Results of radiation therapy performed after unplanned surgery (without re-excision) for soft tissue sarcomas

What is the Optimal Treatment Strategy after Sarcoma R2 Surgery?

OPINION STATEMENT

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours of mesenchymal origin, most commonly occurring in the extremity but also in the retroperitoneum. The curative treatment for STS is radical surgery with wide margins, in some cases in combination with perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Nonradical resection (R2) of STS has been an emerging issue in recent decades, as optimal subsequent management remains debatable. Similarly, there is still no consensus on optimal surgical margins. Combining multiple treatment modalities in adjuvant therapy can achieve local and distant control in patients following surgery with positive margins. Patients who have undergone nonradical resection therefore require additional surgical interventions, and adjuvant radiotherapy resulting in a better prognosis but a higher number of complications. Following non-radical treatment, patients with limb and trunk wall sarcomas and retroperitoneal sarcomas should also undergo increased oncological surveillance. Given the potential issues that may emerge in such clinical situations, it is crucial to up-date the current guidelines to enhance the long-term prognosis of these patients.

Optimal timing of re-excision in synovial sarcoma patients: Immediate intervention versus waiting for local recurrence

BACKGROUND

To investigate the difference in efficacy of re-excision in synovial sarcoma patients with and without residual tumor following unplanned excision, and to compare the prognostic outcomes of immediate re-excision versus waiting for local recurrence.

METHOD

This study included synovial sarcoma patients who underwent re-excision at our center between 2009 and 2019, categorized into groups based on unplanned excision and local recurrence. Analyzed endpoints included overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS). Prognostic factors associated with these three different survival outcomes were analyzed through the use of Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression approaches.

RESULT

In total, this study incorporated 109 synovial sarcoma patients, including 32 (29.4%) with no residual tumor tissue identified after re-excision, 31 (28.4%) with residual tumor tissue after re-excision, and 46 (42.2%) with local recurrence after initial excision. Patients were assessed over a median 52-month follow-up period. The respective 5-year OS, 5-year LRFS, and 5-year DRFS rates were 82.4%, 76.7%, and 74.2% for the nonresidual group, 80.6%, 80.4%, and 77.3% for the residual tumor tissue group, and 63.5%, 50.7%, and 46.3% for the local recurrence group. There was no significant difference in OS of nonresidual group and residual group patients after re-excision (p = 0.471). Concurrent or sequential treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy significantly reduced the risk of metastasis and mortality when compared with noncombined chemoradiotherapy, and was more effective in the local recurrence group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Prompt and adequate re-excision is crucial for patients with synovial sarcoma who undergo initial inadequate tumor excision, and their prognosis is significantly better compared with patients who delay re-excision until local recurrence.

Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Re-excised Soft-tissue Sarcoma After Unplanned Resection

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) re-excised after unplanned tumor resection (UPR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2000 to 2015, we retrospectively evaluated patients with STS of limb or trunk who underwent post-UPR re-excision in our expert center and received or not aRT.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 121 months (IQR 94-165). Among the 145 patients, 37 were not treated with aRT (no-RT) and 108 received aRT with a median radiation dose of 50 Gy (IQR 50-60). At 10 years, patients in the aRT and no-RT groups showed a cumulative incidence of local failure (10y-LF) of 14.7% and 37.7%, and a local recurrence-free survival (10y-LRFS) of 61.3% and 45.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified aRT and age ≥70 years as independent predictors of both LF and LRFS, while grade 3 and deep-seated tumor were independent predictors of LRFS. In overall population, 10-year distant metastasis-free survival (10y-DMFS) and overall survival (10y-OS) were 63.7% and 69.4%. In multivariate analyses, age ≥70 years, grade 3, and deep-seated lesion were associated with shorter DMFS and OS. Acute severe adverse events were not significantly increased in aRT group (14.8% vs. 18.1%, P = .85) but dramatically increased if radiation dose exceeded 50 Gy (risk ratio 2.96 compared to ≤50 Gy, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

In STS patients re-excised after UPR, 50 Gy aRT was safe and associated with reduced LF and longer LRFS. It seems to be beneficial even in absence of residual disease or in absence of initial adverse prognostic factors.

Is no additional excision after unplanned excision with positive margins justified in patients with small (≤5 cm) high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma?: Analysis from the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor registry in Japan

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to elucidate the clinical outcomes of patients with small (≤5 cm) high-grade soft tissue sarcoma, who underwent unplanned excision with positive surgical margin, using data from the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor registry in Japan.

