Gait asymmetries are exacerbated at faster walking speeds in individuals with acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Biomechanical Effects of Manipulating Preferred Cadence During Treadmill Walking in Patients With ACL Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Abnormal gait is common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) which may influence osteoarthritis risk in this population. Yet few gait retraining options currently exist in ACLR rehabilitation. Cueing cadence changes is a simple, low-cost method that can alter walking mechanics in healthy adults, but few studies have tested its effectiveness in an ACLR population. Here, we evaluated the acute effects of altering cadence on knee mechanics in patients 9 to 12 months post ACLR.

HYPOTHESIS

Cueing larger steps will facilitate larger knee angles and moments, while cueing smaller steps would induce smaller knee angles and moments.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized cross-sectional design.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with unilateral ACLR underwent gait assessments on a treadmill at preferred pace. Preferred walking gait was assessed first to obtain preferred cadence. Participants then completed trials while matching an audible beat set to 90% and 110% of preferred cadence in a randomized order. Three-dimensional sagittal and frontal plane biomechanics were evaluated bilaterally.

RESULTS

Compared with preferred cadence, cueing larger steps induced larger peak knee flexion moments (KFMs) and knee extension excursions bilaterally (P < 0.01), whereas cueing smaller steps only reduced knee flexion excursions (P < 0.01). Knee adduction moments remain unchanged across conditions and were similar between limbs (P > 0.05). Peak KFMs and excursions were smaller in the injured compared with uninjured limb (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Frontal plane gait outcomes were unchanged across conditions suggesting acute cadence manipulations result in mainly sagittal plane adaptations. Follow-up studies using a longitudinal cadence biofeedback paradigm may be warranted to elucidate the utility of this gait retraining strategy after ACLR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cueing changes in walking cadence can target sagittal plane knee loading and joint range of motion in ACLR participants. This strategy may offer high clinical translatability given it requires relatively minimal equipment (ie, free metronome app) outside of a treadmill.

Whether Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Walking at a Fast Speed Show more Kinematic Asymmetries?

OBJECTIVE

Knee kinematic asymmetries after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are correlated with poor clinical outcomes, such as the progression of knee cartilage degenerations or reinjuries. Fast walking in patients with knee conditions may exacerbate knee kinematic asymmetries, but its impact on ACLR patients is uncertain. The aim of this study is to investigate if fast walking induces more knee kinematic asymmetries in unilateral ACLR patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study enrolled 55 patients with unilateral ACLR from January 2020 to July 2022. There were 48 males and seven females with an average age of 30.6 ± 6.4 years. Knee kinematic data were collected at three walking speeds: self-selected, fast (150% normal), and slow (50% normal). A 3D knee kinematic analysis system measured the data, and self-reported outcomes assessed comfort levels during walking. We used SPM1D for two-way repeated ANOVA and posthoc paired t-tests to analyze kinematic differences in groups.

RESULTS

In fast walking, ACLR knees exhibited more transverse kinematic asymmetries than intact knees, including greater external rotation angle (1.8°, 38%-43%; gait cycle [GC], p < 0.05 & 1.8-2.7°, 50%-61% GC, p < 0.05) and increased proximal tibial translation (2.1-2.5 mm, 2%-6% GC, p < 0.05 & 2.5-3.2 mm, 92%-96% GC, p < 0.05). Additionally, ACLR knees showed greater posterior tibial translation than intact knees (3.6-3.7 mm, 7%-8% GC, p < 0.05) during fast walking. No posterior tibial translation asymmetries were observed in slow walking compared to normal walking levels. ACLR knees have the most comfortable feelings in slow walking speed, and the most uncomfortable feelings in fast walking speed levels (29%).

CONCLUSIONS

Fast walking induces additional external tibial rotation and proximal and posterior tibial translation asymmetries in ACLR patients. This raises concerns about long-term safety and health during fast walking. Fast walking, not self-selected speed, is beneficial for identifying postoperative gait asymmetries in ACLR patients.

One-dimension statistical parametric mapping in lower limb biomechanical analysis: A systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Biomechanics significantly impacts sports performance and injury prevention. Traditional methods like discrete point analysis simplify continuous kinetic and kinematic data, while one-dimensional Statistical Parametric Mapping (spm1d) evaluates entire movement curves. Nevertheless, spm1d's application in sports and injury research is limited. As no systematic review exists, we conducted a scoping systematic review, synthesizing the current applications of spm1d across various populations, activities, and injuries. This review concludes by identifying gaps in the literature and suggesting areas for future research.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What research exists using spm1d in sports biomechanics, focusing on the lower limbs, in what populations, and what are the current research gaps?

