Vibration improves gait biomechanics linked to posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis following anterior cruciate ligament injury

Acutely Normalizing Walking Speed Does Not Normalize Gait Biomechanics Post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of acutely increasing walking speed on gait biomechanics in ACLR individuals compared with their habitual speed and uninjured matched-controls.

METHODS

Gait biomechanics were collected on 30 ACLR individuals (20 females; age, 22.0 ± 4.2 yr; body mass index, 24.0 ± 3.0 kg·m -2 ) at their habitual speed and at 1.3 m·s -1 , a speed similar to controls, and 30 uninjured matched-controls (age: 21.9 ± 3.8, body mass index: 23.6 ± 2.5) at their habitual speed. Functional waveform analyses compared biomechanics between: i) walking at habitual speed vs 1.3 m·s -1 in ACLR individuals; and ii) ACLR individuals at 1.3 m·s -1 vs controls.

RESULTS

In the ACLR group, there were no statistically significant biomechanical differences between walking at habitual speed (1.18 ± 0.12 m·s -1 ) and 1.3 m·s -1 (1.29 ± 0.05 m·s -1 ). Compared with controls (habitual speed: 1.34 ± 0.12 m·s -1 ), the ACLR group while walking at 1.3 m·s -1 exhibited smaller vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during early and late stance (13-28, 78-90% stance phase), greater midstance vGRF (47-61%), smaller early-to-midstance knee flexion angle (KFA; 1-44%), greater mid-to-late stance KFA (68-73, 96-101%), greater internal knee abduction moment (69-101%), and smaller internal knee extension moment (4-51, 88-96%).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing walking speed to a speed similar to uninjured controls did not elicit significant changes to gait biomechanics, and ACLR individuals continued to demonstrate biomechanical profiles that are associated with PTOA development and differ from controls.

Hamstrings vibration reduces tibiofemoral compressive force following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Individuals who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are at greater risk of developing knee osteoarthritis (OA). This elevated risk of knee OA is associated with high tibiofemoral (TF) compressive force, due to a combination of low knee flexion angles and increased co-contraction of the hamstrings and quadriceps during limb loading. Prolonged vibration of the hamstrings fatigues the intrafusal muscle fibers, which reduces autonomic reflexive excitation of the hamstrings and alleviates reciprocal inhibition to the quadriceps. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of prolonged hamstrings vibration on TF compressive force in individuals who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Fourteen participants with unilateral ACLR and 14 participants without knee injury performed a single-leg drop-land task before and after prolonged (20 min) vibration of the hamstrings. Peak TF compressive force, knee flexion angle, and hamstrings/quadriceps co-contraction were calculated during the deceleration phase of the drop-land task before and after vibration. The ACLR group experienced an 18% decrease in TF compressive force, a 32% increase in knee flexion angle, and a 38% decrease in hamstrings/quadriceps co-contraction after hamstrings vibration. There was no difference in any of the parameters in the noninjured group after vibration. These data suggest that acute prolonged hamstrings vibration has the potential to mitigate TF compressive force, which may protect the knee joint in the long term. Clinical significance: The results of this research are expected to lead to improved clinical care for ACLR patients because it holds promise for mitigating altered joint mechanics and perhaps slowing down the onset of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis.

Comparison of discrete and continuous analysis approaches for evaluating gait biomechanics in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Aberrant gait biomechanics contribute to post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis development following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Walking gait biomechanics are typically evaluated post-ACLR by identifying discrete, peak values in the load acceptance phase of gait (i.e. first 50 %). As these approaches evaluate a single time instant during the gait cycle, functional data analysis (FDA) techniques that evaluate the entire stance phase waveform are becoming more common in the literature. However, it is unclear if these analysis approaches identify the same biomechanical phenomena.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The purpose of this study was to determine whether four gait biomechanics analysis approaches identify the same aberrant gait characteristics in individuals with ACLR.

METHODS

Twenty-four individuals with ACLR and 24 healthy controls completed gait analyses on an instrumented treadmill. Four analysis approaches were employed to compare the vertical ground reaction force and sagittal knee angles and moments during the first 50 % of the stance phase between groups and between limbs in the ACLR cohort: 1) comparison of peak values from individual trials (Peak), 2) comparison of peak values from time-normalized ensemble waveforms (Ensemble Peak), 3) FDA via functional ANCOVA (FANCOVA), and 4) FDA evaluating overlap of the 95 % confidence intervals for each waveform (FDA-CI).

