Absolute bioavailability estimated from oral data

Clinical Pharmacology of Brigatinib: A Next-Generation Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitor

Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor designed to overcome mechanisms of resistance associated with crizotinib, is approved for the treatment of ALK-positive advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. After oral administration of single doses of brigatinib 30-240 mg, the median time to reach maximum plasma concentration ranged from 1 to 4 h. In patients with advanced malignancies, brigatinib showed dose linearity over the dose range of 60-240 mg once daily. A high-fat meal had no clinically meaningful effect on systemic exposures of brigatinib (area under the plasma concentration-time curve); thus, brigatinib can be administered with or without food. In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model with transit absorption compartments was found to adequately describe brigatinib pharmacokinetics. In addition, the population pharmacokinetic analyses showed that no dose adjustment is required based on body weight, age, race, sex, total bilirubin (< 1.5× upper limit of normal), and mild-to-moderate renal impairment. Data from dedicated phase I trials have indicated that no dose adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, while a dose reduction of approximately 40% (e.g., from 180 to 120 mg) is recommended for patients with severe hepatic impairment, and a reduction of approximately 50% (e.g., from 180 to 90 mg) is recommended when administering brigatinib to patients with severe renal impairment. Brigatinib is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, and results of clinical drug-drug interaction studies and physiologically based pharmacokinetic analyses have demonstrated that coadministration of strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitors or inducers with brigatinib should be avoided. If coadministration with a strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitor cannot be avoided, the dose of brigatinib should be reduced by approximately 50% (strong CYP3A inhibitor) or approximately 40% (moderate CYP3A inhibitor), respectively. Brigatinib is a weak inducer of CYP3A in vivo; data from a phase I drug-drug interaction study showed that coadministration of brigatinib 180 mg once daily reduced the oral midazolam area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity by approximately 26%. Brigatinib did not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, or CYP2D6 at clinically relevant concentrations in vitro. Exposure-response analyses based on data from the ALTA (ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of AP26113) and ALTA-1L pivotal trials of brigatinib confirm the favorable benefit versus risk profile of the approved titration dosing regimen of 180 mg once daily (after a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg once daily).

Dried Volumetric Microsampling Approaches for the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Psychiatric Patients Undergoing Clozapine Treatment

Clozapine is one of the most widely used second-generation antipsychotic drugs (SGAs) for the treatment of schizophrenia. Despite advantages over first-generation drugs, clozapine still shows significant side effects and interindividual variations in efficacy. In order to ensure frequent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and improve the compliance of psychiatric patients undergoing clozapine treatment, two novel dried microsampling approaches based on whole blood and plasma volumetric absorptive microsampling (b-VAMS and p-VAMS) and microfluidic generated-dried blood spot technology (mfDBS) were developed and coupled to HPLC with electrochemical detection (ED). The proposed miniaturized strategies by means of VAMS and microfluidic channel-based devices provide several advantages in terms of collection, storage, and handling compared to classical blood and plasma processing. Satisfactory validation results were obtained for all microsampling platforms, with mean extraction yields >85.1%, precision as relative standard deviation (RSD) < 5.1%, and stability < 4.5% analyte loss after 30 days for p-VAMS; mean extraction yields > 83.4%, precision RSD < 5.4%, and stability < 4.6% analyte loss after 30 days for b-VAMS, and mean extraction yields > 74.0%, precision RSD < 5.6%, and stability < 4.9% analyte loss after 30 days for mfDBS. The original microsampling methodologies have been successfully applied to the blood and plasma collected from five psychiatric patients for the monitoring of the levels of clozapine and its main metabolites, providing robust and reliable quali-quantitative results. Comparisons between results of the two dried microsampling technologies with those obtained by classic fluid plasma analysis were in good agreement and have demonstrated that the proposed miniaturized approaches could be suitable for TDM purposes.