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases for the following search string: "(((knee) OR (hip)) OR (ankle)) OR (foot) OR (feet) AND (statistical parametric mapping)". English peer-reviewed studies assessing lower limb kinetics or kinematics in different sports or sports-related injuries were included. Reviews, meta-analyses, conference abstracts, and grey literature were excluded.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 165 papers published since 2012. Among these, 112 examined healthy individuals (67 %), and 53 focused on injured populations (33 %). Running (n = 45), cutting (n = 25), and jumping/landing (n = 18) were the most common activities. The predominant injuries were anterior cruciate ligament rupture (n = 21), chronic ankle instability (n = 18), and hip-related pain (n = 9). The main research gaps included the unbalanced populations, underrepresentation of common sports and sport-related injuries, gender inequality, a lack of studies in non-laboratory settings, a lack of studies on varied sports gear, and a lack of reporting standardization.

SIGNIFICANCE

This review spotlights crucial gaps in spm1d research within sports biomechanics. Key issues include a lack of studies beyond laboratory settings, underrepresentation of various sports and injuries, and gender disparities in research populations. Addressing these gaps can significantly enhance the application of spm1d in sports performance, injury analysis, and rehabilitation.

Acutely Normalizing Walking Speed Does Not Normalize Gait Biomechanics Post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of acutely increasing walking speed on gait biomechanics in ACLR individuals compared with their habitual speed and uninjured matched-controls.

METHODS

Gait biomechanics were collected on 30 ACLR individuals (20 females; age, 22.0 ± 4.2 yr; body mass index, 24.0 ± 3.0 kg·m -2 ) at their habitual speed and at 1.3 m·s -1 , a speed similar to controls, and 30 uninjured matched-controls (age: 21.9 ± 3.8, body mass index: 23.6 ± 2.5) at their habitual speed. Functional waveform analyses compared biomechanics between: i) walking at habitual speed vs 1.3 m·s -1 in ACLR individuals; and ii) ACLR individuals at 1.3 m·s -1 vs controls.

RESULTS

In the ACLR group, there were no statistically significant biomechanical differences between walking at habitual speed (1.18 ± 0.12 m·s -1 ) and 1.3 m·s -1 (1.29 ± 0.05 m·s -1 ). Compared with controls (habitual speed: 1.34 ± 0.12 m·s -1 ), the ACLR group while walking at 1.3 m·s -1 exhibited smaller vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during early and late stance (13-28, 78-90% stance phase), greater midstance vGRF (47-61%), smaller early-to-midstance knee flexion angle (KFA; 1-44%), greater mid-to-late stance KFA (68-73, 96-101%), greater internal knee abduction moment (69-101%), and smaller internal knee extension moment (4-51, 88-96%).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing walking speed to a speed similar to uninjured controls did not elicit significant changes to gait biomechanics, and ACLR individuals continued to demonstrate biomechanical profiles that are associated with PTOA development and differ from controls.

The nature of gait biomechanics changes with walking speed increase in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury

BACKGROUND

This study on gait biomechanics is based on a functional test (FT) performed at free and fast walking speeds.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the pattern of changes in gait biomechanical parameters and the knee function in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury or its reconstruction.

METHODS

The study included 51 patients (33 males, 18 females) with a confirmed recent or old history of ACL tear, before or after reconstruction (26 patients). Mocap data was obtained using an inertial system. All patients were divided into three groups: 41 patients with physiological response (compensation), 6 patients with signs of decompensation, and 4 non-assessable patients.

RESULTS

Increase in gait speed was associated with decrease in the walking cycle duration, stance and double support phases. In the compensation group, the physiological response of the knee was manifested in increased amplitudes. In the decompensation group, the amplitudes remained unchanged or decreased. In the compensation group, there were increases in the symmetrical muscle activity. The decompensation group was characterized by electromyography asymmetry.

CONCLUSION

The observed universal physiological mechanism limiting the load on the damaged joint can be used for accurate assessment of the knee functional state in various periods of rehabilitation.