METHODS

We examined 174 patients (101 males and 73 females; mean age, 59 years) with primary non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. The tumor size was ≤5 cm, and tumor histological grade was high in all patients. The mean follow-up duration was 50 months.

RESULTS

Unplanned excision with R1 and R2 margins was reported in 115 (66%) and 59 patients (34%), respectively. After unplanned excision, immediate additional excision was performed in 154 patients, whereas no additional excision was performed in the remaining 20. Of the 154 patients who underwent additional excision, wide surgical margin resection was achieved in 140 patients, while marginal and intralesional resections were achieved in 10 and 3 patients, respectively. Additionally, 93 patients (60%) underwent reconstruction after additional excision. During the last follow-up, 8 patients died of the disease, 22 developed distant metastasis, and 14 reported local recurrence. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate and 5-year metastasis-free survival rate was 93.5% and 85%, respectively. Tumor depth and additional excision after unplanned excision showed statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. The 5-year metastasis-free survival rate was 89.1% in patients with additional excision and 39.2% in those without. Univariate analysis showed an association between additional excision and local control. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival was significantly worse in patients without additional excision after unplanned excision (52.6%) than in those with additional excision (92.8%).

CONCLUSION

If unplanned excision is performed in patients with small high-grade soft tissue sarcoma, additional excision is recommended for preventing metastasis, along with necessary preparations for reconstruction.

Re-excision after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review and metanalysis. The rationale of systematic re-excision

In Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS) referral centre many patients have already had an incomplete tumour resection. In the majority of specimen, tumoral residual is detected and linked to a worsen prognosis. Systematic surgical re-resection of the scar tissue area is often performed. Some authors suggested to postpone re-resections until a clinically evident local recurrence is detected. A searching strategy was applied to Pubmed-Central and Ovid Medline. Odds ratio (OR) for local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (MTS) or overall survival (OS) were calculated comparing patients who had tumour residual to people who hadn't. OR of local recurrences, distant metastasis and OS were calculated in planned vs unplanned-excisions groups. OR to develop a metastasis and OS after a local recurrences were calculated. Residual tumour led to an OR for LR of 3,56, OR of MTS was 3,42; OR of decreased OS was 3,42. Having a LR lead to a OR of 1,55 for MTS and to a OR of decreased OS of 2,32. Patients who underwent a re-excision compared to planned surgery did not have an increased OR of LR and had an OR to develop a MTS of 0,56. Our data confirm that there is a strong correlation between local recurrences, distant relapses and overall survival. Although there is a selection bias; this analysis highlights the optimal oncological outcome in patients who underwent re-resection. The rationale for systematic re-resection after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas is very strong and this treatment remains the gold standard of care in these patients.

Effect of unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas on skin defects and reconstructive procedures

Unplanned excision (UE) is defined as a procedure wherein a surgeon operates a tumor resection without appropriate preoperative diagnostic modalities and without the intent to achieve tumor-free margins. Generally, the reconstruction rate after UE is higher than that after planned excision (PE). The present study aimed to investigate how the reconstructive procedure and size of skin defect could be influenced. We reviewed the cases of 442 patients who underwent the resection of soft tissue sarcoma. Patients were stratified into two groups (UE vs. PE). We compared the histologic grade, skin defect, reconstructive procedures, depth of the reconstruction layer. For superficial reconstructions, we also compared procedures involving skin graft-only or flap. 105 cases (23.8%) were UE. Histologic grade in PE was significantly higher (p = .024). The reconstruction rate and size of skin defect in UE was significantly higher (76.2% vs. 27.3%, p < .001) and larger (124.5 cm² vs. 65.7 cm², p < .001). The rate of deep layer reconstruction was significantly higher in PE (7.5% vs. 26.1%, p = .001). In superficial reconstructions, 18 (24.3%) skin graft-only procedures were performed in UE and 15 (22.1%) in PE, all other superficial reconstructive procedures involved flap, and there was no significant difference (p = .45). Skin defects were 1.9 times larger after UE than PE. UE did not affect the superficial reconstructive procedure.

