changes in ligament tension following incremental releases. In seven medial and eight lateral collateral porcine ligaments (MCL and LCL, respectively), we measured shear wave speeds and ligament tensions before and after incremental releases consisting of punctures with an 18-gauge needle. We found that shear wave speed squared decreased linearly with decreasing tension in both the MCL (average coefficient of determination (R2 avg ) = 0.76) and LCL (R2 avg  = 0.94). We determined that errors in predicting tension following incremental releases were 26.2 and 14.2 N in the MCL and LCL, respectively, using ligament-specific calibrations. These results suggest shear wave tensiometry is a promising method to objectively measure the tension reduction in released structures. Clinical Significance: Direct, objective measurements of the tension changes in individual ligaments following release could enhance surgical precision during soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Thus, shear wave tensiometry could help surgeons reduce the risk of poor outcomes associated with overly tight ligaments, including residual knee pain and stiffness.

Arthritic knees with more than 10° valgus can have soft-tissue imbalance in flexion

PURPOSE

Valgus knees have inferior outcomes compared to varus knees. There is little data regarding soft-tissue balance in flexion which may influence outcome in valgus knees undergoing TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there is imbalance between medial and lateral flexion gaps in valgus deformity. A secondary aim was to compare soft-tissue balance in knees with valgus deformity less than 10° with those exceeding 10°. The null hypothesis was that there was no soft-tissue imbalance in 90° of flexion irrespective of magnitude of deformity.

METHODS

64 valgus knees (52 female and 12 male) with deformity from 0.5 to 27.5° (mean 188.77, SD 6.21) were studied in 54 patients (mean age 67.81 y, SD 8.69) undergoing navigated TKA. Medial and lateral gaps in extension and at 90° of flexion were compared (using Independent-samples t test) between knees with valgus < 10° with those > 10° using a validated dynamic method after resection of cruciates, menisci and osteophytes, and then after final trialling.

RESULTS

Mean initial medial-lateral (ML) gap difference in extension was 2.63 mm (SD 2.63) and 2.09 mm (SD 3.78) in flexion, being tighter laterally. Initial ML gap differences in extension and flexion correlated with valgus deformity (R =  - 0.514; p = 0.00001; R =  - 0.325; p = 0.01, respectively). Initial ML gap differences in extension correlated with those in flexion (R = 0.42; p = 0.0005). Mean ML flexion and extension gap differences were 1.30 mm (SD 3.67) and 1.26 mm (SD 1.92) in knees with < 10° valgus, and 3.17 mm (SD 3.71) and 4.29 mm (SD 2.45) in those > 10° valgus; p values were 0.026 and < 0.001 respectively.

CONCLUSION

The lateral flexion gap in valgus knees may be narrower than the medial flexion gap, especially in knees with > 10° deformity. This contrasts with native and varus knees, in which it exceeds the medial gap. This novel study indicates the need to identify valgus knees with lateral flexion gap tightness by distracting the posterior femoral condyles from the proximal tibia by dynamic stressing of the soft-tissues after resection of cruciates, menisci, and osteophytes, with the knee flexed to 90°. These findings, highlighting the need for restoring flexion gap balance, may improve the inferior outcomes in valgus knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Equal bony resection of distal and posterior femur will lead to flexion/extension gap inequality in robot-assisted cruciate-retaining TKA

PURPOSE

Joint imbalance has become one of the main reasons for early revision after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and it is directly related to the surgical technique. Therefore, a better understanding of how much bone has to be removed to obtain a balanced flexion/extension gap could improve current practice. The primary objective of this study was to analyse the amount of bone that needed to be removed from the distal and posterior femoral joint surfaces to obtain an equal flexion/extension gap in robot-assisted TKA. The second objective of this study was to evaluate whether the size of the knee joint influenced the amount of bony resection needed to achieve an equal flexion/extension gap in robot-assisted TKA.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients receiving a robot-assisted TKA (Cruciate Retaining (n = 268)) by six surgeons from April 2018 to September 2019. The robot was used consecutively when available in all patients receiving Cruciate Retaining TKA. Gap assessment, bony resections, femoral implant size and hip-knee-ankle angle were evaluated with the robot. Femoral implant size was categorized into small (size 1-2), medium (size 3-5) and large (size 6-8).