Joint and Limb Loading during Gait in Adults with ACL Reconstruction: Comparison between Single-Step and Cumulative Load Metrics

PURPOSE

Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) generally exhibit limb underloading behaviors during walking, but most research focuses on per-step comparisons. Cumulative loading metrics offer unique insight into joint loading as magnitude, duration, and total steps are considered, but few studies have evaluated if cumulative loads are altered post-ACLR. Here, we evaluated if underloading behaviors are apparent in ACLR limbs when using cumulative load metrics and how load metrics change in response to walking speed modifications.

METHODS

Treadmill walking biomechanics were evaluated in 21 participants with ACLR at three speeds (self-selected (SS); 120% SS and 80% SS). Cumulative loads per step and per kilometer were calculated using knee flexion and adduction moment (KFM and KAM) and vertical ground reaction force (GRF) impulses. Traditional magnitude metrics for KFM, KAM, and GRF were also calculated.

RESULTS

The ACLR limb displayed smaller KFM and GRF in early and late stances, but larger KFM and GRF during midstance compared with the contralateral limb ( P < 0.01). Only GRF cumulative loads (per step and per kilometer) were reduced in the ACLR limb ( P < 0.01). In response to speed modifications, load magnitudes generally increased with speed. Conversely, cumulative load metrics (per step and per kilometer) decreased at faster speeds and increased at slow speeds ( P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ACLR underload their knee in the sagittal plane per step, but cumulatively over the course of many steps/distance, this underloading phenomenon was not apparent. Furthermore, cumulative load increased at slower speeds, opposite to what is identified with traditional single-step metrics. Assessing cumulative load metrics may offer additional insight into how load outcomes may be impacted in injured populations or in response to gait modifications.

Is there any biomechanical justification to use hopping as a return to running test? A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the agreement and the correlation between asymmetry indexes of leg stiffness (AI(K_leg)) in running and hopping and the correlation between leg stiffness (K_leg) in running and hopping.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Clinical facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve healthy runners (5 women and 7 men; mean (SD) age = 36.6 (10.1) years; activity level = 6.4 (0.9) on Tegner scale).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A treadmill instrumented by photoelectric cells was used to collect data (flight and contact times) during running assessment (preferential and imposed velocity (3.33 m s^-1) and during a hopping test. K_leg and AI(K_leg) were computed for each modality. Correlation tests were performed, and Bland Altman's plot was created.

RESULTS

A significant and large correlation was found between K_leg in hopping and running at imposed speed (r = 0.6, p = 0.001). An acceptable agreement was found between the AIs in hopping and running, with a bias of 0.04 (-0.15-0.06) at imposed speed and 0.03 (-0.13-0.07) at preferred speed.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that testing an athlete for asymmetry in hopping might help to understand what happens in running. For this purpose, further research is needed, especially in an injured population, to better understand the association between biomechanical asymmetry in hopping and running.

Patellofemoral contact forces and knee gait mechanics 3 months after ACL reconstruction are associated with cartilage degradation 24 months after surgery

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate patellofemoral cartilage health, as assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) T2 relaxation times, 24-months after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and determine if they were associated with patellofemoral contact forces and knee mechanics during gait 3 months after surgery.

DESIGN

Thirty individuals completed motion analysis during overground walking at a self-selected speed 3 months after ACLR. An EMG-driven neuromusculoskeletal model was used to determine muscle forces, which were then used in a previously described model to estimate patellofemoral contact forces. Biomechanical variables of interest included peak patellofemoral contact force, peak knee flexion angle and moment, and walking speed. These same participants underwent a sagittal bilateral T2 mapping qMRI scan 24-months after surgery. T2 relaxation times were estimated for both patellar and trochlear cartilage. Paired t-tests were used to compare T2 relaxation times between limbs while Pearson correlations and linear regressions were utilized to assess the association between the biomechanical variables of interest and T2 relaxation times.

RESULTS

Prolonged involved limb trochlear T2 relaxation times (vs uninvolved) were present 24-months after surgery, indicating worse cartilage health. No differences were detected in patellar cartilage. Significant negative associations were present within the involved limb for all the biomechanical variables of interest 3 months after ACLR and trochlear T2 relaxation times at 24-months. No associations were found in patellar cartilage or within the uninvolved limb.