Estimation of absolute oral bioavailability without performing an intravenous clinical study

The absolute oral bioavailability (BA) of drugs are yet to be determined, and intravenous pharmacokinetic studies are currently considered indispensable for determining the BA values of oral drugs. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a novel approach to estimating BA values without intravenous pharmacokinetic data. Based on the drug inclusion criteria, such as exhibiting a urinary recovery rate of (R_u) of ≥20% in a clinical study, 13 drugs were included in the present study, and pharmacokinetic data for them were collected from the literature. The fraction excreted unchanged into urine (f_e) was calculated for healthy subjects by dividing the R_u value by the total recovery rate. The contribution of renal excretion to total clearance from the systemic circulation (R_ren) was estimated by subjecting oral clearance and creatinine clearance to regression in subjects with normal and impaired renal function. BA was estimated as f_e/R_ren and compared with the observed BA (BA_obs). The predicted BA values for 9 drugs fell within ±20% of their BA_obs. The examined approach makes it possible to estimate BA values for drugs with mean renal excretion values in healthy subjects and oral clearance in subjects with various renal function, without intravenous pharmacokinetic data.

A Nonlinear Mixed Effects Pharmacokinetic Model for Dapagliflozin and Dapagliflozin 3-O-glucuronide in Renal or Hepatic Impairment

Dapagliflozin is a sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A semi-mechanistic population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed for dapagliflozin and its inactive metabolite dapagliflozin 3-O-glucuronide (D3OG) with emphasis on renal and hepatic contribution to dapagliflozin metabolism. Renal and hepatic impairment decreased the clearance of dapagliflozin to D3OG and the clearance of D3OG. The fraction of D3OG formed via the renal route decreased from 40–55% in subjects with normal renal function (creatinine clearance (CLcr) > 80 ml/min) to 10% in subjects with severe renal insufficiency (CLcr = 13 ml/min). The model-based simulations suggested that the increase of systemic exposure (AUC_ss) of dapagliflozin and D3OG was less than twofold in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment. This population modeling analysis presents a useful approach to evaluate the impact of renal and hepatic function on the PK of dapagliflozin.

Bioavailability and its assessment

Bioavailability is a key pharmacokinetic parameter which expresses the proportion of a drug administered by any nonvascular route that gains access to the systemic circulation. Presented in this review are the different approaches to measurement of bioavailability (absolute and relative), including the case in which intravenous administration is impossible. The rate of drug absorption is also discussed with special emphasis on the possible difficulties encountered using C(max) and T(max) or curve fitting to evaluate the rate of drug absorption.

Evaluation of a novel method to estimate absolute bioavailability of drugs from oral data

The goal of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of a novel method allowing estimation of absolute bioavailability from oral data only. In contrast to the traditional method, which compares areas under the drug concentration time curves after oral and intravenous administration in subjects with normal renal function, the novel method uses total and renal clearance values following oral administration from subjects with varying renal functions to estimate bioavailability. The novel method can also provide estimates for nonrenal clearance.Published data on total clearance and renal clearance of drugs obtained from subjects with variable renal functions were collected, the novel method applied, estimates of bioavailability and nonrenal clearance obtained and compared with reported estimates by the traditional methods. In addition computations were performed to assess various factors that could possibly affect the reliability of the novel method. The results indicated that the novel method provides accurate estimates for bioavailability of drugs meeting the prerequisites: linear kinetics, predominant renal excretion in normals, absence of metabolic polymorphism and independence of bioavailability and nonrenal clearance from renal function. The average (standard deviation) of the prediction error and bias of the bioavailability estimates by the novel method was 7.8 (6.0) and -1.4 (9.8)%, respectively. The estimates for nonrenal clearance by the novel method were less accurate. The computations confirmed that the estimates by the novel method are sensitive to renal-function dependent changes in nonrenal clearance and bioavailability and also depend on the extent of renal excretion of a drug. In conclusion, the novel method's main use is to diagnose absence or presence of changes in bioavailability and non-renal clearance of drugs in populations with varying renal function.