Wide resection of soft tissue sarcomas after unplanned primary procedures: A long-term follow-up study

Unplanned resection of soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) predispose the patients to recurrences and metastases, secondary wide resection is usually warranted.To investigate the outcomes of re-excision of STS after unplanned initial resection.The records of 39 patients undergoing re-excision of STS after unplanned initial resection from January 2006 through December 2015 were retrospectively investigated.There were 17 males and 22 females, the mean age was 45.7 years. Most initial unplanned resections were performed in rural hospitals by surgeons from general surgery department, dermatology department, plastic surgery department, and orthopedic department. Thirty-five patients underwent secondary wide resections in our department. Histopathological findings indicated positive margins after primary surgeries in 18 patients. Until the conclusion of 37.2-month follow-up, 7 patients developed metastasis, 3 had local recurrence, and 7 were dead. Positive margins were associated with increased metastases and lower survival rates (P < .05). There was no significant difference in recurrences between the 2 groups.Unplanned initial resection of STS often lead to unfavorable prognosis. Primary wide resections are warranted for this disease entity.

Soft tissue sarcoma in children, adolescents and young adults: Outcomes according to compliance with international initial care guidelines

BACKGROUND

Outcomes for adults with soft tissue sarcoma are better when managed at referral centers. Care guidelines advise for 5 main criteria: 1-Imaging before biopsy; 2-Tumor biopsy before surgery; 3-Multidiscipinary team discussion (MTD) before biopsy; 4-Biopsy in "expert centers"; 5-Somatic molecular biology feasible. The aim is to describe and assess the prognostic impact of initial management of STS according to the type of referring centers and the number of optimal criteria.

METHODS

Monocentric retrospective analysis of the management of 127 youths (0-25 years) with localized STS treated from 2006 to 2015.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 9.6 years (range: 025). Overall, only 41% patients had 5/5, 28% 3-4, 31% ≤2. No adequate imaging was performed before surgery/biopsy for 18% patients, no biopsy before treatment for 29%. Patients referred by "expert centers" had higher compliance to guidelines (P = 0.025). Upfront surgery was performed in 59/127 patients. Immediate re-operation was inversely related to the number of criteria (0% when 5 criteria vs. 14% for 3-4, 46% if ≤ 2; P < 0.001). For malignant tumors, outcome was better when 5 criteria were reached: 5 year EFS 90.8% (81.4-100.0%) vs. 71.6 for (60.4-84.9%; ≤4 criteria; p = 0.033), OS 93.6% (85.5-100%) vs. 79.5% (68.9-91.8%; p = 0.11), and LRFFS 90.6% (81.0-100.0) vs. 73.1% (62.0-86.3%; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

Less than half of the youths with STS are initially managed according to international guidelines, highlighting the need for better information about optimal management. These results plead for immediate management in reference centers to reduce initial burden of therapy.

Inadvertent excision of malignant soft tissue tumours

Inadvertent excision of lumps which turn out to be sarcomas is not uncommon.Imaging has a limited role in detecting microscopic residual disease but can show the extent of the previous surgical field.Standard treatment is wide re-excision, usually combined with radiotherapy.Residual tumour is found in an average of 50% of reported cases.The presence of residual disease is an adverse prognostic factor.All lumps bigger than a golf ball should have a diagnosis prior to excision. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180060.

Local recurrence of soft-tissue sarcoma: issues in imaging surveillance strategy

Soft-tissue sarcomas pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges to physicians, owing to the large number of subtypes, aggressive tumor biology, lack of consensus on management, and controversy surrounding interval and duration of surveillance scans. Advances in multidisciplinary management have improved the care of sarcoma patients, but controversy remains regarding strategies for surveillance following definitive local control. This review provides an updated, comprehensive overview of the current understanding of the risk of local recurrence of soft-tissue sarcoma, by examining the literature based on features such as histological type and grade, tumor size, and resection margin status, with the aim of helping clinicians, surgeons, and radiologists to develop a tailored approach to local imaging surveillance.

Management of Unplanned Excision for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma With Preoperative Radiotherapy Followed by Definitive Resection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes after preoperative radiotherapy and definitive surgery for patients who initially had inadvertent excision for sarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Treatment records of 44 consecutive patients, who initially underwent unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcoma between January 2004 and January 2012, were reviewed. All patients had clinically localized disease before treatment and received preoperative external-beam radiotherapy followed by definitive oncologic surgery at our institution.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 36 months. Residual tumor after preoperative radiotherapy and wound bed excision was identified in 39% (17/44) of the cases. Kaplan-Meier estimates for 5-year local control, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival are 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80-99), 86% (95% CI, 69-94), and 94% (95% CI, 79-99) respectively. Perioperative morbidity occurred in 25% of patients (11/44.) All patients with perioperative wound complications had lower extremity sarcomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal management for unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcoma is unknown. Our institution has adopted the approach of preoperative radiotherapy, followed by definitive surgery. In our series of 44 patients, local control was excellent at 95%, with perioperative complications seen only in patients with lower extremity sarcomas, suggesting that this is a reasonable approach to manage inadvertently resected sarcoma.