CONCLUSIONS

Altered involved limb trochlear cartilage health is present 24-months after ACLR and may be related to patellofemoral loading and other walking gait mechanics 3 months after surgery.

Mechanical Factors Contributing to Altered Knee Extension Moment during Gait after ACL Reconstruction: A Longitudinal Analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to comprehensively examine the extent to which knee flexion angle at initial contact, peak knee flexion angle, and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) contribute to knee extension moments during gait in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Overground gait biomechanics were evaluated in 26 participants with ACL reconstruction at three time points (about 2, 4, and 6 months after the surgery). Knee flexion angle at initial contact, peak knee flexion angle, peak vGRF, and peak knee extension moment were calculated for each limb during the early stance phase of gait for all three time points. A change score from baseline (time point 2 - time point 1 and time point 3 - time point 1) along with limb symmetry values (ACL - non-ACL limb values) was also calculated for these variables. Multiple linear regressions utilizing classical and Bayesian interference methods were used to determine the contribution of knee flexion angle and vGRF to knee extension moment during gait.

RESULTS

Peak knee flexion angle and peak vGRF positively contributed to knee extension moment during gait in both the reconstructed ( R2 = 0.767, P < 0.001) and nonreconstructed limbs ( R2 = 0.815, P < 0.001). Similar results were observed for the symmetry values ( R2 = 0.673, P < 0.001) and change scores ( R2 = 0.731-0.883; all P < 0.001), except that the changes in knee flexion angle at initial contact also contributed to the model using the change scores in the nonreconstructed limb (time point 2 - time point 1: R2 = 0.844, P < 0.001; time point 3 - time point 1: R2 = 0.883, P < 0.001). Bayesian regression evaluating the likelihood of these prediction models showed that there was decisive evidence favoring the alternative model over the null model (all Bayes factors >1000). Standardized β coefficients indicated that changes in knee flexion angle had a greater impact (>2×) on knee extension moments than vGRF at both time points in both limbs ( βvGRF = 0.204-0.309; βkneeflexion = 0.703-0.831).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that both knee flexion angle and peak vGRF positively contribute to altered knee extension moments during gait, but the contribution of knee flexion angle is much greater than vGRF. Therefore, treatment strategies targeting these variables may improve knee loading after ACL reconstruction.

Functional Resistance Training After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improves Knee Angle and Moment Symmetry During Gait: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine 1) whether progressive functional resistance training (FRT) during walking would improve knee biomechanical symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and 2) whether the mode of delivery of FRT would have a differential effect on symmetry.

METHODS

Thirty individuals who underwent primary ACL reconstruction at a single institution volunteered for this study. Participants were randomized into one of three groups: 1) BRACE, 2) BAND, or 3) CONTROL. The BRACE group received FRT with a novel robotic knee brace along with real-time kinematic feedback. The BAND group received FRT with a custom resistance band device along with real-time kinematic feedback. The CONTROL group received only real-time kinematic feedback. Participants in all groups received training (2-3/week for 8 weeks) while walking on a treadmill. Knee angle and moment symmetry were calculated immediately prior to beginning the intervention and within 1 week of completing the intervention. Statistical Parametric Mapping was used to assess differences in biomechanical symmetry between groups across time.

RESULTS

There was a significant interaction in knee moment symmetry from 21 and 24% of the stance phase (P = .046), in which the BAND group had greater improvements following training compared with both BRACE (P = .043) and CONTROL groups (P = .002). There was also a significant time effect in knee angle symmetry from 68 to 79% of the stance phase (P = .028) and from 97 to 100% of the swing phase (P = .050) in which only the BRACE group showed significant improvements after the intervention (stance: P = .020 and swing: P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this randomized controlled clinical trial indicate that 8 weeks of progressive FRT during treadmill walking in individuals with ACL reconstruction improves knee angle and moment symmetry during gait. The findings suggest that FRT could serve as a potential therapeutic adjuvant to traditional rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction and can help restore knee joint biomechanical symmetry.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, randomized controlled trial.