RESULTS

The difference between the posterior and distal resection needed to obtain equal flexion and extension gap was on average 2.0 mm (SD 1.6) and 1.5 mm (SD 2.2) for the medial and lateral compartment, respectively. The discrepancy was smaller in the large implant group compared to the small implant group (p < .05 medial and lateral) and medium implant group (p < .05 medial). Varus knees required a larger differential resection compared to neutral and valgus knees (only laterally) (medial compartment: p < .05 (varus-neutral), p = .051 (varus-valgus); lateral compartment: p < .05 (varus-neutral and varus-valgus).

CONCLUSION

Removing an equal amount of bone from the distal and posterior femur will lead to flexion/extension gap imbalance in TKA. It was required to remove 1.5-2 mm more bone from the posterior femur compared to the distal femur to equalize flexion and extension gap. This effect was size dependent: in larger knees, the discrepancy between the distal and posterior resections was smaller.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Differences in Trochlear Morphology from Native Using a Femoral Component Interfaced with an Anatomical Patellar Prosthesis in Kinematic Alignment and Mechanical Alignment

Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty can be traced in part to alignment of the femoral component. Kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) use the same femoral component but align the component differently. Our objective was to determine differences in trochlear morphology from native for a femoral component interfaced with an anatomical patellar prosthesis in KA and MA. Ten three-dimensional femur-cartilage models were created by combining computed tomography and laser scans of native human cadaveric femurs free of skeletal abnormalities. The femoral component was positioned using KA and MA. Measurements of the prosthetic and native trochlea were made along the arc length of the native trochlear groove and differences from native were computed for the medial-lateral and radial locations of the groove and sulcus angle. Mean medial-lateral locations of the prosthetic groove were within 1.5 and 3.5 mm of native for KA and MA, respectively. Mean radial locations of the prosthetic groove were as large as 5 mm less than native for KA and differences were greater for MA. Sulcus angles of the prosthetic trochlea were 10 degrees steeper proximally, and 10 degrees flatter distally than native for both KA and MA. Largest differences from native occurred for radial locations and sulcus angles for both KA and MA. The consistency of these results with those of other fundamentally different designs which use a modified dome (i.e., sombrero hat) patellar prosthesis highlights the need to reassess the design of the prosthetic trochlea on the part of multiple manufacturers worldwide.

Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with a learning curve for surgical time but not for component alignment, limb alignment and gap balancing

PURPOSE

The application of robotics in the operating theatre for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. As with all new technology, the introduction of new systems is associated with a learning curve and potentially associated with extra complications. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify and predict the learning curve of robot-assisted (RA) TKA.

METHODS

A RA TKA system (MAKO) was introduced in April 2018 in our service. A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients receiving a TKA with this system by six surgeons. Operative times, implant and limb alignment, intraoperative joint balance and robot-related complications were evaluated. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) analyses were used to assess learning curves for operative time, implant alignment and joint balance in RA TKA. Linear regression was performed to predict the learning curve of each surgeon.

RESULTS

RA TKA was associated with a learning curve of 11-43 cases for operative time (p < 0.001). This learning curve was significantly affected by the surgical profile (high vs. medium vs. low volume). A complete normalisation of operative times was seen in four out of five surgeons. The precision of implant positioning and gap balancing showed no learning curve. An average deviation of 0.2° (SD 1.4), 0.7° (SD 1.1), 1.2 (SD 2.1), 0.2° (SD 2.9) and 0.3 (SD 2.4) for the mLDFA, MPTA, HKA, PDFA and PPTA from the preoperative plan was observed. Limb alignment showed a mean deviation of 1.2° (SD 2.1) towards valgus postoperatively compared to the intraoperative plan. One tibial stress fracture was seen as a complication due to suboptimal positioning of the registration pins.

CONCLUSION

RA TKA is associated with a learning curve for surgical time, which might be longer than reported in current literature and dependent on the profile of the surgeon. There is no learning curve for component alignment, limb alignment and gap balancing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Effect of the Extent of Release for Knee Balancing on Post-Operative Limb Coronal Alignment After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction

Outcomes and longevity of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depend mainly on restoring knee function, through precise bony resection and appropriate soft tissue balancing. The current literature lacks evidence regarding the degree of radiographic change after intra-operative knee balancing. The purpose of our study was to assess the degree of change in coronal lower extremity alignment by comparing pre-operative to post-operative full-length radiographs (FLR) after quantifying the degree of intra-operative knee balancing and correlate patient-reported outcomes to the extent of balancing required.