Re-excision after unplanned resection of nonmetastatic nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma in children: Comparison with planned excision

BACKGROUND

It is not exceptional to come by children with initial unplanned surgical intervention for nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of residual disease in these patients after re-excision and compare the treatment outcomes with patients who had planned upfront excision.

METHODS

The data of patients with primary nonmetastatic NRSTS with initially unplanned excision who underwent re-excision between March 2006 and December 2014 were analyzed and the results compared with patients having planned upfront excision in the similar period.

RESULTS

Of the 84 patients, 40 (48%) had an unplanned excision elsewhere; 35 of these patients had a re-excision. Twenty-one of the remaining 44 patients underwent upfront planned excision. A residual tumor was present in 16 (45.7%) patients. There was no significant difference in the local recurrence, distant metastases, or deaths in patients with re-excision or planned excision. The 5-year overall, disease-free survival and local control rates were, respectively, 93.5%, 90.2% and 96.6% for the re-excision group and 84.9%, 65.2% and 88.5% in the planned excision group (p=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of residual disease following unplanned excision of NRSTS is high. The outcomes following re-excision are similar to that with planned excision.

PROGNOSIS STUDY

Level II evidence.

Unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcomas: current concepts for management and prognosis

➤ Biopsy, staging, preoperative imaging and planning, as well as surgical treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas, are best carried out in specialized sarcoma centers, with the support of a multidisciplinary tumor board.➤ Tumor bed excision is recommended after most unplanned excisions, with a goal of obtaining complete tumor removal with an appropriately wide margin of resection.➤ The surgical resection area tends to be more extensive during tumor bed excision than during primary resection because of the need to resect potential areas of contamination, resulting in the need for more reconstructive procedures (flaps and skin grafts) and wider radiation fields.➤ Unplanned excisions are associated with an increased rate of local recurrence related to residual disease and positive margins after tumor bed excision, a deep location, and certain histologic subtypes, such as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, myxofibrosarcoma, and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.➤ While adjuvant radiation therapy has not been found to mitigate the risk of local recurrence in unplanned excisions, it is generally utilized in the treatment of unplanned excisions as it is in the treatment of primary soft-tissue sarcomas.➤ Given the surgical and oncologic sequelae of unplanned excisions, prevention through the diffusion of concepts by means of provider education on how to approach soft-tissue masses, which can be potential soft-tissue sarcomas, is the best strategy.

The role of modern radiation therapy in the management of extremity sarcomas

For nearly half a decade, surgery and radiation therapy have been used in combination to achieve the goal of limb preservation in extremity soft tissue sarcoma, with success rates in excess of 90%. Common decision points in therapeutic radiation delivery for sarcoma are discussed, including preoperative versus postoperative irradiation, the postoperative boost, and when irradiation might be unnecessary. We describe specialized techniques, such as brachytherapy and intraoperative irradiation. The data driving current practice is summarized.

Postoperative radiation boost does not improve local recurrence rates in extremity soft tissue sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for extremity soft tissue sarcomas continues to be negative-margin limb salvage surgery. Radiotherapy is frequently used as an adjunct to decrease local recurrence. No differences in survival have been found between preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy regimens. However, it is uncertain if the use of a postoperative boost in addition to preoperative radiotherapy reduces local recurrence rates.

METHODS

This retrospective review evaluated patients who received preoperative radiotherapy (n = 49) and patients who received preoperative radiotherapy with a postoperative boost (n = 45). The primary endpoint analysed was local recurrence, with distant metastasis and death due to sarcoma analysed as secondary endpoints. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and either χ(2) or Fisher's exact test were used to compare variables. Multivariable regression analyses were used to take into account potential confounders and identify variables that affected outcomes.

RESULTS

No differences in the proportion or rate of local recurrence, distant metastasis or death due to sarcoma were observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). The two groups were similarly matched with respect to demographics such as age, race and sex and tumour characteristics including excision status, tumour site, size, depth, grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, chemotherapy receipt and histological subtype (P > 0.05). The postoperative boost group had a larger proportion of patients with positive microscopic margins (62% vs 10%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

No differences in rates of local recurrence, distant metastasis or death due to sarcoma were found in patients who received both pre- and postoperative radiotherapy when compared with those who received only preoperative radiotherapy.