Functional Resistance Training Improves Thigh Muscle Strength after ACL Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Quadriceps weakness is common after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, resulting in prolonged disability and increased risk for reinjury and osteoarthritis. Functional resistance training (FRT) combines resistance training with task-specific training and may prove beneficial in restoring quadriceps strength. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if a walking-specific FRT program (e.g., resisted walking) improves knee strength in individuals after ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Thirty participants were randomized into one of three groups: 1) FRT with a customized knee BRACE applied to the ACL leg, 2) FRT with elastic BAND tethered to the ankle of the ACL leg, or 3) a TARGET MATCH condition where no resistance was externally applied. Participants in all groups received training while walking on a treadmill 2-3 times per week for 8 wk. Isometric knee extension and flexion strength were measured before the start of the intervention, after the intervention (POST), and 8 wk after intervention completion (POST-2).

RESULTS

The BRACE group had greater knee extensor strength compared with the TARGET MATCH group at POST and POST-2 ( P < 0.05). The BRACE group had greater knee flexor strength than the TARGET MATCH group at POST and POST-2 ( P < 0.05) and the BAND group at POST ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

FRT applied via a customized knee brace results in improvements in knee extensor and flexor strength after ACL reconstruction. FRT is a beneficial adjuvant to ACL rehabilitation and leads to better strength compared with standard of care.

ACLD patients exhibit additional knee kinematic asymmetries at the speed level of healthy subjects

Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD) patients tend to walk slowly but try to catch up with the speed level of healthy subjects daily. Exploring the effects of the walking speed level of healthy subjects on the ACLD patients’ knee kinematics is important to improving non-operative treatments and delaying the progression of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis. This study aimed to explore whether healthy controls’ walking speed level leads to additional knee kinematic asymmetries in patients with ACLD. 27 ACLD patients and 29 healthy controls were recruited for the study. The ACLD patients walked at two levels of walking speed, including self-selected and healthy controls’ walking speed levels. A three-dimensional gait analysis system was used to collect their knee kinematic data. ACLD patients exhibited more kinematic asymmetries when walking at healthy controls’ walking speed level than at their self-selected speeds. The kinematic asymmetries included increased posterior tibial translation (4.6 mm) and anteroposterior tibial ROM (3.9 mm), abduction angle (1.5°), and distal tibial translation (3.2 mm) asymmetries (p < 0.05). Our findings are meaningful for developing non-operative treatment strategies for patients with ACLD. To get fewer knee kinematic asymmetries, self-selected walking speed could be suggested for patients with ACLD daily rather than the speed levels of healthy subjects.

Functional Resistance Training Differentially Alters Gait Kinetics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Quadriceps weakness is common after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and can alter gait mechanics. Functional resistance training (FRT) is a novel approach to retraining strength after injury, but it is unclear how it alters gait mechanics. Therefore, we tested how 3 different types of FRT devices: a knee brace resisting extension (unidirectional brace), a knee brace resisting extension and flexion (bidirectional brace), and an elastic band pulling backwards on the ankle (elastic band)-acutely alter gait kinetics in this population.

HYPOTHESIS

The type of FRT device will affect ground-reaction forces (GRFs) during and after the training. Specifically, the uni- and bidirectional braces will increase GRFs when compared with the elastic band.

STUDY DESIGN

Crossover study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

METHODS

A total of 15 individuals with ACL reconstruction received FRT with each device over 3 separate randomized sessions. During training, participants walked on a treadmill while performing a tracking task with visual feedback. Sessions contained 5 training trials (180 seconds each) with rest between. Vertical and anterior-posterior GRFs were assessed on the ACL-reconstructed leg before, during, and after training. Changes in GRFs were compared across devices using 1-dimensional statistical parametric mapping.

RESULTS

Resistance applied via bidirectional brace acutely increased gait kinetics during terminal stance/pre-swing (ie, push-off), while resistance applied via elastic band acutely increased gait kinetics during initial contact/loading (ie, braking). Both braces behaved similarly, but the unidirectional brace was less effective for increasing push-off GRFs.

CONCLUSION

FRT after ACL reconstruction can acutely alter gait kinetics during training. Devices can be applied to selectively alter gait kinetics. However, the long-term effects of FRT after ACL reconstruction with these devices are still unknown.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

FRT may be applied to alter gait kinetics of the involved limb after ACL reconstruction, depending on the device used.

The 6DOF knee kinematics of healthy subjects during sloped walking compared to level walking

BACKGROUND

Level Walking is a frequent functional movement during daily life. However, sloped walking is also common. Exploring 6DOF knee kinematics during sloped walking is important. It provides a reference for the rehabilitation, safety, and knee health of patients with knee diseases walking on sloped surfaces.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The study aimed to explore 6DOF knee kinematics characteristics during sloped walking compared to level walking. We hypothesized that tibial anteroposterior translation and flexion angle (the sagittal plane) were significantly different from those of level walking.