Patients and Methods

One hundred and fifty-four patients undergoing primary TKA for varus knee osteoarthritis were included in the study. The performed soft tissue releases and bony adjustments to obtain a balanced TKA intra-operatively were prospectively documented and were grouped into minimal, moderate and extensive release groups. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), anatomical femoral-tibial angle (FTA), condylar hip angle (CH), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and condylar plateau angle (CPA) were measured on full-length radiographs both pre-operatively and post-operatively. Frequencies of the soft tissue releases and bony resections in addition to descriptive statistics of the measured angles on the radiographs were recorded. In addition, patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs) were compared between the grouped patients.

Results

Of those that were included in the study, 66 knees (42.9%) required minimal release to adequately balance the knee, while 70 (45.5%) required moderate release and 18 (11.7%) required extensive release. No statistically significant differences were found in change of alignment between the groups for all the measured angles. In addition, no difference in PROMs was seen between the groups both pre- and post-operatively.

Conclusion

Although we found no association between post-operative coronal alignment of a TKA and the degree of soft tissue release and bony resection, this likely represents the fact that a balanced TKA is dynamic and not dependent on change of single radiographic parameters. Patient-reported outcomes were not impacted by the extent of releases.

Calipered Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Accurate Technique That Improves Patient Outcomes and Implant Survival

Kinematic alignment performed with caliper measurements and verification checks accurately co-align the femoral and tibial components with the 3 axes and joint lines of the native knee without ligament release and without restrictions on the degree of preoperative varus, valgus, flexion, and extension deformities and the degree of postoperative correction. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(3):126-135.].

Kinematic alignment more closely restores the groove location and the sulcus angle of the native trochlea than mechanical alignment: implications for prosthetic design

PURPOSE

Kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) position the prosthetic trochlea that guides patellar tracking differently. The present study determined whether KA or MA more closely restores the groove location and sulcus angle of the prosthetic trochlea to the native trochlea for three femoral component designs.

METHODS

Ten 3D femur-cartilage models were created by combining computer tomographic (CT) and laser scans of native human cadaveric femurs. Three femoral component designs were positioned using KA and MA. Measurements of the prosthetic and native trochlea were made along the arc length of the native trochlear groove. The alignment technique with the smaller absolute difference between prosthetic and native for the medial-lateral and radial locations of the groove and sulcus angle of the trochlea more closely restored the native trochlea.

RESULTS

For three femoral component designs, KA more closely restored to native the mean medial-lateral location (p = 0.0033 to < 0.0001) and mean radial location (p = 0.0150 to < 0.0001) than MA. For two femoral component designs, KA more closely restored to native the mean sulcus angle (p = 0.0326 to 0.0006) than MA. However, the differences in the mean sulcus angles between KA and MA were less than 2° for all three designs.

CONCLUSION

KA more closely restored the native trochlea, which explains why the reported risk of patellofemoral complications for KA is not higher than MA according to five randomized clinical trials. Small design modifications of the medial-lateral and radial locations and sulcus angle are strategies for restoring the native trochlea. Such modifications might further reduce the risk of patellofemoral complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Analysis of differences in laxities and neutral positions from native after kinematically aligned TKA using cruciate retaining implants

One biomechanical goal of kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) is to achieve knee laxities and neutral positions that are not different from those of the native knee without soft tissue release. However, replacing the articular surfaces and menisci with implants of discrete sizes and average shapes and resecting the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) might prevent KA TKA from achieving this goal in the tibiofemoral joint. Accordingly, the objective was to determine whether either or both surgically induced changes cause differences in laxities and/or neutral positions from native using a cruciate retaining implant. Eight laxities and four neutral positions were measured from 0° to 120° flexion in 30° increments in 13 human cadaveric knees in three knee conditions: native, ACL-deficient, and KA TKA. After KA TKA, 5 of the 40 laxity measures (8 laxities × 5 flexion angles) and 6 of the 20 neutral position measures (4 neutral positions × 5 flexion angles) were statistically different from those of the native knee. The greatest differences in laxities from native after KA TKA occurred at 30° flexion in anterior translation (1.6 ± 2.1 mm increase, p < 0.0001); this difference was 1.7 ± 2.1 mm less than that in the ACL-d knee (p < 0.0001). The greatest difference in neutral positions from native after KA TKA occurred in anterior-posterior translation at 0° flexion (3.8 ± 1.9 mm anterior, p < 0.0001); this difference was 2.6 ± 1.9 mm greater than that in the ACL-d knee (p = 0.0002). Clinical Significance: These results indicate that the biomechanical goal of KA TKA is largely realized despite the two surgically induced changes. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:358-369, 2019.

