Radiostereometric analysis of the initial stability of internally fixed femoral neck fractures under differential loading

No effect of hydroxyapatite-coated sliding hip screw threads on screw migration in the femoral head/neck of pertrochanteric fractures: a randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cut-out is the most frequently reported mechanical failure of internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to examine if hydroxyapatite-coated screw thread on a sliding hip screw (SHS) could reduce screw migration within the femoral head in patients with stable pertrochanteric fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a double-blinded randomized controlled study, 37 patients at mean age 78 (range 56-96), with pertrochanteric fracture (Evans I, II, IV) received surgery with a SHS with a hydroxyapatite-coated or a non-coated lag screw thread. Radiostereometry and standard radiographs were obtained 1 day, 6 weeks, 3- and 6 months post-operatively to evaluate screw and fracture migration and fracture reposition. The two groups were combined to describe fracture migration.

RESULTS

There was similar and small screw migration in the femoral head between the two groups at 6 weeks, 3- and 6 months (p > 0.12). Fracture migration occurred predominantly in the first 6 weeks, where fracture impaction was 5.95 mm (CI 95% 2.87 to 9.04) and anterior rotation of the femoral head was -2.94° (CI 95% - 5.22 to - 0.66). Migration of the fracture (total translation) correlated to the post-operative fracture reposition (p = 0.002), but not significantly to screw migration (p = 0.09). Neither screw total translation (rho 0.06, p = 0.79) nor fracture total translation (rho 0.04, p = 0.77) correlated with bone mineral density.

CONCLUSION

There was no clinical benefit of hydroxyapatite coating on lag screw migration in this patient cohort. Migration of the pertrochanteric fractures was higher with poor fracture reposition but fractures generally stabilized after 6 weeks follow-up. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05677061).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

Patient-blinded prospective randomized study. Trial registration number The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05677061).

Assessment of Bone Healing: Opportunities to Improve the Standard of Care

➤ Bone healing is commonly evaluated by clinical examination and serial radiographic evaluation. Physicians should be mindful that personal and cultural differences in pain perception may affect the clinical examination. Radiographic assessment, even with the Radiographic Union Score, is qualitative, with limited interobserver agreement.➤ Physicians may use serial clinical and radiographical examinations to assess bone healing in most patients, but in ambiguous and complicated cases, they may require other methods to provide assistance in decision-making.➤ In complicated instances, clinically available biomarkers, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging may determine initial callus development. Quantitative computed tomography and finite element analysis can estimate bone strength in later callus consolidation phases.➤ As a future direction, quantitative rigidity assessments for bone healing may help patients to return to function earlier by increasing a clinician's confidence in successful progressive healing.

Future modalities to assess fracture healing

Objectives:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fracture fixation aims to provide stability and promote healing, but remains challenging in unstable and osteoporotic fractures with increased risk of construct failure and nonunion. The first part of this article reviews the clinical motivation behind finite element analysis of fracture fixation, its strengths and weaknesses, how models are developed and validated, and how outputs are typically interpreted. The second part reviews recent modeling studies of the femur and proximal humerus, areas with particular relevance to fragility fractures.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is some consensus in the literature around how certain modeling aspects are pragmatically formulated, including bone and implant geometries, meshing, material properties, interactions, and loads and boundary conditions. Studies most often focus on predicted implant stress, bone strain surrounding screws, or interfragmentary displacements. However, most models are not rigorously validated. With refined modeling methods, improved validation efforts, and large-scale systematic analyses, finite element analysis is poised to advance the understanding of fracture fixation failure, enable optimization of implant designs, and improve surgical guidance.

Assessment of fracture healing in orthopaedic trauma

Fracture healing is a complex physiologic process, relying on the crucial interplay between biological and mechanical factors. It is generally assessed using imaging modalities, including conventional radiology, CT, MRI and ultrasound (US), based on the fracture and patient features. Although these techniques are routinely used in orthopaedic clinical practice, unfortunately, they do not provide any information about the biomechanical status of the fracture site. Therefore, in recent years, several non-invasive techniques have been proposed to assess bone healing using ultrasonic wave propagation, changes in electrical properties of bones and callus stiffness measurement. Moreover, different research groups are currently developing smart orthopaedic implants (plates, intramedullary nails and external fixators), able to provide information about the fracture healing process. These devices could significantly improve orthopaedic and trauma clinical practice in the future and, at the same time, reduce patients' exposure to X-rays. This study aims to define the role of traditional imaging techniques and emerging technologies in the assessment of the fracture healing process.