RESULTS

The Peak, Ensemble Peak, and FANCOVA approaches identified highly similar group and limb differences in the biomechanics outcomes with respect to both magnitude and temporal location. However, the FANCOVA approach indicated that these differences were distributed across large portions of the load acceptance phase and that differences existed outside the first 50 % of stance. The FDA-CI approach was generally not effective for identifying aberrant gait biomechanics.

SIGNIFICANCE

Peak and FANCOVA approaches to gait analysis provide similar findings. Future research is necessary to determine if the additional information afforded by FANCOVA provides insight regarding the mechanical pathogenesis of post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis.

Aberrant gait biomechanics in individuals with ACL reconstruction are magnified during treadmill walking

Aberrant gait biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) likely contribute to post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) development. Gait biomechanics are typically assessed overground, but the use of instrumented/force-measuring treadmills is increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to compare gait biomechanics overground and on an instrumented treadmill in individuals with ACLR and healthy controls. Twenty-four individuals with ACLR and 24 healthy controls completed overground and gait biomechanics assessments. Biomechanical outcomes included peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), internal knee extension (KEM) and abduction (KAM) moments, and knee flexion (KFA) and adduction angles; KFA at heel strike; knee flexion displacement; and inter-limb symmetry for each outcome. Peak KEM (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.016, -0.007 xBW*Ht]) and vGRF (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.09. -0.03 xBW]) were significantly less symmetrical in the ACLR group compared to the control group on the treadmill but not overground. Additionally, peak KEM was smaller in the ACLR limb compared to the contralateral limb both overground (P = 0.005, 95%CI [-0.010, -0.001 xBW*Ht]) and on the treadmill (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.015, -0.007 xBW*Ht]), but this difference was 1.8x larger on the treadmill compared to overground. Peak KFA (P = 0.001, 95%CI [-4.2, -1.2°]) and vGRF (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.07, -0.03 xBW]) were smaller in the ACLR limb on the treadmill but not overground. These findings suggest aberrant gait biomechanics are exacerbated during treadmill walking post-ACLR and that evaluating kinematics and kinetics on instrumented treadmills may be valuable for assessing risk factors of PTOA development.

Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition: Best Evidence, Mechanisms, and Theory for Treating the Unseen in Clinical Rehabilitation

CONTEXT

Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) impedes the recovery of muscle function following joint injury, and in a broader sense, acts as a limiting factor in rehabilitation if left untreated. Despite a call to treat the underlying pathophysiology of muscle dysfunction more than three decades ago, the continued widespread observations of post-traumatic muscular impairments are concerning, and suggest that interventions for AMI are not being successfully integrated into clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To highlight the clinical relevance of AMI, provide updated evidence for the use of clinically accessible therapeutic adjuncts to treat AMI, and discuss the known or theoretical mechanisms for these interventions.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases were searched for articles that investigated the effectiveness or efficacy of interventions to treat outcomes relevant to AMI.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

122 articles that investigated an intervention used to treat AMI among individuals with pathology or simulated pathology were retrieved from 1986 to 2021. Additional articles among uninjured individuals were considered when discussing mechanisms of effect.

CONCLUSION

AMI contributes to the characteristic muscular impairments observed in patients recovering from joint injuries. If left unresolved, AMI impedes short-term recovery and threatens patients' long-term joint health and well-being. Growing evidence supports the use of neuromodulatory strategies to facilitate muscle recovery over the course of rehabilitation. Interventions should be individualized to meet the needs of the patient through shared clinician-patient decision-making. At a minimum, we propose to keep the treatment approach simple by attempting to resolve inflammation, pain, and effusion early following injury.

Time course of the effects of vibration on quadriceps function in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Quadriceps dysfunction is a common, chronic complication following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) that contributes to aberrant gait biomechanics and poor joint health. Vibration enhances quadriceps function in individuals with ACLR, but the duration of these effects is unknown. This study evaluated the time course of the effects of whole body vibration (WBV) and local muscle vibration (LMV) on quadriceps function. Twenty-four volunteers with ACLR completed 3 testing sessions during which quadriceps isometric peak torque, rate of torque development, and EMG amplitude were assessed prior to and immediately, 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 min following a WBV, LMV, or control intervention. WBV and LMV (30 Hz, 2g) were applied during six one-minute bouts. WBV increased peak torque 5-11% relative to baseline and control at all post-intervention time points. LMV increased peak torque 6% relative to baseline at 10 min post-intervention and 4-6% relative to control immediately, 10 min, and 20 min post-intervention. The interventions did not influence EMG amplitudes or rate of torque development. The sustained improvements in quadriceps following vibration, especially WBV, suggest that it could be applied at the beginning of rehabilitation sessions to "prime" the central nervous system, potentially improving the efficacy of ACLR rehabilitative exercise.