METHODS

One hundred young, healthy adults (50 males and 50 females) were recruited for this study. A three-dimensional gait analysis system was used to collect 6DOF knee kinematics during level and sloped walking. The slope was set to ± 15% when the sloped walking was performed.

RESULTS

Sloped walking mainly increased knee flexion angle (upslope, 2.5-26.2°, 1-100% gait cycle (GC), p < 0.05; downslope, 1.7-11.9°, 15-95% GC, p < 0.05) and anterior tibial translation (upslope, 0.7-4.1 mm, 3-54% GC & 0.6-2.1 mm, 80-94% GC; downslope, 1.0-2.2 mm, 21-69% GC) in the participants' knees. However, participants' other 4DOF knee kinematics during sloped walking were significantly different from those during level walking (p < 0.05). Participants had 'drastically changeable' knee kinematic alterations in the transverse and coronal plane (the other 4DOF knee kinematics) during sloped walking compared to level walking.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results confirmed the hypothesis. Sloped walking significantly increased anterior tibial translation (in most GC) and flexion angle. These kinematic changes in healthy subjects should be evaluated and further explored for patients with knee diseases, such as anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Our findings are meaningful for their rehabilitation or safety or knee health while walking on sloped surfaces. Our study may provide a pilot reference for the 6DOF knee kinematic exploration of sloped walking.

Can Increased Locomotor Task Difficulty Differentiate Knee Muscle Forces After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Changes in knee mechanics following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are known to be magnified during more difficult locomotor tasks, such as when descending stairs. However, it is unclear if increased task difficulty could distinguish differences in forces generated by the muscles surrounding the knee. This study examined how knee muscle forces differ between individuals with ACL reconstruction with different graft types (hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft) and "healthy" controls when performing tasks with increasing difficulty. Dynamic simulations were used to identify knee muscle forces in 15 participants when walking overground and descending stairs. The analysis was restricted to the stance phase (foot contact through toe-off), yielding 162 separate simulations of locomotion in increasing difficulty: overground walking, step-to-floor stair descent, and step-to-step stair descent. Results indicated that knee muscle forces were significantly reduced after ACL reconstruction, and stair descent tasks better discriminated changes in the quadriceps and gastrocnemii muscle forces in the reconstructed knees. Changes in quadriceps forces after a patellar tendon graft and changes in gastrocnemii forces after a hamstring tendon graft were only revealed during stair descent. These results emphasize the importance of incorporating sufficiently difficult tasks to detect residual deficits in muscle forces after ACL reconstruction.

Aberrant gait biomechanics in individuals with ACL reconstruction are magnified during treadmill walking

Aberrant gait biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) likely contribute to post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) development. Gait biomechanics are typically assessed overground, but the use of instrumented/force-measuring treadmills is increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to compare gait biomechanics overground and on an instrumented treadmill in individuals with ACLR and healthy controls. Twenty-four individuals with ACLR and 24 healthy controls completed overground and gait biomechanics assessments. Biomechanical outcomes included peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), internal knee extension (KEM) and abduction (KAM) moments, and knee flexion (KFA) and adduction angles; KFA at heel strike; knee flexion displacement; and inter-limb symmetry for each outcome. Peak KEM (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.016, -0.007 xBW*Ht]) and vGRF (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.09. -0.03 xBW]) were significantly less symmetrical in the ACLR group compared to the control group on the treadmill but not overground. Additionally, peak KEM was smaller in the ACLR limb compared to the contralateral limb both overground (P = 0.005, 95%CI [-0.010, -0.001 xBW*Ht]) and on the treadmill (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.015, -0.007 xBW*Ht]), but this difference was 1.8x larger on the treadmill compared to overground. Peak KFA (P = 0.001, 95%CI [-4.2, -1.2°]) and vGRF (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.07, -0.03 xBW]) were smaller in the ACLR limb on the treadmill but not overground. These findings suggest aberrant gait biomechanics are exacerbated during treadmill walking post-ACLR and that evaluating kinematics and kinetics on instrumented treadmills may be valuable for assessing risk factors of PTOA development.