Relationship Between Coronal Alignment and Rotational Profile of Lower Extremity in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

We aimed at determining whether the coronal alignment of lower extremity was related to rotational geometry of distal femur, femoral anteversion, and tibial torsion in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A total of 422 lower extremities were divided into 3 groups according to the coronal alignment: valgus (n = 31), neutral (n = 78), and varus group (n = 313). Condylar twisting angle was measured to determine rotational geometry of distal femur as the angle between the clinical transepicondylar axis and the posterior condylar line. Femoral anteversion was assessed using the angle between a line intersecting the femoral neck and the posterior condylar line (pFeAV) and the angle between the same line and transepicondylar axis that is not affected by posterior condylar variations (tFeAV). Tibial torsion was evaluated by measuring the angle between the posterior condyles of the proximal tibia and the transmalleolar axis.

RESULTS

As the coronal alignment changed from varus to valgus, the condylar twisting angle increased (r = 0.253, P < .001; 6.6° in varus, 7.4° in neutral, and 10.2° in valgus group). Although the pFeAV also increased (r = 0.145, P = .003), the tFeAV did not change significantly (P = .218). Mean tFeAV was 4.3° in varus, 4.7° in neutral, and 6.5° in valgus group. In contrast, as the coronal alignment changed from varus to valgus, the external tibial torsion increased (r = 0.374, P < .001; 22.6° in varus, 26.3° in neutral, and 32.6° in valgus group).

CONCLUSION

The change patterns of the rotational profiles of the lower extremity according to the coronal alignment should be considered in order to obtain satisfactory rotational alignment after TKA.

Implant Survival and Function Ten Years After Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Alignment in the varus or valgus outlier range of the tibial component, knee, and limb might adversely affect the long-term results of kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) particularly when patients are selected without restricting the degree of preoperative varus-valgus and flexion deformity.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients treated in 2007 with a primary TKA determined the 10-year implant survivorship, yearly revision rate, Oxford Knee Score, and WOMAC. All 222 knees (217 patients) were aligned kinematically using patient-specific instrumentation without restricting the degree of preoperative deformity and with the restoration of the native joint lines and limb alignment. Mechanical alignment criteria categorized the alignments of the tibial component, knee, and limb as in-range or in a varus or valgus outlier range.

RESULTS

The implant survivorship (yearly revision rate) was 97.5% (0.3%) for revision for any reason and 98.4% (0.2%) for aseptic failure. The percentage postoperatively aligned in the varus outlier (valgus outlier) range was 78% (0%) for the angle between the tibial component and mechanical axis of the tibia, 31% (5%) for the tibiofemoral angle of the knee according to the criteria by Ritter et al, and 7% (21%) for the hip-knee-ankle angle of the limb according to the criteria by Parratte et al. Patients grouped in the varus outlier range, valgus outlier range, and in-range had similar implant survival and function scores. The 10-year Oxford Knee Score (48 best) and WOMAC (0 best) averaged 43 and 7 points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

With the limitation that a large case series unlikely represents the full range of preoperative deformities and native alignments, treatment of patients with kinematically aligned TKA with patient-specific instrumentation without restricting the preoperative deformity did not adversely affect the 10-year implant survival, yearly revision rate, and level of function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Internal femoral component rotation adversely influences load transfer in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric navigated study using the Verasense device

PURPOSE AND HYPOTHESIS

Correct femoral component rotation at knee arthroplasty influences patellar tracking and may determine function at extremes of movement. Additionally, such malrotation may deleteriously influence flexion/extension gap geometry and soft tissue balancing kinematics. Little is known about the effect of subtle rotational change upon load transfer across the tibiofemoral articulation. Our null hypothesis was that femoral component rotation would not influence load across this joint in predictable manner.