[Consensus diagnosis and therapy of soft tissue sarcoma]

Soft tissue sarcomas are heterogeneous tumours and relatively uncommon. There have been advances over the past years concerning pathology, clinical behaviour, diagnosis strategies and the treatment. To summarize these advances as well as making it public is one of the goals of the following consensus guidelines. But why do we need special guidelines for Austria? There are international guidelines published by the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). The cause is that we need an explanation of the matrix the ESMO and the NCCN gave according to our clinical practice, the local requirements and facilities in Austria. The following recommendations were drawn up following a consensus meeting of sarcoma specialists from the three high volume centres located at the medical universities in Austria. All fields of involved physicians from diagnosis to therapy worked together to know that soft tissue sarcomas are an interdisciplinary challenge and multimodal treatment is essential. For this reason, these guidelines not only explain but also give the state of the art and clear recommendations. One of the most important guidelines is that any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to one of the three university centres and managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. We hope that the consensus is helpful for the clinical practice and improves the quality of care for patients with soft tissue sarcomas in Austria.

Reconstructive treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity

Limb-sparing surgery is currently the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with soft-tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity. To achieve the best outcome, the reconstructive surgeon must be part of a multidisciplinary team and is required to have a thorough understanding of the whole treatment concept. This article provides an update for the current surgical management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity. Relevant nonsurgical aspects are also highlighted.

Clinical and treatment outcomes of planned and unplanned excisions of soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas are often inappropriately excised without adequate preoperative planning. Inappropriate (unplanned) excisions may adversely affect local recurrence, distant metastasis, patient survival, and /or postoperative function once properly evaluated.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether the clinical and treatment characteristics, survival (overall, local recurrence-free, distant metastasis-free), and functional scores of patients with unplanned excisions differ from those with a planned excision.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients with planned excisions and 63 patients with unplanned excisions at prereferral hospitals followed by additional reexcisions. We determined whether age, gender, tumor size, depth, histologic grade, operative duration, blood loss, survival, or functional scores differed between the two groups. The minimum followup was 6 months (mean, 55 months; range, 6-275 months).

RESULTS

The tumor was larger and its location deeper in the planned excision group. Overall, metastasis-free, and local recurrence-free survival were similar in the two groups: 86%, 71%, and 85% in the planned excision group and 96%, 86%, and 92% in the unplanned excision group, respectively. However, additional soft tissue reconstruction was more often necessary for patients with unplanned excisions. No difference in postoperative function was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest an adequate additional wide excision may improve the local control and survival in patients with an unplanned excision as well as the patients with a planned excision. While patients with unplanned excisions had superficial and smaller tumors, survival and postoperative function were similar to those with planned excisions.

Definitive radiotherapy and single-agent radiosensitizing ifosfamide in patients with localized, irresectable soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective analysis

Background and Purpose

Standard therapy for soft-tissue sarcomas remains complete resection. For primary radiotherapy local control rates of 30-45% have been reported. We analyzed retrospectively 11 cases of radiochemotherapy with single-agent ifosfamide in patients with macroscopic soft-tissue sarcomas.

Patients and Methods

The patients were treated in irresectable high risk situations. Radiation therapy was performed with median 60 Gy. During the first and fifth week the concomitant chemotherapy with ifosfamide was added. Two patients received trimodal therapy with additional regional hyperthermia.

Results

The therapy was completed in 73% of the patients. Average local control time was 91 months, median disease-free-survival/overall-survival was 8/26 months. Five-year rates for local control/disease free survival/overall survival were 70%/34%/34%. The limited prognosis is mainly caused by systemic treatment failure.

Conclusions

The data strongly suggest a better outcome of radiochemotherapy with ifosfamide compared to radiotherapy alone and radiotherapy in combination with other radiosensitizers.

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma complicating nephrogenic systemic fibrosis post liver transplantation

A 46-year-old man with cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis C virus infection and alcohol underwent orthotopic liver transplantation, which required urgent re-grafting because of biliary sepsis from necrosis of the left liver lobe. Recovery was complicated by renal failure and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (probably related to intravenous gadolinium exposure). He subsequently developed a malignant fibrous histiocytoma. We present this case highlighting the occurrence of two rare conditions in the same patient following liver transplantation. We believe this is the first case of its kind to be reported.