Biased estimates of nonrenal clearance

The goal of the investigation was to critically evaluate published values for oral nonrenal clearance and their postulated dependence on renal function with drugs administered orally to subjects with varying renal function. Derivation of the pertinent equations indicated that the values reported for oral nonrenal clearance tend to systematically overestimate both the true oral and intravenous nonrenal clearances of these drugs. Computations were performed to confirm these findings not only for subjects with normal renal function, but also for patients with renal impairment. The computations evaluated the relevance of bioavailability and renal clearance of a drug for the bias in the estimates of true oral or intravenous nonrenal clearance. The results of the computations showed that the estimates for true oral and intravenous nonrenal clearance derived from oral data exceed systematically the true values in subjects with normal or reduced renal function. Also, a renal function dependent decrease of the true oral or intravenous nonrenal clearance is falsely diagnosed if apparent oral nonrenal clearance values are used for the estimates. The magnitude of bioavailability and renal clearance impact the bias in the estimates derived from oral data. For drugs with predominant renal excretion and small bioavailability the bias is largest. For drugs with predominant nonrenal elimination and large bioavailability the bias is smallest.

Effect of renal function on risedronate pharmacokinetics after a single oral dose

AIMS

To determine the relationship between risedronate pharmacokinetics and renal function.

METHODS

Risedronate was administered to adult men and women (n=21) with various degrees of renal function (creatinine clearance 15-126 ml min-1 ) as a single oral dose of 30 mg. Serum samples were obtained for 72 h after dosing, and urine samples were collected for 72 h after dosing and then periodically for 6 weeks. Risedronate concentrations were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Risedronate serum concentration-time and urinary excretion rate-time profiles were analysed simultaneously using nonlinear regression.

RESULTS

Renal clearance and volume of distribution were linearly related to creatinine clearance (r2=0.854, P<0.001; and r2=0.317, P<0.01, respectively). Decreases in predicted renal clearance and volume of distribution of 82 and 69%, respectively, were observed when creatinine clearance decreased from 120 to 20 ml min-1. A 64% decrease in predicted oral clearance was observed when creatinine clearance decreased from 120 to 20 ml min-1 (P=0.064). Iohexol clearance, a predictor of renal function, produced similar results to those observed with creatinine clearance. Risedronate was well tolerated by the study population.

CONCLUSIONS

Risedronate renal clearance was significantly related to a decrease in renal function. There was a consistent reduction in oral clearance with a decrease in creatinine clearance. However, based on the regression analysis, generally no dosage adjustment appears to be necessary for most patients with mild or moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance >20 ml min-1 ).

Pharmacokinetics of sematilide in renal failure

A randomized, two-period, two-treatment study was conducted to investigate the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of the Class III antiarrhythmic sematilide HCl. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacologic effect relationship and tolerability of sematilide HCl were also studied. The study included 22 subjects: 6 healthy volunteers and 16 patients with various degrees of renal impairment, including functionally anephric patients on intermittent hemodialysis. Separated by a 14-day washout period, the subjects received a constant rate intravenous infusion of 40 mg sematilide HCl over 30 minutes and a tablet containing 100 mg of the drug. The functionally anephric patients were studied during and off dialysis after intravenous and oral administration of the drug, respectively. Blood and urine samples were collected at defined times up to 48 hours and 72 hours, respectively, after administration. Sematilide concentrations in plasma, urine, and dialysate were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with ultraviolet detection. The pharmacokinetic data analysis used a compartment model independent approach. The heart rate-corrected Lead II QT interval was recorded as a pharmacologic endpoint. Subjective symptoms, cardiovascular parameters, routine serum chemistry, and hematology and urinalysis parameters were measured to assess tolerability. Mean renal clearance after intravenous and oral administration was reduced in patients with severe renal impairment. Statistically significant linear correlations existed between total clearance of sematilide and creatinine clearance for all subjects who could be evaluated after both intravenous and oral administration. Steady-state volume of distribution, absolute bioavailability, and nonrenal clearance of sematilide were independent of renal function. The mean dialysis clearance was 98 mL/min, indicating effective removal of the drug by hemodialysis. In accord with the drug's Class III pharmacologic activity, the heart rate corrected Lead II QT intervals were prolonged in all subjects after intravenous and oral administration of the drug. The pharmacologic effect to plasma concentration relationship in renal patients and in healthy subjects was comparable. Based on the experimentally determined linear relationship between total clearance of sematilide and creatinine clearance, modified dose regimens for sematilide HCl in patients with renal impairment and functionally anephric patients off hemodialysis were developed.