METHODS

A cadaveric study was performed to examine load transfer using the orthosensor device, respecting laxity patterns in 6° of motion, to examine load across the medial and lateral compartments across a full arc of motion. Mixed-effect modelling allowed for quantification of the effect upon load with internal and external femoral component rotation in relation to a datum in a modern single-radius cruciate-retaining primary knee design.

RESULTS

No significant change in maximal laxity was found between different femoral rotational states. Internal rotation of the femoral component resulted in significant increase in medial compartment load transfer for knee flexion including and beyond 60°. External rotation of the femoral component within the limits studied did not influence tibiofemoral load transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

Internal rotation of the femoral component will adversely influence medial compartment load transfer and could lead to premature polyethylene wear on the medial side.

Does alignment of the limb and tibial width determine relative narrowing between compartments when planning mechanically aligned TKA?

INTRODUCTION

We determined (1) the range of the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle in the native or pre-arthritic limbs of patients with a contralateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA); and when mechanical alignment is planned (2) the relationships between the HKA angle and the tibial width, and the relative narrowing between the medial and lateral compartments and (3) the effect of tibial width on the range of narrowing.

METHODS

The HKA angle, distal lateral femoral angle (DLFA), and proximal medial tibial angle (PMTA) were measured on the native limb of 102 subjects (53 female) treated with contralateral TKA. The sine of the angle of the resection gap (PMTA minus 90° subtracted from the DLFA minus 90°) multiplied by the tibial width and by narrow (59 mm), average (75 mm), and wide (91 mm) tibias computed relative narrowing.

RESULTS

The HKA angle ranged from 8° varus to - 7° valgus; 20% had constitutional varus (≥ 3°) and 11% constitutional valgus (≤ - 3°). The HKA angle strongly predicted (r ² = 0.87) and tibial width weakly predicted (r ² = 0.06) relative narrowing. For narrow, average, and wide tibias, the maximum medial narrowing was 9, 11, 14 mm and maximum lateral narrowing was 7, 9, and 11 mm, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

When mechanical alignment is planned, there is greater relative narrowing between compartments when the pre-arthritic limb greatly deviates from a 0° HKA angle and the tibia is wide. These limbs may need soft-tissue releases until neutral postoperative limb alignment of 0° and negligible varus-valgus laxity are achieved.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, therapeutic study.

Do varus or valgus outliers have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments than those which are in-range after a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? limb and joint line alignment after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

The aims of this study were to determine the proportion of patients with outlier varus or valgus alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whether those with outlier varus or valgus alignment have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments of the knee than those with in-range alignment and whether measurements of the alignment of the limb, knee and components predict compartment forces.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The intra-operative forces in the medial and lateral compartments were measured with an instrumented tibial insert in 67 patients who underwent a kinematically aligned TKA during passive movement. The mean of the forces at full extension, 45° and 90° of flexion determined the force in the medial and lateral compartments. Measurements of the alignment of the limb and the components included the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, proximal medial tibial angle (PMTA), and distal lateral femoral angle (DLFA). Measurements of the alignment of the knee and the components included the tibiofemoral angle (TFA), tibial component angle (TCA) and femoral component angle (FCA). Alignment was measured on post-operative, non-weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) scanograms and categorised as varus or valgus outlier or in-range in relation to mechanically aligned criteria.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with outlier varus or valgus alignment was 16%/24% for the HKA angle, 55%/0% for the PMTA, 0%/57% for the DLFA, 25%/12% for the TFA, 100%/0% for the TCA, and 0%/64% for the FCA. In general, the forces in the medial and lateral compartments of those with outlier alignment were not different from those with in-range alignment except for the TFA, in which patients with outlier varus alignment had a mean paradoxical force which was 6 lb higher in the lateral compartment than those with in-range alignment. None of the measurements of alignment of the limb, knee and components predicted the force in the medial or lateral compartment.

CONCLUSION

Although kinematically aligned TKA has a high proportion of varus or valgus outliers using mechanically aligned criteria, the intra-operative forces in the medial and lateral compartments of patients with outlier alignment were comparable with those with in-range alignment, with no evidence of overload of the medial or lateral compartment of the knee. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1319-28.