Imaging Modalities to Assess Fracture Healing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses imaging modalities for fracture repair assessment, with an emphasis on pragmatic clinical and translational use, best practices for implementation, and challenges and opportunities for continuing research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Semiquantitative radiographic union scoring remains the clinical gold standard, but has questionable reliability as a surrogate indicator of structural bone healing, particularly in early-stage, complex, or compromised healing scenarios. Alternatively, computed tomography (CT) scanning enables quantitative assessment of callus morphometry and mechanics through the use of patient-specific finite-element models. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) are also quantitative, but technically challenging. Nonionizing magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound imaging are of high interest, but require development to enable quantification of 3D mineralized structures. Emerging image-based methods for quantitative assessment of bone healing may transform clinical research design by displacing binary outcomes classification (union/nonunion) and ultimately enhance clinical care by enabling early nonunion detection.

Luminescent Spectral Rulers for Noninvasive Displacement Measurement through Tissue

A luminescent spectral ruler was developed to measure micrometer to millimeter displacements through tissue. The spectral ruler has two components: a luminescent encoder patterned with alternating stripes of two spectrally distinct luminescent materials and an analyzer mask with periodic transparent windows the same width as the encoder stripes. The analyzer mask is placed over the encoder and held so that only one type of luminescent stripe is visible through the window; sliding the analyzer over the encoder modulates the luminescence spectrum acquired through the analyzer windows, enabling detection of small displacements without imaging. We prepared two types of spectral rulers, one with a fluorescent encoder and a second with an X-ray excited optical luminescent (XEOL) encoder. The fluorescent ruler used two types of quantum dots to form stripes that were excited with 633 nm light and emitted at 645 and 680 nm, respectively. Each ruler type was covered with chicken breast tissue to simulate implantation. The XEOL ruler generated a strong signal with negligible tissue autofluorescence but used ionizing radiation, while the fluorescence ruler used non-ionizing red light excitation but required spectral fitting to account for tissue autofluorescence. The precision for both types of luminescent spectral rulers (with 1 mm wide analyzer windows, and measured through 6 mm of tissue) was <2 μm, mostly limited by shot noise. The approach enabled high micrometer to millimeter displacement measurements through tissue and has applications in biomechanical and mechanochemical measurements (e.g., tracking postsurgical bone healing and implant-associated infection).

Radiostereometric Analysis of Stability and Inducible Micromotion After Locked Lateral Plating of Distal Femur Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate interfragmentary motion over 1 year after distal femoral fracture fixation using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The secondary aim was to assess whether RSA data are consistent with diagnoses of nonunion.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level I urban trauma center.

PATIENTS

Sixteen patients between 22 and 89 years of age with distal femoral fracture (OTA/AO type 33).

INTERVENTION

All fractures were treated with a lateral locking plate, and tantalum markers were inserted into the main proximal and distal fracture fragments. RSA was performed at 2, 6, 12, 18, and 52 weeks postoperatively. Both unloaded and loaded RSA measurements were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Unloaded fracture migration over time and inducible micromotion at the fracture site in the coronal plane were determined at each follow-up interval.

RESULTS

RSA precision in the coronal plane of interfragmentary motion over time and inducible micromotion were 1.2 and 0.9 mm in the coronal plane, respectively. Two cases required revision surgery for nonunion 1 year postoperatively. For cases of union, unloaded fracture migration stopped being detectable between 12 and 18 weeks, and inducible micromotion was no longer detectable by the 12-week visit. For cases of nonunion, both unloaded migration and inducible micromotion were detected throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

RSA may be used to reliably assess distal femoral fracture healing. RSA revealed differences in cases of union and nonunion by 3 months and more consistently than traditional x-rays.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.