[Surgical treatment of musculoskeletal soft tissue sarcomas]

Treatment of soft tissue sarcomas requires an individual plan which considers interdisciplinary recommendations and the various clinical situations. Anatomical region, histological grading and typing, and tumor size necessitate adjusted methods of reconstruction. The biopsy should be performed at the institution where the patient is treated. In general surgical resection of the tumor will be the treatment of choice. Adjuvant therapies are applied according to anatomical region and size and grading of the tumor. Surgery alone is recommended only in small (<5 cm), superficial, low-grade sarcomas. Sarcomas larger than 5 cm in diameter should be treated by surgery and radiotherapy, achieving excellent results, although in high-grade sarcomas more than 50% of patients still will experience metastatic disease. In case of locally recurrent disease, surgical revision with tumor-free resection margins followed by radiotherapy should be the aim. This applies even for patients who had had radiotherapy after the first excision. In this case brachytherapy is a good modality of tissue-sparing treatment.

Standardized approach to the treatment of adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities

Soft tissue sarcomas are very rare tumors. Available data are based on only a few prospective randomized trials. Most studies are retrospective, reviewing the results of single institutions. Furthermore, universally accepted treatment protocols for adult patients are lacking. Several prognostic factors have been identified, including grading, tumor size and development of metastatic disease; however, the relevance of other important aspects in the treatment of patients with soft tissue sarcomas remains unknown or subject to controversy. The main issues concern: which surgical margin width is safe from an oncological perspective? Does local recurrence influence survival? Can systemic chemotherapy improve prognosis? Is radiotherapy necessary in every case? Should it be applied pre-, post- or intraoperatively? What is the value of assessing the response after neoadjuvant therapy? These topics are examined in this review.

Local recurrence of disease after unplanned excisions of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas

Unplanned excisions of soft tissue sarcomas occur with alarming frequency and result in high rates of residual disease, potentially affecting patient prognosis. To determine if unplanned excisions and residual disease status at tumor bed excision increased local recurrence rates and predicted disease-specific patient survival, we retrospectively reviewed 203 consecutive patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcomas treated operatively and followed for at least 2 years (mean, 4.8 years) or until patient death. Among the 64 patients (32%) who had undergone previous unplanned excisions, six had gross residual disease and 40 of the remaining 58 (69%) had microscopic residual disease in the tumor bed. We observed subsequent local recurrence in nine of the 139 patients (6%) after planned excision compared with 22 patients (34%) after unplanned excision. More patients with unplanned excisions who underwent limb salvage procedures required flap coverage and/or skin grafting with their definitive resection (30% versus 5%). In the unplanned excision cohort, residual disease status at tumor bed excision predicted increased rates of local recurrence and decreased disease-specific survival. Unplanned excisions of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas resulted in increased rates of local recurrence but not disease-specific survival. Residual disease at reexcision predicted the likelihood of local recurrence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The role of radiation therapy in the management of sarcomas

Sarcomas represent a heterogeneous, challenging, and rare group of tumors that present many management challenges. In this article, the authors concentrate on the radiotherapeutic management of sarcomas occurring in the most common locations: the extremities, the trunk, and the retroperitoneum. An overview of the current radiotherapeutic management of soft tissue sarcoma is presented in addition to a discussion of how surgical management may affect radiotherapeutic management. Finally, the authors describe current controversies surrounding the appropriate management of sarcomas with radiotherapy and describe ongoing studies and future areas of research.

Clinical significance of additional wide resection for unplanned resection of high grade soft tissue sarcoma

Purpose:

Unplanned resection of musculoskeletal sarcoma involves tumor excision without any suspicion of malignancy or regard for the necessity of defining adequate margins. For orthopaedic oncologists, many opportunities arise for management of unplanned resections initially performed by non-specialist surgeons. The puropose of this study is to assess the clinical outcomes and the problems of the patients with unplanned resection of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma.

Methods:

77 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Oncological outcomes together with validity and problems of additional treatments were analyzed.

Results:

Five-year local recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, event-free survival and total survival were 71.55%, 73.2%, 57.5% and 85.9%, respectively. Among adjuvant therapy including additional wide resection, radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy, only additional wide resection significantly improved oncological outcomes.

Conclusion:

Additional wide resection appears to be effective in the treatment of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas following primary resection with compromised margins of resection.